Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the intracranial circulation

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 599-614

  Sohn, Chul Ho ^a,b   Sevick, Robert J ^b   Frayne, Richard ^b,c  

^a Keimyung University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^c FOOTHILLS HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE MEGLUMINE;

ABDOMINAL AORTA; ANEURYSM; ANGIOGRAPHY; AORTOGRAPHY; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BRAIN ANGIOGRAPHY; BRAIN ARTERY ANEURYSM; CIRCULATION; COMPUTER; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONGENITAL BLOOD VESSEL MALFORMATION; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DISEASE SEVERITY; EXTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; MOYAMOYA DISEASE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POSTERIOR CEREBRAL ARTERY; REVIEW; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; STROKE; THORACIC AORTA;

EID: 0345791498     PISSN: 10649689     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1064-9689(03)00064-3     Document Type: Review

References (72)

1. Laub GA. Time-of-flight method of MR angiography. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 1995:3:391-8.
2. Dumoulin CL. Phase contrast MR angiography techniques. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 1995:3:399-411.
3. Adams WM, Laitt RD, Jackson A. The role of MR angiography in the pretreatment assessment of intracranial aneurysms: a comparative study. Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1618-28.
4. Huston J, Rufenacht DA, Ehman RL. Wiebers. Intracranial aneurysms and vascular malformations: comparison of time-of-flight and phase-contrast MR angiography. Radiology 1991:181:721-30.
5. Stock KW, Radue EW, Jacob AL, Bao X-S, Steinbrich W. Intracranial arteries: Prospective blinded comparative study of MR angiography and DSA in 50 patients. Radiology 1995;195:451-6.
6. Wilms G, Bosmans H, Demaerel PH, Marchal G. Magnetic resonance angiography of the intracranial vessels. Eur J Radiol 2001;38:10-8.
7. Summers PE, Jarosz JM, Markus H. MR Angiography in cerebrovascular disease. Clin Radiol 2001:56:437-56.
8. Tsuruda JS, Shimakawa A, Pelc NJ, Saloner D. Dural sinus occlusion: Evaluation with phase-sensitive gradient-echo MR imaging. Am J Neuroradiol 1991;12:481-8.
9. Drutman J, Gyorke A, Davis WL, Turski PA. Evaluation of subclavian steal with two-dimensional phase-contrast and two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography. Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:1642-5.
10. Urchuk SN, Plewes DB. Mechanisms of flow-induced signal loss in MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 1992;2:453-62.
11. Prince MR, Yucel EK, Kaufman JA, Harrison DC, Geller SC. Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced three dimensional abdominal MR arteriography. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993;3:877-81.
12. Runge VM, Kirsch JE, Lee C. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993;3:233-39.
13. Runge VM, Gelblum DY. The role of gadolinium dielhylenetriaminepentaacetic acid in the evaluation of the central nervous system. Magn Reson Q 1990;6:85-107.
14. Frayne R, Grist TM, Korosec FR, et al. MR angiography with three-dimensional MR digital subtraction angiography. Top Magn Reson Imaging 1996;8:366-88.
15. Prince MR, Grist TM, Debatin JF. 3D Contrast MR Angiography. 2nd edition. New York: Springer; 1999.
16. Willig DS, Turski PA, Frayne R, et al. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR DSA of the carotid artery bifurcation: preliminary study of comparison with unenhanced 2D and 3D time-of-flight MR angiography. Radiology 1998;208:447-51.
17. Krinsky G, Weinreb J. Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of the thoracoabdominal aorta. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 1996;17:280-303.
18. Hany TF, Leung DA, Pfammatter T, Debatin JF. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the renal arteries. Original investigation. Invest Radiol 1998;33:653-9.
19. Rofsky NM, Adelman MA. MR angiography in the evaluation of atherosclerotic peripheral vascular disease. Radiology 2000;214:325-38.
20. Swan JS, Carroll TJ, Kennell TW, et al. Time-resolved three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the peripheral vessels. Radiology 2002;225:43-52.
21. Saloner D. The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents. An introduction to MR angiography. Radiographics 1995;15:453-65.
22. Bosmans H, Wilms G, Dymarkowski S, Marchal G. Basic principles of MRA. Eur J Radiol 2001;38:2-9.
23. Felmlee JP, Ehman RL. Spatial presaturation: a method for suppressing flow artifacts and improving depiction of vascular anatomy in MR imaging. Radiology 1987;64:559-64.
