Student perceptions of evaluation in undergraduate medical education: A qualitative study from one medical school

BMC Medical Education

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Schiekirka, Sarah ^a   Reinhardt, Deborah ^a   Heim, Susanne ^b   Fabry, Götz ^c   Pukrop, Tobias ^a   Anders, Sven ^d   Raupach, Tobias ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

Author keywords

Consequence; Evaluation; Learning outcome; Purpose; Undergraduate medical education

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CURRICULUM; EVALUATION; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LEARNING; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL SCHOOL; MEDICAL STUDENT; METHODOLOGY; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; STATISTICS; TEACHING;

CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; GERMANY; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; PERCEPTION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SCHOOLS, MEDICAL; STUDENTS, MEDICAL; TEACHING;

EID: 84862537334     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726920     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-45     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. The Development and Implementation of a Health-System-Wide Evaluation System for Education Activities: Build It and They Will Come. McOwen KS, Bellini LM, Morrison G, Shea JA, Acad Med 2009 84 1352 1359 1310.1097/ACM. 1350b1013e3181b1356c1996 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181b6c996 19881421
2. Positionspapier der nordrhein-westfälischen Studiendekane zur hochschulvergleichenden leistungsorientierten Mittelvergabe für die Lehre. Herzig S, Marschall B, Nast-Kolb D, Soboll S, Rump LC, Hilgers RD, GMS Z Med Ausbild 2007 24 Doc109
3. Student ratings; the validity of use. McKeachie W, Am Psychol 1997 52 1218 1225
4. Piloting an outcome-based programme evaluation tool in undergraduate medical education. Raupach T, Schiekirka S, Münscher C, Beibarth T, Himmel W, Burckhardt G, Pukrop T, GMS Z Med Ausbild 2012 29 Doc44 22737204
5. Academic course evaluation: Theoretical and empirical distinctions between self-rated gain in competences and satisfaction with teaching behavior. Braun E, Leidner B, Eur Psychol 2009 14 297 306 10.1027/1016-9040.14.4.297
6. GUEST EDITORIAL: Evaluation: beyond the rhetoric. Cantillon P, J Eval Clin Pract 1999 5 265 268 10.1046/j.1365-2753.1999.00175.x 10461578 (Pubitemid 29344419)
7. Instructor ratings: Controlling for bias from Initial student interest. Prave RS, Baril GL, J Educ Bus 1993 68 362 366 10.1080/08832323.1993.10117644
8. Instructor Reputation and Student Ratings of Instruction. Griffin BW, Contemp Educ Psychol 2001 26 534 552 10.1006/ceps.2000.1075 11681831 (Pubitemid 33082687)
9. The Doctor Fox Lecture: A Paradigm of Educational Seduction. Naftulin DH, Ware JE, Donnelly FA, J Med Educ 1973 48 630 635 10.1097/00001888-197307000- 00003 4708420
10. Effects of expressiveness, content coverage, and incentive on multidimensional student rating scales: New interpretations of the Dr. Marsh HW, Ware JE, Fox effect J Educ Psychol 1982 74 126 134
11. Interpreting course evaluation results: insights from thinkaloud interviews with medical students. Billings-Gagliardi S, Barrett SV, Mazor KM, Med Educ 2004 38 1061 1070 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01953.x 15461651 (Pubitemid 39389427)
12. Towards outcome-based programme evaluation: Using student comparative self-assessments to determine teaching effectiveness. Raupach T, Munscher C, Beissbarth T, Burckhardt G, Pukrop T, Med Teach 2011 33 446 e453 10.3109/0142159X.2011.586751 21774642
13. Morgan DL, Focus Groups as Qualitative Research Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks 2 1997
