System justification theory as compliment, complement, and corrective to theories of social identification and social dominance

Social Motivation

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 223-263

  Jost, John T ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865850843     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (203)

1. Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. (Eds.). (1990). Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances. New York: Springer-Verlag.
2. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3. Altemeyer, R. A. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.
4. Altemeyer, R. A. (1998). The other "authoritarian personality." Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 48-92.
5. Aronson, E., & Mills, J. (1959). The effect of severity of initiation on liking for a group. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59, 177-181.
6. Ashburn-Nardo, L., Knowles, M. L., & Monteith, M. J. (2003). Black Americans implicit racial associations and their implications for intergroup judgment. Social Cognition, 21, 61-87.
7. Banaji, M. R. (2004). The opposite of a great truth is also true: Homage to koan #7. In J. T. Jost, M. R. Banaji, & D. Prentice (Eds.), Perspectivism in social psychology: The yin and yang of scientific progress (pp. 127-140). Washington, DC: APA Press.
8. Bartels, L. (2006). What's the matter with What's the matter with Kansas? Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 1, 201-226.
9. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
10. Bettelheim, B. (1943). Individual and mass behavior in extreme situations. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38, 417-452.
11. Blair, I., & Jost, J. T. (2003). Exit, loyalty, and collective action among workers in a simulated business environment: Interactive effects of group identification and boundary permeability. Social Justice Research, 16, 95-108.
12. Blanton, H., George, G., & Crocker, J. (2001). Contexts of system justification and system evaluation: Exploring the social comparison strategies of the (not yet) contented female worker. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 4, 127-138.
13. Blasi, G., & Jost, J. T. (2006). System justification theory and research: Implications for law, legal advocacy, and social justice. California Law Review, 94, 1119-1168.
14. Bourdieu, P. (1986). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (Original translation published 1977)
15. Branthwaite, A., & Jones, J. E. (1975). Fairness and discrimination: English versus Welsh. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 323-338.
16. Brewer, M. B. (1979). Ingroup bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307-324.
17. Brewer, M. B. (2007). The importance of being we: Human nature and intergroup relations. American Psychologist, 62, 728-738.
18. Brewer, M. B., & Brown, R. J. (1998). Intergroup relations. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, 4th ed., pp. 554-594). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
19. Brown, R. J. (1988). Group processes: Dynamics within and between groups. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
20. Brown, R. (2000a). Group processes: Dynamics within and between groups (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
21. Brown, R. (2000b). Social identity theory: Past achievements, current problems and future challenges. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 745-778.
22. Brown, R. J., & Wade, G. (1987). Superordinate goals and intergroup behaviour: The effect of role ambiguity and status on intergroup attitudes and task performance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 131-142.
23. Chen, E. S., & Tyler, T. R. (2001). Cloaking power: Legitimizing myths and the psychology of the advantaged. In A. Y. Lee-Chai & J. Bargh (Eds.), The use and abuse of power: Multiple perspectives on the causes of corruption (pp. 241-261). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
24. Clark, K. B., & Clark, M. P. (1947). Racial identification and preference in Negro children. In E. E. Maccoby, T. M. Newcomb, & E. L. Hartley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (pp. 602-611). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
25. Cooper, J., & Fazio, R. H. (1986). The formation and persistence of attitudes that support intergroup conflict. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 183-195). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
26. Crandall, C. S., Eidelman, S., Skitka, L. J., & Morgan, G. S. (2009). Status quo framing increases support for torture. Social Influence, 4, 1-10.
27. Crosby, F. (1984). The denial of personal discrimination. American Behavioral Scientist, 27, 371-386.
28. Cunningham, F. (1987). False consciousness. In Democratic theory and socialism (pp. 236-267). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29. Deaux, K. (1996). Social identification. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 777-798). New York: Guilford.
30. Désert, M., & Leyens, J.-P. (2006). Social comparisons across cultures I: Gender stereotypes in high and low power distance cultures. In S. Guimond (Ed.), Social comparison and social psychology (pp. 303-317). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31. Dollard, J. (1937). Caste and class in a southern town. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
32. Dovidio, J., & Gaertner, S. (2010). Intergroup bias. In S.T. Fiske, D. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th edition, Vol. 2, pp. 1084-1121). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley
33. Eagleton, T. (1991). Ideology. London: Verso.
34. Eagly, A. H., Diekman, A. B., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & Koenig, A. M. (2004). Gender gaps in sociopolitical attitudes: A social psychological analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 796-816.