24. Haacke EM, Tkach JA, Parrish TB. Reduction of T2* dephasing in gradient field-echo imaging. Radiology 1989;170:457-62.
25. Blatter DD, Parker DL, Ahn SS, et al. Cerebral MR angiography with multiple overlapping thin slab acquisition. II. Early clinical experience. Radiology 1992;83:379-89.
26. Pelc NJ, Bernstein MA, Shimakawa A, Glover GH. Encoding strategies for three direction phase-contrast MR imaging of flow. J Magn Reson Imaging 1991;1:405-13.
27. Pipe JG. Limits of Time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2001;12:163-74.
28. Marchal G, Michiels J, Bosmans H, Hecke PV. Contrast-enhanced MRA of the brain. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1992;16:25-9.
29. Cosottini M, Calabrese R, Puglioli M, et al. Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of neck vessels: does dephasing effect alter diagnostic accuracy? Eur Radiol 2003;13;571-81.
30. Runge VM, Armstrong MR, Barr RG, et al. A clinical comparison of the safety and efficacy of MiultiHance (gadobenate dimeglumine) and Omniscan (Gadodiamide) in magnetic resonance imaging in patients with central nervous system pathology, Invest Radiol 2001;36:65-71.
31. Prince MR, Arnoldus C, Frisoli JK. Nephrotoxicity of high-dose gadolinium compared with iodinated contrast. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996;6:162-6.
32. Murphy KJ, Brunberg JA, Cohan RH. Adverse reactions to gadolinium contrast media: A review of 36 cases. Am J Roentgenol 1996;167:847-9.
33. Parker DL, Tsuruda JS, Goodrich KC, Alexander AL, Buswell HR. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of cerebral arteries. A review. Invest Radiol 1998;33:560-72.
34. Yang JJ, Hill MD, Morrish WF, et al. Comparison of pre- and postcontrast 3D time-of-flight MR angiography for the evaluation of distal intracranial branch occlusions in acute ischemic stroke. Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:557-67.
35. Jung HW, Chang KH, Choi DS, Han MH, Han MC. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography for the diagnosis of intracranial vascular disease: Optimal dose of gadopen-tetate dimeglumine. Am J Roentgenol 1995;165:1251-5.
36. Tartaro A, Severini S, Tonni G, Magarelli N, Carriero A, Bonomo L. Magnetic resonance angiography with gadolinium (Gd-DTPA) versus baseline magnetic resonance angiography in the study of the intracranial circulation [abstract]. Radiol Med (Torino) 1992;84:536.
37. Levy RA, Maki JH. Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the extracranial carotid arteries: two techniques. Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:688-90.
38. Remonda L, Heid O, Schroth G. Carotid artery stenosis, occlusion, and pseudo-occlusion: first-pass, gadolinium-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography-Preliminary study. Radiology 1998;209:95-102.
39. Foo TK, Saranathan M, Prince MR, Chenevert TL. Automated detection of bolus arrival and initiation of data acquisition in fast, three-dimensional, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 1997;203:275-80.
40. Prince MR, Chenevert TL, Foo TK, Londy FJ, Ward JS, Maki JH. Contrast-enhanced abdominal MR angiography: Optimization of imaging delay time by automating the detection of contrast material arrival in the aorta. Radiology 1997;203:109-14.
41. Riederer SJ, Bernstein MA, Breen JF, et al. Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography with real-time fluoroscopic triggering: design specifications and technical reliability in 330 patient studies. Radiology 2000;215:584-93.
42. Maki JH, Prince MR, Londy FJ, Chenevert TL. The effects of time varying intravascular signal intensity and k-space acquisition order on three-dimensional MR angiography image quality. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996;6:642-51.
43. Mistretta CA, Grist TM, Korosec FR, et al. 3D time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR DSA: Advantages and tradeoffs. Magn Reson Med 1998;40:571-81.
44. Wilman AH, Riederer SJ, Huston J, Wald JT, Debbins JP. Arterial phase carotid and vertebral artery imaging in 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography by combining fluoroscopic triggering with an elliptical centric acquisition order. Magn Reson Med 1998;40:24-35.
45. Kim JK, Farb RI, Wright GA. Test bolus examination in the carotid artery at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 1998;206:283-9.
46. Hennig J, Scheffler K, Laubenberger J, Strecker R. Time-resolved projection after bolus injection of contrast agent. Magn Reson Med 1997;37:341-5.
47. Tsuchiya K, Katase S, Yoshino A, Hachiya J. MR digital subtraction angiography of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:707-11.
48. Griffiths PD, Hoggard N, Warren DJ, Wilkinson ID, Anderson B, Romanowski C. Brain arteriovenous malformations: assessment with dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography. Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1892-9.
