Disruption of state estimation in the human lateral cerebellum

PLoS Biology

Volumn 5, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 2733-2744

  Miall, R Chris ^a   Christensen, Lars O D ^b   Cain, Owen ^a   Stanley, James ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; CEREBELLUM; ERROR; FEMALE; FINGER; HAND; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; STATE ESTIMATION; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; VISION; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION; VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT; ARM; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EVOKED MUSCLE RESPONSE; MAGNETISM; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RADIATION EXPOSURE;

ADULT; ARM; CEREBELLUM; EVOKED POTENTIALS, MOTOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETICS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SPACE PERCEPTION; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

EID: 37249049757     PISSN: 15449173     EISSN: 15457885     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050316     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Wolpert DM, Flanagan JR (2001) Motor prediction. Curr Biol 11: R729-R732.
2. Miall RC, Weir DJ, Stein JF (1985) Visuomotor tracking with delayed visual feedback. Neurosci 16: 511-520.
3. Saunders JA, Knill DC (2003) Humans use continuous visual feedback from the hand to control fast reaching movements. Exp Brain Res 152: 341-352.
4. Desmurget M, Grafton S (2000) Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends Cogn Sci 4: 423-431.
5. Saunders JA, Knill DC (2005) Humans use continuous visual feedback from the hand to control both the direction and distance of pointing movements. Exp Brain Res 162: 458-473.
6. Vaziri S, Diedrichsen J, Shadmehr R (2006) Why does the brain predict sensory consequences of oculomotor commands? Optimal integration of the predicted and the actual sensory feedback. J Neurosci 26: 4188-4197.
7. Wolpert DM, Miall RC, Kawato M (1998) Internal models in the cerebellum. Trends Cogn Sci 2: 338-347.
8. Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z (2000) Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nat Neurosci 3: 1212-1217.
9. Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Jordan MI (1995) An internal model for sensorimotor control. Science 269: 1880-1882.
10. Ariff G, Donchin O, Nanayakkara T, Shadmehr R (2002) A real-time state predictor in motor control: study of saccadic eye movements during unseen reaching movements. J Neurosci 22: 7721-7729.
11. Miall RC, Wolpert DM (1996) Forward models for physiological motor control. Neural Netw 9: 1265-1279.
12. Miall RC, Weir DJ, Wolpert DM, Stein JF (1993) Is the cerebellum a Smith Predictor? J Motor Behav 25: 203-216.
13. Paulin MG (1989) A Kalman filter theory of the cerebellum. In: Arbib MA, Amari S, editors. Dynamic interations in neural networks: Models and data. New York: Springer-Verlag. pp. 239-260.
14. Paulin MG (2005) Evolution of the cerebellum as a neuronal machine for Bayesian state estimation. J Neural Eng 2: S219-S234.
15. Paulin MG, Hoffman LF, Assad C (2001) A model of cerebellar computations for dynamical state estimation. Auton Robots 11: 279-284.
16. Wolpert DM, Goodbody SJ, Husain M (1998) Maintaining internal representations: the role of the human superior parietal lobe. Nat Neurosci 1: 529-533.
17. Desmurget M, Epstein CM, Turner RS, Prablanc C, Alexander GE, et al. (1999) Role of the posterior parietal cortex in updating reaching movements to a visual target. Nat Neurosci 2: 563-567.
18. Buneo CA, Andersen RA (2006) The posterior parietal cortex: Sensorimotor interface for the planning and online control of visually guided movements. Neuropsychologia 44: 2594-2606
19. Desmurget M, Grea H, Grethe JS, Prablanc C, Alexander GE, et al. (2001) Functional anatomy of nonvisual feedback loops during reaching: a positron emission tomography study. J Neurosci 21: 2919-2928.
