A systematic review of the psychological literature on interruption and its patient safety implications

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 6-12

  Li, Simon Y W ^a   Magrabi, Farah ^b   Coiera, Enrico ^b  

^a LINGNAN UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INTERRUPTION; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT SAFETY; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOLOGIC ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOLOGY; REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TASK PERFORMANCE; THEORY; WORKING MEMORY;

ATTENTION; HUMAN ENGINEERING; HUMANS; PATIENT SAFETY; PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84863011785     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: 1527974X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2010-000024     Document Type: Review

References (75)

1. Coiera E. Clinical communication: a new informatics paradigm. Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp 1996:17-21.
2. Coiera E, Tombs V. Communication behaviours in a hospital setting: an observational study. BMJ 1998;316:673-6.
3. Grundgeiger T, Sanderson P. Interruptions in healthcare: theoretical views. Int J Med Inform 2009;78:293-307.
4. Parker J, Coiera E. Improving clinical communication: a view from psychology. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2000;7:453-61.
5. Altmann EM, Trafton JG. Timecourse of recovery from task interruption: data and a model. Psychon Bull Rev 2007;14:1079-84.
6. Li SYW, Blandford A, Cairns P, et al. The effect of interruptions on postcompletion and other procedural errors: an account based on the activation-based goal memory model. J Exp Psychol Appl 2008;14:314-28.
7. Westbrook JI, Coiera E, Dunsmuir WT, et al. The impact of interruptions on clinical task completion. Qual Saf Health Care 2010;19:284-9.
8. Ashcroft DM, Quinlan P, Blenkinsopp A. Prospective study of the incidence, nature and causes of dispensing errors in community pharmacies. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2005;14:327-32.
9. Westbrook JI, Woods A, Rob MI, et al. Association of interruptions with an increased risk and severity of medication administration errors. Arch Intern Med 2010;170:683-90.
10. Spencer R, Coiera E, Logan P. Variation in communication loads on clinical staff in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 2004;44:268-73.
11. Magrabi F, Li SY, Dunn AG, et al. Why is it so difficult to measure the effects of interruptions in healthcare? Stud Health Technol Inform 2010;160:784-8.
12. Magrabi F, Li SY, Day RO, et al. Errors and electronic prescribing: a controlled laboratory study to examine task complexity and interruption effects. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010;17:575-83.
13. Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Karsh BT. Interruptions and distractions in healthcare: review and reappraisal. Qual Saf Health Care 2010;19:304-12.
14. Bailey BP, Konstan JA, Carlis JV. The effects of interruptions on task performance, annoyance, and anxiety in the user interface. In: Hirose M, ed. Human-Computer InteractiondINTERACT 2001 Conference Proceedings. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2001:593-601.
15. Trafton JG, Altmann EM, Brock DP, et al. Preparing to resume an interrupted task: effects of prospective goal encoding and retrospective rehearsal. Int J Hum Comput Stud 2003;58:583-603.
16. Byrne MD, Bovair S. A working memory model of a common procedural error. Cogn Sci 1997;21:31-61.
17. Hodgetts HM, Jones DM. Interruption of the Tower of London task: Support for a goal-activation approach. J Exp Psychol Gen 2006;135:103-15.
18. Hodgetts HM, Jones DM. Contextual cues aid recovery from interruption: the role of associative activation. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 2006;32:1120-32.
19. Monk CA, Boehm-Davis DA, Trafton JG. The attentional costs of interrupting task performance at various stages. Bridging Fundamentals and New Opportunities Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society; 30 Septembere4 October 2002, Baltimore, MD. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2002:1824-8.
20. Dodhia RM, Dismukes RK. Interruptions create prospective memory tasks. Appl Cogn Psychol 2009;23:73-89.
21. Wickens CD. Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 2002;3:159-77.
22. McFarlane DC, Latorella KA. The scope and importance of human interruption in human-computer interaction design. Hum Comput Interact 2002;17:1-61.
23. Jett QR, George JM. Work interrupted: a closer look at the role of interruptions in organizational life. Acad Manage Rev 2003;28:494-507.
24. Interruption.net. http://interruptions.net/literature.htm (accessed Aug 2009).
25. Horstmann G. Latency and duration of the action interruption in surprise. Cogn Emot 2006;20:242-73.
26. Drugge M, Nilsson M, Liljedahl U, et al. Methods for interrupting a wearable computer user. Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Wearable Computers; 31 Octobere3 November 2004, Arlington, VA. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society, 2004:150-7.
