Gone in 0.6 seconds: The encoding of motor memories depends on recent sensorimotor states

Journal of Neuroscience

Volumn 32, Issue 37, 2012, Pages 12756-12768

  Howard, Ian S ^a   Ingram, James N ^a   Franklin, David W ^a   Wolpert, Daniel M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EYE FIXATION; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; VISUAL ADAPTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

CUES; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; MOVEMENT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84866235480     PISSN: 02706474     EISSN: 15292401     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5909-11.2012     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Addou T, Krouchev N, Kalaska JF (2011) Colored context cues can facilitate the ability to learn and to switch between multiple dynamical force fields. J Neurophysiol 106:163-183.
2. Brashers-Krug T, Shadmehr R, Bizzi E (1996) Consolidation in human motor memory. Nature 382:252-255.
3. Burdet E, Osu R, Franklin DW, Milner TE, Kawato M (2001) The central nervous system stabilizes unstable dynamics by learning optimal impedance. Nature 414:446-449.
4. Caithness G, Osu R, Bays P, Chase H, Klassen J, Kawato M, Wolpert DM, Flanagan JR (2004) Failure to consolidate the consolidation theory of learning for sensorimotor adaptation tasks. J Neurosci 24:8662-8671.
5. Churchland MM, Cunningham JP, Kaufman MT, Ryu SI, Shenoy KV (2010) Cortical preparatory activity: representation of movement or first cog in a dynamical machine? Neuron 68:387-400.
6. Churchland MM, Cunningham JP, Kaufman MT, Foster JD, Nuyujukian P, Ryu SI, Shenoy KV (2012) Neural population dynamics during reaching. Nature 487:51-56.
7. Cisek P, Kalaska JF (2005) Neural correlates of reaching decisions in dorsal premotor cortex: specification of multiple direction choices and final selection of action. Neuron 45:801-814.
8. Cothros N, Wong J, Gribble PL (2009) Visual cues signaling object grasp reduce interference in motor learning. J Neurophysiol 102:2112-2120.
9. Donchin O, Francis JT, Shadmehr R (2003) Quantifying generalization from trial-by-trial behavior of adaptive systems that learn with basis functions: theory and experiments in human motor control. J Neurosci 23:9032-9045.
10. Ebner TJ, Pasalar S (2008) Cerebellum predicts the future motor state. Cerebellum 7:583-588.
11. Flash T, Hogan N (1985) The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model. J Neurosci 5:1688-1703.
12. Franklin DW, Osu R, Burdet E, Kawato M, Milner TE (2003) Adaptation to stable and unstable dynamics achieved by combined impedance control and inverse dynamics model. J Neurophysiol 90:3270-3282.
13. Franklin DW, Liaw G, Milner TE, Osu R, Burdet E, Kawato M (2007) Endpoint stiffness of the arm is directionally tuned to instability in the environment. J Neurosci 27:7705-7716.
14. Franklin DW, Burdet E, Tee KP, Osu R, Chew CM, Milner TE, Kawato M (2008) CNS learns stable, accurate, and efficient movements using a simple algorithm. J Neurosci 28:11165-11173.
15. Franklin S, Wolpert DM, Franklin DW (2012) Visuomotor feedback gains upregulate during the learning of novel dynamics. J Neurophysiol 108:467-478.
16. Fujita M, Amagai A, Minakawa F, Aoki M (2002) Selective and delay adaptation of human saccades. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 13:41-52.
17. Gandolfo F, Mussa-Ivaldi FA, Bizzi E (1996) Motor learning by field approximation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93:3843-3846.
18. Harvey RJ, Porter R, Rawson JA (1977) The natural discharges of Purkinje cells in paravermal regions of lobules V and VI of the monkey's cerebellum. J Physiol 271:515-536.
19. Hewitt AL, Popa LS, Pasalar S, Hendrix CM, Ebner TJ (2011) Representation of limb kinematics in Purkinje cell simple spike discharge is conserved across multiple tasks. J Neurophysiol 106:2232-2247.
20. Hirashima M, Nozaki D (2012) Distinct motor plans form and retrieve distinct motor memories for physically identical movements. Curr Biol 22:432-436.
21. Howard IS, Ingram JN, Wolpert DM (2008) Composition and decomposition in bimanual dynamic learning. J Neurosci 28:10531-10540.
22. Howard IS, Ingram JN, Wolpert DM (2009) A modular planar robotic manipulandum with end-point torque control. J Neurosci Methods 181:199-211.
23. Howard IS, Ingram JN, Wolpert DM (2010) Context-dependent partitioning of motor learning in bimanual movements. J Neurophysiol 104:2082-2091.
24. Howard IS, Ingram JN, Wolpert DM (2011) Separate representations of dynamics in rhythmic and discrete movements: evidence from motor learning. J Neurophysiol 105:1722-1731.