20. Ito M (2002) Historical review of the significance of the cerebellum and the role of Purkinje cells in motor learning. Ann N Y Acad Sci 978: 273-288.
21. Miall RC, Jenkinson EW (2005) Functional imaging of changes in cerebellar activity related to learning during a novel eye-hand tracking task. Exp Brain Res 166: 170-183.
22. Blakemore SJ, Frith CD, Wolpert DM (2001) The cerebellum is involved in predicting the sensory consequences of action. Neuroreport 12: 1879-1884.
23. Muller F, Dichgans J (1994) Dyscoordination of pinch and lift forces during grasp in patients with cerebellar lesions. Exp Brain Res 101: 485-492.
24. Nowak DA, Hermsdorfer J, Marquardt C, Fuchs HH (2002) Grip and load force coupling during discrete vertical arm movements with a grasped object in cerebellar atrophy. Exp Brain Res 145: 28-39.
25. Nowak DA, Timmann D, Hermsdorfer J (2007) Dexterity in cerebellar agenesis. Neuropsychol 45: 696-703.
26. Sanguineti V, Morasso PG, Baratto L, Brichetto G, Luigi MG, et al. (2003) Cerebellar ataxia: Quantitative assessment and cybernetic interpretation. Hum Mov Sci 22: 189-205.
27. Bastian AJ, Martin TA, Keating JG, Thach WT (1996) Cerebellar ataxia: Abnormal control of interaction torques across multiple joints. J Neurophysiol 76: 492-509.
28. Herwig U, Satrapi P, Schonfeldt-Lecuona C (2003) Using the international 10-20 EEG system for positioning of transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain Topogr 16: 95-99.
29. Leocani L, Cohen LG, Wassermann EM, Ikoma K, Hallett M (2000) Human corticospinal excitability evaluated with transcranial magnetic stimulation during different reaction time paradigms. Brain 123: 1161-1173.
30. Sawaki L, Okita T, Fujiwara M, Mizuno K (1999) Specific and non-specific effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on simple and go/no-go reaction time. Exp Brain Res 127: 402-408.
31. Pascual-Leone A, Valls-Sole J, Wassermann EM, Brasil-Neto J, Cohen LG, et al. (1992) Effects of focal transcranial magnetic stimulation on simple reaction time to acoustic, visual and somatosensory stimuli. Brain 115: 1045-1059.
32. Ito M (1970) Neurophysiological aspects of the cerebellar motor control system. Int J Neurol 7: 162-176.
33. Kawato M, Gomi H (1992) A computational model of four regions of the cerebellum based on feedback-error-learning. Biol Cybern 68: 95-103.
34. Nixon PD (2003) The role of the cerebellum in preparing responses to predictable sensory events. Cerebellum 2: 114-122.
35. Ohyama T, Nores WL, Murphy M, Mauk MD (2003) What the cerebellum computes. Trends Neurosci 26: 222-227.
36. Bastian AJ (2006) Learning to predict the future: the cerebellum adapts feedforward movement control. Curr Opin Neurobiol 16: 645-649.
37. Vilis T, Hore J (1980) Central neural mechanisms contributing to cerebellar tremor produced by limb perterbations. J Neurophysiol 43: 279-291.
38. Ivry RB (1996) The representation of temporal information in perception and motor control. Curr Opin Neurobiol 6: 851-857.
39. Spencer RM, Ivry RB, Zelaznik HN (2005) Role of the cerebellum in movements: control of timing or movement transitions? Exp Brain Res 161: 383-396.
40. Kawato M (1999) Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Curr Opin Neurobiol 9: 718-727.
41. Miall RC (1998) The cerebellum, predictive control and motor coordination. Novartis Found Symp 218: 272-290.
42. Miall RC, Reckess GZ, Imamizu H (2001) The cerebellum coordinates eye and hand tracking movements. Nat Neurosci 4: 638-644.
43. Holmes G (1939) The cerebellum of man. Brain 62: 1-30.
44. Monzee J, Drew T, Smith AM (2004) Effects of muscimol inactivation of the cerebellar nuclei on precision grip. J Neurophysiol 91: 1240-1249.
45. Diedrichsen J, Criscimagna-Hemminger SE, Shadmehr R (2007) Dissociating timing and coordination as functions of the cerebellum. J Neurosci 27: 6291-6301.
46. Miall RC, Weir DJ, Stein JF (1987) Visuo-motor tracking during reversible inactivation of the cerebellum. Exp Brain Res 65: 455-464.