49. Aoki S, Yoshikawa T, Hori M, et al. MR digital subtraction angiography for the assessment of cranial arteriovenous malformations and fistulas. Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:451-3.
50. Korosec FR, Frayne R, Grist TM, Mistretta CA. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:345-51.
51. Carroll TJ, Korosec FR, Petermann GM, Grist TM, Turski PA. Carotid bifurcation: evaluation of time-resolved three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 2001;220:525-32.
52. Mohr J, Caplan LR, Melski J. The Harvard cooperative stroke registry: a prospective registry. Neurology 1978;28:754-62.
53. Beaulieu C, de Crespigny A, Tong DC, Moseley ME, Albers GW, Marks MP. Longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study of perfusion and diffusion in stroke: evolution of lesion volume and correlation with clinical outcome. Ann Neurol 1999;46:568-78.
54. Frayne R, Sevick RJ, Demchuk AM, et al. Clinical stroke imaging at 3 T. ISM RM program. 2000;1253.
55. Kucinski T, Koch C, Eckert B, et al. Collateral circulation is an independent radio logical predictor of outcome after thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke. Neuroradiology 2003;45:11-8.
56. Willinsky RA, Taylor SM, terBrugge K, Farb RI, Tomlinson G, Montanera W. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: Prospective Analysis of 2,899 Procedures and review of the literature. Radiology 2003;227:522-8.
57. Ross JS, Masaryk TJ, Modic MT, Ruggieri PM, Haacke EM, Selman WR. Intracranial aneurysms: Evaluation by MR angiography. Am J Neuroradiol 1990;11:449-55.
58. Atlas SW, Sheppard L, Goldberg HI, Hurst RW, Listerud J, Flamm E. Intracranial aneurysms: Detection and characterization with MR angiography with use of an advanced postprocessing technique in a blinded-reader study. Radiology 1997;203:807-14.
59. Nagasawa S, Deguchi J, Arai M, Tanaka H, Kawanishi M, Ohta T. Topographic anatomy of paraclinoid carotid artery aneurysms: Usefulness of MR angiographic source images. Neuroradiology 1997;39:341-3.
60. Isoda H, Takehara Y, Isogai S, et al. MRA of intracranial aneurysm models: a comparison of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MRA with time-of-flight MRA. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2000;24:308-15.
61. Metens T, Rio F, Balériaux D, Roger T, David P, Rodesch G. Intracranial aneurysms: Detection with gadolinium-enhanced dynamic three-dimensional MR angiography-Initial results. Radiology 2000;216:39-46.
62. Jager HR, Ellamushi H, Moore EA, Grieve JP, Kitchen ND, Taylor WJ. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of intracranial giant aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1900-7.
63. Boulin A, Pierot L. Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils: comparison of gadolinium-enhanced 3D time-of-flight MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 2001;219:108-13.
64. Mori H, Aoki S, Okubo T, el al. Two-dimensional thick-slice MR digital subtraction angiography in the assessment of small to medium-size intracranial arteriovenous malformations. Neuroradiology 2003;45:27-33.
65. Klisch J, Strecker R, Hennig J, Schumacher M. Time-resolved projection MRA: Clinical application in intracranial vascular malformations. Neuroradiology 2000;42:104-7.
66. Kauczor HU, Engenhart R, Layer G, et al. 3D TOF MR angiography of cerebral arteriovenous malformations after radiosurgery. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1993;17:184-90.
67. Shim YW, Chung TS, Kang WS, Joo JY, Strecker R, Hennig J. Non-invasive follow-up evaluation of post-embolized AVM with time-resolved MRA: A case report. Korean J Radiol 2002;3:271-5.
68. Suzuki M, Matsui O, Kobayashi K, et al. Contrast-enhanced MRA for investigation of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Neuroradiology 2003;45:231-5.
69. Duran M, Schoenberg SO, Yuh WTC, et al. Cerebral arteriovenous malformations: morphologic evaluation by ultrashort 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Eur Radiol 2002:12:2957-64.
70. Atlas SW, Do HM. Intracranial vascular malformations and aneurysms. In: Atlas SW, Their SO, editors. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and spine. 3rd edition. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2002. p. 833-917.
71. Coley SC, Romanowski CA, Hodgson TJ, Griffiths PD. Dural arteriovenous fistulae: Noninvasive diagnosis with dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography. Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:404-7.
72. Yoon HK, Shin HJ, Lee M, Byun HS, Na DG, Han BK. MR angiography of Moyamoya disease before and after encephaloduroarteriosynangiosis. Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:195-200.