Making it stick: Convection, reaction and diffusion in surface-based biosensors

Nature Biotechnology

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 417-426

  Squires, Todd M ^a   Messinger, Robert J ^a   Manalis, Scott R ^b  

^a University of California   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMOLECULES; CHEMICAL REACTIONS;

ANALYTE TRANSPORT; BIOMOLECULAR DETECTION; NANOSCALE SENSORS;

BIOSENSORS;

ALGORITHM; BIOSENSOR; DIFFUSION; KINETICS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; NANOANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; REACTION ANALYSIS; REVIEW; STEADY STATE; THERMODYNAMICS; TRANSPORT KINETICS;

ADHESIVENESS; BIOSENSING TECHNIQUES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIFFUSION; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; MICROFLUIDICS; MODELS, CHEMICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 41849151140     PISSN: 10870156     EISSN: 15461696     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nbt1388     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. The chipping forecast. Nat. Genet. 21, S1 (1999).
2. The chipping forecast II. Nat. Genet. 32, S4 (2002).
3. Johnsson, B., Lofas, S. & Lindquist, G. Immobilization of proteins to a carboxymethyl-dextran-modified gold surface for biospecific interaction analysis in surface-plasmon resonance sensors. Anal. Biochem. 198, 268-277 (1991).
4. Rich, R.L. & Myszka, D.G. Survey of the year 2001 commercial optical biosensor literature. J. Mol. Recognit. 15, 352-376 (2002).
5. Morgan, C.L., Newman, D.J. & Price, C.P. Immunosensors: technology and opportunities in laboratory medicine. Clin. Chem. 42, 193-209 (1996).
6. Kartalov, E.P. et al. High-throughput multi-antigen microfluidic fluorescence immunoassays. Biotechniques 40, 85-90 (2006).
7. Fritz, J. et al. Translating biomolecular recognition into nanomechanics. Science 288, 316-318 (2000).
8. Wu, G. et al. Bioassay of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) using microcantilevers. Nat. Biotechnol. 19, 856-860 (2001).
9. Bergveld, P. Development, operation, and application of ion-sensitive field-effect transistor as a tool for electrophysiology. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. BM19, 342 (1972).
10. Souteyrand, E. et al. Direct detection of the hybridization of synthetic homo-oligomer DNA sequences by field effect. J. Phys. Chem. B 101, 2980-2985 (1997).
11. Milovic, N.M. et al. Monitoring of heparin and its low-molecular-weight analogs by silicon field effect. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 13374-13379 (2006).
12. Wang, J. Towards genoelectronics: electrochemical biosensing of DNA hybridization. Chem. Eur. J. 5, 1681-1685 (1999).
13. Xiao, Y., Lubin, A.A., Baker, B.R., Plaxco, K.W. & Heeger, A.J. Single-step electronic detection of femtomolar DNA by target-induced strand displacement in an electrode-bound duplex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 16677-16680 (2006).
14. Burg, T.P. et al. Weighing of biomolecules, single cells and single nanoparticles in fluid. Nature 446, 1066-1069 (2007).
15. Cui, Y., Wei, Q.Q., Park, H.K. & Lieber, C.M. Nanowire nanosensors for highly sensitive and selective detection of biological and chemical species. Science 293, 1289-1292 (2001).
16. Bunimovich, Y.L. et al. Quantitative real-time measurements of DNA hybridization with alkylated nonoxidized silicon nanowires in electrolyte solution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 16323-16331 (2006).
17. Zheng, G., Patolsky, F., Cui, Y., Wang, W.U. & Lieber, C.M. Multiplexed electrical detection of cancer markers with nanowire sensor arrays. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 1294-1301 (2005).
18. Stern, E. et al. Label-free immunodetection with CMOS-compatible semiconducting nanowires. Nature 445, 519-522 (2007).
19. Armani, A.M., Kulkarni, R.P., Fraser, S.E., Flagan, R.C. & Vahala, K.J. Label-free, single-molecule detection with optical microcavities. Science 317, 783-787 (2007).
20. Benn, J.A. et al. Comparative modeling and analysis of microfluidic and conventional DNA microarrays. Anal. Biochem. 348, 284-293 (2006).
