Quantitative Live Cell Imaging Reveals a Gradual Shift between DNA Repair Mechanisms and a Maximal Use of HR in Mid S Phase

Molecular Cell

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 320-329

  Karanam, Ketki ^a   Kafri, Ran ^a   Loewer, Alexander ^a,b   Lahav, Galit ^a  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b MAX DELBRÜCK CENTER FOR MOLECULAR MEDICINE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

53BP1 PROTEIN; BINDING PROTEIN; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; DNA; FLUORESCENT DYE; RAD52 PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE; CELL CYCLE PHASE; CELL CYCLE PROGRESSION; CELL CYCLE S PHASE; CHROMATID; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA END JOINING REPAIR; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; FLUORESCENCE IMAGING; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MICROSCOPY; MOLECULAR IMAGING; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ALGORITHMS; CELL CYCLE; CELL LINE, TUMOR; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; FLUORESCENT DYES; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING PEPTIDES AND PROTEINS; KINETICS; RAD52 DNA REPAIR AND RECOMBINATION PROTEIN; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SISTER CHROMATID EXCHANGE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84864321774     PISSN: 10972765     EISSN: 10974164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.05.052     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Anderson L., Henderson C., Adachi Y. Phosphorylation and rapid relocalization of 53BP1 to nuclear foci upon DNA damage. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2001, 21:1719-1729.
2. Aylon Y., Liefshitz B., Kupiec M. The CDK regulates repair of double-strand breaks by homologous recombination during the cell cycle. EMBO J. 2004, 23:4868-4875.
3. Bekker-Jensen S., Lukas C., Melander F., Bartek J., Lukas J. Dynamic assembly and sustained retention of 53BP1 at the sites of DNA damage are controlled by Mdc1/NFBD1. J. Cell Biol. 2005, 170:201-211.
4. Bekker-Jensen S., Lukas C., Kitagawa R., Melander F., Kastan M.B., Bartek J., Lukas J. Spatial organization of the mammalian genome surveillance machinery in response to DNA strand breaks. J. Cell Biol. 2006, 173:195-206.
5. Beucher A., Birraux J., Tchouandong L., Barton O., Shibata A., Conrad S., Goodarzi A.A., Krempler A., Jeggo P.A., Löbrich M. ATM and Artemis promote homologous recombination of radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks in G2. EMBO J. 2009, 28:3413-3427.
6. Dean P.N., Jett J.H. Mathematical analysis of DNA distributions derived from flow microfluorometry. J. Cell Biol. 1974, 60:523-527.
7. Deckbar D., Stiff T., Koch B., Reis C., Löbrich M., Jeggo P.A. The limitations of the G1-S checkpoint. Cancer Res. 2010, 70:4412-4421.
8. Essers J., Houtsmuller A.B., van Veelen L., Paulusma C., Nigg A.L., Pastink A., Vermeulen W., Hoeijmakers J.H., Kanaar R. Nuclear dynamics of RAD52 group homologous recombination proteins in response to DNA damage. EMBO J. 2002, 21:2030-2037.
9. Feng Z., Scott S.P., Bussen W., Sharma G.G., Guo G., Pandita T.K., Powell S.N. Rad52 inactivation is synthetically lethal with BRCA2 deficiency. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108:686-691.
10. Gu B., Chen P.L. Expression of PCNA-binding domain of CtIP, a motif required for CtIP localization at DNA replication foci, causes DNA damage and activation of DNA damage checkpoint. Cell Cycle 2009, 8:1409-1420.
11. Helleday T., Lo J., van Gent D.C., Engelward B.P. DNA double-strand break repair: from mechanistic understanding to cancer treatment. DNA Repair (Amst.) 2007, 6:923-935.
12. Huertas P., Jackson S.P. Human CtIP mediates cell cycle control of DNA end resection and double strand break repair. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284:9558-9565.
13. Huertas P., Cortés-Ledesma F., Sartori A.A., Aguilera A., Jackson S.P. CDK targets Sae2 to control DNA-end resection and homologous recombination. Nature 2008, 455:689-692.
14. Ira G., Pellicioli A., Balijja A., Wang X., Fiorani S., Carotenuto W., Liberi G., Bressan D., Wan L., Hollingsworth N.M., et al. DNA end resection, homologous recombination and DNA damage checkpoint activation require CDK1. Nature 2004, 431:1011-1017.
15. Jazayeri A., Falck J., Lukas C., Bartek J., Smith G.C., Lukas J., Jackson S.P. ATM- and cell cycle-dependent regulation of ATR in response to DNA double-strand breaks. Nat. Cell Biol. 2006, 8:37-45.
16. Johnson R.D., Jasin M. Sister chromatid gene conversion is a prominent double-strand break repair pathway in mammalian cells. EMBO J. 2000, 19:3398-3407.
17. Jullien D., Vagnarelli P., Earnshaw W.C., Adachi Y. Kinetochore localisation of the DNA damage response component 53BP1 during mitosis. J. Cell Sci. 2002, 115:71-79.
18. Kadyk L.C., Hartwell L.H. Sister chromatids are preferred over homologs as substrates for recombinational repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 1992, 132:387-402.
19. Kruhlak M.J., Celeste A., Dellaire G., Fernandez-Capetillo O., Müller W.G., McNally J.G., Bazett-Jones D.P., Nussenzweig A. Changes in chromatin structure and mobility in living cells at sites of DNA double-strand breaks. J. Cell Biol. 2006, 172:823-834.
20. Lieber M.R., Ma Y., Pannicke U., Schwarz K. Mechanism and regulation of human non-homologous DNA end-joining. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2003, 4:712-720.
