Elementary school students' perceptions of the new science and technology curriculum by gender

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 116-126

  Gömleksiz, Mehmet Nuri ^a  

^a FIRAT UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Elementary schools; Gender; Science curriculum; Science education; Science teaching; Technology education

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864411732     PISSN: 11763647     EISSN: 14364522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Açi{dotless}kgöz, K. Ü., & Güvenç, H. (2007). The effects of cooperative learning and concept mapping on learning strategy use. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 7(1), 95-127.
2. Babadogan, C., & Olkun, S. (2006). Program development models and reform in Turkish primary school mathematics curriculum. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning. Retrieved December 17, 2006, from http://www.cimt.plymouth.ac.uk/journal/default.htm
3. Baker, D. R. (1987). Sex differences in classroom interactions in secondary science. The Journal of Classroom Interaction, 22(2), 6-12.
4. Baker, D. R. (1990, April). Gender differences in science: Where they start and where they go (part II). Paper presented at the Meeting of the National Association for Science Teaching and Research, Atlanta, GA.
5. Baker, D. R. (1998). Equity issues in science education. In B. Fraser & K. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of research in science education (pp. 869-896). Amsterdam: Kluwer.
6. Bame, A. E., Dugger, W. E., de Vries, M., & McBee, J. (1993). Pupils' attitudes toward technology, PATT-USA. Journal of Technology Studies, 19(1), 40-48.
7. Basar, E. (2004). Milli egitim bakanlari{dotless}ni{dotless}n egitim faaliyetleri (1920-1960). (Educational activities of ministries of national education). Istanbul, Turkey: Devlet Kitaplari Mudurlugu.
8. Becker, B. J. (1989). Gender and science achievement: A reanalysis of studies from two metaanalyses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(2), 141-169.
9. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1996). Rethinking learning. In D. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), Handbook of education and human development: New models of learning, teaching and schooling (485-513). Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
10. Bilgin, İ., & Geban, Ü. (2004). Investigating the effects of cooperative learning strategy and gender on pre-service elementary teacher students' attitude toward science and achievement of science teaching class I. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 26, 9-18.
11. Boser, R. A., Palmer, J. D., & Daugherty, M. K. (1998). Students' attitudes toward technology in selected technology education programs. Journal of Technology Education, 10(1), 4-26.
12. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
13. Burkam, D. T., Lee, V. T., & Smerdon, B.A. (1997). Gender and science learning early in high school: Subject matter and laboratory experiences. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 297-331.
14. Cabrera, A.F., Crissman, J.L., Bernal, E.M., Nora, A.P.T., & Pascarella, E.T. (2002). Collaborative learning: Its impact on college students' development and diversity. Journal of College Student Development, 43(2), 20-34.
15. Catsambis, S. (1995). Gender, race, ethnicity, and science education in the middle grades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(3), 243-257.
16. Collis, B., & Williams, R. (1987). Cross-cultural comparison of gender differences in adolescents' attitudes toward computers and selected school subjects. The Journal of Educational Research, 81(1), 17-27.
17. Dai, D. Y. (2000). To be or not to be (challenged), That is the question: Task and ego orientations among high-ability, highachieving adolescents. The Journal of Experimental Education, 68(4), 311-330.
18. Dawson, C. (2000). Upper primary boys' and girls' interests in science: Have they changed since 1980? International Journal of Science Education, 22(6), 557-570.
19. Ding, N., & Harskamp, E. (2006). How partner gender influences female students' problem solving in physics education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(5-6), 331-343.
20. Eccles, J. (1989). Bringing young women to math and science. In M. Crawford & M. Gentry (Eds.), Gender and thought: Psychological perspectives (pp. 36 -58). New York: Springer-Verlag.
21. Ellis, R. A. (2004). University student approaches to learning science through writing. International Journal of Science Education, 26(15), 1835-1853.
22. Engstrom, J., & Noonan, R. (1990). Science achievement and attitudes in Swedish schools. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 16, 443-456.
23. Erickson, G., & Erickson, L. (1984). Females and science achievement: Evidence, explanations and implications. Science Education, 68(2), 63-89.
24. Erickson, G., & Farkas, S. (1991). Prior experience and gender differences in science achievement. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 37, 225-239.
25. Felder, R. M. (1993). Reaching the second tier: Learning and teaching styles in college science education. Journal of College Science Teaching, 23(5), 286-290.
26. Felder, R. M., & Spurlin, J. (2005). Applications, reliability and validity of the index of learning styles. International Journal of Engineering Education, 21(1), 103-112.
27. Ferreira, M. M. (2003). Gender issues related to graduate student attrition in two science departments. International Journal of Science Education, 25(8), 969-989.
28. Francis, L. J., & Greer, J. E. (1999). Attitude toward science among secondary school pupils in Northern Ireland: Relationship with sex, age and religion. Research in Science and Technological Education, 17(1), 67-74.