35. Elkins, S. (1967). Slavery and personality. In R. S. Lazarus & E. M. Opton, Jr. (Eds.), Personality (pp. 395-420). Middlesex, UK: Penguin.
36. Ellemers, N., Haslam, S. A., Platow, M. J., & van Knippenberg, D. (2003). Social identity at work: Developments, debates, directions. In S. A. Haslam, D. van Knippenberg, M. J. Platow, & N. Ellemers (Eds.), Social identity at work: Developing theory for organizational practice (pp. 3-26). New York: Psychology Press.
37. Ellemers, N., Van Rijswijk, W., Roefs, M., & Simons, C. (1997). Bias in intergroup perceptions: Balancing group identity with social reality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 186-198.
38. Ellemers, N., Wilke, H., & van Knippenberg, A. (1993). Effects of the legitimacy of low group or individual status on individual and collective status-enhancement strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 766-778.
39. Elster, J. (1982). Belief, bias, and ideology. In M. Hollis & S. Lukes (Eds.), Rationality and relativism (pp. 123-148). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
40. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
41. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
42. Frank, T. (2004). What's the matter with Kansas? New York: Metropolitan Books.
43. Fromm, E. (1962). Beyond the chains of illusion: My encounter with Marx and Freud. New York: Simon & Schuster.
44. Gelman, A. (2008). Red state blue state rich state poor state. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
45. Gilbert, D. T., Pinel, E. C., Wilson, T. D., Blumberg, S. J., & Wheatley, T. (1998). Immune neglect: A source of durability bias in affective forecasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 617-638.
46. Gilens, M. (1999). Why Americans hate welfare: Race, media, and the politics of antipoverty policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
47. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109-118.
48. Goodwin, S. A., Operario, D., & Fiske, S. T. (1998). Situational power and interpersonal dominance facilitate bias and inequality. Journal of Social Issues, 54, 677-698.
49. Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. New York: International.
50. Gurr, T. (1970). Why men rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton.
51. Haines, E. L., & Jost, J. T. (2000). Placating the powerless: Effects of legitimate and illegitimate explanation on affect, memory, and stereotyping. Social Justice Research, 13, 219-236.
52. Haslam, S. A., Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., Reynolds, K. J., & Doosje, B. (2002). From personal pictures in the head to collective tools in the world: How shared stereotypes allow groups to represent and change social reality. In C. McGarty, V. Yzerbyt, & R. Spears (Eds.), Stereotypes as explanation: The formation of meaningful beliefs about social groups (pp. 157-185). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
53. Havel, V. (1991). The power of the powerless. In V. Havel (Ed.), Open letters (pp. 125-214). London: Faber & Faber.
54. Henry, P. J., & Saul, A. (2006). The development of system justification in the developing world. Social Justice Research, 19, 365-378.
55. Hewstone, M. (1989). Causal attribution. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
56. Hewstone, M. (1990). The "ultimate attribution error"? A review of the literature on intergroup causal attribution. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 311-335.
57. Hewstone, M., Rubin, M., & Willis, H. (2002). Intergroup bias. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 575-604.
58. Hinkle, S., & Brown, R. (1990). Intergroup comparisons and social identity: Some links and lacunae. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances (pp. 48-70). New York: Springer-Verlag.
59. Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
60. Ho, E. A., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., & Akimoto S. A. (2002). The effects of comparative status on social stereotypes: How the perceived success of some persons affects the stereotypes of others. Social Cognition, 20, 36-57.
61. Hoffman, A. (1989). The best of Abbie Hoffman. New York: Four Walls Eight Windows.
62. Hofstede, G. H. (1997). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.
63. Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. London: Routledge.
64. Hornsey, M. J. (2008). Social identity theory and self-categorization theory: A historical review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 204-222.
