Translational plant proteomics: A perspective

Journal of Proteomics

Volumn 75, Issue 15, 2012, Pages 4588-4601

  Agrawal, Ganesh Kumar ^a   Pedreschi, Romina ^b   Barkla, Bronwyn J ^c   Bindschedler, Laurence Veronique ^d   Cramer, Rainer ^d   Sarkar, Abhijit ^e   Renaut, Jenny ^f   Job, Dominique ^g   Rakwal, Randeep ^a,h,i  

^a Research Laboratory for Biotechnology and Biochemistry RLABB   (Nepal)

^b WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c INSTITUTO DE BIOTECNOLOGÍA   (Mexico)

^d UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

^e BANARAS HINDU UNIVERSITY   (India)

^f LUXEMBOURG INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Luxembourg)

^g BAYER AG   (Germany)

^h UNIVERSITY OF TSUKUBA   (Japan)

ⁱ SHOWA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Biomarker; Education awareness; Food; Nutrition; Stress

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CROP IMPROVEMENT; FOOD ANALYSIS; FOOD COMPOSITION; FOOD QUALITY; FOOD SAFETY; GENOMICS; NONHUMAN; NUTRITION; PLANT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEOMICS; REVIEW;

PLANT PROTEINS; PLANTS; PROTEOME; PROTEOMICS;

EID: 84864088484     PISSN: 18743919     EISSN: 18767737     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2012.03.055     Document Type: Review

References (127)

