Transient protein-protein interaction of the SH3-peptide complex via closely located multiple binding sites

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2012, Pages

  Hahn, Seungsoo ^a   Kim, Dongsup ^a  

^a Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN SH3; PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOLECULAR DOCKING; MOLECULAR MODEL; PEPTIDE SYNTHESIS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN MOTIF; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; METABOLISM; SRC HOMOLOGY DOMAIN;

BINDING SITES; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEINS; SRC HOMOLOGY DOMAINS;

EID: 84863344579     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032804     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Spaar A, Dammer C, Gabdoulline RR, Wade RC, Helms V, (2006) Diffusional encounter of barnase and barstar. Biophys J 90: 1913-1924.
2. Janin J, (1997) The kinetics of protein-protein recognition. Proteins 28: 153-161.
3. Fawzi NL, Doucleff M, Suh JY, Clore GM, (2010) Mechanistic details of a protein-protein association pathway revealed by paramagnetic relaxation enhancement titration measurements. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 1379-1384.
4. Ahmad M, Gu W, Helms V, (2008) Mechanism of fast peptide recognition by SH3 domains. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 47: 7626-7630.
5. Schreiber G, (2002) Kinetic studies of protein-protein interactions. Curr Opin Struct Biol 12: 41-47.
6. Tang C, Iwahara J, Clore GM, (2006) Visualization of transient encounter complexes in protein-protein association. Nature 444: 383-386.
7. Saitoh T, Igura M, Obita T, Ose T, Kojima R, et al. (2007) Tom20 recognizes mitochondrial presequences through dynamic equilibrium among multiple bound states. Embo J 26: 4777-4787.
8. Zarrinpar A, Bhattacharyya RP, Lim WA, (2003) The structure and function of proline recognition domains. Sci STKE 2003: RE8.
9. Letunic I, Doerks T, Bork P, (2009) SMART 6: recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Res 37: D229-232.
10. Kay BK, Williamson MP, Sudol M, (2000) The importance of being proline: the interaction of proline-rich motifs in signaling proteins with their cognate domains. Faseb J 14: 231-241.
11. Cesareni G, Panni S, Nardelli G, Castagnoli L, (2002) Can we infer peptide recognition specificity mediated by SH3 domains? FEBS Lett 513: 38-44.
12. Landgraf C, Panni S, Montecchi-Palazzi L, Castagnoli L, Schneider-Mergener J, et al. (2004) Protein interaction networks by proteome peptide scanning. PLoS Biol 2: E14.
13. Mayer BJ, (2001) SH3 domains: complexity in moderation. J Cell Sci 114: 1253-1263.
14. Jia CY, Nie J, Wu C, Li C, Li SS, (2005) Novel Src homology 3 domain-binding motifs identified from proteomic screen of a Pro-rich region. Mol Cell Proteomics 4: 1155-1166.
15. Li SS, (2005) Specificity and versatility of SH3 and other proline-recognition domains: structural basis and implications for cellular signal transduction. Biochem J 390: 641-653.
16. Ladbury JE, Arold S, (2000) Searching for specificity in SH domains. Chem Biol 7: R3-8.
17. Wunderlich L, Goher A, Farago A, Downward J, Buday L, (1999) Requirement of multiple SH3 domains of Nck for ligand binding. Cell Signal 11: 253-262.
18. Hiipakka M, Poikonen K, Saksela K, (1999) SH3 domains with high affinity and engineered ligand specificities targeted to HIV-1 Nef. J Mol Biol 293: 1097-1106.
19. Evanics F, Kitevski JL, Bezsonova I, Forman-Kay J, Prosser RS, (2007) 19F NMR studies of solvent exposure and peptide binding to an SH3 domain. Biochim Biophys Acta 1770: 221-230.
20. Angers A, Ramjaun AR, McPherson PS, (2004) The HECT domain ligase itch ubiquitinates endophilin and localizes to the trans-Golgi network and endosomal system. J Biol Chem 279: 11471-11479.
21. Hong S, Chung T, Kim D, (2010) SH3 domain-peptide binding energy calculations based on structural ensemble and multiple peptide templates. PLoS One 5: e12654.
22. Hou T, Xu Z, Zhang W, McLaughlin WA, Case DA, et al. (2009) Characterization of domain-peptide interaction interface: a generic structure-based model to decipher the binding specificity of SH3 domains. Mol Cell Proteomics 8: 639-649.