29. Fraser, B. J. (1998). Classroom environment instruments: Development, validity and applications. Learning Environment Research, 1(1), 7-33.
30. Fraser, B. J., Williamson, J. C., & Tobin, K. (1987). Use of classroom and school climate scales in evaluating alternative high schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3, 219-231.
31. Freedman, M. P. (1997). Relationships among laboratory instruction, attitudes toward science, and achievement in science knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(4), 343-357.
32. Gozutok, F. D. (2003). Türkiye'de program geliştirme çali{dotless}şmalari{dotless} (Curriculum development studies in Turkey). Milli Egitim, 160.
33. Green, M. F. (Ed.). (1989). Minorities on campus: A handbook for enriching diversity, Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
34. Greenfield, T. A. (1996). Gender, ethnicity, science achievement, and attitudes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(8), 901-933.
35. Greenfield, T. A. (1997). Gender-and grade-level differences in science interest and participation. Science Education, 81(3), 259- 276.
36. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis with readings. New York: Prentice-Hall.
37. Hofstein, A., Scherz, Z., & Yager, R. E. (1986). What students say about science teaching, science teachers and science classes in Israel and the U.S. Science Education, 70, 21-30.
38. James, R. K., & Smith, S. (1985). Alienation of students from science in grades 4-12. Science Education, 69(1), 39-45.
39. Jewett, T. (1996). " And they is us" : Gender issues in the instruction of science. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 402202).
40. Johnson, S. (1987). Gender differences in science: Parallels in interest, experience and performance. International Journal of Science Education, 9(4), 467-481.
41. Johnson, S., & Murphy, P. (1984). The underachievement of girls in physics: Toward explanations. European Journal of Science Education, 4(4), 399-409.
42. Jones, M. G., Howe, A., & Rua, M. J. (2000). Gender differences in students' experiences, interests, and attitudes toward science and scientists. Science Education, 84(2), 180-192.
43. Jovanovic, J., & King, S.S. (1998). Boys and girls in the performance-based science classroom: Who's doing the performing? American Educational Research Journal, 35, 477-496.
44. Kahle, J. B. (1983). The disadvantaged majority: Science education for women. Association for the Education of Teachers in Science, (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 242 561).
45. Kahle, J. B., & Lakes, M. K. (1983). The myth of equality in science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 131-140.
46. Kahle, J.B., & Meece, J. (1994). Research on gender issues in the classroom. In D. Gable (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching (pp.542-557). New York: MacMillan Publishing Company.
47. Kemp, R. L. (2005). The impact of gender-specific and mixed-gender cooperative groups on female gifted students using computer-assisted, problem-based learning. Action Research Exchange, 4(1). Retrieved November 12, 2010, from http://teach.valdosta.edu/are/vol4no1/pdf/KempRArticle.pdf
48. Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Bertram, B. M. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook II affective domain. New York: David McKay Company, Inc.
49. Kurth, K. (1987). Factors which influence a female's decision to remain in science (Exit Project S 591). Indiana University, South Bend, IN. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 288 739).
50. Labudde, P., Herzog, W., Neuenschwander, M. P., Violi, E., & Gerber, C. (2000). Girls and physics: Teaching and learning strategies tested by classroom interventions in grade 11. International Journal of Science Education, 22(2), 143-157.
51. Lawrenz, F. (1987). Gender effects for student perception of the classroom psychosocial environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(8), 689-697.
52. Leder, G. C. (1989). Mathematics learning and socialisation processes. In L. Burton (Ed.), Girls into maths can go, (pp. 77-89). London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
53. Lee, V. E., & Burkam, D. T. (1996). Gender differences in middle grade science achievement: Subject domain, ability level, and course emphasis. Science Education, 80(6), 613-650.
54. Linn, M., & Hyde, J. (1989). Gender mathematics and science. Educational Researcher, 18(8), 17-27.
55. Lundeberg, M., Fox, P. & Puncochar, J. (1994). Highly confidant but wrong: Gender differences and similarities in confidence judgements. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 114-121.
56. Lyons, J. B. (2001). Do school facilities really affect a child's education? Retrieved December 15, 2006, from http://www.cefpi.org/pdf/issue14.pdf
57. Massachusetts Department of Education (2006). Massachusetts Science and Technology/Engineering Curriculum Framework. Retrieved December 18, 2006, from http://www.doe.mass.edu/frameworks/scitech/1006.pdf
58. Meece, J. L., & Holt, K. (1993). A pattern analysis of students' achievement goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 582-590.
59. Meyer, K. (1998). Reflections on being female in school science: Toward a praxis of teaching science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(4), 463-471.
60. Meyer, M., & Koehler, M. S. (1990). Internal influences on gender differences in mathematics. In E. Fennema & G. Leder (Eds.), Mathematics and gender (pp. 60-95). New York: Teachers College Press.
