Conventional MRI and MR angiography of stroke

Acute Ischemic Stroke: Imaging and Intervention

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 123-144

  Kim, Anne Catherine ^a   Vu, David ^b   Gilberto Gonzalez R ^a   Schaefer, Pamela W ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b La Jolla Radiology Medical Group   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864223840     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-12751-9_6     Document Type: Chapter

References (79)

1. Yuh, W. T., et al., MR imaging of cerebral ischemia: findings in the first 24 hours. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 1991. 12(4): p. 621-9.
2. Maeda, M., et al., Time course of arterial hyperintensity with fast fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery imaging in acute and subacute middle cerebral arterial infarction. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2001. 13(6): p. 987-90.
3. Flacke, S., et al., Middle cerebral artery (MCA) susceptibility sign at susceptibility-based perfusion MR imaging: clinical importance and comparison with hyperdense MCA sign at CT. Radiology, 2000. 215(2): p. 476-82.
4. Hjort, N., et al., MRI detection of early blood-brain barrier disruption: parenchymal enhancement predicts focal hemorrhagic transformation after thrombolysis. Stroke, 2008. 39(3): p. 1025-8.
5. Molina, C. A., et al., Thrombolysis-related hemorrhagic infarction: a marker of early reperfusion, reduced infarct size, and improved outcome in patients with proximal middle cerebral artery occlusion. Stroke, 2002. 33(6): p. 1551-6.
6. González RG, Schaefer PW, Buonanno FS, Schwamm LH, Budzik RF, Rordorf G, Wang B, Sorensen AG, Koroshetz WJ. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging: diagnostic accuracy in patients imaged within 6 hours of stroke symptom onset. Radiology, 1999. 210(1): p. 155-62.
7. Perkins, C. J., et al., Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery and diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MRI abnormalities in 117 consecutive patients with stroke symptoms. Stroke, 2001. 32(12): p. 2774-81.
8. Ida, M., et al., Subcortical low intensity in early cortical ischemia. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 1994. 15(7): p. 1387-93.
9. Ricci, P. E., et al., A comparison of fast spin-echo, fluidattenuated inversion-recovery, and diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the first 10 days after cerebral infarction. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 1999. 20(8): p. 1535-42.
10. Asato, R., R. Okumura, and J. Konishi, "Fogging effect" in MR of cerebral infarct. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 1991. 15(1): p. 160-2.
11. Crain, M. R., et al., Cerebral ischemia: evaluation with contrast-enhanced MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 1991. 12(4): p. 631-9.
12. Purroy, F., et al., Higher risk of further vascular events among transient ischemic attack patients with diffusion-weighted imaging acute lesions. Stroke, 2004. 35(10): p. 2313-9.
13. Boyko, O. B., et al., Non-heme mechanisms for T1 shortening: pathologic, CT, and MR elucidation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 1992. 13(5): p. 1439-45.
14. Gaudinski, M. R., et al., Establishing final infarct volume: stroke lesion evolution past 30 days is insignificant. Stroke, 2008. 39(10): p. 2693-4.
15. Fisher, M. and R. D. Adams, Observations on brain embolism with special reference to the mechanism of hemorrhagic infarction. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol, 1951. 10(1): p. 92-4.
16. Derex, L. and N. Nighoghossian, Intracerebral haemorrhage after thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke: an update. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2008. 79(10): p. 1093-9.
17. Hornig, C. R., W. Dorndorf, and A. L. Agnoli, Hemorrhagic cerebral infarction-a prospective study. Stroke, 1986. 17(2): p. 179-85.
18. Hakim, A. M., A. Ryder-Cooke, and D. Melanson, Sequential computerized tomographic appearance of strokes. Stroke, 1983. 14(6): p. 893-7.
19. Horowitz, S. H., et al., Computed tomographic-angiographic fndings within the first five hours of cerebral infarction. Stroke, 1991. 22(10): p. 1245-53.
20. Ogata, J., et al., Hemorrhagic infarct of the brain without a reopening of the occluded arteries in cardioembolic stroke. Stroke, 1989. 20(7): p. 876-83.
21. Lijnen, H. R., et al., Regulation of gelatinase activity in mice with targeted inactivation of components of the plasminogen/plasmin system. Thromb Haemost, 1998. 79(6): p. 1171-6.
22. Liotta, L. A., et al., Effect of plasminogen activator (urokinase), plasmin, and thrombin on glycoprotein and collagenous components of basement membrane. Cancer Res, 1981. 41(11 Pt 1): p. 4629-36.
23. Carmeliet, P., et al., Urokinase-generated plasmin activates matrix metalloproteinases during aneurysm formation. Nat Genet, 1997. 17(4): p. 439-44.
24. Wardlaw, J. M., et al., Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2003(3): p. CD000213.
