Analysis of multiple exposures in the case-crossover design via sparse conditional likelihood

Statistics in Medicine

Volumn 31, Issue 21, 2012, Pages 2290-2302

  Avalos, Marta ^a,b   Grandvalet, Yves ^c   Adroher, Nuria Duran ^b,d   Orriols, Ludivine ^a,b   Lagarde, Emmanuel ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE BORDEAUX   (France)

^b INSERM   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE TECHNOLOGIE DE COMPIÈGNE   (France)

^d AGROCAMPUS OUEST   (France)

Author keywords

Lasso; Model selection; Penalised conditional likelihood; Pharmacoepidemiology; Regularisation; Road traffic crash

Indexed keywords

DRUG;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; DRUG EXPOSURE; DRUG USE; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PRESCRIPTION; PROBABILITY; PROCESS MODEL; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; STRATEGIC PLANNING; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT; TRAFFIC SAFETY;

ACCIDENTS, TRAFFIC; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; HUMANS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MODELS, STATISTICAL;

EID: 84865623364     PISSN: 02776715     EISSN: 10970258     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sim.5344     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Maclure M. The case-crossover design: a method for studying transient effects on the risk of acute event. American journal of epidemiology 1991; 133:144-153, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2010324.1964941.
2. Maclure M, Mittleman M. Should we use a case-crossover design? Annual review of public health 2000; 21:193-221.
3. Breslow NE, Day NE. Statistical Methods in Cancer Research. Volume 1: The Analysis of Case-Control Studies, IARC Scientific Publications: Lyon, 1980.
4. Lefrancois R, D'Amours M. Exposure and risk factors among elderly drivers: a case-Control study. Accident Analysis and Prevention 1997; 29:267-275.
5. Tibshirani R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 1996; 58:267-288.
6. 1 penalized estimation in the Cox proportional hazards model. Biometrical Journal 2010; 52:70-84, DOI: 10.1002/bimj.200900028.
7. Orriols L, Delorme B, Gadegbeku B, Tricotel A, Contrand B, Laumon B, Salmi L, Lagarde E. Prescription medicines and the risk of road traffic crashes: a french registry-based study. PLoS medicine 2010; 7, DOI: 10.1371/ journal.pmed.1000366.
8. Swartz MD, Kimmel M, Mueller P, Amos CI. Stochastic search gene suggestion: a Bayesian hierarchical model for gene mapping. Biometrics 2006; 62:495-503.
9. Breiman L. Heuristics of instability and stabilization in model selection. Annals of Statistics 1996; 24:2350-2383.
10. Austin PC. Using the bootstrap to improve estimation and confidence intervals for regression coefficients selected using backwards variable elimination. Statistics in Medicine 2008; 27:3286-3300, DOI: 10.1002/sim.3104.
11. Greenland S. Invited commentary: variable selection versus shrinkage in the control of multiple confounders. American Journal of Epidemiology 2008; 167:523-529.
12. Wiegand RE. Performance of using multiple stepwise algorithms for variable selection. Statistics in Medicine 2010; 29:1647-1659, DOI: 10.1002/sim.3943.
13. Hurvich CM, Tsai CL. The impact of model selection on inference in linear regression. The American Statistician 1990; 44:214-217.
14. Rao CR, Wu Y. On model selection, In Model Selection, Lahiri P (ed), Lecture Notes - Monograph Series, Institute of Mathematical Statistics: Beachwood, OH, 2001.
15. Bickel P, Ritov Y, Tsybakov A. Simultaneous analysis of lasso and Dantzig selector. Annals of Statistics 2009; 37:1705-1732.
16. 2 penalization. Electronic journal of statistics 2008; 2:1153-1194, DOI: 10.1214/08-EJS287.
17. Tibshirani R. The lasso method for variable selection in the Cox model. Statistics in Medicine 1997; 16:385-395, DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19970228)16:4h385::AID-SIM380i3.0.CO;2-3.
18. Avalos M, Grandvalet Y, Ambroise C. Parsimonious additive models. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 2007; 51:2851-2870, DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2006.10.007.
19. Zou H, Hastie T. Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 2005; 67:301-320.
20. Zou H. The adaptive lasso and its oracle properties. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2006; 101:1418-1429.
