Individual differences in working memory capacity and attention, and their relationship with students' approaches to learning

Higher Education

Volumn 64, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 285-297

  Kyndt, Eva ^a   Cascallar, Eduardo ^a   Dochy, Filip ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Approaches to learning; Attention; Higher education; Working memory capacity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84863556306     PISSN: 00181560     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10734-011-9493-0     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Anderson, J. R. (1993). Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Anderson, J. R., & Matessa, M. (1997). A production system theory of serial memory. Psychological Review, 104(4), 728-748.
3. Anderson, J. R., Reder, J. M., & Lebière, C. (1996). Working memory: Activation limitations on retrieval. Cognitive Psychology, 30, 221-256.
4. Baeten, M., Kyndt, E., Struyven, K., & Dochy, F. (2010). Using student-centred learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: Factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness. Educational Research Review, 5(3), 243-260.
5. Biggs, J. (1993). What do inventories of students' learning processes really measure? A theoretical review and clarification. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 3-19.
6. Biggs, J. B. (2001). Enhancing learning: A matter of style or approach? In R. J. Sternberg & L. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles (pp. 73-102). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Biggs, J., Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2001). The revised two-factor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 133-149.
8. Birenbaum, M., & Rosenau, S. (2006). Assessment preferences, learning orientations and learning strategies of pre-service and in-service teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching, 32(2), 213-225.
9. Byrne, M., Flood, B., & Willis, P. (2004). Using the student learning framework to explore the variation in academic performance of European business students. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 28(1), 67-78.
10. Cano, F. (2005). Epistemological beliefs and approaches to learning: Their change through secondary school and their influence on academic performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 203-221.
11. Cascallar, E. C., & Musso, M. F. (2008). Classificatory stream analysis in the prediction of expected reading readiness: Understanding student performance. International Journal of Psychology, 43(3-4), 231.
12. Cassidy, S. (2006). Learning style and student self-assessment skill. Education and Training, 48(2-3), 170-177.
13. Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Arteche, A. (2008). Intellectual competence and academic performance: Preliminary validation of a model. Intelligence, 36, 564-573.
14. Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2008). Personality, intelligence and approaches to learning as predictors of academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1596-1603.
15. Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Furnham, A., & Lewis, M. (2007). Personality and approaches to learning predict preference for different teaching methods. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 241-250.
16. Colom, R., Escorial, S., Chun Shih, P., & Privado, J. (2007). Fluid intelligence, memory span, and temperament difficulties predict academic performance of young adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 1503-1514.
17. Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user's guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(5), 769-786.
18. Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2003). Working memory capacity and its relation to general intelligence. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7(12), 547-552.
19. Crawford, K., Gordon, S., Nicholas, J., & Prosser, M. (1998). Qualitatively different experiences of learning mathematics at university. Learning and Instruction, 8(5), 455-468.
20. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester: University of Rochester Press.
21. Diseth, A. (2002). The relationship between intelligence, approaches to learning and academic achievement. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 46(2), 219-230.
22. Diseth, A., & Martinsen, O. (2003). Approaches to learning, cognitive style, and motives as predictors of academic achievement. Educational Psychology, 23(2), 195-207.
23. Diseth, A., Pallesen, S., Brunborg, G. S., & Larsen, S. (2010). Academic achievement among first semester undergraduate psychology students: The role of course experience, effort, motives and learning strategies. Higher Education, 59(3), 335-352.
24. Dunlosky, J., & Kane, M. J. (2007). The contributions of strategy use to working memory span: A comparison of strategy assessment methods. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(9), 1227-1245.
25. Engle, R. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 19-23.
26. Entwistle, N. J. (1988). Motivational factors in students' approaches to learning. In R. R. Schmeck (Ed.), Learning strategies and learning styles (pp. 21-51). New York: Plenum Press.
27. Entwistle, N. J. (1991). Approaches to learning and perceptions of the learning environment. Introduction to the special issue. Higher Education, 22, 201-204.
28. Entwistle, N. J., McCune, V., & Walker, P. (2001). Conceptions, styles, and approaches within higher education: Analytical abstractions and everyday experience. In R. J. Sternberg & L.-F. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on cognitive, learning and thinking styles (pp. 103-136). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29. Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Summer, T., Raz, A., & Posner, M. I. (2002). Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(3), 340-347.
30. Fernandez-Castillo, A., & Gutiérrez-Rojas, M. E. (2009). Selective attention, anxiety, depressive symptomatology and academic performance in adolescents. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 7(1), 49-76.
31. Gathercole, S. E., Alloway, T. P., Kirkwood, H. J., Elliot, J. G., Holmes, J., & Hilton, K. A. (2008). Attentional and executive function behaviours in children with poor working memory. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 214-223.
32. Gathercole, S. E., Pickering, S. J., Knight, C., & Stegmann, Z. (2004). Working memory skills and educational attainment: Evidence from national curriculum assessments at 7 and 14 years of age. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1-16.
33. Gazzaniga, M., Ivry, R., & Mangun, G. (2002). Cognitive neuroscience: The biology of the mind (2nd ed.). New York: W. W. Norton.
34. Gibbs, G. (1992). Improving the quality of student learning. Bristol, UK: Technical and Education Services.
35. Gijbels, D., van De Watering, G., Dochy, F., & van Den Bossche, P. (2005). The relationship between students' approaches to learning and the assessment of learning outcomes. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 20(4), 327-341.