47. Buneo CA, Andersen RA (2006) The posterior parietal cortex: sensorimotor interface for the planning and online control of visually guided movements. Neuropsychologia 44: 2594-2606.
48. Pellijeff A, Bonilha L, Morgan PS, McKenzie K, Jackson SR (2006) Parietal updating of limb posture: an event-related fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 44: 2685-2690.
49. Blakemore SJ, Sirigu A (2003) Action prediction in the cerebellum and in the parietal lobe. Exp Brain Res 153: 239-245.
50. Sirigu A, Duhamel JR, Cohen L, Pillon B, Dubois B, et al. (1996) The mental representation of hand movements after parietal cortex damage. Science 273: 1564-1568.
51. MacDonald PA, Paus T (2003) The role of parietal cortex in awareness of self-generated movements: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Cereb Cortex 13: 962-967.
52. Sirigu A, Daprati E, Pradat-Diehl P, Franck N, Jeannerod M (1999) Perception of self-generated movement following left parietal lesion. Brain 122: 1867-1874.
53. Frith CD, Blakemore SJ, Wolpert DM (2000) Abnormalities in the awareness and control of action. Philos Trans R Soc Lond (Biol) 355: 1771-1788.
54. Critchley M (1953) Disorders of the body image. In: Critchley M, editors. The parietal lobe. New York: Hafner Press. pp. 225-255.
55. Stein JF, Glickstein M (1992) The role of the cerebellum in the visual guidance of movement. Physiol Rev 72: 967-1017.
56. Kelly RM, Strick PL (2003) Cerebellar loops with motor cortex and prefrontal cortex of a nonhuman primate. J Neurosci 23: 8432-8444.
57. Amino Y, Kyuhou S, Matsuzaki R, Gemba H (2001) Cerebello-thalamocortical projections to the posterior parietal cortex in the macaque monkey. Neurosci Lettr 309: 29-32.
58. Schmahmann JD, Pandya DN (1990) Anatomical investigation of projections from thalamus to posterior parietal cortex in the rhesus monkey: a WGA-HRP and fluorescent tracer study. J Comp Neurol 295: 299-326.
59. Clower DM, West RA, Lynch JC, Strick PL (2001) The inferior parietal lobule is the target of output from the superior colliculus, hippocampus, and cerebellum. J Neurosci 21: 6283-6291.
60. Clower DM, Dum RP, Strick PL (2005) Basal ganglia and cerebellar inputs to 'AIP'. Cereb Cortex 15: 913-920.
61. Colby CL, Goldberg ME (1999) Space and attention in parietal cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci 22: 319-49.
62. Kitazawa S, Kimura M, Yin P-B (1998) Cerebellar complex spikes encode both destinations and errors in arm movements. Nature 392: 494-497.
63. Nixon PD, Passingham RE (1999) The cerebellum and cognition: cerebellar lesions do not impair spatial working memory or visual associative learning in monkeys. Eur J Neurosci 11: 4070-4080.
64. Golla H, Thier P, Haarmeier T (2005) Disturbed overt but normal covert shifts of attention in adult cerebellar patients. Brain 128: 1525-1535
65. Diedrichsen J, Hashambhoy Y, Rane T, Shadmehr R (2005) Neural correlates of reach errors. J Neurosci 25: 9919-9931.
66. Vaillancourt DE, Thulborn KR, Corcos DM (2003) Neural basis for the processes that underlie visually guided and internally guided force control in humans. J Neurophysiol 90: 3330-3340.
67. Suminski AJ, Rao SM, Mosier KM, Scheidt RA (2007) Neural and electromyographic correlates of wrist posture control. J Neurophysiol 97: 1527-1545.
68. Monzee J, Smith AM (2004) Responses of cerebellar interpositus neurons to predictable perturbations applied to an object held in a precision grip. J Neurophysiol 91: 1230-1239.
69. Werhahn KJ, Taylor J, Ridding M, Meyer BU, Rothwell JC (1996) Effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation over the cerebellum on the excitability of human motor cortex. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 101: 58-66.
70. Miall RC, Christensen LO (2004) The effect of rTMS over the cerebellum in normal human volunteers on peg-board movement performance. Neurosci Lett 371: 185-189.
71. Lai M, Baker MR, Fisher KM, Baker SN (2005) Inhibition of motor cortex following magnetic stimulation over the contralateral occiput may have a corticospinal origin. Soc Neurosci 179.14.