27. Drugge M, Witt H, Parnes P, et al. Using the 'HotWire' to Study Interruptions in Wearable Computing Primary Tasks,. Proceedings of 10th IEEE International Symposium on WearableComputers (ISWC 2006). Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society, 2006:37-44.
28. Kreifeldt JG, McCarthy ME. Interruption as a test of the user-computer interface. Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference on Manual Control (California Institute of Technology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Publication 81-95). National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), 1981:655-67.
29. Field G, Spence R. Now, where was I? New Zealand Journal of Computing 1994;5:35-43.
30. Altmann EM, Trafton JG. Task interruption: resumption lag and the role of cues. In: Forbus K, Gentner D, Regier T, eds. Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2004:43-8.
31. Mark G, Gudith D, Klocke U. The Cost of Interrupted Work: More Speed and Stress. Florence, Italy: Association for Computing Machinery, 2008:107-10.
32. Liu W. Focusing on desirability: the effect of decision interruption and suspension on preferences. J Consum Res 2008;35:640-52.
33. LeGoullon MD. Spring ahead or fall back? Exploring the nature of resumption errors. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50th Annual Meeting; 16-20 October 2006, San Francisco, CA. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2006:363-7. Available in CD-ROM Format.
34. Latorella KA. Investigating interruptions: an example from the flightdeck. Proc of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 40th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1996:249-53.
35. Newell A, Simon HA. Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1972.
36. Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics an Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
37. Gillie T, Broadbent D. What makes interruptions disruptive? A study of length, similarity and complexity. Psychol Res 1989;50:243-50.
38. Adamczyk PD, Bailey BP. If not now, when? the effects of interruption at different moments within task execution. In: Dykstra-Erickson E, Tscheligi M, eds. CHI 2004-CoNNECT Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; 24-29 April 2004, Vienna, Austria. New York: ACM Press, 2004:271-8.
39. Botvinick MM, Bylsma LM. Distraction and action slips in an everyday task: evidence for a dynamic representation of task content. Psychon Bull Rev 2005;12:1011-17.
40. Beeftink F, Van Eerde W, Rutte CG. The effect of interruptions and breaks on insight and impasses: do you need a break right now? Creat Res J 2008;20:358-64.
41. Hess SM, Detweiler MC. Training to reduce the disruptive effects of interruptions. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 38th Annual Meeting; 1994. Santa Monica: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1994:1173-7.
42. Hodgetts HM, Jones DM. Interruptions in the tower of London task: can preparation minimise disruption? A Summit for People and Technology Proceedings of the 47th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society; 13-17 October 2003, Denver, CO. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2003:1000-4. Available in CD-ROM Format.
43. Bailey BP, Konstan JA. On the need for attention-aware systems: measuring effects of interruption on task performance, error rate, and affective state. Comput Human Behav 2006;22:685-708.
44. Speier C, Valacich JS, Vessey I. The influence of task interruption on individual decision making: an information overload perspective. Decis Sci 1999;30:337-60.
45. Speier C, Vessey I, Valacich JS. The effects of interruptions, task complexity, and information presentation on computer-supported decision-making performance. Decis Sci 2003;34:771-97.
46. Cades DM, Trafton JG, Boehm-Davis DA, et al. Does the difficulty of an interruption affect our ability to resume? Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 51st Annual Meeting; 1-5 October 2007, Baltimore, MD. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2007:234-8. Available in CDROM Format.
47. Cades DM, Werner N, Trafton JG, et al. Dealing with interruptions can be complex, but does interruption complexity matter: a mental resources approach to quantifying disruptions. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 52nd Annual Meeting. Santa Monica: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2008:398-402.
48. Oulasvirta A, Saariluoma P. Surviving task interruptions: investigating the implications of long-term working memory theory. Int J Hum Comput Stud 2006;64:941-61.
49. Zijlstra FRH, Roe RA, Leonova AB, et al. Temporal factors in mental work: effects of interrupted activities. J Occup Organ Psychol 1999;72:163-85.
50. Edwards MB, Gronlund SD. Task interruption and its effects on memory. Memory 1998;6:665-87.
51. Weisband SP, Fadel KJ, Mattarelli E. An experiment on the effects of interruptions on individual work trajectories and performance in critical environments. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society, 2007:138-47.
