The abundance of Rad51 protein in mouse embryonic stem cells is regulated at multiple levels

Stem Cell Research

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 124-134

  Tichy, Elisia D ^a   Pillai, Resmi ^a   Deng, Li ^b   Tischfield, Jay A ^b   Hexley, Philip ^c   Babcock, George F ^c   Stambrook, Peter J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RAD51 PROTEIN;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL LEVEL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; FIBROBLAST; HALF LIFE TIME; MOUSE; MOUSE EMBRYO FIBROBLAST; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONTENT; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN METABOLISM; RECOMBINATION REPAIR; REGULATORY MECHANISM; TRANSLATION REGULATION;

ANIMALS; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; E2F TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; EMBRYO, MAMMALIAN; EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; FIBROBLASTS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; MICE; PROLIFERATING CELL NUCLEAR ANTIGEN; PROTEIN BIOSYNTHESIS; PROTEIN STABILITY; RAD51 RECOMBINASE;

EID: 84862115171     PISSN: 18735061     EISSN: 18767753     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scr.2012.05.004     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Adams B.R., Golding S.E., Rao R.R., Valerie K. Dynamic dependence on ATR and ATM for double-strand break repair in human embryonic stem cells and neural descendants. PLoS One 2010, 5:e10001.
2. Badie S., Escandell J.M., Bouwman P., Carlos A.R., Thanasoula M., Gallardo M.M., Suram A., Jaco I., Benitez J., Herbig U., Blasco M.A., Jonkers J., Tarsounas M. BRCA2 acts as a RAD51 loader to facilitate telomere replication and capping. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2010, 17:1461-1469.
3. Banath J.P., Banuelos C.A., Klokov D., MacPhail S.M., Lansdorp P.M., Olive P.L. Explanation for excessive DNA single-strand breaks and endogenous repair foci in pluripotent mouse embryonic stem cells. Exp. Cell Res. 2009, 315:1505-1520.
4. Bracken A.P., Ciro M., Cocito A., Helin K. E2F target genes: unraveling the biology. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2004, 29:409-417.
5. Bravo R., Macdonald-Bravo H. Changes in the nuclear distribution of cyclin (PCNA) but not its synthesis depend on DNA replication. EMBO J. 1985, 4:655-661.
6. Celis J.E., Madsen P., Celis A., Nielsen H.V., Gesser B. Cyclin (PCNA, auxiliary protein of DNA polymerase delta) is a central component of the pathway(s) leading to DNA replication and cell division. FEBS Lett. 1987, 220:1-7.
7. Chaturvedi P., Eng W.K., Zhu Y., Mattern M.R., Mishra R., Hurle M.R., Zhang X., Annan R.S., Lu Q., Faucette L.F., Scott G.F., Li X., Carr S.A., Johnson R.K., Winkler J.D., Zhou B.B. Mammalian Chk2 is a downstream effector of the ATM-dependent DNA damage checkpoint pathway. Oncogene 1999, 18:4047-4054.
8. Chen Y., Sanchez Y. Chk1 in the DNA damage response: conserved roles from yeasts to mammals. DNA Repair (Amst) 2004, 3:1025-1032.
9. Chen F., Nastasi A., Shen Z., Brenneman M., Crissman H., Chen D.J. Cell cycle-dependent protein expression of mammalian homologs of yeast DNA double-strand break repair genes Rad51 and Rad52. Mutat. Res. 1997, 384:205-211.
10. Dyson N. The regulation of E2F by pRB-family proteins. Genes Dev. 1998, 12:2245-2262.
11. Elias J.M. Cell proliferation indexes: a biomarker in solid tumors. Biotech. Histochem. 1997, 72:78-85.
12. Flygare J., Benson F., Hellgren D. Expression of the human RAD51 gene during the cell cycle in primary human peripheral blood lymphocytes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1996, 1312:231-236.
13. Fujii-Yamamoto H., Kim J.M., Arai K., Masai H. Cell cycle and developmental regulations of replication factors in mouse embryonic stem cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280:12976-12987.
14. Gagou M.E., Zuazua-Villar P., Meuth M. Enhanced H2AX phosphorylation, DNA replication fork arrest, and cell death in the absence of Chk1. Mol. Biol. Cell 2010, 21:739-752.
