Perceived norms mediate effects of a brief motivational intervention for sanctioned college drinkers

Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 58-71

  Carey, Kate B ^a   Henson, James M ^b   Carey, Michael P ^a   Maisto, Stephen A ^a  

^a SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Alcohol use; Brief interventions; College students; Mediation; Norms

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951535282     PISSN: 09695893     EISSN: 14682850     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2850.2009.01194.x     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Agostinelli G, Brown J M, Miller W R. Effects of normative feedback on consumption among heavy drinking college students. Journal of Drug Education 1995, 25:31-40.
2. Baer J S, Stacy A, Larimer M. Biases in the perception of drinking norms among college students. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 1991, 52:580-586.
3. Barnett N P, Murphy J G, Colby S M, Monti P M. Efficacy of counselor vs. computer-delivered intervention with mandated college students. Addictive Behaviors 2007, 32:2529-2548.
4. Baron R M, Kenny D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1986, 51:1173-1182.
5. Biener L, Abrams D B. The Contemplation Ladder: Validation of a measure of readiness to consider smoking cessation. Health Psychology 1991, 10:360-365.
6. Borsari B, Carey K B. Effects of a brief motivational intervention with college student drinkers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2000, 68:728-733.
7. Borsari B, Murphy J M, Carey K B. Readiness to change in brief interventions: A requisite condition for drinking reductions? Addictive Behaviors 2009, 34:232-235.
8. Bourgeois M J, Bowen A. Self-organization of alcohol-related attitudes and beliefs in a campus housing complex: An initial investigation. Health Psychology 2001, 20:434-437.
9. Budd R J, Rollnick S. The structure of the Readiness to Change Questionnaire: A test of Prochaska & DiClemente's transtheoretical model. British Journal of Health Psychology 1996, 1:365-376.
10. Carey K B, Henson J M, Carey M P, Maisto S A. Computer versus in-person intervention for students violating campus alcohol policy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2009, 77:74-87.
11. Carey K B, Hester R K. Rethinking readiness-to-change for at-risk college drinkers. The Addictions Newsletter 2005, 12:6-8.
12. Carey K B, Scott-Sheldon L, Carey M P, DeMartini K. Individual-level interventions to reduce college student drinking: A meta-analytic review. Addictive Behaviors 2007, 32:2469-2494.
13. Cheong J, MacKinnon D P, Khoo S T. Investigation of mediational processes using parallel process latent growth curve modeling. Structural Equation Modeling 2003, 10:238-262.
14. Collins S E, Carey K B, Sliwinski M J. Mailed personalized normative feedback as a brief intervention for at-risk college drinkers. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 2002, 63:559-567.
15. Collins R L, Parks G A, Marlatt G A. Social determinants of alcohol consumption: The effects of social interaction and model status on the self-administration of alcohol. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1985, 53:189-200.
16. Doumas D M, McKinley L L, Book P. Evaluation of two web-based alcohol interventions for mandated students. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2009, 36:65-74.
17. Duncan T E, Duncan S C, Strycker L A. An introduction to latent variable growth curve modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications 2006, 2nd ed, Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
18. Kraemer H C, Wilson G T, Fairburn C G, Agras W S. Mediators and moderators of treatment effects in randomized clinical trials. Archives of General Psychiatry 2002, 59:877-884.
19. Larimer M E, Cronce J M. Identification, prevention, and treatment revisited: Individual-focused college drinking prevention strategies 1999-2006. Addictive Behaviors 2007, 32:2439-2468.
20. Larimer M E, Turner A P, Anderson B K, Fader J S, Kilmer J R, Palmer R S. Evaluating a brief alcohol intervention with fraternities. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 2001, 62:370-380.
21. Larimer M E, Turner A P, Mallett K A, Geisner I M. Predicting drinking behavior and alcohol-related problems among fraternity and sorority members: Examining the role of descriptive and injunctive norms. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 2004, 18:203-212.
22. Lewis M A, Neighbors C. Who is the typical college student? Implications for personalized normative feedback interventions. Addictive Behaviors 2006, 31:2120-2126.
23. Lewis M A, Neighbors C. Optimizing personalized normative feedback: The use of gender-specific referents. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 2007, 68:228-237.