65. Huddy, L. (2004). Contrasting theoretical approaches to intergroup relations. Political Psychology, 25, 947-967.
66. Hunt, M. O. (2000). Status, religion, and the "belief in a just world": Comparing African Americans, Latinos, and Whites. Social Science Quarterly, 81, 325-343.
67. Jackman, M. R. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Berkeley: University of California Press.
68. Jennings, M. K. (1991). Thinking about social injustice. Political Psychology, 12, 187-204.
69. Jost, J. T. (1995). Negative illusions: Conceptual clarification and psychological evidence concerning false consciousness. Political Psychology, 16, 397-424.
70. Jost, J. T. (1997). An experimental replication of the depressed entitlement effect among women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 387-393.
71. Jost, J. T. (2001). Outgroup favoritism and the theory of system justification: An experimental paradigm for investigating the effects of socio-economic success on stereotype content. In G. Moskowitz (Ed.), Cognitive social psychology: The Princeton symposium on the legacy and future of social cognition (pp. 89-102). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
72. Jost, J. T. (2004). A perspectivist looks at the past, present, and (perhaps) the future of intergroup relations: A quixotic defense of system justification theory. In J. T. Jost, M. R. Banaji, & D. Prentice (Eds.), Perspectivism in social psychology: The yin and yang of scientific progress (pp. 215-230). Washington, DC: APA Press.
73. Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1-27.
74. Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881-919.
75. Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Prentice, D. (Eds.). (2004). Perspectivism in social psychology: The yin and yang of scientific progress. Washington, DC: APA Press.
76. Jost, J. T., Blount, S., Pfeffer, J., & Hunyady, G. (2003). Fair market ideology: Its cognitive-motivational underpinnings. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 53-91.
77. Jost, J. T., & Burgess, D. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence and the conflict between group and system justification motives in low status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 293-305.
78. Jost, J. T., Burgess, D., & Mosso, C. (2001). Conflicts of legitimation among self, group, and system: The integrative potential of system justification theory. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 363-388). New York: Cambridge University Press.
79. Jost, J. T., Fitzsimons, G., & Kay, A. C. (2004). The ideological animal: A system justification view. In J. Greenberg, S. L. Koole, & T. Pyszczynski (Eds.), Handbook of experimental existential psychology (pp. 263-283). New York: Guilford.
80. Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339-375.
81. Jost, J. T., & Hamilton, D. L. (2005). Stereotypes in our culture. In J. Dovidio, P. Glick, & L. Rudman (Eds.), On The Nature of Prejudice: Fifty years after Allport (pp. 208-224). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
82. Jost, J. T., & Hardin, C.D. (in press). On the structure and dynamics of human thought: The legacy of William J. McGuire for social and political psychology. Political Psychology.
83. Jost, J. T., & Hunyady, O. (2002). The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology. European Review of Social Psychology, 13, 111-153.
84. Jost, J. T., & Hunyady, O. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 260-265.
85. Jost, J. T., & Kay, A. C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 498-509.
86. Jost, J. T., & Kay, A. C. (2010). Social justice: History, theory, and research. In S.T. Fiske, D. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th edition, Vol. 2, pp. 1122-1165). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
87. Jost, J. T., Kivetz, Y., Rubini, M., Guermandi, G., & Mosso, C. (2005). System-justifying functions of complementary regional and ethnic stereotypes: Cross-national evidence. Social Justice Research, 18, 305-333.
88. Jost, J. T., Ledgerwood, A., & Hardin, C. D. (2008). Shared reality, system justification, and the relational basis of ideological beliefs. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 171-186.
89. Jost, J. T., Liviatan, I., van der Toorn, J., Ledgerwood, A., Mandisodza, A., & Nosek, B. A. (in press). System justification: How do we know it's motivated? In A. C. Kay et al. (Eds.), The psychology of justice and legitimacy: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 11). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
90. Jost, J. T., & Major, B. (2001). Emerging perspectives on the psychology of legitimacy. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 3-30). New York: Cambridge University Press.
91. Jost, J. T., Napier, J. L., Thorisdottir, H., Gosling, S. D., Palfai, T. P., & Ostafin, B. (2007). Are needs to manage uncertainty and threat associated with political conservatism or ideological extremity? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 989-1007.