1. Agrawal G.K., Rakwal R. Plant proteomics: technologies, strategies, and applications 2008, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA. G.K. Agrawal, R. Rakwal (Eds.).
2. Finnie C. Plant proteomics 2006, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA. C. Finnie (Ed.).
3. Ranjitha Kumari B.D. Plant proteomics 2008, A.P.H. Publication Corporation, India. B.D. Ranjithakumari (Ed.).
4. Samaj J., Thelen J.J. Plant proteomics 2007, Springer, USA. J. Samaj, J.J. Thelen (Eds.).
5. Thiellement H., Zivy M., Damerval C., Mechin V. Plant proteomics: methods and protocols 2007, vol. 355. Humana Press. H. Thiellement, M. Zivy, C. Damerval, V. Mechin (Eds.).
6. Jorrín-Novo J.V., Maldonado A.M., Echevarría-Zomeño S., Valledor L., Castillejo M.A., Curto M., et al. Plant proteomics update (2007-2008): second-generation proteomic techniques, an appropriate experimental design, and data analysis to fulfill MIAPE standards, increase plant proteome coverage and expand biological knowledge. J Proteomics 2009, 72:285-314.
7. Agrawal G.K., Rakwal R. Rice proteomics: a cornerstone for cereal food crop proteomes. Mass Spectrom Rev 2006, 25:1-53.
8. Agrawal G.K., Rakwal R. Rice proteomics: a move toward expanded proteome coverage to comparative and functional proteomics uncovers the mysteries of rice and plant biology. Proteomics 2011, 11:1630-1649.
9. Kersten B., Agrawal G.K., Durek P., Neigenfind J., Schulze W., Walther D., et al. Plant phosphoproteomics: an update. Proteomics 2009, 9:964-988.
10. Rice G.E., Georgiou H.M., Ahmed N., Shi G., Kruppa G. Translational proteomics: developing a predictive capacity - a review. Placenta 2006, 27:S76-S86. (Supp A, Trophoblast Res).
11. Wienkoop S., Baginsky S., Weckwerth W. Arabidopsis thaliana as a model organism for plant proteome research. J Proteomics 2010, 73:2239-2248.
12. Agrawal G.K., Job D., Zivy M., Agrawal V.P., Bradshaw R., Dunn M.J., et al. Time to articulate a vision for the future of plant proteomics - a global perspective: an initiative for establishing the International Plant Proteomics Organization (INPPO). Proteomics 2011, 11:1559-1568.
13. Brautigam A., Shrestha R.P., Whitten D., Wilkerson C.G., Carr K.M., Froehlich J.E., et al. Low-coverage massively parallel pyrosequencing of cDNAs enables proteomics in non-model species: comparison of a species-specific database generated by pyrosequencing with databases from related species for proteome analysis of pea chloroplast envelopes. J Biotechnol 2008, 136:44-53.
14. Carpentier S.C., Witters E., Laukens K., Van Onckelen H., Swennen R., Panis B. Banana (Musa spp.) as a model to study the meristem proteome: acclimation to osmotic stress. Proteomics 2007, 7:92-105.
15. Carpentier S.C., Panis B., Vertommen A., Swennen R., Sergeant K., Renaut J., et al. Proteome analysis of non-model plants: a challenging but powerful approach. Mass Spectrom Rev 2008, 27:354-377.
16. Carpentier S.C., Coemans B., Podevin N., Laukens K., Witters E., Matsumura H., et al. Functional genomics in a non-model crop: transcriptomics or proteomics?. Physiol Plant 2008, 133:117-130.
17. Remmerie N., De Vijlder T., Laukens K., Dang T.H., Lemiere F., Mertens I., et al. Next generation functional proteomics in non-model plants: a survey on techniques and applications for the analysis of protein complexes and post-translational modifications. Phytochemistry 2011, 72:1192-1218.
18. Vertommen A., Moller A.L., Cordewener J.H., Swennen R., Panis B., Finnie C., et al. A workflow for peptide-based proteomics in a poorly sequenced plant: a case study on the plasma membrane proteome of banana. J Proteomics 2011, 74:1218-1229.
19. Vertommen A., Panis B., Swennen R., Carpentier S.C. Challenges and solutions for the identification of membrane proteins in non-model plants. J Proteomics 2011, 74:1165-1181.
