Brief alcohol interventions for mandated college students: Comparison of face-to-face counseling and computer-delivered interventions

Addiction

Volumn 106, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 528-537

  Carey, Kate B ^a   Carey, Michael P ^a   Henson, James M ^b   Maisto, Stephen A ^a   DeMartini, Kelly S ^a  

^a SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Alcohol abuse prevention; Brief intervention; College drinking; Computer delivered intervention; Gender; Mandated students

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL;

ADULT; ALCOHOLISM; ARTICLE; BLOOD; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED THERAPY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; COUNSELING; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; MALE; MANDATORY PROGRAM; METHODOLOGY; MOTIVATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOTHERAPY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECURRENT DISEASE; SEX DIFFERENCE; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; STUDENT; TIME; UNITED STATES;

ALCOHOL DRINKING; ALCOHOLISM; COUNSELING; ETHANOL; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MANDATORY PROGRAMS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MOTIVATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PSYCHOTHERAPY, BRIEF; RECURRENCE; SEX FACTORS; STUDENTS; THERAPY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TIME FACTORS; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79551644339     PISSN: 09652140     EISSN: 13600443     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03193.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Underage Alcohol Use among Full-Time College Students. Issue 31, 2006. Online at (accessed 28 October 2010)
2. Barnett N. P., Murphy J. G., Colby S. M., Monti P. M. Efficacy of counselor vs. computer-delivered intervention with mandated college students. Addict Behav 2007; 32: 2529-48.
3. Borsari B., Carey K. B. Two brief alcohol interventions for mandated college students. Psychol Addict Behav 2005; 19: 296-302.
4. Carey K. B., Henson J. M., Carey M. P., Maisto S. A. Computer versus in-person intervention for students violating campus alcohol policy. J Consult Clin Psychol 2009; 77: 74-87.
5. Doumas D. M., McKinley L. L., Book P. Evaluation of two Web-based alcohol interventions for mandated college students. J Subst Abuse Treat 2009; 36: 65-74.
6. White H. R., Morgan T. J., Pugh L. A., Celinska K., LaBouvie E. W., Pandina R. J. Evaluating two brief substance-use interventions for mandated college students. J Stud Alcohol 2006; 67: 309-17.
7. White H. R., Mun E. Y., Pugh L., Morgan T. J. Long-term effects of brief substance use interventions for mandated college students: sleeper effects of an in-person personal feedback intervention. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2007; 31: 1380-91.
8. Fromme K., Corbin W. Prevention of heavy drinking and associated negative consequences among mandated and voluntary college students. J Consult Clin Psychol 2004; 72: 1038-49.
9. Morgan T. J., White H. R., Mun E. Y. Changes in drinking before a mandated brief intervention with college students. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 2008; 69: 286-90.
10. Elliott J. C., Carey K. B., Bolles J. R. Computer-based interventions for college drinking: a qualitative review. Addict Behav 2008; 33: 994-1005.
11. Carey K. B., Scott-Sheldon L. A. J., Elliott J. C., Bolles J. R., Carey M. P. Computer-delivered interventions to reduce college student drinking: a meta-analysis. Addiction 2009; 104: 1807-19.
12. Kaner E., Lock C., Heather N., McNamee P., Bond S. Promoting brief alcohol interventions by nurses in primary care: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns 2003; 51: 277-84.
13. Chang G. Brief interventions for problem drinking and women. J Subst Abuse Treat 2002; 23: 1-7.
14. Carey K. B., Henson J. M., Carey M. P., Maisto S. A. Which heavy drinking college students benefit from a brief motivational intervention? J Consult Clin Psychol 2007; 75: 663-9.
15. Collins R. L., Parks G. A., Marlatt G. A. Social determinants of alcohol consumption: the effects of social interaction and model status on the self administration of alcohol. J Consult Clin Psychol 1985; 53: 189-200.
16. Matthews D. B., Miller W. R. Estimating blood alcohol concentration: two computer programs and their applications in therapy and research. Addict Behav 1979; 4: 55-60.
17. Wechsler H., Davenport A., Dowdall G., Moeykens B., Rimm E. B. A gender-specific measure of binge drinking among college students. Am J Public Health 1995; 85: 982-5.
18. White H. R., Labouvie E. W. Towards the assessment of adolescent problem drinking. J Stud Alcohol 1989; 50: 30-7.
19. Carey K. B., Carey M. P., Maisto S. A., Henson J. M. Brief motivational interventions for heavy college drinkers: a randomized controlled trial. J Consult Clin Psychol 2006; 74: 943-54.
20. Miller W. R., Rollnick S. R. Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for Change, 2nd edn. New York: Guilford Press; 2002.
21. Muthen B., Muthen L. MPlus. 5.21 edn. Los Angeles; Muthen and Muthen; 2009.
22. Walters S. T., Vader A. M., Harris T. R., Field C. A., Jouriles E. N. Dismantling motivational interviewing and feedback for college drinkers: a randomized clinical trial. J Consult Clin Psychol 2009; 77: 64-73.
23. White H. R., Mun E. Y., Morgan T. J. Do brief personalized feedback interventions work for mandated students or is it just getting caught that works? Psychol Addict Behav 2008; 22: 107-16.
24. Landrine H., Bardwell S., Dean T. Gender expectations for alcohol use: a study of the significance of the masculine role. Sex Roles 1988; 19: 703-12.
25. Suls J., Green P. Pluralistic ignorance and college student perceptions of gender-specific alcohol norms. Health Psychol 2003; 22: 479-86.
26. Courtenay W. H. Key determinants of the health and well-being of men and boys. Int J Men's Health 2003; 2: 1-30.
27. Amaro H., Ahl M., Matsumoto A., Prado G., Mule C., Kemmemer A. etal. Trial of the university assistance program for alcohol use among mandated students. J Stud Alcohol Drugs Suppl 2009; Suppl 16: 45-56.