Colored context cues can facilitate the ability to learn and to switch between multiple dynamical force fields

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 106, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 163-183

  Addou, Touria ^a   Krouchev, Nedialko ^a   Kalaska, John F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Contextual cues; Force field adaptation; Human; Implicit and explicit cues; Motor learning

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; COLOR; ELBOW FLEXION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRAINING; VISUAL FIELD;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COLOR; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79959991991     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00869.2010     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Addou T, Krouchev N, Kalaska JF. Can visual cues facilitate simultaneous learning of multiple force fields? Soc Neurosci Abstr 31: 980.163-19, 2005.
2. Akazawa K, Milner TE, Stein RB. Modulation of reflex EMG and stiffness in response to stretch of human finger muscle. J Neurophysiol 49: 16-27, 1983.
3. Brashers-Krug T, Shadmehr R, Bizzi E. Consolidation in human motor memory. Nature 382: 252-255, 1996.
4. Caithness G, Osu R, Bays P, Chase H, Klassen J, Kawato M, Wolpert DM, Flanagan JR. Failure to consolidate the consolidation theory of learning for sensorimotor adaptation tasks. J Neurosci 24: 8662-8671, 2004.
5. Conditt MA, Gandolfo F, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. The motor system does not learn the dynamics of the arm by rote memorization of past experience. J Neurophysiol 78: 554-560, 1997.
6. Cothros N, Wong J, Gribble PL. Distinct haptic cues do not reduce interference when learning to reach in multiple force fields. PLoS One 3: e1990, 2008.
7. Cunningham HA, Welch RB. Multiple concurrent visual-motor mappings: implications for models of adaptation. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 20: 987-999, 1994.
8. Davidson PR, Wolpert DM. Motor learning and prediction in a variable environment. Curr Opin Neurobiol 13: 232-237, 2003.
9. Davidson PR, Wolpert DM, Scott SH, Flanagan JR. Common encoding of novel dynamic loads applied to the hand and arm. J Neurosci 25: 5425-5429, 2005.
10. Del Rey P. Training and contextual interference effects on memory and transfer. Res Q Exerc Sport 60: 342-347, 1989.
11. Doemges F, Rack PM. Task-dependent changes in the response of human wrist joints to mechanical disturbance. J Physiol 447: 575-585, 1992.
12. Flanagan JR, Nakano E, Imamizu H, Osu R, Yoshioka T, Kawato M. Composition and decomposition of internal models in motor learning under altered kinematic and dynamic environments. J Neurosci 19: RC34, 1999.
13. Franklin DW, Liaw G, Milner TE, Osu R, Burdet E, Kawato M. Endpoint stiffness of the arm is directionally tuned to instability in the environment. J Neurosci 27: 7705-7716, 2007.
14. Fukushi Ashe J T. Adaptation of arm trajectory during continuous drawing movements in different dynamic environments. Exp Brain Res 148: 95-104, 2003.
15. Gandolfo F, Mussa-Ivaldi FA, Bizzi E. Motor learning by field approximation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 3843-3846, 1996.
16. Ganguly K, Carmena JM. Emergence of a Stable Cortical Map for Neuroprosthetic Control. PLoS Biol 7: e1000153, 2009.
17. Gribble PL, Mullin LI, Cothros N, Mattar A. Role of cocontraction in arm movement accuracy. J Neurophysiol 89: 2396-2405, 2003.
18. Gupta R, Ashe J. Lack of adaptation to random conflicting force fields of variable magnitude. J Neurophysiol 97: 738-745, 2007.
19. Hall KG, Magill RA. Variability of practice and contextual interference in motor skill learning. J Mot Behav 27: 299-309, 1995.
20. Haruno M, Wolpert DM, Kawato M. Mosaic model for sensorimotor learning and control. Neural Comput 13: 2201-2220, 2001.