92. Jost, J. T., Pelham, B. W., & Carvallo, M. (2002). Non-conscious forms of system justification: Cognitive, affective, and behavioral preferences for higher status groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 586-602.
93. Jost, J. T., Pelham, B. W., Sheldon, O., & Sullivan, B. N. (2003). Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system: Evidence of enhanced system justification among the disadvantaged. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 13-36.
94. Jost, J. T., & Sidanius, J. (2004). Political psychology: An introduction. In J. T. Jost & J. Sidanius (Eds.), Political psychology: Key readings (pp. 1-17). New York: Psychology Press.
95. Jost, J. T., & Thompson, E. P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209-232.
96. Jost, J. T., & van der Toorn, J. (2011). System justification theory. In P.A.M. van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology. London: Sage.
97. Jost, J. T., Wakslak, C., & Tyler, T. R. (2008). System justification theory and the alleviation of emotional distress: Palliative effects of ideology in an arbitrary social hierarchy and in society. In K. Hegtvedt & J. Clay-Warner (Eds.), Justice: Advances in group processes (Vol. 25, pp. 181-211). Bingley, UK: JAI/Emerald.
98. Jost, L. J., & Jost, J. T. (2007). Why Marx left philosophy for social science. Theory and Psychology, 17, 297-322.
99. Kaiser, C. R., Dyrenforth, P. S., & Hagiwara, N. (2006). Why are attributions to discrimination interpersonally costly? A test of system- and group-justifying motivations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1523-1536.
100. Kay, A., Jimenez, M. C., & Jost, J. T. (2002). Sour grapes, sweet lemons, and the anticipatory rationalization of the status quo. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1300-1312.
101. Kay, A. C., & Jost, J. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of "poor but happy" and "poor but honest" stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823-837.
102. Kay, A. C., Jost, J. T., Mandisodza, A. N., Sherman, S. J., Petrocelli, J. V., & Johnson, A. L. (2007). Panglossian ideology in the service of system justification: How complementary stereotypes help us to rationalize inequality. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 39, pp. 305-358). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
103. Kay, A. C., Jost, J. T., & Young, S. (2005). Victim derogation and victim enhancement as alternate routes to system justification. Psychological Science, 16, 240-246.
104. Kay, A. C., & Zanna, M. (2009). A contextual analysis of the system justification motive and its societal consequences. In J. T. Jost, A. C. Kay, & H. Thorisdottir (Eds.), Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification. New York: Oxford University Press.
105. Keller, J. (2005). In genes we trust: The biological component of psychological essentialism and its relationship to mechanisms of motivated social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 686-702.
106. Kinder, D. R., & Sears, D. O. (1985). Public opinion and political action. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. II, 3rd ed., pp. 714-726). New York: Random House.
107. Kluegel, J. R., & Smith, E. R. (1986). Beliefs about inequality: Americans' views of what is and what ought to be. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
108. Kugler, M., Cooper, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2010). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality correspond to different psychological motives. Social Justice Research.
109. Lane, K. A., Mitchell, J. P., & Banaji, M. R. (2005). Me and my group: Cultural status can disrupt cognitive consistency. Social Cognition, 23, 353-386.
110. Lane, R. E. (2004). The fear of equality. American Political Science Review, 53, 35-51. (Original work published 1959) (Reproduced in Political psychology: Key readings, by J. T. Jost & J. Sidanius, Eds., New York: Psychology Press)
111. Lau, G. P., Kay, A. C., & Spencer, S. J. (2007). Loving those who justify inequality: The effects of system threat on attraction to women who embody benevolent sexist ideals. Psychological Science, 19, 20-21.
112. Leach, C. W., Spears, R., Branscombe, N. R., & Doosje, B. (2003). Malicious pleasure: Schadenfreude at the suffering of another group. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 932-943.
113. Ledgerwood, A., Mandisodza, A., Jost, J. T., & Pohl, M. (in press). Working for the system: Motivated defense of meritocratic beliefs. Social Cognition.
114. Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum.
115. Levin, S., & Sidanius, J. (1999). Social dominance and social identity in the United States and Israel: Ingroup favoritism or outgroup derogation? Political Psychology, 20, 99-126.
