Transposed-letter priming effect in Hebrew in the same-different task

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 65, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 1296-1305

  Kinoshita, Sachiko ^a   Norris, Dennis ^b   Siegelman, Noam ^c  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b MRC COGNITION AND BRAIN SCIENCES UNIT   (United Kingdom)

^c HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

Arabic; Hebrew; Letter position coding; Morphology; Orthography; Transposed letter priming

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; MALE; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; READING; RECOGNITION; SEMANTICS; VISION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; READING; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SEMANTICS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; VOCABULARY;

EID: 84864684256     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2012.655749     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Boudelaa, S. and Marslen-Wilson, W. D. 2005. Discontinuous morphology in time: Incremental masked priming in Arabic. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20: 207-260.
2. Duñabeitia, J. A., Kinoshita, S., Carreiras, M. and Norris, D. 2010. Is morph-orthographic decomposition purely orthographic? Evidence from masked priming in the same-different task. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26: 509-529.
3. Duñabeitia, J. A., Perea, M. and Carreiras, M. 2007. Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a morpheme level? Evidence for ortho-morphological decomposition. Cognition, 105: 691-703.
4. Forster, K. I. and Forster, J. C. 2003. DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 35: 116-124.
5. Friedmann, N. and Gvion, A. 2001. Letter position dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18: 673-696.
6. Friedmann, N. and Haddad-Hanna, M. in press. Letter position dyslexia in Arabic: From form to position. Behavioural Neurology,
7. Frost, R. 2009. "Reading in Hebrew vs. reading in English: Is there a qualitative difference?". In How children learn to read: Current issues and new directions in the integration of cognition, neurobiology, and genetics of reading and dyslexia research and practice, Edited by: Pugh, K. and McCradle, P. 235-254. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
8. Gomez, P., Ratcliff, R. and Perea, M. 2008. The overlap model: A model of letter position coding. Psychological Review, 115: 577-600.
9. Kinoshita, S. and Norris, D. 2009. Transposed-letter priming of orthographic representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 35: 1-18.
10. Longtin, C. M. and Meunier, F. 2005. Morphological decomposition in early visual word processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 53: 26-51.
11. Norris, D. and Kinoshita, S. 2008. Perception as evidence accumulation and Bayesian inference: Insights from masked priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137: 433-455.
12. Norris, D., Kinoshita, S. and van Casteren, M. 2010. A stimulus sampling theory of letter identity and order. Journal of Memory and Language, 62: 254-271.
13. Perea, M., Abu Mallouh, R. and Carreiras, M. 2010. The search for an input coding scheme: Transposed letter priming in Arabic. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17: 375-380.
14. Perea, M., Abu Mallouh, R., García-Orza, J. and Carreiras, M. 2010. Masked priming effects are modulated by expertise in the script. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64: 902-919.
15. Perea, M. and Lupker, S. J. 2003. "Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked form priming". In Masked priming: The state of the art, Edited by: Kinoshita, S. and Lupker, S. J. 97-120. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
16. Rastle, K. and Davis, M. H. 2003. "Reading morphologically complex words: Some thoughts from masked priming". In Masked priming: The state of the art, Edited by: Kinoshita, S. and Lupker, S. J. 279-305. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
17. Rastle, K., Davis, M. H. and New, B. 2004. The broth in my brother's brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11: 1090-1098.
18. Rueckl, J. G. and Rimzhim, A. 2011. On the interaction of letter transpositions and morpheme boundaries. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26: 482-508.
19. Schoonbaert, S. and Grainger, J. 2004. Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19: 333-367.
20. Seidenberg, M. S. 1987. "Sublexical structures in visual word recognition: Access units or orthographic redundancy?". In Attention and Performance XII: The psychology of reading, Edited by: Coltheart, M. 245-263. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21. Velan, H. and Frost, R. 2007. Cambridge University versus Hebrew University: The impact of letter transposition on reading English and Hebrew. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14: 913-918.
22. Velan, H. and Frost, R. 2009. Letter-transposition effects are not universal: The impact of transposing letters in Hebrew. Journal of Memory and Language, 61: 285-302.
23. Velan, H. and Frost, R. 2011. Words with and without internal structure: What determines the nature of orthographic and morphological processing?. Cognition, 118: 141-156.