25. Kidwell, C. S., et al., Predictors of hemorrhagic transformation in patients receiving intra-arterial thrombolysis. Stroke, 2002. 33(3): p. 717-24.
26. *-weighted gradient-echo sequences. Neuroradiology, 2001. 43(10): p. 809-15.
27. Lin, D. D., et al., Detection of intracranial hemorrhage: comparison between gradient-echo images and b (0) images obtained from diffusion-weighted echo-planar sequences. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2001. 22(7): p. 1275-81.
28. Haacke, E. M., et al., Characterizing iron deposition in multiple sclerosis lesions using susceptibility weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2009. 29(3): p. 537-44.
29. Wycliffe, N. D., et al., Reliability in detection of hemorrhage in acute stroke by a new three-dimensional gradient recalled echo susceptibility-weighted imaging technique compared to computed tomography: a retrospective study. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2004. 20(3): p. 372-7.
30. Mittal, S., et al., Susceptibility-weighted imaging: technical aspects and clinical applications, part 2. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2009. 30(2): p. 232-52.
31. Kim, H. S., et al., Multiple cerebral microbleeds in hyperacute ischemic stroke: impact on prevalence and severity of early hemorrhagic transformation after thrombolytic treatment. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2006. 186(5): p. 1443-9.
32. Bradley, W. G., Jr., MR appearance of hemorrhage in the brain. Radiology, 1993. 189(1): p. 15-26.
33. Jewells, V. and M. Castillo, MR angiography of the extracranial circulation. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am, 2003. 11(4): p. 585-97, vi.
34. Sohn, C. H., R. J. Sevick, and R. Frayne, Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the intracranial circulation. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am, 2003. 11(4): p. 599-614.
35. Barnett, H. J., et al., Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med, 1998. 339(20): p. 1415-25.
36. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. JAMA, 1995. 273(18): p. 1421-8.
37. Alvarez-Linera, J., et al., Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2003. 24(5): p. 1012-9.
38. U-King-Im, J. M., et al., Contrast-enhanced MR angiography for carotid disease: diagnostic and potential clinical impact. Neurology, 2004. 62(8): p. 1282-90.
39. Hathout, G. M., M. J. Duh, and S. M. El-Saden, Accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR angiography in predicting angiographic stenosis of the internal carotid artery: linear regression analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2003. 24(9): p. 1747-56.
40. Wardlaw, J. M., et al., Interobserver variability of magnetic resonance angiography in the diagnosis of carotid stenosiseffect of observer experience. Neuroradiology, 2002. 44(2): p. 126-32.
41. Stark, D. W. B., Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Elsevier, Philadelphia. 1999.
42. Patel, M. R., et al., Preoperative assessment of the carotid bifurcation. Can magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography replace contrast arteriography? Stroke, 1995. 26(10): p. 1753-8.
43. Nederkoorn, P. J., et al., Carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR angiography for diagnosis. Radiology, 2003. 228(3): p. 677-82.
44. Nederkoorn, P. J., Y. van der Graaf, and M. G. Hunink, Duplex ultrasound and magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography in carotid artery stenosis: a systematic review. Stroke, 2003. 34(5): p. 1324-32.
45. Elgersma, O. E., et al., Multidirectional depiction of internal carotid arterial stenosis: three-dimensional time-offlight MR angiography versus rotational and conventional digital subtraction angiography. Radiology, 2000. 216(2): p. 511-6.
46. Elgersma, O. E., et al., Maximum internal carotid arterial stenosis: assessment with rotational angiography versus conventional intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. Radiology, 1999. 213(3): p. 777-83.
47. El-Saden, S. M., et al., Imaging of the internal carotid artery: the dilemma of total versus near total occlusion. Radiology, 2001. 221(2): p. 301-8.
48. Heiserman, J. E., et al., Carotid artery stenosis: clinical efficacy of two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography. Radiology, 1992. 182(3): p. 761-8.
49. Debrey, S. M., et al., Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography for internal carotid artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke, 2008. 39(8): p. 2237-48.
50. Modaresi, K. B., et al., Comparison of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography, magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography for measuring carotid artery stenosis. Br J Surg, 1999. 86(11): p. 1422-6.
51. Furlan, A., et al., Intra-arterial prourokinase for acute ischemic stroke. The PROACT II study: a randomized controlled trial. Prolyse in Acute Cerebral Thromboembolism. JAMA, 1999. 282(21): p. 2003-11.
52. del Zoppo, G. J., et al., Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in acute thrombotic and embolic stroke. Ann Neurol, 1992. 32(1): p. 78-86.