116. Levin, S., Sidanius, J., Rabinowitz, J. L., & Federico, C. (1998). Ethnic identity, legitimizing ideologies, and social status: A matter of ideological asymmetry. Political Psychology, 19, 373-404.
117. Lewin, K. (1947). Group decision and social change. In T. M. Newcomb & E. L. Harley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (pp. 330-344). New York: Holt.
118. Lewin, K. (1948). Self-hatred among Jews. In K. Lewin (Ed.), Resolving social conflicts: Selected papers on group dynamics. New York: Harper & Brothers. (Original work published 1941)
119. Leyens, J. P., & Demoulin, S. (2009). Hierarchy-based groups: Real inequalities and essential differences. In S. Otten, K. Sassenberg, & T. Kessler (Ed.), Intergroup relations: The role of motivation and emotion. New York: Psychology Press.
120. Lipset, S. M. (1981). Working-class authoritarianism. In S. M. Lipset (Ed.), Political man: The social bases of politics (pp. 87-126). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins. (Original work published 1960)
121. Livingston, R. W. (2002). The role of perceived negativity in the moderation of African Americans' implicit and explicit racial attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 405-413.
122. Lukács, G. (1971). History and class consciousness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
123. Mackie, D. M., & Hamilton, D. L. (Eds.). (1993). Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
124. MacKinnon, C. A. (1989). Towards a feminist theory of state. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
125. Major, B. (1994). From social inequality to personal entitlement: The role of social comparisons, legitimacy appraisals, and group memberships. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 293-355.
126. Major, B., Gramzow, R. H., McCoy, S. K., Levin, S., Schmader, T., & Sidanius, J. (2002). Perceiving personal discrimination: The role of group status and legitimizing ideology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 269-282.
127. Martin, J. (1986). The tolerance of injustice. In J. M. Olson, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Relative deprivation and social comparison: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 4, pp. 217-242). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
128. Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1970). The German ideology (C. J. Arthur, Ed.). New York: International Publishers. (Original work published 1846)
129. McGuire, W. J. (1983). A contextualist theory of knowledge: Its implications for innovation and reform in psychological research. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 1-47.
130. McGuire, W. J. (1989). A perspectivist approach to the strategic planning of programmatic scientific research. In B. Gholson, W. R. Shadish, Jr., R. A. Niemeyer, & A. C. Houts (Eds.), The psychology of science: Contributions to metascience (pp. 214-245). New York: Cambridge University Press.
131. McGuire, W. J. (1997). Creative hypothesis generating in psychology: Some useful heuristics. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 1-30.
132. Mendes, W. B., Blascovich, J., Hunter, S. B., Lickel, B. & Jost, J. T. (2007). Threatened by the unexpected: Physiological responses during social interactions with expectancy-violating partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 698-716.
133. Moore, B., Jr. (1978). Injustice: The social bases of obedience and revolt. White Plains, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
134. Mummendey, A., & Simon, B. (1989). Better or different? III: The impact of importance of comparison and relative in-group size upon intergroup discrimination. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 1-16.
135. Napier, J. L., & Jost, J. T. (2008a). The "anti-democratic personality" revisited: A cross-national investigation of working class authoritarianism. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 595-617.
136. Napier, J. L., & Jost, J. T. (2008b). Why are conservatives happier than liberals? Psychological Science, 19, 565-572.
137. Napier, J., Mandisodza, A., Andersen, S. M., & Jost, J. T. (2006). System justification in responding to the poor and displaced in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 6, 57-73.
138. Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration website. Group Dynamics, 6, 101-115.
139. Oakes, P. J., Turner, J. C., & Haslam, A. (1994). Stereotyping and social reality. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
140. O'Brien, L. T., & Crandall, C. S. (2005). Perceiving self-interest: Power, ideology, and maintenance of the status quo. Social Justice Research, 18, 1-24.
141. O'Brien, L. T., & Major, B. (2005). System justifying beliefs and psychological well-being: The roles of group status and identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1718-1729.
142. Overbeck, J., Jost, J. T., Mosso, C., & Flizik, A. (2004). Resistant vs. acquiescent responses to ingroup inferiority as a function of social dominance orientation in the USA and Italy. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 7, 35-54.
143. Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 598-609.
144. Pelham, B. W., & Hetts, J. J. (2001). Underworked and overpaid: Elevated entitlement in men's self-pay. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 93-103.
145. Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763.
146. Reicher, S. (1984). The St. Paul's riot: An explanation of the limits of crowd action in terms of a social identity model. European Journal of Social Psychology, 14, 1-21.
147. Reicher, S. (2004). The context of social identity: Dominance, resistance, and change. Political Psychology, 25, 921-945.
148. Reicher, S., Hopkins, N., & Condor, S. (1997). Stereotype construction as a strategy of influence. In R. Spears, P. J. Oakes, N. Ellemers, & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 94-118). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
149. Robinson, W. P. (Ed.). (1996). Social groups and identities: Developing the legacy of Henri Tajfel. Oxford, UK: Butterworth Heinemann.
150. Rubin, M., & Hewstone, M. (1998). Social identity theory's self-esteem hypothesis: A review and some suggestions for clarification. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 40-62.
151. Rubin, M., & Hewstone, M. (2004). Social identity, system justification, and social dominance: Commentary on Reicher, Jost et al., and Sidanius et al. Political Psychology, 25, 823-844.
152. Rudman, L. A., Feinberg, J., & Fairchild, K. (2002). Minority members' implicit attitudes: Automatic ingroup bias as a function of group status. Social Cognition, 20, 294-320.
153. Runciman, W. (1969). False consciousness. In Sociology in its place (pp. 212-223). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
154. Sachdev, I., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1984). Minimal majorities and minorities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 14, 35-52.
155. Sachdev, I., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1987). Status differentials and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 277-294.
156. Sachdev, I., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1991). Power and status differentials in minority and majority group relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 1-24.
157. Schimel, J., Simon, L., Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., Waxmonsky, J., & Arndt, J. (1999). Stereotypes and terror management: Evidence that mortality salience enhances stereotypic thinking and preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 905-926.
158. Scott, J. (1990). Domination and the arts of resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University.
159. Sidanius, J. (1993). The psychology of group conflict and the dynamics of oppression: A social dominance perspective. In S. Iyengar & W. J. McGuire (Eds.), Explorations in political psychology (pp. 183-219). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
160. Sidanius, J., Feshbach, S., Levin, S., & Pratto, F. (1997). The interface between ethnic and national attachment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61, 103-133.
161. Sidanius, J., Levin, S., Federico, M., & Pratto, F. (2001). Legitimizing ideologies: The social dominance approach. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 307-331). New York: Cambridge University Press.
162. Sidanius, J., Levin, S., & Pratto, F. (1996). Consensual social dominance orientation and its correlates within the hierarchical structure of American society. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 20, 385-408.
163. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1993). The inevitability of oppression and the dynamics of social dominance. In P. Sniderman, P. E. Tetlock, & E. G. Carmines (Eds.), Prejudice, politics, and the American dilemma (pp. 173-211). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
164. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
165. Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., & Bobo, L. (1996). Racism, conservatism, affirmative action, and intellectual sophistication: A matter of principled conservatism or group dominance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 476-490.
166. Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., & Mitchell, M. (1994). In-group identification, social dominance orientation, and differential intergroup social allocation. Journal of Social Psychology, 134, 151-167.
167. Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., & Rabinowitz, J. L. (1994). Gender, ethnic status, and ideological asymmetry: A social dominance interpretation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 25, 194-216.
168. Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., van Laar, C., & Levin, S. (2004). Social dominance theory: Its agenda and method. Political Psychology, 25, 845-880.
169. Simon, B., & Klandermans, B. (2001). Politicized collective identity: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 56, 319-331.
170. Sinclair, S., Sidanius, J., & Levin, S. (1998). The interface between ethnic and social system attachment: The differential effects of hierarchy-enhancing and hierarchy-attenuating environments. Journal of Social Issues, 54, 741-757.
171. Sniderman, P., & Piazza, T. (1993). The scar of race. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
172. Spears, R., Doosje, B., & Ellemers, N. (1997). Self-stereotyping in the face of threats to group status and distinctiveness: The role of group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 538-553.