25. Ikegami T, Hirashima M, Taga G, Nozaki D (2010) Asymmetric transfer of visuomotor learning between discrete and rhythmic movements. J Neurosci 30:4515-4521.
26. Imamizu H, Sugimoto N, Osu R, Tsutsui K, Sugiyama K, Wada Y, Kawato M (2007) Explicit contextual information selectively contributes to predictive switching of internal models. Exp Brain Res 181:395-408.
27. Jax SA, Rosenbaum DA (2009) Hand path priming in manual obstacle avoidance: rapid decay of dorsal stream information. Neuropsychologia 47:1573-1577.
28. Joiner WM, Smith MA (2008) Long-term retention explained by a model of short-term learning in the adaptive control of reaching. J Neurophysiol 100:2948-2955.
29. Joiner WM, Ajayi O, Sing GC, Smith MA (2011) Linear hypergeneralization of learned dynamics across movement speeds reveals anisotropic, gainencoding primitives for motor adaptation. J Neurophysiol 105:45-59.
30. Karniel A, Mussa-Ivaldi FA (2002) Does the motor control system use multiple models and context switching to cope with a variable environment? Exp Brain Res 143:520-524.
31. Kim JJ, Thompson RF (1997) Cerebellar circuits and synaptic mechanisms involved in classical eyeblink conditioning. Trends Neurosci 20:177-181.
32. Krakauer JW, Ghilardi MF, Ghez C (1999) Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching. Nat Neurosci 2:1026-1031.
33. Krouchev NI, Kalaska JF (2003) Context-dependent anticipation of different task dynamics: rapid recall of appropriate motor skills using visual cues. J Neurophysiol 89:1165-1175.
34. Lashley K (1951) The problem of serial order in behavior (Jeffress LA, ed). In: Cerebral mechanisms in behavior: The Hixon Symposium. New York: Wiley.
35. Lee JY, Schweighofer N (2009) Dual adaptation supports a parallel architecture of motor memory. J Neurosci 29:10396-10404.
36. Maschke M, Gomez CM, Ebner TJ, Konczak J (2004) Hereditary cerebellar ataxia progressively impairs force adaptation during goal-directed arm movements. J Neurophysiol 91:230-238.
37. Miall RC, Christensen LO, Cain O, Stanley J (2007) Disruption of state estimation in the human lateral cerebellum. PLo S Biol 5:e316.
38. Milner TE, Franklin DW (2005) Impedance control and internal model use during the initial stage of adaptation to novel dynamics in humans. J Physiol 567:651-664.
39. Nozaki D, Scott SH (2009) Multi-compartment model can explain partial transfer of learning within the same limb between unimanual and bimanual reaching. Exp Brain Res 194:451-463.
40. Nozaki D, Kurtzer I, Scott SH (2006) Limited transfer of learning between unimanual and bimanual skills within the same limb. Nat Neurosci 9:1364-1366.
41. Ohyama T, Nores WL, Murphy M, Mauk MD (2003) What the cerebellum computes. Trends Neurosci 26:222-227.
42. Osu R, Franklin DW, Kato H, Gomi H, Domen K, Yoshioka T, Kawato M (2002) Short-and long-term changes in joint co-contraction associated with motor learning as revealed from surface EMG. J Neurophysiol 88:991-1004.
43. Osu R, Hirai S, Yoshioka T, Kawato M (2004) Random presentation enables subjects to adapt to two opposing forces on the hand. Nat Neurosci 7:111-112.
44. Rubia FJ, Kolb FP (1978) Responses of cerebellar units to a passive movement in the decerebrate cat. Exp Brain Res 31:387-401.
45. Shidara M, Kawano K, Gomi H, Kawato M (1993) Inverse-dynamics model eye movement control by Purkinje cells in the cerebellum. Nature 365:50-52.
46. Sing GC, Joiner WM, Nanayakkara T, Brayanov JB, Smith MA (2009) Primitives for motor adaptation reflect correlated neural tuning to position and velocity. Neuron 64:575-589.
47. Smith MA, Shadmehr R (2005) Intact ability to learn internal models of arm dynamics in Huntington's disease but not cerebellar degeneration. J Neurophysiol 93:2809-2821.
48. Smith MA, Ghazizadeh A, Shadmehr R (2006) Interacting adaptive processes with different timescales underlie short-term motor learning. PLo S Biol 4:e179.
49. Thoroughman KA, Shadmehr R (2000) Learning of action through adaptive combination of motor primitives. Nature 407:742-747.
50. Wada Y, Kawabata Y, Kotosaka S, Yamamoto K, Kitazawa S, Kawato M (2003) Acquisition and contextual switching of multiple internal models for different viscous force fields. Neurosci Res 46:319-331.
51. Wainscott SK, Donchin O, Shadmehr R (2005) Internal models and contextual cues: encoding serial order and direction of movement. J Neurophysiol 93:786-800.
52. Wolpert DM, Kawato M (1998) Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control. Neural Netw 11:1317-1329.
53. Yokoi A, Hirashima M, Nozaki D (2011) Gain field encoding of the kinematics of both arms in the internal model enables flexible bimanual action. J Neurosci 31:17058-17068.