53. Adams, H. P., Jr., et al., Guidelines for the early management of adults with ischemic stroke: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, Clinical Cardiology Council, Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Council, and the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease and Quality of Care Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Groups: the American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline as an educational tool for neurologists. Stroke, 2007. 38(5): p. 1655-711.
54. Lansberg, M. G., et al., The MRA-DWI mismatch identifies patients with stroke who are likely to benefit from reperfusion. Stroke, 2008. 39(9): p. 2491-6.
55. Ma, L., et al., Can baseline magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) status become a foremost factor in selecting optimal acute stroke patients for recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) thrombolysis beyond 3 hours? Neurol Res, 2009. 31(4): p. 355-61.
56. Kucinski, T., et al., Collateral circulation is an independent radiological predictor of outcome after thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke. Neuroradiology, 2003. 45(1): p. 11-8.
57. Provenzale, J. M., Dissection of the internal carotid and vertebral arteries: imaging features. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1995. 165(5): p. 1099-104.
58. Shin, J. H., et al., Vertebral artery dissection: spectrum of imaging findings with emphasis on angiography and correlation with clinical presentation. Radiographics, 2000. 20(6): p. 1687-96.
59. Fisher, C. M., R. G. Ojemann, and G. H. Roberson, Spontaneous dissection of cervico-cerebral arteries. Can J Neurol Sci, 1978. 5(1): p. 9-19.
60. Benninger, D. H., et al., Mechanism of ischemic infarct in spontaneous carotid dissection. Stroke, 2004. 35(2): p. 482-5.
61. Ozdoba, C., M. Sturzenegger, and G. Schroth, Internal carotid artery dissection: MR imaging features and clinicalradiologic correlation. Radiology, 1996. 199(1): p. 191-8.
62. Mokri, B., et al., Spontaneous dissection of the cervical internal carotid artery. Ann Neurol, 1986. 19(2): p. 126-38.
63. Provenzale, J. M. and B. Sarikaya, Comparison of test performance characteristics of MRI, MR angiography, and CT angiography in the diagnosis of carotid and vertebral artery dissection: a review of the medical literature. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2009. 193(4): p. 1167-74.
64. Levy, C., et al., Carotid and vertebral artery dissections: three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography and MR imaging versus conventional angiography. Radiology, 1994. 190(1): p. 97-103.
65. Rodallec, M. H., et al., Craniocervical arterial dissection: spectrum of imaging findings and differential diagnosis. Radiographics, 2008. 28(6): p. 1711-28.
66. Scott, R. M. and E. R. Smith, Moyamoya disease and moyamoya syndrome. N Engl J Med, 2009. 360(12): p. 1226-1237.
67. Yamada, I., Y. Matsushima, and S. Suzuki, Moyamoya disease: diagnosis with three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography. Radiology, 1992. 184(3): p. 773-8.
68. Yamada, I., et al., High-resolution turbo magnetic resonance angiography for diagnosis of Moyamoya disease. Stroke, 2001. 32(8): p. 1825-31.
69. Yamada, I., S. Suzuki, and Y. Matsushima, Moyamoya disease: comparison of assessment with MR angiography and MR imaging versus conventional angiography. Radiology, 1995. 196(1): p. 211-8.
70. Steen, R. G., et al., Brain imaging findings in pediatric patients with sickle cell disease. Radiology, 2003. 228(1): p. 216-25.
71. Demaerel, P., et al., Magnetic resonance angiography in suspected cerebral vasculitis. Eur Radiol, 2004. 14(6): p. 1005-12.
72. Heiserman, J. E., et al., MR angiography of cervical fibromuscular dysplasia. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 1992. 13(5): p. 1454-7.
73. Furie, D. M. and R. D. Tien, Fibromuscular dysplasia of arteries of the head and neck: imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1994. 162(5): p. 1205-9.
74. Filippidis, A., et al., Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis: review of the demographics, pathophysiology, current diagnosis, and treatment. Neurosurg Focus, 2009. 27(5): p. E3.
75. Leach, J. L., W. M. Strub, and M. F. Gaskill-Shipley, Cerebral venous thrombus signal intensity and susceptibility effects on gradient recalled-echo MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2007. 28(5): p. 940-5.
76. Boukobza, M., et al., MR imaging features of isolated cortical vein thrombosis: diagnosis and follow-up. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2009. 30(2): p. 344-348.
77. Liauw, L., et al., MR angiography of the intracranial venous system. Radiology, 2000. 214(3): p. 678-82.
78. Ayanzen, R. H., et al., Cerebral MR venography: normal anatomy and potential diagnostic pitfalls. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2000. 21(1): p. 74-8.
79. Khandelwal, N., et al., Comparison of CT venography with MR venography in cerebral sinovenous thrombosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2006. 187(6): p. 1637-1643.