Teacher actions to maximize mathematics learning opportunities in heterogeneous classrooms

International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 117-143

  Sullivan, Peter ^a   Mousley, Judith ^b   Zevenbergen, Robyn ^b  

^a LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Classroom research; Heterogeneous class teaching; Lesson structure; Mathematics teaching; Teacher actions

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745597588     PISSN: 15710068     EISSN: 15731774     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10763-005-9002-y     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Askew, M., Brown, M., Rhodes, V., Johnson, D. & Wiliam, D. (1997). Effective teachers of numeracy (Final report). London: King's College.
2. Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity: Theory, research, critique. London: Taylor & Francis.
3. Boaler, J. (1997). Experiencing school mathematics: Teaching styles, sex and setting. Buckingham: Open University Press.
4. Boaler, J. (2003). Studying and capturing the complexity of practice: The case of the dance of agency. In N.A. Pateman, BJ. Dougherty & J.T. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2003 Joint Meeting of PME and PMENA (pp. 3-16). University of Hawai'i, Hawai'i: PME.
5. Brophy, J.E. (1983). Research on the self-fulfilling prophecy and teacher expectations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(5), 631-661.
6. Brinker Kent, L. (2000). Connecting introduced to meaningful contexts. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 6(1), 62-66.
7. Building Perspectives (1994). Apple education series, maths bundle. New York: Sunburst Communications.
8. Christiansen, B. & Walther, G. (1986). Task and activity. In B. Christiansen, A.G. Howson & M. Otte (Eds.), Perspectives on mathematics education (pp. 243-307). Dordretcht: Reidel.
9. Clarke, D., et al. (2002). Early numeracy research project report. Melbourne: Victorian Department of Education and Training, Catholic Education Office, and Association of Independent Schools.
10. Cobb, P. & McClain, K. (2001). An approach for supporting teachers' learning in social context. In F.-L. Lin & T. Cooney (Eds.), Making sense of mathematics teacher education (pp. 207-233). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
11. Cooper, B. & Dunne, M. (1998). Anyone for tennis? Social class differences in children's responses to national curriculum mathematics testing. Sociological Review, (Jan) pp. 115-148.
12. Delpit, L. (1988). The silenced dialogue: Power and pedagogy in educating other people's children. Harvard Educational Review, 58(3), 280-298.
13. Department of Education and Skills (Available online November, 2004). The National Numeracy Strategy. Retrieved from http://www.standards.dfes.gov.uk/ numeracy/teaching_resources/reception_to_year6/?leaf=0&subleaf=4.
14. Department of Education, Employment and Training (2001). Early Years Numeracy Strategy. Available online October 4, 2004, http://www.sofweb.vic.edu. au/eys/num/index.htm.
15. Dweck, C.S. (2000). Self theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
16. Ernest, P. (1994). Varieties of constructivism: Their metaphors, epistemologies and pedagogical implications. Hiroshima Journal of Mathematics Education, 2, 1-14.
17. Ginsburg, H.P. (1997). Mathematical learning disabilities: A view for developmental psychology. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(1), 20-33.
18. Griffin, S. & Case, R. (1997). Re-thinking the primary school with curriculum: An approach based on cognitive science. Issues in Education, 3(1), 1-49.
19. Jaworski, B. (2004). A reaction to the background document: Joy and challenge in mathematics teacher development. In R. Strässer, G. Brandell, B. Grevholm & O. Helenius (Eds.), Educating for the future: Proceedings of an international symposium on mathematics Teacher education (pp. 59-67). Stockholm: The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.
20. Lovitt, C. & Clarke, D. (1988). Mathematics curriculum and teaching program: Activity Bank- Volumes 1 and 2. Canberra: Curriculum Corporation.
21. Lubienski, S.T. (2000). Problem solving as a means toward mathematics for all: An exploratory look through a class lens. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 454-482.
22. Middleton, J.A. (1995). A study of intrinsic motivation in the mathematics classroom: A personal construct approach. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(3), 254-279.
23. Mousley, J., Sullivan, P. & Mousley, P. (1997). Learning about teaching. CD-ROM. Reston, VA: NCTM.
24. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
25. Simon, M. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 114-145.
26. Simon, A. & Boyer, E.G. (1968). Mirrors for behavior. Philadelphia, PA: Research for Better Schools and the Centre for the Study of Teaching.
27. Stephens, M. & Sullivan, P. (1997). Developing tasks to assess mathematical performance. In F. Biddulph & K. Carr (Eds.), People in mathematics education. Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 470-477). Rotorua, NZ: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.
28. Sullivan, P. (1999). Seeking a rationale for particular classroom tasks and activities. In J.M. Truran & K.M. Truran (Eds.), Making the difference. Proceedings of the 21st Conference of the Mathematics Educational Research Group of Australasia (pp. 15-29). Adelaide: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.
29. Sullivan, P., Zevenbergen, R. & Mousley, J. (2002). Contexts in mathematics teaching: Snakes or ladders? In B. Barton, K.C. Irwin, M. Pfannkuch & M. Thomas (Eds.), Mathematics education in the South Pacific (pp. 649-656). Auckland: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.
30. Sullivan, P., Mousley, J., Zevenbergen, R. & Turner Harrison, R. (2003). Being explicit about aspects of mathematics pedagogy. In N.A. Pateman, B.J. Dougherty & J.T. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2003 Joint Meeting of PME and PMENA (pp. 267-275). University of Hawai'i, Hawai'i: PME.
31. Sullivan, P., Mousley, J. & Zevenbergen, R. (2004). Describing elements of mathematics lessons that accommodate diversity in student background. In M. Johnsen Joines & A. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 4-257-4-265). Bergen: PME
32. Sullivan, P., Zevenbergen, R. & Mousley, J. (2005). Planning and teaching mathematics lessons as a dynamic, interactive process. In H. Chick & J. Vincent (Eds.), Vol. 4, Proceedings of the Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 249-256). Melbourne.
33. Thornton, C., Langrall, C. & Jones, G. (1997). Mathematics instruction for elementary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(2), 142-150.
34. Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A. & Hoy, W. (1998). Teaching efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202-248.
35. Watson, A. (2003). Opportunities to learn mathematics. In L. Bragg, C. Campbell, G. Herbert & J. Mousley (Eds.), Mathematics Education Research: Innovation, Networking, Opportunity. Proceedings of the 26th Annual; Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 29-41). Geelong: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.
36. Wood, T. (2002). What does it mean to teach mathematics differently? In B. Barton, K.C. Irwin, M. Pfannkuch & M. Thomas (Eds.), Mathematics education in the South Pacific (pp. 61-71). Auckland: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.
37. Zevenbergen, R. (1998). Language, mathematics and social disadvantage: A Bourdieuian analysis of cultural capital in mathematics education. In C. Kanes, M. Goos & E. Warren (Eds.), Teaching mathematics in new times (pp. 716-722). Gold Coast: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.
38. Zevenbergen, R. (2000). "Cracking the code" of mathematics: School success as a function of linguistic, social and cultural background. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 201-223). New York: JAI/Ablex.
39. Zevenbergen, R. (2003). Ability grouping in mathematics classrooms: A Bourdieuian analysis. For the Learning of Mathematics, 23(3), 5-10.
40. Zevenbergen, R., Mousley, J. & Sullivan, P. (2004). Disrupting pedagogic relay in mathematics classrooms: Using open-ended tasks with Indigenous students. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 8(4), 391-405.