61. Norman, C. (1988). Math education: A mixed picture. Science, 241(4864), 408-409.
62. Ogunjuyigbe, P. O., Ojofeitimi, E. O., & Akinlo, A. (2006). Science education in Nigeria: An examination of people's perceptions about female participation in science, mathematics and technology. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(3-4), 277- 284.
63. Otto, P. B. (1991). One science. One sex? School Science and Mathematics, 91(8), 367-372.
64. Owens, L., & Straton, R. (1980). The development of a cooperative, competitive, and individualized learning preference scale for students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 50, 147-63.
65. Panagiotopoulou, G., Christoulas, K., Papanckolaou, A., & Mandroukas, K. (2004). Classroom furniture dimensions and anthropometric measures in primary school. Applied Ergonomics, 35(2), 121-128.
66. Piburn, M., & Baker, D. (1989). Sex differences in formal reasoning ability: Task and interviewer effects. Science Education, 73, 101-113.
67. Popham, W. (1994). Educational assessment's lurking lacuna: The measure of affect. Education and Urban Society, 26 (4), 404- 416.
68. Prokop, P., Tuncer, G., & Chuda, J. (2007). Slovakian students' attitudes toward biology. Euroasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(4), 287-295.
69. Raat, J. H., & de Vries, M. (1985). What do 13-year old students think about technology? The conception of and the attitude towards technology of 13-year old girls and boys. Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 262-998).
70. Reece, I., & Walker, S. (1997). Teaching, training and learning: A practical guide (3rd ed.). Sunderland, England: Business Education Publishers.
71. Sax, L. J. (1995). Predicting gender and major-field differences in mathematical self-concept during college. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 1, 291-307.
72. Schibeci, R. A. (1984). Attitudes to science: An update. Studies in Science Education, 11, 26-59.
73. Schibeci, R. A., Rideng, I. M., & Fraser, B. J. (1987). Effects of classroom environment on science attitudes: A cross-cultural replication in Indonesia, International Journal of Science Education, 9, 169-186.
74. Schroeder, C. M., Scott, T. P., Tolson, H., Huang, T. Y., & Lee, Y. H. (2007). A metaanalysis of national research: Effects of teaching strategies on student achievement in science in the United States. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(10), 1436-1460.
75. Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Colorado: Westview Press.
76. Shwalb, D. W., Shwalb, B. J., & Nakazawa, J. (1995). Competitive and cooperative attitudes: A longitudinal survey of Japanese adolescents. Journal of Early Adolescence, 15(1), 145-168.
77. Silverman, S., & Pritchard, A. (1993). Guidance, gender equity and technology education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 362-651).
78. Simpson, R.D., & Oliver, J.S. (1985). Attitude toward science and achievement motivation profiles of male and female science students in grade six through ten. Science Education, 69, 511-526.
79. Spall, K., Barrett, S., Stanistreet, M, Dickson, D., & Boyles, E. (2003). Undergraduates views' about biology and physics. Research in Science and Technological Education, 21(2), 193-208
80. Speering, W., & Rennie, L. (1996). Students' perceptions about science: the impact of transition from primary to secondary school. Research in Science Education, 26(3), 283-298.
81. Spiro, R, J., Feltovich, P., Jacobsen, M., & Coulson, R. L. (1991). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. Educational Technology, 31(5), 24-33.
82. Stake, J.E., & Mares, K.R. (2001). Science enrichment programs for gifted high school girls and boys: Predictors of program impact on science confidence and motivation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(10), 1065-1088.
83. Stronge, J. H. (2002). Qualities of effective teachers. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.
84. Talton, E. L., & Simpson, R. D. (1987). Relationships of attitude toward classroom environment with attitude toward and achievement in science among tenth-grade biology students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(6), 507-525.
85. Tobin, K., & Garnett, P. (1987). Gender related differences in science activities. Science Education, 71(1), 91-103.
86. Trumper, R. (2006). Factors affecting junior high school students' interest in physics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(1), 47-58.
87. Turkmen, H. (2006). Exploring Turkish science education faculties' understanding of educational technology and use. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 2(2), 69-81.
88. Udo, M. K., Ramsey, G. P., & Mallow, J. V. (2005). Science anxiety and gender in students taking general education science courses. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(4), 435-446.
89. Waxman, H. C., & Huang, S. L. (1998). Classroom learning environments in urban elementary middle and high schools. Learning Environments Research, 1(1), 95-113.
90. Weinburgh, M. (1995). Gender differences in student attitudes toward science: A metaanalysis of the literature from 1970 to 1991. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 387-398.
91. Yager, R. E., & Yager, S. O. (1985). Changes in perceptions of science for third, seventh, and eleventh grade students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(4), 347-358.
92. Yanowitz, K. L., & Vanderpool, S. S. (2004). Assessing girls' reactions to science workshops. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(3), 353-359.
93. Yi{dotless}lmaz-Soylu, M., & Akkoyunlu, B. (2009). The effect of learning styles on achievement in different learning environments. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8(4), 43-50.