Evaluation of RapidChek Select for the screening of Salmonella in meat and meat products

Journal of Microbiological Methods

Volumn 90, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 217-219

  Torlak, Emrah ^a   Akan, Ibrahim Mustafa ^b   Inal, Mustafa ^c  

^a NECMETTIN ERBAKAN UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b Ministry of Food Agriculture and Livestock   (Turkey)

^c Food Control Laboratory   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Meat and meat products; Method comparison; RapidChek Select; Salmonella

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL STRAIN; BACTERIUM CONTAMINATION; BACTERIUM DETECTION; FOOD ANALYSIS; FOOD CONTAMINATION; ISO REFERENCE CULTURE BASED METHOD; LIMIT OF DETECTION; MEAT; MEAT INDUSTRY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAPIDCHEK SELECT; SALMONELLA; SALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM; SCREENING TEST;

ANIMALS; ANTIBODIES, BACTERIAL; ANTIBODIES, IMMOBILIZED; CATTLE; FOOD MICROBIOLOGY; IMMUNOLOGIC TESTS; LIMIT OF DETECTION; MEAT; POULTRY; REFERENCE STANDARDS; SALMONELLA;

SALMONELLA;

EID: 84864106620     PISSN: 01677012     EISSN: 18728359     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2012.05.010     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. AFNOR Validation certificate for alternative analytical method according to Standard EN ISO 16140: 2003, Certificate no. SDI 34/01-04/10 2010, AFNOR Certification, Denis Cedex.
2. Alakomi H.L., Saarela M. Salmonella importance and current status of detection and surveillance methods. Qual. Assur. Saf. Crops Food 2009, 1:142-152.
3. AOAC Final report and executive summaries from the AOAC International presidential task force on best practices for microbiological methodology 2006, Association of Analytical Communities, Gaithersburg.
4. Brunelle S. Validation of microbiological methods for food. In Statistical Aspects of the Microbiological Examination of Foods 2008, Elsevier Academic Press, New York, Chapter 13. 2nd edition.
5. Cetinkaya F., Mus T.E., Cibik R., Levent B., Gulesenb R. Assessment of microbiological quality of cigkofte (raw consumed spiced meatball): Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella. Food Control 2012, 26(1):15-18.
6. de Boer E., Beumer R.R. Methodology for detection and typing of foodborne microorganisms. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1999, 50(1-2):119-130.
7. Elizaquível P., Gabaldón J.A., Aznar R. Comparative evaluation of RTI-PCR and Mini-VIDAS SLM system as predictive tools for the routine detection of Salmonella spp. in naturally contaminated food products. Food Anal. Methods 2009, 2(2):102-109.
8. Eyigor A., Temelli S., Carli K.T. Evaluation of ISO 6579 and FDA-BAM methods to complement real-time polymerase chain reaction for the detection of Salmonella in naturally contaminated poultry meat and red meat. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2010, 7(8):921-927.
9. Ghafir Y., China B., Korsak N., Dierick K., Collard J.M., Godard C., De Zutter L., Daube G. Belgian surveillance plans to assess changes in Salmonella prevalence in meat at different production stages. J. Food Prot. 2005, 68(11):2269-2277.
10. Goncagül G., Günaydin E., Carli K.T. Prevalence of Salmonella serogroups in chicken meat. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2005, 29:103-106.
11. ISO ISO 6579, Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs - Horizontal method for the detection of Salmonella spp 2002, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.
12. ISO ISO 16140, Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs - Protocol for the validation of alternative methods 2003, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.
13. Jordan E., Egan J., Dullea C., Ward J., McGillicuddy K., Murray G., Murphy A., Bradshaw B., Leonard N., Rafter P., McDowell S. Salmonella surveillance in raw and cooked meat and meat products in the Republic of Ireland from 2002 to 2004. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2006, 112(1):66-70.
14. Muldoon M.T., Li J., Sutzko M., Olsson-Allen A.C., Teaney G., Gonzalez V. RapidChek SELECT Salmonella. Performance tested method 080601. J. AOAC Int. 2009, 92(6):1890-1894.
15. NMKL NordVal protocol for the validation of alternative microbiological methods 2009, Nordic Committee on Food Analysis, Oslo.
16. Plym-Forshell L., Wierup M. Salmonella contamination: a significant challenge to the global marketing of animal food products. Rev. Suisse Zool. 2006, 25:541-554.
17. Pui C.F., Wong W.C., Chai L.C., Tunung R., Jeyaletchumi P., Noor Hidayah M.S., Ubong A., Farinazleen M.G., Cheah Y.K., Son R. Review Article Salmonella: A foodborne pathogen. Int. Food Res. J. 2011, 18:465-473.
18. Quintavalla S., Bolmini L., Dellapina G., Pancini E., Barbuti S. Rapid methods for Salmonella detection in meat products. I. Evaluation of two automated immuno-enzymatic methods. Industria Converse 1996, 71(2):147-156.
19. Temelli S., Eyigor A., Carli K.T. Salmonella serogroup detection in poultry meat samples by examining multiple colonies from selective plates of two standard culture methods. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2010, 7(10):1229-1234.
20. Walker R.L., Kinde H., Anderson R.J., Brown A.E. Comparison of VIDAS enzyme-linked fluorescent immunoassay using Moore swab sampling and conventional culture method for Salmonella detection in bulk tank milk and in-line milk filters in California dairies. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2001, 67(1):123-129.
21. Zhao C., Ge B., De Villena J., Sudler R., Yeh E., Zhao S., White D.G., Wagner D., Meng J. Prevalence of Campylobacter spp., Escherichia coli, and Salmonella serovars in retail chicken, turkey, pork, and beef from the Greater Washington, D.C., Area. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 67(12):5431-5436.