14. Mayring P, Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse-Grundlagen und Techniken Beltz Verlag, Weinheim und Basel 11 2010
15. "Ruhm und Ehre" oder LOM für Lehre?-eine qualitative Analyse von Anreizverfahren für gute Lehre an Medizinischen Fakultäten in Deutschland. Müller-Hilke B, GMS Z Med Ausbild 2010 27 Doc43 21818220
16. Course evaluation in medical education. Kogan JR, Shea JA, Teach Teach Educ 2007 23 251 264 10.1016/j.tate.2006.12.020
17. The German Council of Science and Humanities (Wissenschaftsrat), Empfehlungen zur Qualitaetsverbesserung von Lehre und Studium, Berlin 2008
18. What Factors Affect Students' Overall Ratings of a Course? Woloschuk W, Coderre S, Wright B, McLaughlin K, Acad Med 2011 86 640 643 10.1097/ACM. 0b013e318212c1b6 21436669
19. Fakultätsinterne Prüfungen an den deutschen medizinischen Fakultäten. Möltner A, Duelli R, Resch F, Schultz J-H, Jünger J, GMS Z Med Ausbild 2010 27 3 oc 44
20. Generalizability of Multidimensional Student Ratings of University Instruction Across Courses and Teachers. Rindermann H, Schofield N, Res High Educ 2001 42 377 399 10.1023/A:1011050724796
21. Making students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective: The critical issues of validity, bias, and utility. Marsh HW, Roche LA, Am Psychol 1997 52 1187 1197 (Pubitemid 127680849)
22. Recruiting and rewarding faculty for medical student teaching. Pessar LF, Levine RE, Bernstein CA, Cabaniss DS, Dickstein LJ, Graff SV, Hales DJ, Nadelson C, Robinowitz CB, Scheiber SC, et al. Acad Psychiatr 2006 30 126 129 10.1176/appi.ap.30.2.126 (Pubitemid 46939970)
23. Rewards for teaching excellence: practice in South African medical schools. Olmesdahl PJ, Med Educ 1997 31 27 32 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1997.tb00039.x 9231121 (Pubitemid 27427320)
24. The significance and impact of a faculty teaching award: disparate perceptions of department chairs and award recipients. Brawer J, Steinert Y, St-Cyr J, Watters K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Med Teach 2006 28 614 617 10.1080/01421590600878051 17594552 (Pubitemid 46978512)
25. A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to improve teaching effectiveness in medical education: BEME Guide No. 8. Steinert Y, Mann K, Centeno A, Dolmans D, Spencer J, Gelula M, Prideaux D, Med Teach 2006 28 497 526 10.1080/01421590600902976 17074699 (Pubitemid 44660478)
26. Nonresponse and Online Student Evaluations of Teaching: Understanding the Influence of Salience, Fatigue, and Academic Environments. Adams M, Umbach P, Res High Educ 2011 1 16 Epub ahead of print 22427717
27. Online student ratings of instruction. Johnson TD, New Dir Teach Learn 2003 96 49 59
28. Students' perceptions on the influence of institutional evaluation on universities. Leite D, Santiago RA, Sarrico CS, Leite CL, Polidori M, Assess Eval High Educ 2006 31 625 638 10.1080/02602930600760264
29. Research blenders: commentary and response. Transitions to new methodologies in nursing sciences. Clarke PN, Yaros PS, Nurs Sci Q 1988 1 147 151 10.1177/089431848800100406 3205479
30. Mixed Methods Research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Johnson RB, Onwuegbuzie AJ, Educ Res 2004 33 12 26 10.3102/0013189X033002012
31. Focus Groups. Morgan WF, Ann Rev Sociol 1996 22 129 152 10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.129
32. What about N? A methodological study of sample-size reporting in focus group studies. Carlsen B, Glenton C, BMC Med Res Methodol 2011 11 26 10.1186/1471-2288-11-26 21396104
33. German medical students lack knowledge of how to treat smoking and problem drinking. Strobel L, Schneider NK, Krampe H, Beissbarth T, Pukrop T, Anders S, West R, Aveyard P, Raupach T, Addiction 2012 Epub ahead of print
34. Dammer I, Szymkowiak F, Gruppendiskussionen in der Marktforschung Rheingold Institut, Opladen 2008