Task Interruption and its Effects on Memory

Memory

Volumn 6, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 665-687

  Edwards, Mark B ^a,b   Gronlund, Scott D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

^b Hum Factors Eng Grp US W I   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; HUMAN; MEMORY; RECALL; TIME;

ATTENTION; HUMANS; MEMORY; MENTAL RECALL; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0032198332     PISSN: 09658211     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/741943375     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Adams, M.J., Tenny, Y.J., & Pew, R.W. (1991). State-of-the-art report: Strategic workload and the cognitive management of advanced multi-task systems (CSERIAC 91-6). Wrighl-Patterson Air Force Base, OH: Crew System Ergonomics Information Analysis Center.
2. Bambridge, L. (1984). Diagnostic skills in process operation. Proceedings of 1984 International Conference on Occupational Ergonomics, 2, 1-10.
3. Brandimonte, M., Einstein, G.O., & McDaniel, M.A. (Eds.) (1996). Prospective memory: Theory and applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Krlbaum Associates Inc.
4. Bullemer, P., & Nissen, M.J. (1990). Attentional orienting in the expression of procedural knowledge. Presented at the 31st Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, New Orleans, L.A.
5. Czerwinski, M.P., Chrisman, S.E., & Rudisill, M. (1991). Interruptions in multitasking situations: The effect of similarity and warning (technical report JSC-24757). Houston, Tx: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
6. Dunn, O.J. (1961). Multiple comparisons among means. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 56, 52-64.
7. Ericsson, K.A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211-245.
8. Gillie, T., & Broadbent, D. (1989). What makes interruptions disruptive? A study of length, similarity, and complexity. Psychological Research, 50, 243-250.
9. Gillund, G., & Shiffrin, R.M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 91, 1-67.
10. Griffon-Fouco, M., & Ghertman, F. (1984). Recueil de données sur les facteurs humains à Electricité de France, Operational Safety of Nuclear Power Plants. Vienna International Atomic Energy Agency, 157-172.
11. Hayes-Roth, B. (1977). Evolution of cognitive structures and processes. Psychological Review, 84, 260-278.
12. Hays, W.L. (1988). Statistics. Orlando, FL: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
13. Hockley, W.E. (1991). Recognition memory for item and associative information: A comparison of forgetting rates. In W.E. Hockley & S. Lewandowsky (Eds.), Relating theory and data: Essays on human memory in honor of Bennet B. Murdock (pp.227-248). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
14. Johnson, M.K., & raye, C.L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88, 67-85.
15. Meyer, D.E., & Kieras, D.E. (1977). A computational theory of executive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms, Psychological Review, 104, 3-65.
16. National Traffic Safety Board (1988). Aircraft accident report - Northwest Airlines, McDonnell Douglas DC-9-82, N312RC, Detroit Metropolitan Wayne Co. Airport. Washington, DC: NTSB.
17. Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
18. Raaijmakers, J.G.W., & Shiffrin, R.M. (1980). SAM: A theory of probabilistic search of associative memory. In G.H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 14)., New York: Academic Press.
19. Rasmussen, J. (1983). Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 3, 257-266.
20. Rasmussen, J. (1986). Information processing and human-machine interaction. New York: Elsevier Science Publishing.
21. Strong, E.K. Jr. (1912). The effect of length of series upon recognition memory. Psychological Review, 19, 447-462.
22. Vortac, O.U., Edwards, M.B., Fuller, D.K., & Manning, C.A. (1993). Automation and cognition in air traffic control: An empirical investigation. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 7, 631-651.
23. Wickens, CD. (1984). Processing resources in attention. In R. Parasuraman & D.R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
24. Zeigamik, B. (1927). Das behalten erledigter und underledigter handlungen. Psychologische Forschung, 9, 1-85.