20. Catusse J., Rajjou L., Job C., Job D. Proteome of seed development and germination. Plant proteomics: technologies, strategies, and applications 2008, 191-206. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA. G.K. Agrawal, R. Rakwal (Eds.).
21. Miernyk J.A., Hajduch M. Seed proteomics. J Proteomics 2011, 74:389-400.
22. Agrawal G.K., Bourguignon J., Rolland N., Ephritikhine G., Ferro M., Jaquinod M., et al. Plant organelle proteomics: collaborating for optimal cell function. Mass Spectrom Rev 2011, 30:772-853.
23. Abril N., Gion J.M., Kerner R., Muller-Starck G., Cerrillo R.M., Plomion C., et al. Proteomics research on forest trees, the most recalcitrant and orphan plant species. Phytochemistry 2011, 72:1219-1242.
24. Arabidopsis Genome Initiative Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 2000, 408:796-815.
25. Goff S.A., Ricke D., Lan T.H., Presting G., Wang R., Dunn M., et al. A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp. japonica). Science 2002, 296:92-100.
26. Yu J., Hu S., Wang J., Wong G.K., Li S., Liu B., et al. A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp. indica). Science 2002, 296:79-92.
27. International Rice Genome Sequencing Project The map based sequence of the rice genome. Nature 2005, 436:793-800.
28. Schnable P.S., Ware D., Fulton R.S., Stein J.C., Wei F., Pasternak S., et al. The B73 maize genome: complexity, diversity, and dynamics. Science 2009, 326:1112-1115.
29. Paterson A.H., Bowers J.E., Bruggmann R., Dubchak I., Grimwood J., Gundlach H., et al. The Sorghum bicolor genome and the diversification of grasses. Nature 2009, 457:551-556.
30. Schmutz J., Cannon S.B., Schlueter J., Ma J., Mitros T., Nelson W., et al. Genome sequence of the palaeopolyploid soybean. Nature 2010, 463:178-183.
31. Xu X., Pan S., Cheng S., Zhang B., Mu D., Ni P., et al. Genome sequence and analysis of the tuber crop potato. Nature 2011, 475:189-195.
32. Velasco R., Zharkikh A., Affourtit J., Dhingra A., Cestaro A., Kalyanaraman A., et al. The genome of the domesticated apple (Malus×domestica Borkh.). Nat Genet 2010, 42:833-839.
33. Sonah H., Deshmukh R.K., Singh V.P., Gupta D.K., Singh N.K., Sharma T.R. Genomic resources in horticultural crops: status, utility and challenges. Biotechnol Adv 2011, 29:199-209.
34. Weckwerth W. Green systems biology - from single genomes, proteomes and metabolomes to ecosystems research and biotechnology. J Proteomics 2011;00:000-000.
35. Shulaev V., Sargent D.J., Crowhurst R.N., Mockler T.C., Folkerts O., Delcher A.L., et al. The genome of woodland strawberry (Fragaria vesca). Nat Genet 2011, 43:109-116.
36. Renuse S., Chaerkady R., Pandey A. Proteogenomics. Proteomics 2011, 11:620-630.
37. Spanu P.D., Abbott J.C., Amselem J., Burgis T.A., Soanes D.M., Stuber K., et al. Genome expansion and gene loss in powdery mildew fungi reveal tradeoffs in extreme parasitism. Science 2010, 330:1543-1546.
38. Castellana N., Bafna V. Proteogenomics to discover the full coding content of genomes: a computational perspective. J Proteomics 2010, 73:2124-2135.
39. Matsumoto T., Tanaka T., Sakai H., Amano N., Kanamori H., Kurita K., et al. Comprehensive sequence analysis of 24,783 barley full-length cDNAs derived from 12 clone libraries. Plant Physiol 2011, 156:20-28.
40. Soderlund C., Descour A., Kudrna D., Bomhoff M., Boyd L., Currie J., et al. Sequencing, mapping, and analysis of 27,455 maize full-length cDNAs. PLoS Genet 2009, 5:e1000740.
41. Krug K., Nahnsen S., Macek B. Mass spectrometry at the interface of proteomics and genomics. Mol Biosyst 2011, 7:284-291.
42. Xing X.B., Li Q.R., Sun H., Fu X., Zhan F., Huang X., et al. The discovery of novel protein-coding features in mouse genome based on mass spectrometry data. Genomics 2011, 98:343-351.
43. Castellana N.E., Payne S.H., Shen Z., Stanke M., Bafna V., Briggs S.P. Discovery and revision of Arabidopsis genes by proteogenomics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008, 105:21034-21038.
