Quantification of the affinities and kinetics of protein interactions using silicon nanowire biosensors

Nature Nanotechnology

Volumn 7, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 401-407

  Duan, Xuexin ^a   Li, Yue ^a   Rajan, Nitin K ^b   Routenberg, David A ^a   Modis, Yorgo ^a   Reed, Mark A ^a,b  

^a Yale University   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASSOCIATION REACTIONS; BINDING ENERGY; BIOSENSORS; KINETICS; LIGANDS; NANOWIRES; PROTEINS; RATE CONSTANTS; SILICON; SURFACE PLASMON RESONANCE;

BINDING AFFINITIES; CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS; FEMTOMOLAR CONCENTRATION; LIGAND BINDING AFFINITY; PROTEIN INTERACTION; SILICON NANOWIRE FIELD-EFFECT TRANSISTORS; SILICON NANOWIRES; THROUGHPUT ANALYSIS;

FIELD EFFECT TRANSISTORS;

NANOWIRE; SILICON;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; BIOSENSOR; CALIBRATION; DISSOCIATION; KINETICS; LIGAND BINDING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MONITORING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN INTERACTION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SEMICONDUCTOR; SURFACE PLASMON RESONANCE;

EID: 84863720729     PISSN: 17483387     EISSN: 17483395     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2012.82     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Boccaletti, S., Latora, V., Moreno, Y., Chavez, M. & Hwang, D. U. Complex networks: structure and dynamics. Phys. Rep. 424, 175-308 (2006).
2. Wilson, G. S. & Gifford, R. Biosensors for real-time in vivo measurements. Biosens. Bioelectron. 20, 2388-2403 (2005).
3. Cheng, M. M. C. et al. Nanotechnologies for biomolecular detection and medical diagnostics. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 10, 11-19 (2006).
4. D'Orazio, P. Biosensors in clinical chemistry. Clin. Chim. Acta 334, 41-69 (2003).
5. Arlett, J. L., Myers, E. B. & Roukes, M. L. Comparative advantages of mechanical biosensors. Nature Nanotech. 6, 203-215 (2011).
6. Cooper, M. A. Optical biosensors in drug discovery. Nature Rev. Drug Discov. 1, 515-528 (2002).
7. Curreli, M. et al. Real-time, label-free detection of biological entities using nanowire-based FETs. IEEE Trans. Nanotech. 7, 651-667 (2008).
8. Stern, E., Vacic, A. & Reed, M. A. Semiconducting nanowire field-effect transistor biomolecular sensors. IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 55, 3119-3130 (2008).
9. Cui, Y. & Lieber, C. M. Functional nanoscale electronic devices assembled using silicon nanowire building blocks. Science 291, 851-853 (2001).
10. Stern, E. et al. Label-free immunodetection with CMOS-compatible semiconducting nanowires. Nature 445, 519-522 (2007).
11. Wang, W. U., Chen, C., Lin, K. H., Fang, Y. & Lieber, C. M. Label-free detection of small-molecule-protein interactions by using nanowire nanosensors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 3208-3212 (2005).
12. De Vico, L. et al. Quantifying signal changes in nano-wire based biosensors. Nanoscale 3, 706-717 (2011).
13. Bunimovich, Y. L. et al. Quantitative real-time measurements of DNA hybridization with alkylated nonoxidized silicon nanowires in electrolyte solution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 16323-16331 (2006).
14. Squires, T. M., Messinger, R. J. & Manalis, S. R. Making it stick: convection, reaction and diffusion in surface-based biosensors. Nature Biotechnol. 26, 417-426 (2008).
15. Tian, J. et al. Toll-like receptor 9-dependent activation by DNA-containing immune complexes is mediated by HMGB1 and RAGE. Nature Immunol. 8, 487-496 (2007).