24. MacKinnon D P, Krull J L, Lockwood C M. Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prevention Science 2000, 1:173-181.
25. McCabe S E, Hughes T L, Bostwick W, Boyd C J. Assessment of difference in dimensions of sexual orientation: Implications for substance use research in a college-age population. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 2005, 66:620-629.
26. Migneault J P, Velicer W F, Prochaska J O, Stevenson J F. Decisional balance for immoderate drinking in college students. Substance Use & Misuse 1999, 34:1325-1346.
27. Miller W R, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing: Preparing people for change 2002, 2nd ed, New York, Guilford Press
28. Murphy J G, Benson T A, Vuchinich R E, Deskins M M, Eakin D, Flood A M. A comparison of personalized feedback for college student drinkers delivered with and without a motivational interview. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 2004, 65:200-203.
29. Muthen B, Muthen L. MPlus [Computer software]. 2008, Los Angeles, Muthen & Muthen
30. Neighbors C, Larimer M E, Lewis M A. Targeting misperceptions of descriptive drinking norms: Efficacy of a computer-delivered personalized normative feedback intervention. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2004, 72:434-447.
31. Nock M K. Conceptual and design essentials for evaluating mechanisms of change. Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research 2007, 31:4S-12S.
32. Perkins H W. The emergence and evolution of the social norms approach to substance abuse prevention. The social norms approach to preventing school and college age substance abuse: A handbook for educators, counselors, and clinicians 2003, 3-17. Perkins H W. In, Ed, pp, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass
33. Preacher K J, Hayes A F. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods 2008, 40:879-891.
34. Prentice D A. Mobilizing and weakening peer influence as mechanisms for change behavior: Implications for alcohol intervention programs. Understanding peer influence in children and adolescents 2008, 161-180. Prinstein M J DDodge K A. In, Eds, pp, New York, Guilford
35. Prochaska J O. Strong and weak principles for progressing from precontemplation to action on the basis of twelve problem behaviors. Health Psychology 1994, 13:47-51.
36. Prochaska J O, DiClemente C C. The transtheoretical approach. Handbook of psychotherapy integration 1992, 300-334. Norcross J C, Goldfried M R. In, Eds, pp, New York, Basic Books
37. Prochaska J O, Velicer W F, Rossi J S, Goldstein M G, Marcus B H, Rakowski W. Stages of change and decisional balance for 12 problem behaviors. Health Psychology 1994, 13:39-46.
38. Read J P, Wood M D, Davidoff O J, McLacken J, Campbell J F. Making the transition from high school to college: The role of alcohol-related social influence factors in students' drinking. Substance Abuse 2002, 23:53-65.
39. Reifman A, Watson W K, McCourt A. Social networks and college drinking: Probing processes of social influence and selection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2006, 32:820-832.
40. Rollnick S, Heather N, Gold R, Hall W. Development of a short " Readiness to Change Questionnaire" for use in brief, opportunistic interventions among excessive drinkers. British Journal of Addictions 1992, 87:743-754.
41. Schroeder C M, Prentice D A. Exposing pluralistic ignorance to reduce alcohol use among college students. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1998, 28:2150-2180.
42. Stout R L. Advancing the analysis of treatment process. Addiction 2007, 102:1539-1545.
43. Suls J, Green P. Pluralistic ignorance and college student perceptions of gender-specific alcohol norms. Health Psychology 2003, 22:479-486.
44. Sutton S. Back to the drawing board? A review of applications of the transtheoretical model to substance use. Addiction 2001, 96:175-186.
45. Walters S T, Neighbors C. Feedback interventions for college alcohol misuse: What, why and for whom? Addictive Behaviors 2005, 30:1168-1182.
46. Walters S T, Vader A M, Harris T R. A controlled trial of web-based feedback for heavy drinking college students. Prevention Science 2007, 8:83-88.
47. Wechsler H, Davenport A, Dowdall G, Moeykens B, Rimm E B. A gender-specific measure of binge drinking among college students. American Journal of Public Health 1995, 85:982-985.
48. White H R, Labouvie E W. Towards the assessment of adolescent problem drinking. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 1989, 50:30-37.
49. Wood M D, Capone C, Laforge R, Erickson D J, Brand N H. Brief motivational intervention and alcohol expectancy challenge with heavy drinking college students: A randomized factorial study. Addictive Behaviors 2007, 32:2509-2528.
50. Yanovitzky I, Stewart L P, Lederman L C. Social distance, perceived drinking by peers, and alcohol use by college students. Health Communication 2006, 19:1-10.