44. Helmy M., Tomita M., Ishihama Y. OryzaPG-DB: rice proteome database based on shotgun proteogenomics. BMC Plant Biol 2011, 11:63.
45. Bindschedler L.V., McGuffin L.J., Burgis T.A., Spanu P.D., Cramer R. Proteogenomics and in silico structural and functional annotation of the barley powdery mildew Blumeria graminis F. sp. hordei. Methods 2011, 54:431-440.
46. Bringans S., Hane J.K., Casey T., Tan K.C., Lipscombe R., Solomon P.S., et al. Deep proteogenomics; high throughput gene validation by multidimensional liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry of proteins from the fungal wheat pathogen Stagonospora nodorum. BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10:301.
47. Ansong C., Purvine S.O., Adkins J.N., Lipton M.S., Smith R.D. Proteogenomics: needs and roles to be filled by proteomics in genome annotation. Brief Funct Genomics Proteomics 2008, 7:50-62.
48. Armengaud J. A perfect genome annotation is within reach with the proteomics and genomics alliance. Curr Opin Microbiol 2009, 12:292-300.
49. Armengaud J. Proteogenomics and systems biology: quest for the ultimate missing parts. Expert Rev Proteomics 2010, 7:65-77.
50. Castellana N.E., Pham V., Arnott D., Lill J.R., Bafna V. Template proteogenomics: sequencing whole proteins using an imperfect database. Mol Cell Proteomics 2010, 9:1260-1270.
51. Sanders W.S., Wang N., Bridges S.M., Malone B.M., Dandass Y.S., McCarthy F.M., et al. The proteogenomic mapping tool. BMC Bioinformatics 2011, 12:115.
52. Specht M., Stanke M., Terashima M., Naumann-Busch B., Janssen I., Hohner R., et al. Concerted action of the new Genomic Peptide Finder and AUGUSTUS allows for automated proteogenomic annotation of the Chlamydomonas reinhardtii genome. Proteomics 2011, 11:1814-1823.
53. Liska A.J., Shevchenko A. Expanding the organismal scope of proteomics: cross-species protein identification by mass spectrometry and its implications. Proteomics 2003, 3:19-28.
54. Carpentier S.C., Panis B., Renaut J., Samyn B., Vertommen A., Vanhove A.C., et al. The use of 2D-electrophoresis and de novo sequencing to characterize inter- and intra-cultivar protein polymorphisms in an allopolyploid crop. Phytochemistry 2011, 72:1243-1250.
55. Slootweg R., Kolhoff A. A generic approach to integrate biodiversity considerations in screening and scoping for EIA. Environ Impact Assess Rev 2003, 23:657-681.
56. Hahn M., Walbot V. Effects of cold-treatment on protein synthesis and mRNA levels in rice leaves. Plant Physiol 1989, 91:930-938.
57. Kottapalli K.R., Rakwal R., Shibato J., Burow G., Tissue D., Burke J., et al. Physiology and proteomics of the water-deficit stress response in three contrasting peanut genotypes. Plant Cell Environ 2009, 32:380-407.
58. Chevalier F., Martin O., Rofidal V., Devauchelle A.-D., Barteau S., Sommerer N., et al. Proteomic investigation of natural variation between Arabidopsis ecotypes. Proteomics 2004, 4:1372-1381.
59. Tester M., Langridge P. Breeding technologies to increase crop production in a changing world. Science 2010, 327:818-822.
60. Sunkar R. Plant stress tolerance: methods and protocols. Meth Mol Biol 2010, 639:365.
61. Kosova K., Vitamvas P., Prasil I.T., Renaut J. Plant proteome changes under abiotic stress - contribution of proteomics studies to understanding plant stress response. J Proteomics 2011, 74:1301-1322.
62. Quirino B.F., Candido E.S., Campos P.F., Franco O.L., Kruger R.H. Proteomic approaches to study plant-pathogen interactions. Phytochemistry 2010, 71:351-362.
63. Kaufmann K., Smaczniak C., De Vries S., Angenent G.C., Karlova R. Proteomics insights into plant signaling and development. Proteomics 2011, 11:744-755.
64. García-Limones C., Mercado-Blanco J., Jorge I. Protein identification and quantification by mass spectrometry-based analysis: applications in plant-pathogen interactions studies. Curr Proteomics 2010, 7:234-243.
