Academic achievement among first semester undergraduate psychology students: The role of course experience, effort, motives and learning strategies

Higher Education

Volumn 59, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 335-352

  Diseth, Åge ^a   Pallesen, Ståle ^a   Brunborg, Geir Scott ^a   Larsen, Svein ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

Author keywords

Course experience; Effort; Motives; Strategies; Students' approaches to learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951204563     PISSN: 00181560     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10734-009-9251-8     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Arbuckle, J. L. (1999). AMOS users' guide version 4. 0. Chicago: SPSS Corporation.
2. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
3. Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at university. Buckingham: Open UP and SRHE.
4. Biggs, J. (2001). Enhancing learning: A matter of style or approach? In R. J. Sternberg & L. F. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles (pp. 73-103). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Biggs, J. B. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university. UK: SRHE and Open University Press.
6. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 445-455). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7. Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modelling with AMOS. Basic concepts, applications, and programming. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8. Byrne, M., & Flood, B. (2003). Assessing the teaching quality of accounting programmes: An evaluation of the course experience questionnaire. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28, 135-145.
9. Cano, F. (2005). Epistemological beliefs and approaches to learning: Their change through secondary school and their influence on academic performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 203-221.
10. Cavell, T. A., & Woehr, D. J. (1994). Predicting introductory psychology test scores: An engaging and useful topic. Teaching of Psychology, 21, 108-110.
11. Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., & Ecclestone, K. (2004). Should we be using learning styles? What research has to say to practice. London: Learning and Skills Research Centre.
12. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13. Diseth, Å. (2001). Validation of a Norwegian version of the approaches and study skills inventory for students (ASSIST): Application of structural equation modelling. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 45, 381-394.
14. Diseth, Å. (2003). Personality and approaches to learning as predictors of academic achievement. European Journal of Personality, 17, 143-155.
15. Diseth, Å. (2007). Approaches to learning, course experience and examination grade among undergraduate psychology students: Testing of mediator effects and construct validity. Studies in Higher Education, 32, 373-388.
16. Diseth, Å., Pallesen, S., Hovland, A., & Larsen, S. (2006). Course experience, approaches to learning and academic achievement. Education and Training, 48, 156-169.
17. Duff, A. (2003). Quality of learning on an MBA programme: the impact of approaches to learning on academic performance. Educational Psychology, 23, 127-139.
18. Entwistle, N. (1987). A model of the teaching-learning process. In J. T. E. Richardson, M. W. Eysenck, & D. Warren Piper (Eds.), Improving learning: New perspectives (pp. 178-198). London: Kogan Page.
19. Entwistle, N. J. (1997). The approaches and study skills inventory for students (ASSIST). Edinburgh: Centre for Research on Learning and Instruction, University of Edinburgh.
20. Entwistle, N., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. London: Croom Helm.
21. Entwistle, N., & Smith, C. (2002). Personal understanding and target understanding: Mapping influences on the outcomes of learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 321-342.
22. Entwistle, N., & Tait, H. (1990). Approaches to learning, evaluation of teaching, and preferences for contrasting academic environments. Higher Education, 19, 169-194.
23. Entwistle, N., Tait, H., & McCune, V. (2000). Patterns of response to an approaches to studying inventory across contrasting groups and contexts. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15, 33-48.
24. Fan, X., Wang, L., & Thompson, B. (1999). Effects of sample size, estimation method, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 56-83.
25. Honkimäki, S., Tynjälä, P., & Valkonen, S. (2004). University students' study orientations, learning experiences and study success in innovative courses. Studies in Higher Education, 29, 431-449.
26. Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modelling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76-99). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27. Jöreskog, K. G. (1993). Testing structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 294-317). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
28. Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (1998). Influences upon students' perceptions of workload. Educational Psychology, 18, 293-307.
29. Laurillard, D. (1979). The process of student learning. Higher Education, 8, 395-409.
30. Lawless, C. J., & Richardson, J. T. E. (2002). Approaches to studying and perceptions of academic quality in distance education. Higher Education, 44, 257-282.