21. Hinder MR, Woolley DG, Tresilian JR, Riek S, Carson RG. The efficacy of colour cues in facilitating adaptation to opposing visuomotor rotations. Exp Brain Res 191: 143-155, 2008.
22. Hwang EJ, Donchin O, Smith MA, Shadmehr R. A gain-field encoding of limb position and velocity in the internal model of arm dynamics. PLoS Biol 1: E25, 2003.
23. Hwang EJ, Shadmehr R. Internal models of limb dynamics and the encoding of limb state. J Neural Eng 2: S266-S278, 2005.
24. Hwang EJ, Smith MA, Shadmehr R. Adaptation and generalization in acceleration-dependent force fields. Exp Brain Res 169: 496-506, 2006.
25. Imamizu H, Higuchi S, Toda A, Kawato M. Reorganization of brain activity for multiple internal models after short but intensive training. Cortex 43: 338-349, 2007a.
26. Imamizu H, Kawato M. Neural correlates of predictive and postdictive switching mechanisms for internal models. J Neurosci 28: 10751-10765, 2008.
27. Imamizu H, Kawato M. Brain mechanisms for predictive control by switching internal models: implications for higher-order cognitive functions. Psychol Res 73: 527-544, 2009.
28. Imamizu H, Kuroda T, Yoshioka T, Kawato M. Functional magnetic resonance imaging examination of two modular architectures for switching multiple internal models. J Neurosci 24: 1173-1181, 2004.
29. Imamizu H, Sugimoto N, Osu R, Tsutsui K, Sugiyama K, Wada Y, Kawato M. Explicit contextual information selectively contributes to predictive switching of internal models. Exp Brain Res 181: 395-408, 2007b.
30. Karniel A, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Does the motor control system use multiple models and context switching to cope with a variable environment? Exp Brain Res 143: 520-524, 2002.
31. Krakauer JW. Motor learning and consolidation: the case of visuomotor rotation. Adv Exp Med Biol 629: 405-421, 2009.
32. Krakauer JW, Ghilardi MF, Ghez C. Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching. Nat Neurosci 2: 1026-1031, 1999.
33. Krakauer JW, Shadmehr R. Consolidation of motor memory. Trends Neurosci 29: 58-64, 2006.
34. Krouchev NI, Kalaska JF. Context-dependent anticipation of different task dynamics: rapid recall of appropriate motor skills using visual cues. J Neurophysiol 89: 1165-1175, 2003.
35. Krutky MA, Ravichandran VJ, Trumbower RD, Perreault EJ. Interactions between limb and environmental mechanics influence stretch reflex sensitivity in the human arm. J Neurophysiol 103: 429-440, 2010.
36. Miall RC, Jenkinson N, Kulkarni K. Adaptation to rotated visual feedback: a re-examination of motor interference. Exp Brain Res 154: 201-210, 2004.
37. Milner TE. Accuracy of internal dynamics models in limb movements depends on stability. Exp Brain Res 159: 172-184, 2004.
38. Milner TE, Franklin DW. Impedance control and internal model use during the initial stage of adaptation to novel dynamics in humans. J Physiol 567: 651-664, 2005.
39. Nichols TR, Cope TC, Abelew TA. Rapid spinal mechanisms of motor coordination. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 27: 255-284, 1999.
40. Osu R, Hirai S, Yoshioka T, Kawato M. Random presentation enables subjects to adapt to two opposing forces on the hand. Nat Neurosci 7: 111-112, 2004.
41. Perrault EJ, Chen K, Trumbower RD, Lewis G. Interactions with compliant loads alter stretch reflex gains but not intermuscular coordination. J Neurophysiol 99: 2101-2113, 2008.
42. Pruszynski JA, Kurtzer I, Lillicrap TP, Scott SH. Temporal evolution of "automatic gain-scaling". J Neurophysiol 102: 992-1003, 2009.
43. Richter S, Jansen-Osmann P, Konczak J, Kalveram KT. Motor adaptation to different dynamic environments is facilitated by indicative context stimuli. Psychol Res 68: 245-251, 2004.