65. Joshi H.J., Hirsch-Hoffmann M., Baerenfaller K., Gruissem W., Baginsky S., Schmidt R., et al. MASCP gator: an aggregation portal for the visualization of Arabidopsis proteomics data. Plant Physiol 2011, 155:259-270.
66. Gfeller A., Baerenfaller K., Loscos J., Chételat A., Baginsky S., Farmer E. Jasmonate controls polypeptide patterning in undamaged tissue in wounded Arabidopsis leaves. Plant Physiol 2011, 156:1797-1807.
67. Khan P.S.S.V., Hoffman L., Renaut J., Hausman J.F. Current initiatives in proteomics for the analysis of plant salt tolerance. Curr Sci 2007, 93:807-817.
68. Roy A., Rushton P.J., Rohila J.S. The potential of proteomics technologies for crop improvement under drought conditions. Crit Rev Plant Sci 2011, 30:471-490.
69. Farinha A.P., Irar S., de Oliveira E.M., Oliveira M.M., Page's M. Novel clues on abiotic stress tolerance emerge from embryo proteome analyses of rice varieties with contrasting stress adaptation. Proteomics 2011, 11:2389-2405.
70. Ford K.L., Cassin A., Bacic A. Quantitative proteomic analysis of wheat cultivars with differing drought stress tolerance. Front Plant Sci 2011, 2:44.
71. Rampitsch C., Bykova N.V. Proteomics and plan disease: advances in combating a major threat to the global food supply. Proteomics 2012, 12:1-18.
72. Poste G. Bring on the biomarkers. Nature 2011, 469:156-157.
73. Fröhlich A., Lindermayr C. Deep insights into the plant proteome by pretreatment with combinatorial hexapeptide ligand libraries. J Proteomics 2011, 74:1732-1739.
74. Pedreschi R., Hertog M., Lilley K., Nicolaï B. Proteomics for the food industry: opportunities and challenges. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2010, 50:680-692.
75. Lliso I., Tadeo F.R., Phinney B.S., Wilkerson C.G., Talón M. Protein changes in the albedo of citrus fruits on postharvest storage. J Agric Food Chem 2007, 55:9047-9053.
76. Pedreschi R., Vanstreels E., Carpentier S., Hertog M., Lammertyn J., Robben J., et al. Proteomic analysis of core breakdown disorder in Conference pears (Pyrus communis L.). Proteomics 2007, 7:2083-2099.
77. Pedreschi R., Hertog M., Robben J., Noben J.P., Nicolaï B. Physiological implications of controlled atmosphere storage on Conference pears (Pyrus communis L.): proteomic approach. Postharvest Biol Technol 2008, 50:110-116.
78. Pedreschi R., Hertog M., Robben J., Lilley K., Karp N., Baggerman G., et al. Gel based proteomics approach to study metabolic changes in pear tissue during storage. J Agric Food Chem 2009, 57:6997-7004.
79. Abdi N., Holford P., McGlasson B. Application of two-dimensional electrophoresis to detect proteins associated with harvest maturity in stone fruit. Postharvest Biol Technol 2002, 26:1-13.
80. Di Carli M., Zamboni A., Pè M., Pezotti M., Lilley K., Benvenuto E., et al. Two-dimensional differential in gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE) analysis of grape berry proteome during postharvest withering. J Proteome Res 2011, 10:429-446.
81. Cilindre C., Castro A.J., Clement C., Jeandet P., Marchal R. Influence of Botrytis cinerea infection on Champagne wine proteins (characterized by two dimensional electrophoresis/immuno detection) and wine foaming properties. Food Chem 2007, 103:139-149.
82. Cilindre C., Jégou S., Hovasse A., Schaeffer C., Castro A., Clément C., et al. Proteomic approach to identify champagne wine properties as modified by Botrytis cinerea infection. J Proteome Res 2008, 7:1199-1208.
83. Nilo R., Saffie C., Lilley K., Baeza-Yates R., Cambiazo V., Campos-Vargas R., et al. Proteomic analysis of peach fruit mesocarp softening and chilling injury using difference gel electrophoresis (DIGE). BMC Genomics 2010, 11:43.
84. Yun Z., Li L., Pan Z., Xu J., Chang Y., Deng X. Comparative analysis of differentially accumulated protein in juice sacs of ponkan (Citrus reticulata) fruit during postharvest cold storage. Postharvest Biol Technol 2010, 56:189-201.
