Maximum internal carotid arterial stenosis: Assessment with rotational angiography versus conventional intraarterial digital subtraction angiography

Radiology

Volumn 213, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 777-783

  Elgersma, Otto E H ^a   Buijs, Pieter C ^a   Wüst, Aloys F J ^a   Van Der Graaf, Yolanda ^a   Elkelboom, Bert C ^a   Mali, Willem P T M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Carotid arteries, angiography; Carotid arteries, stenosis or obstruction; Digital subtraction angiography, comparative studies; Digital subtraction angiography, technology

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; ENDARTERECTOMY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY OCCLUSION; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0032750205     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.213.3.r99nv03777     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 1991; 325: 445-453.
2. European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group. Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet 1998; 351:1379-1387.
3. Spencer MP, Reid JM. Quantitation of carotid stenosis with continuous-wave (C-W) Doppler ultrasound. Stroke 1979; 10:326-330.
4. Alexandrov AV, Brodie DS, McLean A, Hamilton P, Murphy J, Burns PN. Correlation of peak systolic velocity and angiographic measurement of carotid stenosis revisited. Stroke 1997; 28:339-342.
5. Schenk EA, Bond MG, Aretz TH, et al. Multicenter validation study of real-time ultrasonography, arteriography, and pathology: pathologic evaluation of carotid endarterectomy specimens. Stroke 1988; 19:289-296.
6. O'Donnell TF, Erdoes LS, Mackey WC, et al. Correlation of B-mode ultrasound imaging and arteriography with pathologic findings at carotid endarterectomy. Arch Surg 1985; 120:443-449.
7. Pan XM, Saloner D, Reilly LM, et al. Assessment of carotid artery stenosis by ultrasonography, conventional angiography, and magnetic resonance angiography: correlation with ex vivo measurements of plaque stenosis. J Vasc Surg 1995; 21: 82-89.
8. Tu RK, Cohen WA, Maravilla KR, et al. Digital subtraction rotational angiography for aneurysms of the intracranial anterior circulation: injection method and optimization. AJNR 1996; 17:1127-1136.
9. van Leersum M, van Leeuwen MS, van der Schouw Y, Mali WPTM, Eikelboom BC. New duplex threshold values for angiographically determined stenosis of the internal carotid artery in light of the NASCET and ECST (abstr). Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1996; 18:S62.
10. Goldstein LB, Bertels C, Davies JN. Interrater reliability of the NIH stroke scale. Arch Neurol 1989; 46:660-662.
11. de Haan R, Limburg M, Bossuyt P, van der Meulen J, Aaronson N. The clinical meaning of Rankin "handicap" grades after stroke. Stroke 1995; 26:2027-2030.
12. Alexandrov AV, Bladin CF, Maggisano R, Norris JW. Measuring carotid stenosis: time for a reappraisal. Stroke 1993; 24: 1292-1296.
13. Rubin JR, Bondi JA, Rhodes RS. Duplex scanning versus conventional arteriography for the evaluation of carotid artery plaque morphology. Surgery 1987; 102: 749-755.
14. Schumacher M, Kutluk K, Ott D. Digital rotational angiography in neuroradiology. AJNR 1989; 10:644-649.
15. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA 1995; 273:1421-1428.
16. Dillon EH, van Leeuwen MS, Fernandez MA, Eikelboom BC, Mali WPTM. CT angiography: application to the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis. Radiology 1993; 189:211-219.
17. Patel MR, Kuntz KM, Klufas RA, et al. Preoperative assessment of the carotid bifurcation: can magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography replace contrast arteriography? Stroke 1995; 26:1753-1758.
18. Young GR, Humphrey PR, Shaw MD, Nixon TE, Smith ET. Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography, duplex ultrasound, and digital subtraction angiography in assessment of extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994; 57:1466-1478.