Interruption management: The use of attention-directing tactile cues

Human Factors

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 1-11

  Hopp, Pamela J ^a   Smith, C A P ^a   Clegg, Benjamin A ^a   Heggestad, Eric D ^a  

^a Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

STIMULI AIDS MANAGEMENT; TACTILE CUES; VISUAL CUES;

COMPUTERS; DATA PROCESSING; MONITORING;

ERGONOMICS;

AIRCRAFT; ALERTNESS; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; AVIATION; COMPUTER; COMPUTER INTERFACE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ERROR; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; JOB PERFORMANCE; MALE; MONITORING; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; RANDOMIZATION; READING; TACTILE STIMULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; WORK ENVIRONMENT; WORKLOAD;

ADULT; ATTENTION; AVIATION; CUES; DATA DISPLAY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL PROCESSES; REACTION TIME; REFERENCE VALUES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 17844373236     PISSN: 00187208     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1518/0018720053653884     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Akamatsu, M., MacKenzie, I. S., & Hasbroucq, T. (1995). A comparison of tactile, auditory, and visual feedback in a pointing task using a mouse-type device. Ergonomics, 38, 816-827.
2. Cellier, J.-M., & Eyrolle, H. (1992). Interference between switched tasks. Ergonomics, 35, 25-36.
3. Cholewiak, R. W., Brill, J. C., & Schwab, A. (2004). Vibrotactile localization on the abdomen: Effects of place and space. Perception and Psychophysics, 66, 970-987.
4. Cholewiak, R. W., & Collins, A. A. (2000). The generation of vibrotactile patterns on a linear array: Influences of body site, time, and presentation mode. Perception and Psychophysics, 62, 1220-1235.
5. Cholewiak, R. W., & Collins, A. A. (2003). Vibrotactile localization on the arm: Effects of place, space, and age. Perception and Psychophysics, 65, 1058-1077.
6. Damos, D. L. (1984). Individual differences in multiple-task performance and subjective estimates of workload. Perceptual and Motor Skill, 59, 567-580.
7. Dornheim, M. A. (2000, July 17). Crew distractions emerge as new safety focus. Aviation Week and Space Technology, pp. 58-60.
8. Edworthy, J., Stanton, N., & Hellier, E. (1995). Warnings in research and practice [Editorial]. Ergonomics, 38, 2145-2154.
9. Fisher, C. D. (1998). Effects of external and internal interruptions on boredom at work: Two studies. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 503-522.
10. Gilliland, K., & Schlegel, R. E. (1994). Tactile stimulation of the human head for information display. Human Factors, 36, 700-717.
11. Gopher, D. (1993). The skill of attention control: Acquisition and execution of attention strategies. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and performance XIV: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 299-322). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Griffon-Fouco, M., & Ghertman, F. (1984). Recueil de données sur les facteurs humains à Electricité de France [Collection of data on the human factors with Electricity of France]. In Operational safety of nuclear power plants (pp. 157-172). Vienna, Austria: Vienna International Atomic Energy Agency.
13. Ho, C.-Y., Nikolic, M. I., & Sarter, N. B. (2001). Multimodal infomation presentation in support of timesharing and effective interruption management. In Proceedings of the 20th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (pp. 5D2/1-5D2/8). Los Alamitos, CA: Institute of Electrical & Electronics Engineers.
14. Ho, C.-Y., Waters, M. J., Nikolic, M. I., & Sarter, N. B. (2003, April). Supporting attention management in complex event-driven domains through informative interruptive cueing. Paper presented at the 12th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Dayton, OH.
15. Jett, Q. R., & George, J. M. (2003). Work interrupted: A closer look at the role of interruptions in organizational life [Note]. Academy of Management Review, 28, 494-507.
16. Kirmeyer, S. L. (1988). Coping with competing demands: Interruptions and the Type A pattern. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 621-629.
17. Kliegel, M., Martin, M., McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2002). Complex prospective memory and executive control of working memory: A process model. Psychologische Beitrage, 44, 303-318.
18. Latorella, K. A. (1996). Investigating interruptions: Implications for flight deck performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo.
19. Mark, G. (2002). Extreme collaboration. Communications of the ACM, 45(4), 89-93.
20. McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2000). Strategic and automatic processes in prospective memory retrieval: A multiprocess framework. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, S127-S144.
21. McFarlane, D. C. (2002). Comparison of four primary methods for coordinating the interruption of people in human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 17, 63-139.
22. Mintzberg, H. (1973). The nature of managerial work. New York: Harper and Row.
23. Moray, N. (1981). The role of attention in the detection of errors and the diagnosis of errors in man-machine systems. In J. Rasmussen & W. Rouse (Eds.), Human detection and diagnosis of system failures (pp. 185-198). New York: Plenum.
24. Moray, N. (1986). Monitoring behavior and supervisory control. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (pp. 40.1-40.51). New York: Wiley.
25. Perlow, L. (1999). The time famine: Toward a sociology of work time. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 57-81.
26. Rupert, A. H. (2000). An instrumentation solution for reducing spatial disorientation mishaps. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, 19(2), 71-80.
27. Sanders, A. F. (1983). Towards a model of stress and human performance. Acta Psychologica, 53, 61-97.
28. Sarter, N. B. (2000). The need for multisensory interfaces in support of effective attention allocation in highly dynamic event-driven domains: The case of cockpit automation. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 10, 231-245.
29. Sarter, N. B. (2001). Human technology interface: Multimodal communication in support of coordinative functions in human-machine teams. Human Performance in Extreme Environments, 5(2), 50-54.
30. Sklar, A. E., & Sarter, N. B. (1999). Good vibrations: Tactile feedback in support of attention allocation and human-automation coordination in event-driven domains. Human Factors, 41, 543-552.
31. Smith, C. A. P., Johnston, J., & Paris, C. (2004). Decision support for air warfare: Detection of deceptive threats. Group Decision and Negotiation, 13, 129-148.
32. Sorkin, R. D., Kantowitz, B. H., & Kantowitz, S. C. (1988). Likelihood alarm displays. Human Factors, 30, 445-459.
33. Spector, A., & Biederman, I. (1976). Mental set and mental shift revisited. American Journal of Psychology, 89, 669-679.
34. van Erp, J. B. F. (2001). Tactile navigation display. In S. Brewster & R. Murray-Smith (Eds.), Haptic human-computer interaction (pp. 165-173). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
35. Wickens, C. D. (1984). Processing resources in attention. In R. Parasuraman & R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 63-101). Orlando, FL: Academic.
36. Wickens, C. D. (2002). Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomic Science, 3, 159-177.
37. Wickens, C. D., & Liu, Y. (1988). Codes and modalities in multiple resources: A success and a qualification. Human Factors, 30, 599-616.
38. Woods, D. D., Johannesen, L., Cook, R. I., & Sarter, N. (1994). Behind human error, cognitive systems, computers, and hindsight. Dayton, OH: Crew Systems Ergonomic Information and Analysis Center.
39. Zlotnik, M. A. (1988). Applying electro-tactile display technology to fighter aircraft - Flying with feeling again. In Proceedings of the IEEE 1988 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference, NAECON 1988 (pp. 191-197). New York: IEEE Aerospace and Electronics Systems Society.