85. Zhang L., Yu Z., Jiang L., Jiang J., Luo H., Fu L.E. Effect of postharvest heat treatment on proteome change of peach fruit during ripening. J Proteomics 2011, 74:1135-1149.
86. De Angelis M., Minervini F., Caputo L., Cassone A., Coda R., Calasso M.P., et al. Proteomic analysis by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and starch characterization of Triticum turgidum L. var durum cultivars for pasta making. J Agric Food Chem 2008, 56:8619-8628.
87. Yahata E., Maruyama-Funatsuki W., Nishio Z., Tabiki T., Tahata K., Yamanoto Y. Wheat cultivar specific proteins in grain revealed by 2-DE and their application to cultivar identification of flour. Proteomics 2005, 5:3942-3953.
88. Limure T., Nankaku N., Hirota N., Tiansu Z., Hoki T., Kihara M., et al. Construction of a novel beer proteome map and its use in beer quality control. Food Chem 2010, 118:566-574.
89. Fasoli E., Aldini G., Regazzoni L., Kravchuk A., Citterio A., Righetti G. Les Mai-tres de l'Orge: the proteome content of your beer mug. J Proteome Res 2010, 9:5262-5269.
90. Commission directive 2007/68/EC of 27 November 2007 amending annex IIIa to Directive 2000/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards certain food ingredients. Off J Eur Union 2007, 310-314.
91. Akawaga M., Handoyo T., Ishii T., Kumazawa S., Morita N., Suyama K. Proteomic analysis of wheat flour allergens. J Agric Food Chem 2007, 55:6863-6870.
92. Pischetsrieder M., Baeuerlein R. Proteome research in food science. Chem Soc Rev 2009, 38:2600-2608.
93. Chassaigne H., Norgaard J., van Hengel A.J. Proteomics based approach to detect and identify major allergens in processed peanuts by capillary LC-Q-TOF (MS/MS). J Agric Food Chem 2007, 55:4461-4473.
94. Heick J., Fischer M., Pöpping B. First screening method for the simultaneous detection of seven allergens by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 2011, 1218:938-943.
95. Heick J., Fischer M., Kerbach S., Tamm U., Popping B. Application of a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method for the simultaneous detection of seven allergenic foods in flour and bread and comparison of the method with commercially available Elisa test kits. J AOAC Int 2011, 94:1060-1068.
96. Lutter P., Parisod V., Weymuth H. Development and validation of a method for the quantification of milk proteins in food products based on liquid chromatography with mass spectrometric detection. J AOAC Int 2011, 94:1043-1059.
97. Johnson P.E., Baumgartner S., Aldick T., Bessant C., Giosafatto V., Heick J., et al. Current perspectives and recommendations for the development of mass spectrometry methods for the determination of allergens in foods. J AOAC Int 2011, 94:1026-1033.
98. Demirev P., Fenselau C. Mass spectrometry in biodefense. J Mass Spectrom 2008, 43:1441-1457.
99. Fagerquist C., Bates A., Heath S., King B., Garbus B., Harden L., et al. Sub-speciating Campylobacter jejuni by proteomic analysis of its protein biomarkers and their post translational modifications. J Proteome Res 2006, 5:2527-2538.
100. Welker M. Proteomics for routine identification of microorganisms. Proteomics 2011, 11:3143-3153.
101. Kaur P., Chakraborti A. Proteome analysis of a food borne pathogen enteroaggregative Escherichia coli under acid stress. J Proteomics Bioinformatics 2010, 3:10-19.
102. Sonck K., Gwendoline K., Schoofs G., Vander Wauven C., Vanderleyden J., Keersmaeckeer S. The proteome of Salmonella typhimurium grown in vivo mimicking conditions. Proteomics 2009, 9:565-579.
103. Chassy B.M. Can omics inform a food safety assessment?. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2010, 25:S62-S70.
104. Gil-Agusti M.T., Campostrini N., Zolla L., Ciambella C., Invernizzi C., Righetti P.G. Two dimensional mapping as a tool for classification of green coffee bean species. Proteomics 2010, 5:710-718.