52. Monk CA, Boehm-Davis DA, Trafton JG. Recovering from interruptions: implications for driver distraction research. Hum Factors 2004;46:650-63.
53. Bailey BP, Iqbal ST. Understanding changes in mental workload during execution of goal-directed tasks and its application for interruption management. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact 2008;14:1-28.
54. Ho CY, Nikolic MI, Sarter NB. Supporting timesharing and interruption management through multimodal information presentation. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2001:341-5.
55. Ho CY, Nikolic MI, Waters MJ, et al. Not Now! Supporting interruption management by indicating the modality and urgency of pending tasks. Hum Factors 2004;46:399-409.
56. Hopp PJ, Smith CAP, Clegg BA, et al. Interruption management: the use of attention-directing tactile cues. Hum Factors 2005;47:1-11.
57. Hopp-Levine PJ, Smith CA, Clegg BA, et al. Tactile interruption management: tactile cues as task-switching reminders. Cogn Technol Work 2006;8:137-45.
58. Hameed S, Ferris T, Jayaraman S, et al. Using informative peripheral visual and tactile cues to support task and interruption management. Hum Factors 2009;51:126-35.
59. Monk CA, Trafton JG, Boehm-Davis DA. The effect of interruption duration and demand on resuming suspended goals. J Exp Psychol Appl 2008;14:299-313.
60. Einstein GO, McDaniel MA, Williford CL, et al. Forgetting of intentions in demanding situations is rapid. J Exp Psychol Appl 2003;9:147-62.
61. Van Nimwegen C, Van Oostendorp H. Visual guidance and the impact of interruption during problem solving: interface issues embedded in cognitive load theory. In: Vosniadou S, Kayser D, Protopaps A, eds. EuroCogSci 07 The European Cognitive Science Conference 2007; 23-27 May 2007, Delphi, Greece. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2007:800-5.
62. Oulasvirta A, Saariluoma P. Long-term working memory and interrrupting messages in human-computer interaction. Behav Inf Technol 2004;23:53-64.
63. Ratwani RM, Trafton JG. Spatial memory guides task resumption. Vis cogn 2008;16:1001-10.
64. Bailey BP, Konstan JA, Carlis JV. Measuring the effects of interruptions on task performance in the user interface. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 2000: Cybernetics Evolving to Systems, Humans, Organizations, and Their Complex Interactions. Piscataway: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2000:757-62.
65. Czerwinski M, Cutrell E, Horvitz E. Instant messaging: effects of relevance and time. People and Computers XIV: Proceedings of HCI 2000. London: Springer-Verlag, 2000:71-6.
66. Magrabi F. Using Cognitive Models to Evaluate Safety-Critical Interfaces in Healthcare. CHI '08 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Florence, Italy: ACM, 2008.
67. Kieras DE. A guide to GOMS model usability evaluation using NGOMSL. In: Helander M, Landauer T, eds. The Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction. 2nd edn. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1996.
68. Latorella KA. Effects of modality on interrupted flight deck performance: implications for data link. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting. Santa Monica: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1998:87-91.
69. Ratwani RM, Andrews AE, Sousk JD, et al. The effect of interruption modality on primary task resumption. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 52nd Annual Meeting: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Santa Monica: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2008:393-7.
70. Hsu KE, Man FY, Gizicki RA, et al. Experienced surgeons can do more than one thing at a time: effect of distraction on performance of a simple laparoscopic and cognitive task by experienced and novice surgeons. Surg Endosc 2008;22:196-201.
71. Cades DM, Trafton JG, Boehm-Davis DA. Mitigating disruptions: can resuming an interrupted task be trained? Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50th Annual Meeting; 16-20 October 2006, San Francisco, CA. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2006:368-71. Available in CDROM Format.
72. McFarlane DC. Comparison of four primary methods for coordinating the interruption of people in human-computer interaction. Hum Comput Interact 2002;17:63-139.
73. Carton AM, Aiello JR. Control and anticipation of social interruptions: reduced stress and improved task performance. J Appl Soc Psychol 2009;39:169-85.
74. Gievska S, Sibert J. Using Task Context Variables for Selecting the Best Timing for Interrupting Users. Proceedings of the 2005 Joint Conference on Smart Objects and Ambient Intelligence: Innovative Context-Aware Services: Usages and Technologies. New York: ACM Press, 2005:171-6.
75. Czerwinski M, Cutrell E, Horvitz E. Instant messaging and interruption: influence of task type on performance. In: Paris C, Ozkan N, Howard S, et al, eds. Proceedings of OZCHI 2000: Interfacing Reality in the New Millennium. Australia: Computer Human Interaction Special Interest Group, 2000:356-61.