16. Li, Y., Berk, I. C. & Modis, Y. DNA binding to proteolytically activated TLR9 is sequence-independent and enhanced by DNA curvature. EMBO J. 31, 919-931 (2012).
17. Wilchek, M. & Bayer, E. A. Introduction to avidin-biotin technology. Methods Enzymol. 184, 5-13 (1990).
18. Balasubramanian, K. Challenges in the use of 1D nanostructures for on-chip biosensing and diagnostics: a review. Biosens. Bioelectron. 26, 1195-1204 (2011).
19. Ishikawa, F. N. et al. A calibration method for nanowire biosensors to suppress device-to-device variation. ACS Nano 3, 3969-3976 (2009).
20. Lee, B. Y. et al. Universal parameters for carbon nanotube network-based sensors: can nanotube sensors be reproducible? ACS Nano 5, 4373-4379 (2011).
21. Abe, M. et al. Quantitative detection of protein using a top-gate carbon nanotube field effect transistor. J. Phys. Chem. C 111, 8667-8670 (2007).
22. Myszka, D. G., He, X., Dembo, M., Morton, T. A. & Goldstein, B. Extending the range of rate constants available from BIACORE: interpreting mass transportinfluenced binding data. Biophys. J. 75, 583-594 (1998).
23. Gaster, R. S. et al. Quantification of protein interactions and solution transport using high-density GMR sensor arrays. Nature Nanotech. 6, 314-320 (2011).
24. Elfstroem, N., Karlstroem, A. E. & Linnrost, J. Silicon nanoribbons for electrical detection of biomolecules. Nano Lett. 8, 945-949 (2008).
25. Sheehan, P. E. & Whitman, L. J. Detection limits for nanoscale biosensors. Nano Lett. 5, 803-807 (2005).
26. Bergveld, P. A critical-evaluation of direct electrical protein-detection methods. Biosens. Bioelectron. 6, 55-72 (1991).
27. Stern, E. et al. Importance of the debye screening length on nanowire field effect transistor sensors. Nano Lett. 7, 3405-3409 (2007).
28. Bianchi, M. E., Beltrame, M. & Paonessa, G. Specific recognition of cruciform DNA by nuclear-protein HMG1. Science 243, 1056-1059 (1989).
29. Ivanov, S. et al. A novel role for HMGB1 in TLR9-mediated inflammatory responses to CpG-DNA. Blood 110, 1970-1981 (2007).
30. Ohndorf, U. M., Rould, M. A., He, Q., Pabo, C. O. & Lippard, S. J. Basis for recognition of cisplatin-modified DNA by high-mobility-group proteins. Nature 399, 708-712 (1999).
31. Pil, P. M. & Lippard, S. J. Specific binding of chromosomal protein-HMG1 to DNA damaged by the anticancer drug cisplatin. Science 256, 234-237 (1992).
32. Halford, S. E. & Marko, J. F. How do site-specific DNA-binding proteins find their targets? Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 3040-3052 (2004).
33. Jung, Y. & Lippard, S. J. Nature of full-length HMGB1 binding to cisplatinmodified DNA. Biochemistry 42, 2664-2671 (2003).
34. Perez-Luna, V. H. et al. Molecular recognition between genetically engineered streptavidin and surface-bound biotin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 6469-6478 (1999).
35. Jung, L. S., Nelson, K. E., Stayton, P. S. & Campbell, C. T. Binding and dissociation kinetics of wild-type and mutant streptavidins on mixed biotincontaining alkylthiolate monolayers. Langmuir 16, 9421-9432 (2000).
36. Buranda, T. et al. Ligand receptor dynamics at streptavidin-coated particle surfaces: a flow cytometric and spectrofluorimetric study. J. Phys. Chem. B 103, 3399-3410 (1999).
37. Tang, Y. J., Mernaugh, R. & Zeng, X. Q. Nonregeneration protocol for surface plasmon resonance: study of high-affinity interaction with high-density biosensors. Anal. Chem. 78, 1841-1848 (2006).