36. Grimley, M., & Banner, G. (2008). Working memory, cognitive style, and behavioural predictors of GCSE exam success. Educational Psychology, 28(3), 341-351.
37. Gsanger, K., Wa, S., Homack, S., Siekierski, B., & Riccio, C. (2002). The relation of memory and attention to academic achievement in children. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 17(8), 790.
38. Hoffman, B., & Schraw, G. (2009). The influence of self-efficacy and working memory capacity on problem solving efficiency. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(1), 91-100.
39. Jimmerson, S. R., Dubrow, E. H., Adam, E., Gunnar, M., & Bozoky, I. K. (2006). Associations among academic achievement, attention, and andrenocortical reactivity in Caribbean village children. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 21, 120-138.
40. Kember, D., Charlesworth, M., Dabies, H., MacKay, J., & Stott, V. (1997). Evaluating the effectiveness of educational innovations: Using the study process questionnaire to show that meaningful learning occurs. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 23(2), 141-157.
41. Klein, K., & Fiss, W. H. (1999). The reliability and stability of the Turner and Engle working memory task. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 31, 429-432.
42. LaBerge, D., Carlson, R. L., Williams, J. K., & Bunney, B. G. (1997). Shifting attention in visual space: Tests of moving-spotlight models versus an activity-distribution model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23(5), 1380-1392.
43. Learning Disabilities Association of Minnesota. (2007). Introduction to working memory. Netnews, 7(4), 1-3.
44. Lynn, R., & Irwing, P. (2008). Sex differences in mental arithmetic, digit span, and 'g' defined as working memory capacity. Intelligence, 36(3), 226-235.
45. Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1997). Approaches to learning. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning. Implications for teaching and studying in higher education (2nd ed., pp. 39-58). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
46. Masoura, E. V. (2006). Establishing the link between working memory function and learning disabilities. Learning disabilities: A contemporary journal, 4(2), 29-41.
47. McParland, M., Noble, L., & Livingston, G. (2004). The effectiveness of problem-based learning compared to traditional teaching in undergraduate psychiatry. Medical Education, 38, 859-867.
48. Musso, M. F., & Cascallar, E. C. (2009). New approaches for improved quality in educational assessments: Using automated predictive systems in reading and mathematics. Journal of Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 17, 134-151.
49. Naglieri, J. A., & Rohjahn, J. (2001). Gender differences in planning, attention, simultaneous and successive (PASS) cognitive processes and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 430-437.
50. Nijhuis, J., Segers, M., & Gijselaers, W. (2008). The extent of variability in learning strategies and students' perceptions of the learning environment. Learning and Instruction, 18(2), 121-134.
51. Phan, H. P. (2007). An Examination of reflective thinking, learning approaches, and self-efficacy beliefs at the university of the South-Pacific: A path analysis approach. Educational Psychology, 27(6), 789-806.
52. Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E. (1990). The attention systems of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13, 25-42.
53. Redick, T. S., & Engle, R. W. (2006). Working memory capacity and attention network test performance. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 713-721.
54. Riccio, C. A., Lee, D., Romine, C., Cash, D., & Davis, B. (2002). Relation of memory and attention to academic achievement in adults. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 18(7), 755-756.
55. Riding, R. J., Grimley, M., Dahraei, H., & Banner, G. (2003). Cognitive style, working memory and learning behaviour and attainment in school subjects. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 749-769.
56. Schmeck, R. R. (1988). Strategies and styles of learning. An integration of varied perspectives. In R. R. Schmeck (Ed.), Learning strategies and learning styles (pp. 317-347). New York: Plenum Press.
57. Sperling, G., & Weichselgartner, E. (1995). Episodic theory of the dynamics of spatial attention. Psychological Review, 102, 503-532.
58. Stes, A., De Maeyer, S., & van Petegem, P. (2008). Students' study approaches: A study into the validity and reliability of a Dutch version of the R-SPQ-2F. European learning styles information network, 13th annual conference. Gent, Belgium.
59. Struyven, K., Dochy, F., Janssens, S., & Gielen, S. (2006). On the dynamics of students' approaches to learning: The effects of the teaching/learning environment. Learning and Instruction, 16, 279-294.
60. Swanson, H. L., Cochran, K. F., & Ewers, C. A. (1990). Can learning disabilities be determined from working memory performance? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23(1), 59-67.
61. Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1991). Relating approaches to study and quality of learning outcomes at the course level. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 61(3), 265-275.
62. Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127-154.
63. Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Individual differences in working memory capacity and learning: Evidence from the serial reaction time task. Memory & Cognition, 33(2), 213-220.
64. Unsworth, N., Heitz, R. P., Schrock, J. C., & Engle, R. W. (2005). An automated version of the operation span task. Behavior Research Methods, 37(3), 498-505.
65. Unsworth, N., & Spillers, G. J. (2010). Working memory capacity: Attention control, second memory, or both? A direct test of the dual-component model. Journal of Memory and Language, 62(4), 392-406.
66. Valk, A., & Marandi, T. (2005). How to support deep learning at a university? In F. E. H. Tay, T. S. Chuan, & S. Han-Ming (Eds.), Proceeding of the international conference on education 2005. Singapore: National University of Singapore.
67. Vermetten, Y., Vermunt, J., & Lodewijks, H. (2002). Powerful learning environment? How do university students differ in their response to instructional measures. Learning and Instruction, 12, 263-284.
68. Watkins, D. (2001). Correlates of approaches to learning: A cross-cultural meta-analysis. In R. Sternberg & L. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles (pp. 165-196). London: Erlbaum.
69. Wilson, K., & Fowler, J. (2005). Assessing the impact of learning environments on students' approaches to learning: Comparing conventional and action learning designs. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(1), 87-101.
70. Zeegers, P. (2001). Approaches to learning in science: A longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 115-132.
71. Zeegers, P. (2004). Student learning in higher education: A path analysis of academic achievement in science. Higher Education Research & Development, 23(1), 35-56.