105. D'Amato A., Fasoli E., Kravchuk A.V., Righetti P.G. Going nuts for nuts? The trace proteome of a cola drink as detected via combinatorial peptide ligand libraries. J Proteome Res 2011, 10:2684-2686.
106. Fasoli E., D'Amato A., Kravchuk A.V., Critterio A., Righetti P.G. In depth proteomic analysis of non-alcoholic beverages with peptide ligand libraries. I: almond milk and orgeat syrup. J Proteomics 2011, 74:1080-1090.
107. Rapeanu G., Vicol C., Bichescu C. Possibilities to assess the wines authenticity. Inn Rom Food Biotechnol 2009, 5:1-9.
108. Won S.R., Lee D.C., Hyun Ko S., Kim J.W., Rhee H.I. Honey major protein characterization and its application to adulteration detection. Food Res Int 2008, 41:952-956.
109. Kussman M., Van Bladeren P.J. The extended nutrigenomics - understanding the interplay between the genomes of food, gut microbes and human host. Front Genet 2011, 2:1-13.
110. Kussman M., Panchaud A., Affolter M. Proteomics in nutrition: status quo outlook for biomarkers and bioactives. J Proteome Res 2010, 9:4876-4887.
111. Kussmann M., Affolter M. Proteomic methods in nutrition. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2006, 5:575-583.
112. Moller N.P., Scholz-Ahrens K.E., Roos N., Schrezenmeir J. Bioactive peptides and proteins from foods: indication for health effects. Eur J Nutr 2008, 47:171-182.
113. de Lumen B.O. Lunasin: a cancer preventive soy peptide. Nutr Rev 2005, 63:16-21.
114. Brambilla F., Resta D., Isak I., Zanotti M., Arnoldi A. A label-free internal standard method for the differential analysis of bioactive lupin proteins using nano HPLC-chip coupled with ion trap mass spectrometry. Proteomics 2009, 9:272-286.
115. Jegannathan K.R., Chan E.S., Ravindra P. Harnessing biofuels: a global renaissance in energy production?. Renew Sust Energy Rev 2009, 13:2163-2168.
116. Murphy S. Biofuels: finding a sustainable balance for food and energy. Food security, nutrition and sustainability 2010, Earthscan Publishers, UK. G. Lawrence, K. Lyons, T. Wallington (Eds.).
117. Bhattarai K., Stalick W.M., McKay S., Geme G., Bhattarai N. Biofuel: an alternative to fossil fuel for alleviating world energy and economic crises. J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng 2011, 46:1424-1442.
118. Munns R., Tester M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2008, 59:651-681.
119. Calviño M., Messing J. Sweet sorghum as a model system for bioenergy crops. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2012, 23:323-329.
120. Kasuga M., Liu Q., Miura S., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K., Shinozaki K. Improving plant drought, salt, and freezing tolerance by gene transfer of a single stress-inducible transcription factor. Nat Biotechnol 1999, 17:287-291.
121. Ngara R., Ndimba B.K. Mapping and characterisation of the sorghum cell suspension culture secretome. Afr J Biotechnol 2011, 10:253-266.
122. Ngara R., Rees D.J.G., Ndimba B.K. Establishment of sorghum cell suspension culture system for proteomics studies. Afr J Biotechnol 2008, 7:744-749.
123. Sudhakar Johnson T., Eswaran N., Sujatha M. Molecular approaches to improvement of Jatropha curcas Linn. as a sustainable energy crop. Plant Cell Rep 2011, 30:1573-1591.
124. Yang M.F., Liu Y.J., Liu Y., Chen H., Chen F., Shen S.H. Proteomic analysis of oil mobilization in seed germination and post-germination development of Jatropha curcas. J Proteome Res 2009, 8:1441-1451.
125. Liu H., Liu Y.J., Yang M.F., Shen S.H. A comparative analysis of embryo and endosperm proteome from seeds of Jatropha curcas. J Integr Plant Biol 2009, 51:850-857.
126. Popluechai S., Froissard M., Jolivet P., Breviario D., Gatehouse A.M.R., Donnell A.G.O., et al. Jatropha curcas oil body proteome and oleosins: L-form JcOle3 as a potential phylogenetic marker. Plant Physiol Biochem 2011, 49:352-356.
127. James P. The International Proteomics Tutorial Programme (IPTP): a teaching tool box for the proteomics community. Proteomics 2011, 11:3596-3597.