21. Yuan M, Lin Y. Model selection and estimation in regression with grouped variables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 2006; 68:49-67.
22. Wang S, Nan B, Rosset S, Zhu J. Random lasso. The Annals of Applied Statistics 2011; 5(1):468-485.
23. Bunea F, Barbu A. Dimension reduction and variable selection in case control studies via regularized likelihood optimization. Electronic Journal of Statististics 2009; 3:1257-1287, DOI: 10.1214/09-EJS537.
24. Efron B, Hastie T, Johnstone I, Tibshirani R. Least angle regression. Annals of statistics 2004; 32:407-499.
25. Zhao P, Yu B. On model selection consistency of lasso. Journal of Machine Learning Research 2006; 7:2541-2563.
26. Meinshausen N, Yu B. Lasso-type recovery of sparse representations for high-dimensional data. Annals of Statistics 2009; 37:246-270.
27. 1-regularization path algorithm for generalized linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 2007; 69:659-677.
28. Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R. Regularized paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. Journal of Statistical Software 2010; 33:1-22.
29. Bach F. Bolasso: model consistent lasso estimation through the bootstrap, In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2008), McCallum A, Roweis S, Cohen W (eds), Helsinki, Finland, 2008.
30. Meinshausen N, Bühlmann P. Stability selection. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 2010; 72:417-473.
31. Chatterjee A, Lahiri SN. Asymptotic properties of the residual bootstrap for lasso estimators. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 2010; 138:4497-4509.
32. Gui J, Li H. Penalized Cox regression analysis in the high-dimensional and low-sample size settings, with applications to microarray gene expression data. Bioinformatics 2005; 21:3001-3008.
33. Segal M. Microarray gene expression data with linked survival phenotypes: diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma revisited. Biostatistics 2006; 7:268-285.
34. VanHouwelingen HC, Bruinsma T, Hart AAM, van't Veer LJ, Wessels LFA. Cross-validated Cox regression on microarray gene expression data. Statistics in Medicine 2006; 25:3201-3216, DOI: 10.1002/sim.2353.
35. Leng C, Lin Y, Wahba G. A note on the lasso and related procedures in model selection. Statistica Sinica 2006; 16:1273-1284.
36. Zou H, Hastie T, Tibshirani R. On the degrees of freedom of the lasso. Annals of Statistics 2007; 35:2173-2192.
37. Hebert C, Delaney J, Hemmelgarn B, Lévesque L, Suissa S. Benzodiazepines and elderly drivers: a comparison of pharmacoepidemiological study designs. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety 2007; 16:845-849.
38. Leproust S, Lagarde E, Suissa S, Salmi L. Association between road vehicle collisions and recent medical contact in older drivers: a case-crossover study. Injury Prevention 2007; 13:382-387.
39. Leisch F, Weingessel A, Hornik K. 1998.On the generation of correlated artificial binary data, Technical Report Technical Report, Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration, Austria. Working paper No. 13.
40. McGwin G, Sims RV, Pulley LV, Roseman JM. Relations among chronic medical conditions, medications, and automobile crashes in the elderly: a population-based case-Control study. American Journal of Epidemiology 2000; 152:424-431.
41. Delaney J, Opatrny L, Suissa S. Warfarin use and the risk of motor vehicle crash in older drivers. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2006; 61:229-232, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2005.02548.x.
42. Engeland A, Skurtveit S, Morland J. Risk of road traffic accidents associated with the prescription of drugs: a registry-based cohort study. Annals of Epidemiology 2007; 17:597-602.
43. Walter S, Tiemeier H. Variable selection: current practice in epidemiological studies. European Journal of Epidemiology 2009; 24:733-736, DOI: 10.1007/s10654-009-9411-2.
44. Pötscher B, Schneider U. Confidence sets based on penalized maximum likelihood estimators in Gaussian regression. Electronic Journal of Statistics 2010; 4:334-360, DOI: 10.1214/09-EJS523.
45. Sperrin M, Jaki T. Direct effects testing: a two-stage procedure to test for effect size and variable importance for correlated binary predictors and a binary response. Statistics in Medicine 2010; 29:2544-2556, DOI: 10.1002/sim.4014.
46. Knight K, Fu W. Asymptotics for lasso-type estimators. The Annals of Statistics 2000; 28:1356-1378.