A meta-analysis of computer-tailored interventions for health behavior change

Preventive Medicine

Volumn 51, Issue 3-4, 2010, Pages 214-221

  Krebs, Paul ^a   Prochaska, James O ^b   Rossi, Joseph S ^b  

^a MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Behavioral medicine; Behavioral research; Diet therapy; Exercise; Mammography; Smoking cessation; Telemedicine

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR CHANGE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; CHRONIC DISEASE; COMPUTER ASSISTED THERAPY; DIET THERAPY; EFFECT SIZE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; KINESIOTHERAPY; MAMMOGRAPHY; META ANALYSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SAMPLE SIZE; SMOKING CESSATION; TELEMEDICINE;

DECISION MAKING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; DIET; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; MALE; MAMMOGRAPHY; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; REMINDER SYSTEMS; SMOKING CESSATION;

EID: 79959897101     PISSN: 00917435     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.06.004     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. Bauman A., Bull F., Chey T., et al. The international prevalence study on physical activity: Results from 20 countries. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. 2009, Act. 6, art. no. 21.
2. Biostat Comprehensive Meta-analysis 2006, Englewood, NJ.
3. Borenstein M., Hedges L., Higgins J., Rothstein H. Introduction to Meta-analysis 2009, Wiley, Chichester, UK.
4. Boutron I., Moher D., Altman D.G., Schulz K.F., Ravaud P. Extending the consort statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: Explanation and elaboration. Ann. Intern. Med. 2008, 148:295-309.
5. Breen N., Cronin K.A., Meissner H.I., et al. Reported drop in mammography: Is this cause for concern?. Cancer 2007, 109:2405-2409.
6. Brug J., Campbell M., van Assema P. The application and impact of computer-generated personalized nutrition education: A review of the literature. Patient Educ. Couns. 1999, 36:145-156.
7. Centers for Disease Control Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion 2008, CDC, Atlanta, GA.
8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Fruit and vegetable consumption among adults - United States, 2005. MMWR 2007, 56:213-217.
9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2009. Overweight and obesity.
10. Duval S., Tweedie R. Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 2000, 56:455-463.
11. Fiore M., Jaen C.R., Baker T.B., et al. Treating tobacco use and dependence: 2008 update. Clinical Practice Guideline. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service, Rockville, MD 2008, M.C. Fiore (Ed.).
12. Grembowski D., Patrick D., Diehr P., et al. Self-efficacy and health behavior among older adults. J. Health Soc. Behav. 1993, 34:89-104.
13. Hageman P.A., Walker S.N., Pullen C.H. Tailored versus standard internet-delivered interventions to promote physical activity in older women. J. Geriatr. Phys. Ther. 2005, 28:28-33.
14. Hall K.L., Rossi J.S. Meta-analytic examination of the strong and weak principles across 48 health behaviors. Prev. Med. 2008, 46:266-274.
15. Heimendinger J., O'Neill C., Marcus A.C., et al. Multiple tailored messages are effective in increasing fruit and vegetable consumption among callers to the cancer information service. J. Health Commun. 2005, 10:65-82.
16. Higgins J., Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.0.2. The Cochrane Collaboration 2009.
17. Hughes J.R., Keely J.P., Niaura R.S., Ossip-Klein D.J., Richmond R.L., Swan G.E. Measures of abstinence in clinical trials: Issues and recommendations. Nicotine Tob. Res. 2003, 5:13-25.
18. Institute of Medicine Health and Behavior 2001, 377. National Academies Press.
19. Kreuter M.W., Skinner C.S. Tailoring: what's in a name?. Health Educ. Res. 2000, 15:1-4.
20. Kroeze W., Werkman A., Brug J. A systematic review of randomized trials on the effectiveness of computer-tailored education on physical activity and dietary behaviors. Ann. Behav. Med. 2006, 31:205-223.
21. Lancaster T., Stead L.F. Telephone counselling for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2006, 3, pp. CD002850.
22. Lipsey M., Wilson D.B. Practical Meta-analysis 2001, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
23. Moher D., Cook D.J., Eastwood S., Olkin I., Rennie D., Stroup D.F. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: The QUOROM statement. Lancet 1999, 354:1896-1900.
24. Moher D., Pham B., Jones A., et al. Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?. Lancet 1998, 352:609-613.
25. Noar S.M., Benac C.N., Harris M.S. Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychol. Bull. 2007, 133:673-693.
26. Noar S.M., Chabot M., Zimmerman R.S. Applying health behavior theory to multiple behavior change: Considerations and approaches. Prev. Med. 2008, 46:275-280.
27. Norman G.J. A review of ehealth interventions for physical activity and dietary behavior change. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2007, 33:336-345. e316.
28. Petty K., Elster A. Attitudes and Persuasion: Classical and Contemporary Approaches 1981, Brown, Dubuque, IA.
29. Portnoy D.B., Scott-Sheldon L.A., Johnson B.T., Carey M.P. Computer-delivered interventions for health promotion and behavioral risk reduction: A meta-analysis of 75 randomized controlled trails, 1988 - 2007. Prev. Med. 2008, 47:3-16.
30. Prochaska J.J., Spring B., Nigg C.R. Multiple health behavior change research: An introduction and overview. Prev. Med. 2008, 46:181-188.
31. Prochaska J.O., DiClemente C.C., Velicer W.F., Rossi J.S. Standardized, individualized, interactive, and personalized self-help programs for smoking cessation. Health Psychol. 1993, 12:399-405.
32. Rimer B.K., Kreuter M.W. Advancing tailored health communication: A persuasion and message effects perspective. J. Commun. 2006, 56.
33. Rossi J.S. Comparison of the use of significance testing and effect sizes in theory-based health promotion research. 43rd Annual Meeting of the Society for Multivariate Experimental Psychology, Keystone, CO 2003, Keystone, CO.
34. Ryan P., Lauver D.R. The efficacy of tailored interventions. J. Nurs. Scholarsh. 2002, 34:331-337.
35. Skinner C.S., Campbell M.K., Rimer B.K., Curry S., Prochaska J.O. How effective is tailored print communication?. Ann. Behav. Med. 1999, 21:290-298.
36. Sohl S.J.S.J. Tailored interventions to promote mammography screening: A meta-analytic review. Prev. Med. 2007, 45:252-261.
37. Stellefson M.L., Hanik B.W., Chaney B.H., Chaney J.D. Challenges for tailored messaging in health education. Am. J. Health Educ. 2008, 39:303-311.
38. Strecher V.J. Computer-tailored smoking cessation materials: A review and discussion. Patient Educ. Couns. 1999, 36:107-117.
39. Strecher V.J., Shiffman S., West R. Randomized controlled trial of a web-based computer-tailored smoking cessation program as a supplement to nicotine patch therapy. Addiction 2005, 100:682-688.
40. Thompson B.T., Schoenfeld D. Usual care as the control group in clinical trials of nonpharmacologic interventions. Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2007, 4:577-582.
41. Tunis S.R., Stryer D.B., Clancy C.M. Practical clinical trials: Increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. JAMA 2003, 290:1624-1632.
42. Vandelanotte C., Reeves M.M., Brug J., De Bourdeaudhuij I. A randomized trial of sequential and simultaneous multiple behavior change interventions for physical activity and fat intake. Prev. Med. 2008, 46:232-237.
43. Velicer W.F., Prochaska J.O. A comparison of four self-report smoking cessation outcome measures. Addict. Behav. 2004, 29:51-60.
44. World Health Organization Move for health 2002, World Health Organization, Geneva.