31. Lizzio, A., Wilson, K., & Simons, R. (2002). University students' perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: Implications for theory and practice. Studies in Higher Education, 27, 27-52.
32. Marsh, H. W. (1987). Students' evaluation of university teaching: Research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research. International Journal of Educational Research, 11, 253-388.
33. Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I-outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4-11.
34. Newble, D. I., & Clarke, R. (1987). Approaches to learning in a traditional and an innovative medical school. In J. T. E. Richardson, M. W. Eysenck, & D. Warren Piper (Eds.), Student learning: Research in education and cognitive psychology (pp. 39-48). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
35. Newble, D., & Hejka, E. J. (1991). Approaches to learning of medical students and practicing physicians: Some empirical evidence and its implications for medical education. Educational Psychology, 11, 333-342.
36. Newstead, S. E. (1992). A study of two 'quick-and-easy' methods of assessing individual differences in student learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 299-312.
37. Pampel, F. C. (2000). Logistic regression: A primer. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38. Plant, E. A., Ericsson, K. A., Hill, L., & Asberg, K. (2005). Why study time does not predict grade point average across college students: Implications of deliberate practice for academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 96-116.
39. Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
40. Ramsden, P. (1979). Student learning and perceptions of the academic environment. Higher Education, 8, 411-427.
41. Ramsden, P. (1988). Situational influences on learning. In R. R. Schmeck (Ed.), Learning strategies and learning styles (pp. 159-184). New York: Plenum Press.
42. Ramsden, P. (1991). A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The course experience questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 16, 129-150.
43. Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge.
44. Ramsden, P., & Entwistle, N. (1981). Effects of academic departments on students' approaches to studying. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 368-383.
45. Rau, W., & Durand, A. (2000). The academic ethic and college grades: Does hard work help students to "make the grade?". Sociology of Education, 73, 19-38.
46. Richardson, J. T. E. (2003). Approaches to studying and perceptions of academic quality in a short web-based course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34, 433-442.
47. Richardson, J. T. E. (2006). Investigating the relationship between variations in students' perceptions of their academic environment and variations in study behaviour in distance education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 867-893.
48. Richardson, J. T. E., & Price, L. (2003). Approaches to studying and perceptions of academic quality in electronically delivered courses. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34, 45-56.
49. Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119-144.
50. Sadler-Smith, E. (1997). 'Learning style': Frameworks and instruments. Educational Psychology, 17, 51-63.
51. Sadlo, G., & Richardson, J. T. E. (2003). Approaches to studying and perceptions of the academic environment in students following problem-based and subject-based curricula. Higher Education Research and Development, 22, 253-274.
52. Sambell, K., & McDowell, L. (1998). The construction of the hidden curriculum: Messages and meanings in the assessment of student learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 23, 391-402.
53. Schuman, H., Walsh, E., Olson, C., & Etheridge, B. (1985). Effort and reward: The assumption that college grades are affected by the quantity of study. Social Forces, 63, 945-966.
54. Scouller, K. (1998). The influence of assessment method on students' learning approaches: Multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay. Higher Education, 35, 453-472.
55. Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Pearson.
56. Touron, J. (1983). The determinants of factors related to academic achievement in the university: Implications for the selection and counselling of students. Higher Education, 12, 399-410.
57. Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1991). Improving the quality of student learning: The influence of learning context and student approaches to learning on learning outcomes. Higher Education, 22, 251-266.
58. Volet, S. E., & Chalmers, D. (1992). Investigation of qualitative differences in university students' learning goals based on an unfolding model of stage development. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 17-34.
59. Wachtel, H. (1998). Student evaluation of college teaching effectiveness: A brief review. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 23, 191-211.
60. Watkins, D. (2001). Correlates of approaches to learning: A cross-cultural meta-analysis. In R. J. Sternberg & L. F. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles (pp. 165-195). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
61. Wilson, K. L., Lizzio, A., & Ramsden, P. (1997). The development, validation and appreciation of the course experience questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 22, 33-53.
62. Woehr, D. J., & Cavell, T. A. (1993). Self-report measures of ability, effort, and non-academic activity as predictors of introductory psychology test scores. Teaching of Psychology, 20, 156-160.