44. Rao AK, Shadmehr R. Contextual cues facilitate learning of multiple models of arm dynamics. Soc Neurosci Abstr 27: 302.245-4, 2001.
45. Robertson EM, Pascual-Leone A, Miall RC. Current concepts in procedural consolidation. Nat Rev Neurosci 5: 576-582, 2004.
46. Roller CA, Cohen HS, Kimball KT, Bloomberg JJ. Variable practice with lenses improves visuo-motor plasticity. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 12: 341-352, 2001.
47. Scheidt RA, Conditt MA, Secco EL, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Interaction of visual and proprioceptive feedback during adaptation of human reaching movements. J Neurophysiol 93: 3200-3213, 2005.
48. Scott SH. Optimal feedback control and the neural basis of volitional control. Nat Rev Neurosci 5: 532-546, 2004.
49. Shadmehr R, Brashers-Krug T. Functional stages in the formation of human long-term motor memory. J Neurosci 17: 409-419, 1997.
50. Shadmehr R, Moussavi ZM. Spatial generalization from learning dynamics of reaching movements. J Neurosci 20: 7807-7815, 2000.
51. Shadmehr R, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J Neurosci 14: 3208-3224, 1994.
52. Shadmehr R. Generalization as a behavioral window to the neural mechanisms of learning internal models. Hum Mov Sci 23: 543-568, 2004.
53. Shadmehr R, Smith MA, Krakauer JW. Error correction, sensory prediction, and adaptation in motor control. Annu Rev Neurosci 33: 89-108, 2010.
54. Shea CH, Kohl RM. Specificity and variability of practice. Res Q Exerc Sport 61: 169-177, 1990.
55. Shemmell J, Krutky MA, Perreault EJ. Stretch sensitive reflexes as an adaptive mechanism for maintaining limb stability. Clin Neurophysiol 121: 1680-1689, 2010.
56. Smith MA, Ghazizadeh A, Shadmehr R. Interacting adaptive processes with different timescales underlie short-term motor learning. PLoS Biol 4: e179, 2006.
57. Thoroughman KA, Shadmehr R. Electromyographic correlates of learning an internal model of reaching movements. J Neurosci 19: 8573-8588, 1999.
58. Todorov E, Jordan MI. Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nat Neurosci 5: 1226-1235, 2002.
59. Tong C, Flanagan JR. Task-specific internal models for kinematic transformations. J Neurophysiol 90: 578-585, 2003.
60. Wada Y, Kawabata Y, Kotosaka S, Yamamoto K, Kitazawa S, Kawato M. Acquisition and contextual switching of multiple internal models for different viscous force fields. Neurosci Res 46: 319-331, 2003.
61. Wagner MJ, Smith MA. Shared internal models for feedforward and feedback control. J Neurosci 28: 10663-10673, 2008.
62. Werner S, Bock O. Effects of variable practice and declarative knowledge on sensorimotor adaptation to rotated visual feedback. Exp Brain Res 178: 554-559, 2007.
63. Wainscott SK, Donchin O, Shadmehr R. Internal models and contextual cues: encoding serial order and direction of movement. J Neurophysiol 93: 786-800, 2005.
64. Wang T, Dordevic GS, Shadmehr R. Learning the dynamics of reaching movements results in the modification of arm impedance and long-latency perturbation responses. Biol Cybern 85: 437-448, 2001.
65. Willingham DB, Salidis J, Gabrieli JD. Direct comparison of neural systems mediating conscious and unconscious skill learning. J Neurophysiol 88: 1451-1460, 2002.
66. Wolpert DM, Kawato M. Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control. Neural Netw 11: 1317-1329, 1998.
67. Woolley DG, Tresilian JR, Carson RG, Riek S. Dual adaptation to two opposing visuomotor rotations when each is associated with different regions of workspace. Exp Brain Res 179: 155-165, 2007.