23. Hou T, Zhang W, Case DA, Wang W, (2008) Characterization of domain-peptide interaction interface: a case study on the amphiphysin-1 SH3 domain. J Mol Biol 376: 1201-1214.
24. Hou T, McLaughlin W, Lu B, Chen K, Wang W, (2006) Prediction of binding affinities between the human amphiphysin-1 SH3 domain and its peptide ligands using homology modeling, molecular dynamics and molecular field analysis. J Proteome Res 5: 32-43.
25. Gilson MK, Given JA, Bush BL, McCammon JA, (1997) The statistical-thermodynamic basis for computation of binding affinities: a critical review. Biophys J 72: 1047-1069.
26. Guerois R, Nielsen JE, Serrano L, (2002) Predicting changes in the stability of proteins and protein complexes: a study of more than 1000 mutations. Journal of Molecular Biology 320: 369-387.
27. Kramer A, Reineke U, Dong L, Hoffmann B, Hoffmuller U, et al. (1999) Spot synthesis: observations and optimizations. J Pept Res 54: 319-327.
28. Frank R, (1992) Spot-Synthesis- an Easy Technique for the Positionally Addressable, Parallel Chemical Synthesis on a Membrane Support. Tetrahedron 48: 9217-9232.
29. Frank R, (2002) The SPOT-synthesis technique. Synthetic peptide arrays on membrane supports-principles and applications. J Immunol Methods 267: 13-26.
30. Apgar JR, Hahn S, Grigoryan G, Keating AE, (2009) Cluster expansion models for flexible-backbone protein energetics. Journal of Computational Chemistry 30: 2402-2413.
31. Hahn S, Ashenberg O, Grigoryan G, Keating AE, (2010) Identifying and reducing error in cluster-expansion approximations of protein energies. Journal of Computational Chemistry 31: 2900-2914.
32. Eswar N, John B, Mirkovic N, Fiser A, Ilyin VA, et al. (2003) Tools for comparative protein structure modeling and analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 3375-3380.
33. Owen DJ, Wigge P, Vallis Y, Moore JD, Evans PR, et al. (1998) Crystal structure of the amphiphysin-2 SH3 domain and its role in the prevention of dynamin ring formation. EMBO Journal 17: 5273-5285.
34. Wu X, Knudsen B, Feller SM, Zheng J, Sali A, et al. (1995) Structural basis for the specific interaction of lysine-containing proline-rich peptides with the N-terminal SH3 domain of c-Crk. Structure 3: 215-226.
35. Duan Y, Wu C, Chowdhury S, Lee MC, Xiong G, et al. (2003) A point-charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed-phase quantum mechanical calculations. Journal of Computational Chemistry 24: 1999-2012.
36. Case DA, Darden TA, Cheatham TEI, Simmerling CL, Wang J, et al. (2006) AMBER9. University of California, San Francisco.
37. Leaver-Fay A, Tyka M, Lewis SM, Lange OF, Thompson J, et al. (2011) ROSETTA3: an object-oriented software suite for the simulation and design of macromolecules. Methods in Enzymology 487: 545-574.
38. Cestra G, Castagnoli L, Dente L, Minenkova O, Petrelli A, et al. (1999) The SH3 domains of endophilin and amphiphysin bind to the proline-rich region of synaptojanin 1 at distinct sites that display an unconventional binding specificity. J Biol Chem 274: 32001-32007.
39. Dalgarno DC, Botfield MC, Rickles RJ, (1997) SH3 domains and drug design: ligands, structure, and biological function. Biopolymers 43: 383-400.
40. Smithgall TE, (1995) SH2 and SH3 domains: potential targets for anti-cancer drug design. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 34: 125-132.
41. Diaz-Ortiz A, Dosch H, (2007) Noise filtering of cluster expansions in multicomponent systems Noise filtering of cluster expansions in multicomponent systems. Phys Rev B 76:-.
42. Diaz-Ortiz A, Dosch H, Drautz R, (2007) Cluster expansions in multicomponent systems: precise expansions from noisy databases. J Phys-Condens Mat 19:-.
43. Marles JA, Dahesh S, Haynes J, Andrews BJ, Davidson AR, (2004) Protein-protein interaction affinity plays a crucial role in controlling the Sho1p-mediated signal transduction pathway in yeast. Mol Cell 14: 813-823.
44. Zarrinpar A, Park SH, Lim WA, (2003) Optimization of specificity in a cellular protein interaction network by negative selection. Nature 426: 676-680.
45. Grigoryan G, Reinke AW, Keating AE, (2009) Design of protein-interaction specificity gives selective bZIP-binding peptides. Nature 458: 859-864.