21. Melin, J. & Quake, S.R. Microfluidic large-scale integration: the evolution of design rules for biological automation. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 36, 213-231 (2007).
22. Sheehan, P.E. & Whitman, L.J. Detection limits for nanoscale biosensors. Nano Lett. 5, 803-807 (2005).
23. Bender, C.M. & Orszag, S.A. Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers (McGraw Hill, New York, 1978).
24. Hinch, E.J. Perturbation Methods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991.
25. Bird, R.B., Stewart, W.E. & Lightfoot, E.N. Transport Phenomena, edn. 2 (Wiley, New York, 2002).
26. Leal, L.G. Advanced Transport Phenomena: Fluid Mechanics and Convective Transport Processes (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007).
27. Deen, W.M. 123. Analysis of Transport Phenomena (Oxford University Press, New York, 1998).
28. Squires, T.M. & Quake, S.R. Microfluidics: Fluid physics at the nanoliter scale. Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 977-1026 (2005).
29. Berg, H.C. Random Walks in Biology (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1993).
30. Newman, J. The fundamental principles of current distribution and mass transport in electrochemical cells. in Electroanalytical Chemistry vol. 6 (ed. Bard, A.) 279-297, (Dekker, New York, 1973).
31. Ackerberg, R.C., Patel, R.D. & Gupta, S.K. Heat-mass transfer to a finite strip at small Peclet numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 86, 49-65 (1978).
32. Zhang, W., Stone, H.A. & Sherwood, J.D. Mass transfer at a microelectrode in channel flow. J. Phys. Chem. 100, 9462-9464 (1996).
33. Peluso, P. et al. Optimizing antibody immobilization strategies for the construction of protein microarrays. Anal. Biochem. 312, 113-124 (2003).
34. Myszka, D.G., He, X., Dembo, M., Morton, T.A. & Goldstein, B. Extending the range of rate constants available from BIACORE: Interpreting mass transport-influenced binding data. Biophys. J. 75, 583-594 (1998).
35. Schreiber, G. Kinetic studies of protein-protein interactions. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12, 41-47 (2002).
36. Wallis, R., Moore, G.R., James, R. & Kleanthous, C. Protein-protein interactions in Colicin E9 Dnase-immunity protein complexes. 1. diffusion-controlled association and femtomolar binding for the cognate complex. Biochemistry 34, 13743-13750 (1995).
37. Record, M.T., Zhang, W.T. & Anderson, C.F. Analysis of effects of salts and uncharged solutes on protein and nucleic acid equilibria and processes: a practical guide to recognizing and interpreting polyelectrolyte effects, Hofmeister effects, and osmotic effects of salts. in Advances In Protein Chemistry, vol. 51 (eds. Di Cera, E. & Eisenberg, D.E.) 281-353, (Academic Press, San Diego, 1998).
38. Belosludtsev, Y. et al. Nearly instantaneous, cation-independent, high selectivity nucleic acid hybridization to DNA microarrays. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 282, 1263-1267 (2001).
39. Sosnowski, R.G., Tu, E., Butler, W.F., Oconnell, J.P. & Heller, M.J. Rapid determination of single base mismatch mutations in DNA hybrids by direct electric field control. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 1119-1123 (1997).
40. Riggs, A.D., Bourgeoi, S. & Cohn, M. Lac repressor-operator interaction. III. kinetic studies. J. Mol. Biol. 53, 401 (1970).
41. Wang, Y.M., Austin, R.H. & Cox, E.C. Single molecule measurements of repressor protein 1d diffusion on DNA. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, (2006).
42. Halford, S.E. & Marko, J.F. How do site-specific DNA-binding proteins find their targets? Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 3040-3052 (2004).
43. Yoon, S.K., Fichtl, G.W. & Kenis, P.J.A. Active control of the depletion boundary layers in microfluidic electrochemical reactors. Lab Chip 6, 1516-1524 (2006).
44. Vijayendran, R.A., Motsegood, K.M., Beebe, D.J. & Leckband, D.E. Evaluation of a three-dimensional micromixer in a surface-based biosensor. Langmuir 19, 1824-1828 (2003).
45. Gervais, T. & Jensen, K.F. Mass transport and surface reactions in microfluidic systems. Chem. Eng. Sci. 61, 1102-1121 (2006).