Comparison of CT venography with MR venography in cerebral sinovenous thrombosis

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 187, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1637-1643

  Khandelwal, N ^a   Agarwal, Ajay ^a,b   Kochhar, Rohit ^a   Bapuraj, J R ^a   Singh, Paramjeet ^a   Prabhakar, S ^a   Suri, S ^a  

^a POSTGRADUATE INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH   (India)

^b Kesri Bhavan   (India)

Author keywords

Cerebral sinovenous thrombosis; CT; MRI; Neuroradiology; Venography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CEREBRAL SINUS THROMBOSIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; GOLD STANDARD; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; OCCLUSIVE CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE; PHLEBOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; RELIABILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALGORITHMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHLEBOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SINUS THROMBOSIS, INTRACRANIAL; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 33751223569     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.05.1249     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Krayenbuhl H. Cerebral venous thrombosis: the diagnostic value of cerebral angiography. Schweiz Arch Neurol Psychiatr 1954; 74:261-287
2. Ameri A, Bousser MG. Cerebral venous thrombosis. Neurol Clin 1992; 10:87-111
3. Thron A, Wessel K, Linden D. Superior sagittal sinus thrombosis: neuroradiological evaluation and clinical findings. J Neurol 1986; 233:283-288
4. Vogl TJ, Bergman C, Villringer A, Einhaupl K, Lissner J, Felix R. Dural sinus thrombosis: value of venous MR angiography for diagnosis and follow-up. AJR 1994; 162:1191-1198
5. Casey SO, Alberico RA, Patel M, et al. Cerebral CT venography. Radiology 1996; 198:163-170
6. Goldberg AL, Rosenbaum AE, Wang H, et al. Computed tomography of dural sinus thrombosis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1986; 10:16-20
7. Buonanno FS, Mody DM, Ball MR, et al. Computed cranial tomographic findings in cerebral sinovenous occlusion. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1978; 2:281-290
8. Ford K, Sarwar M. Computed tomography of dural sinus thrombosis Am J Neuroradiol 1981; 2:539-543
9. Osborn AG, Anderson RE, Wing SD. The false falx sign. Radiology 1980; 134:421-425
10. Cure JK, Van Tassel P, Smith HT. Normal and variant anatomy of the dural venous sinuses. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 1994; 15:499-519
11. Yuh WT, Simonson TM, Wang AM, et al. Venous sinus occlusive disease: MR findings. Am J Neuroradiol 1994; 15:309-316
12. Mattle HP, Wentz KU, Edelman RR, et al. Cerebral venography with MR. Radiology 1991; 178:453-458
13. Liauw L, van Buchem MA, Spilt A, et al. MR angiography of the intracranial venous system. Radiology 2000; 214:678-682
14. Hoston J III, Ehman RL. Comparison of time-of-flight and phase-contrast MR neuroangiographic techniques. RadioGraphics 1993; 13:5-19
15. Ayanzen RH, Bird CR, Keller PS. Cerebral MR venography: normal anatomy and potential pitfalls. Am J Neuroradiol 2000; 21:74-78
16. Ozsvath RR, Casey SO, Lustrin ES, Alberico RA, Hassankhani A, Patel M. Cerebral venography: comparison of CT and MR projection venography. AJR 1997; 169:1699-1707
17. Wetzel SG, Kirsch E, Stock KW, Kolbe M, Kaim A, Radue EW. Cerebral veins: comparative study of CT venography with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. Am J Neuroradiol 1999; 20:249-255