Context-dependent partitioning of motor learning in bimanual movements

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 104, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 2082-2091

  Howard, Ian S ^a   Ingram, James N ^a   Wolpert, Daniel M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; BIMANUAL MOVEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYNAMICS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KINEMATICS; LEARNING; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRAINING; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION; VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ARM; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; LEARNING; MOTOR SKILLS; MOVEMENT; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

EID: 77957829718     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00299.2010     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Bays PM, Wolpert DM. Actions and consequences in bimanual interaction are represented in different coordinate systems. J Neurosci 26: 7121-7126, 2006.
2. Blakemore SJ, Goodbody SJ, Wolpert DM. Predicting the consequences of our own actions: the role of sensorimotor context estimation. J Neurosci 18: 7511-7518, 1998.
3. Bock O, Schneider S, Bloomberg J. Conditions for interference versus facilitation during sequential sensorimotor adaptation. Exp Brain Res 138: 359-365, 2001.
4. Brashers-Krug T, Shadmehr R, Bizzi E. Consolidation in human motor memory. Nature 382: 252-255, 1996.
5. Caithness G, Osu R, Bays P, Chase H, Klassen J, Kawato M, Wolpert DM, Flanagan JR. Failure to consolidate the consolidation theory of learning for sensorimotor adaptation tasks. J Neurosci 24: 8662-8671, 2004.
6. Cisek P, Crammond DJ, Kalaska JF. Neural activity in primary motor and dorsal premotor cortex in reaching tasks with the contralateral versus ipsilateral arm. J Neurophysiol 89: 922-942, 2003. (Pubitemid 36206140)
7. Cothros N, Wong J, Gribble PL. Distinct haptic cues do not reduce interference when learning to reach in multiple force fields. PloS One 3: e1990, 2008.
8. Davidson PR, Wolpert DM, Scott SH, Flanagan JR. Common encoding of novel dynamic loads applied to the hand and arm. J Neurosci 25: 5425-5429, 2005.
9. Diedrichsen J. Optimal task-dependent changes of bimanual feedback control and adaptation. Curr Biol 17: 1675-1679, 2007.
10. Diedrichsen J, Verstynen T, Hon A, Lehman SL, Ivry RB. Anticipatory adjustments in the unloading task: is an efference copy necessary for learning? Exp Brain Res 148: 272-276, 2003.
11. Donchin O, Gribova A, Steinberg O, Bergman H, Vaadia E. Primary motor cortex is involved in bimanual coordination. Nature 395: 274-278, 1998.
12. Goedert KM, Willingham DB. Patterns of interference in sequence learning and prism adaptation inconsistent with the consolidation hypothesis. Learn Mem 9: 279-292, 2002.
13. Goodbody SJ, Wolpert DM. Temporal and amplitude generalization in motor learning. J Neurophysiol 79: 1825-1838, 1998.
14. Howard IS, Ingram JN, Kording KP, Wolpert DM. The statistics of natural movements are reflected in motor errors. J Neurophysiol 102: 1902-1910, 2009a.
15. Howard IS, Ingram JN, Wolpert DM. A modular planar robotic manipulandum with end-point torque control. J Neurosci Methods 181: 199-211, 2009b.
16. Howard IS, Ingram JN, Wolpert DM. Composition and decomposition in bimanual dynamic learning. J Neurosci 28: 10531-10540, 2008.
17. Imamizu H, Sugimoto N, Osu R, Tsutsui K, Sugiyama K, Wada Y, Kawato M. Explicit contextual information selectively contributes to predictive switching of internal models. Exp Brain Res 181: 395-408, 2007. (Pubitemid 47077039)
18. Karniel A, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Does the motor control system use multiple models and context switching to cope with a variable environment? Exp Brain Res 143: 520-524, 2002.
19. Kelso JA. Phase transitions and critical behavior in human bimanual coordination. Am J Physiol 246: R1000-R1004, 1984.
20. Kelso JAS. Dynamic Patterns: The Self Organisation of Brain and Behaviour. Cambridge: MIT, 1995.
21. Krakauer JW, Ghez C, Ghilardi MF. Adaptation to visuomotor transformations: consolidation, interference, and forgetting. J Neurosci 25: 473-478, 2005.
22. Krakauer JW, Ghilardi MF, Ghez C. Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching. Nat Neurosci 2: 1026-1031, 1999.
23. Lee JY, Schweighofer N. Dual adaptation supports a parallel architecture of motor memory. J Neurosci 29: 10396-10404, 2009.
24. Mechsner F, Kerzel D, Knoblich G, Prinz W. Perceptual basis of bimanual coordination. Nature 414: 69-73, 2001.
25. Miall RC, Jenkinson N, Kulkarni K. Adaptation to rotated visual feedback: a re-examination of motor interference. Exp Brain Res 154: 201-210, 2004.
26. Nozaki D, Kurtzer I, Scott SH. Limited transfer of learning between unimanual and bimanual skills within the same limb. Nat Neurosci 9: 1364-1366, 2006. (Pubitemid 44646206)
27. Osu R, Kamimura N, Iwasaki H, Nakano E, Harris CM, Wada Y, Kawato M. Optimal impedance control for task achievement in the presence of signal-dependent noise. J Neurophysiol 92: 1199-1215, 2004.
28. Pearson TS, Krakauer JW, Mazzoni P. Learning not to generalize: modular adaptation of visuomotor gain. J Neurophysiol 103: 2938-2952, 2010.
29. Sainburg RL, Wang J. Interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations: independence of direction and final position information. Exp Brain Res 145: 437-447, 2002.
30. Scheidt RA, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Conditt MA, Rymer WZ, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Persistence of motor adaptation during constrained, multi-joint, arm movements. J Neurophysiol 84: 853-862, 2000.
31. Shadmehr R. Generalization as a behavioral window to the neural mechanisms of learning internal models. Hum Mov Sci 23: 543-568, 2004.
32. Shadmehr R, Brashers-Krug T. Functional stages in the formation of human long-term motor memory. J Neurosci 17: 409-419, 1997. (Pubitemid 27008880)
33. Shadmehr R, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J Neurosci 14: 3208-3224, 1994.
34. Steinberg O, Donchin O, Gribova A, Cardosa de Oliveira S, Bergman H, Vaadia E. Neuronal populations in primary motor cortex encode bimanual arm movements. Eur J Neurosci 15: 1371-1380, 2002.
35. Swinnen SP, Jardin K, Verschueren S, Meulenbroek R, Franz L, Dounskaia N, Walter CB. Exploring interlimb constraints during bimanual graphic performance: effects of muscle grouping and direction. Behav Brain Res 90: 79-87, 1998.
36. Tcheang L, Bays PM, Ingram JN, Wolpert DM. Simultaneous bimanual dynamics are learned without interference. Exp Brain Res 183: 17-25, 2007. (Pubitemid 47460455)
37. Wada Y, Kawabata Y, Kotosaka S, Yamamoto K, Kitazawa S, Kawato M. Acquisition and contextual switching of multiple internal models for different viscous force fields. Neurosci Res 46: 319-331, 2003.
38. Wang J, Sainburg RL. Interlimb transfer of novel inertial dynamics is asymmetrical. J Neurophysiol 92: 349-360, 2004. (Pubitemid 38802257)
39. Wigmore V, Tong C, Flanagan JR. Visuomotor rotations of varying size and direction compete for a single internal model in motor working memory. J Exp Psychol 28: 447-457, 2002.
40. Witney AG, Goodbody SJ, Wolpert DM. Predictive motor learning of temporal delays. J Neurophysiol 82: 2039-2048, 1999.