21. Lisby M., Barlow J.H., Burgess R.C., Rothstein R. Choreography of the DNA damage response: spatiotemporal relationships among checkpoint and repair proteins. Cell 2004, 118:699-713.
22. Löbrich M., Shibata A., Beucher A., Fisher A., Ensminger M., Goodarzi A.A., Barton O., Jeggo P.A. gammaH2AX foci analysis for monitoring DNA double-strand break repair: strengths, limitations and optimization. Cell Cycle 2010, 9:662-669.
23. Lukas C., Melander F., Stucki M., Falck J., Bekker-Jensen S., Goldberg M., Lerenthal Y., Jackson S.P., Bartek J., Lukas J. Mdc1 couples DNA double-strand break recognition by Nbs1 with its H2AX-dependent chromatin retention. EMBO J. 2004, 23:2674-2683.
24. Lukas C., Savic V., Bekker-Jensen S., Doil C., Neumann B., Pedersen R.S., Grøfte M., Chan K.L., Hickson I.D., Bartek J., Lukas J. 53BP1 nuclear bodies form around DNA lesions generated by mitotic transmission of chromosomes under replication stress. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011, 13:243-253.
25. McIlwraith M.J., West S.C. DNA repair synthesis facilitates RAD52-mediated second-end capture during DSB repair. Mol. Cell 2008, 29:510-516.
26. Raghuraman M.K., Winzeler E.A., Collingwood D., Hunt S., Wodicka L., Conway A., Lockhart D.J., Davis R.W., Brewer B.J., Fangman W.L. Replication dynamics of the yeast genome. Science 2001, 294:115-121.
27. Rijkers T., Van Den Ouweland J., Morolli B., Rolink A.G., Baarends W.M., Van Sloun P.P., Lohman P.H., Pastink A. Targeted inactivation of mouse RAD52 reduces homologous recombination but not resistance to ionizing radiation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1998, 18:6423-6429.
28. Rothkamm K., Löbrich M. Evidence for a lack of DNA double-strand break repair in human cells exposed to very low x-ray doses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100:5057-5062.
29. Rothkamm K., Krüger I., Thompson L.H., Löbrich M. Pathways of DNA double-strand break repair during the mammalian cell cycle. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2003, 23:5706-5715.
30. Sakaue-Sawano A., Kurokawa H., Morimura T., Hanyu A., Hama H., Osawa H., Kashiwagi S., Fukami K., Miyata T., Miyoshi H., et al. Visualizing spatiotemporal dynamics of multicellular cell-cycle progression. Cell 2008, 132:487-498.
31. Schultz L.B., Chehab N.H., Malikzay A., Halazonetis T.D. p53 binding protein 1 (53BP1) is an early participant in the cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks. J. Cell Biol. 2000, 151:1381-1390.
32. Shibata A., Conrad S., Birraux J., Geuting V., Barton O., Ismail A., Kakarougkas A., Meek K., Taucher-Scholz G., Löbrich M., Jeggo P.A. Factors determining DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice in G2 phase. EMBO J. 2011, 30:1079-1092.
33. Shiloh Y., van der Schans G.P., Lohman P.H., Becker Y. Induction and repair of DNA damage in normal and ataxia-telangiectasia skin fibroblasts treated with neocarzinostatin. Carcinogenesis 1983, 4:917-921.
34. Shrivastav M., De Haro L.P., Nickoloff J.A. Regulation of DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice. Cell Res. 2008, 18:134-147.
35. Snijder B., Pelkmans L. Origins of regulated cell-to-cell variability. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2011, 12:119-125.
36. Soutoglou E., Dorn J.F., Sengupta K., Jasin M., Nussenzweig A., Ried T., Danuser G., Misteli T. Positional stability of single double-strand breaks in mammalian cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007, 9:675-682.
37. Stark J.M., Pierce A.J., Oh J., Pastink A., Jasin M. Genetic steps of mammalian homologous repair with distinct mutagenic consequences. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2004, 24:9305-9316.
38. Takata M., Sasaki M.S., Sonoda E., Morrison C., Hashimoto M., Utsumi H., Yamaguchi-Iwai Y., Shinohara A., Takeda S. Homologous recombination and non-homologous end-joining pathways of DNA double-strand break repair have overlapping roles in the maintenance of chromosomal integrity in vertebrate cells. EMBO J. 1998, 17:5497-5508.
39. Tashiro S., Walter J., Shinohara A., Kamada N., Cremer T. Rad51 accumulation at sites of DNA damage and in postreplicative chromatin. J. Cell Biol. 2000, 150:283-291.
40. Toettcher J.E., Loewer A., Ostheimer G.J., Yaffe M.B., Tidor B., Lahav G. Distinct mechanisms act in concert to mediate cell cycle arrest. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106:785-790.
41. van Veelen L.R., Essers J., van de Rakt M.W., Odijk H., Pastink A., Zdzienicka M.Z., Paulusma C.C., Kanaar R. Ionizing radiation-induced foci formation of mammalian Rad51 and Rad54 depends on the Rad51 paralogs, but not on Rad52. Mutat. Res. 2005, 574:34-49.
42. West S.C. Molecular views of recombination proteins and their control. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2003, 4:435-445.
43. Woodfine K., Fiegler H., Beare D.M., Collins J.E., McCann O.T., Young B.D., Debernardi S., Mott R., Dunham I., Carter N.P. Replication timing of the human genome. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2004, 13:191-202.
44. Yun M.H., Hiom K. CtIP-BRCA1 modulates the choice of DNA double-strand-break repair pathway throughout the cell cycle. Nature 2009, 459:460-463.
45. Zierhut C., Diffley J.F. Break dosage, cell cycle stage and DNA replication influence DNA double strand break response. EMBO J. 2008, 27:1875-1885.