173. Spears, R., Jetten, J., & Doosje, B. (2001). The (il)legitimacy of ingroup bias: From social reality to social resistance. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 332-362). New York: Cambridge University Press.
174. Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1989). The social context of stereotyping and differentiation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 101-121.
175. Spears, R., Oakes, P. J., Ellemers, N., & Haslam, S. A. (Eds.). (1997). The social psychology of stereotyping and group life. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
176. Stacey, B. G., & Green, R. T. (1971). Working-class conservatism: A review and an empirical study. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 10, 10-26.
177. Stangor, C., & Jost, J. T. (1997). Individual, group, and system levels of analysis and their relevance for stereotyping and intergroup relations. In R. Spears, P. Oakes, N. Ellemers, & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 336-358). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
178. Tajfel, H. (Ed.). (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.
179. Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
180. Tajfel, H. (1982). Psychological concepts of equity: The present and the future. In P. Fraisse (Ed.), Psychologie de demain. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
181. Tajfel, H. (1984). Intergroup relations, social myths and social justice in social psychology. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), The social dimension: European developments in social psychology (pp. 695-715). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
182. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), The psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall. (Original work published 1979)
183. Turner, J. C. (1975). Social comparison and social identity: Some prospects for intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 5-34.
184. Turner, J. C. (1982). Toward a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup behavior (pp. 15-40). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
185. Turner, J. C. (1999). Some current issues in research on social identity and self-categorization theories. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, and content (pp. 6-34). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
186. Turner, J.C. (2006). Tyranny, freedom and social structure: Escaping our theoretical prisons. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 41-46.
187. Turner, J. C., & Brown, R. (1978). Social status, cognitive alternatives, and intergroup relations. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups (pp. 201-234). London: Academic Press.
188. Turner, J. C., & Giles, H. (Eds.). (1981). Intergroup behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
189. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
190. Tyler, T. R., & McGraw, K. M. (1986). Ideology and the interpretation of personal experience: Procedural justice and political quiescence. Journal of Social Issues, 42, 115-128.
191. Uhlmann, E., Dasgupta, N., Elgueta, A., Greenwald, A. G., & Swanson, J. E. (2002). Subgroup prejudice based on skin color among Hispanics in the United States and Latin America. Social Cognition, 20, 198-225.
192. Ullrich, J., & Cohrs, J. C. (2007). Terrorism salience increases system justification: Experimental evidence. Social Justice Research, 20, 117-139.
193. Van der Toorn, J., Tyler, T. R., & Jost, J. T. (2010). Justice or justification? The effect of outcome dependence on perceived legitimacy of authority. Manuscript submitted for publication.
194. Van Knippenberg, A. (1984). Intergroup differences in group perceptions. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), The social dimension (Vol. 2, pp. 560-578). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
195. Wakslak, C., Jost, J. T., Tyler, T. R., & Chen, E. (2007). Moral outrage mediates the dampening effect of system justification on support for redistributive social policies. Psychological Science, 18, 267-274.
196. Whitley, B. E., Jr. (1999). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 126-134.
197. Wicklund, R., & Brehm, J. (1976). Perspectives on cognitive dissonance. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
198. Wright, S. C. (2001). Restricted intergroup boundaries: Tokenism, ambiguity, and the tolerance of injustice. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 223-254). New York: Cambridge University Press.
199. Wright, S. C., Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 994-1003.
200. Yoshimura, K., & Hardin, C. D. (2009). Cognitive salience of subjugation and the ideological justification of U.S. geopolitical dominance in Japan. Social Justice Research, 22, 298-311.
201. Yzerbyt, V., & Demoulin, S. (2010). Intergroup relations. In S. T. Fiske, D. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th edition, Vol. 2, pp. 1024-1083). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
202. Yzerbyt, V. Y., Rocher, S. J., & Schadron, G. (1997). Stereotypes as explanations: A subjective essentialistic view of group perception. In R. Spears, P. J. Oakes, N. Ellemers, & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 208-235). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
203. Zinn, H. (1968). Disobedience and democracy: Nine fallacies on law and order. New York: Vintage.