15. Gary R., Kim K., Cornelius H.L., Park M.S., Matsumoto Y. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen facilitates excision in long-patch base excision repair. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274:4354-4363.
16. Gauthier L.R., Granotier C., Hoffschir F., Etienne O., Ayouaz A., Desmaze C., Mailliet Pl, Biard D.S., Boussin F.D. Rad51 and DNA-PKcs are involved in the generation of specific telomere aberrations induced by the quadruplex ligand 360A that impair mitotic cell progression and lead to cell death. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2012, 69:629-640.
17. Grandin N., Charbonneau M. The Rad51 pathway of telomerase-independent maintenance of telomeres can amplify TG1-3 sequences in yku and cdc13 mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2003, 23:3721-3734.
18. Hao L.Y., Strong M.A., Greider C.W. Phosphorylation of H2AX at short telomeres in T cells and fibroblasts. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279:45148-45154.
19. He X., Wei C., Song T., Yuan J., Zhang Y., Ma Q., Shi W., Zhong H. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen destabilizes c-Abl tyrosine kinase and regulates cell apoptosis in response to DNA damage. Apoptosis 2009, 14:268-275.
20. Ingolia N.T., Lareau L.F., Weissman J.S. Ribosome profiling of mouse embryonic stem cells reveals the complexity and dynamics of mammalian proteomes. Cell 2011, 147:789-802.
21. Ishida S., Huang E., Zuzan H., Spang R., Leone G., West M., Nevins J.R. Role for E2F in control of both DNA replication and mitotic functions as revealed from DNA microarray analysis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2001, 21:4684-4699.
22. Iyer R.R., Pohlhaus T.J., Chen S., Hura G.L., Dzantiev L., Beese L.S., Modrich P. The MutSalpha-proliferating cell nuclear antigen interaction in human DNA mismatch repair. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283:13310-13319.
23. Jain S., Filipe M.I., Hall P.A., Waseem N., Lane D.P., Levison D.A. Prognostic value of proliferating cell nuclear antigen in gastric carcinoma. J. Clin. Pathol. 1991, 44:655-659.
24. Jiang K., Pereira E., Maxfield M., Russell B., Goudelock D.M., Sanchez Y. Regulation of Chk1 includes chromatin association and 14-3-3 binding following phosphorylation on Ser-345. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278:25207-25217.
25. Kelman Z. PCNA: structure, functions and interactions. Oncogene 1997, 14:629-640.
26. Kolle G., Ho M., Zhou Q., Chy H.S., Krishnan K., Cloonan N., Bertoncello I., Laslett A.L., Grimmond S.M. Identification of human embryonic stem cell surface markers by combined membrane-polysome translation state array analysis and immunotranscriptional profiling. Stem Cells 2009, 27:2446-2456.
27. Kondoh H., Lleonart M.E., Nakashima Y., Yokode M., Tanaka M., Bernard D., Gil J., Beach D. A high glycolytic flux supports the proliferative potential of murine embryonic stem cells. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2007, 9:293-299.
28. Kubbutat M.H., Jones S.N., Vousden K.H. Regulation of p53 stability by Mdm2. Nature 1997, 387:299-303.
29. Le S., Moore J.K., Haber J.E., Greider C.W. RAD50 and RAD51 define two pathways that collaborate to maintain telomeres in the absence of telomerase. Genetics 1999, 152:143-152.
30. Lee S.D., Alani E. Analysis of interactions between mismatch repair initiation factors and the replication processivity factor PCNA. J. Mol. Biol. 2006, 355:175-184.
31. Lee H.H., Chiang W.H., Chiang S.H., Liu Y.C., Hwang J., Ng S.Y. Regulation of cyclin D1, DNA topoisomerase I, and proliferating cell nuclear antigen promoters during the cell cycle. Gene Expr. 1995, 4:95-109.
32. Lin Y.H., Chang C.C., Wong C.W., Teng S.C. Recruitment of Rad51 and Rad52 to short telomeres triggers a Mec1-mediated hypersensitivity to double-stranded DNA breaks in senescent budding yeast. PLoS One 2009, 4:e8224.
33. Lu R., Markowetz F., Unwin R.D., Leek J.T., Airoldi E.M., MacArthur B.D., Lachmann A., Rozov R., Ma'ayan A., Boyer L.A., Troyanskaya O.G., Whetton A.D., Lemischka I.R. Systems-level dynamic analyses of fate change in murine embryonic stem cells. Nature 2009, 462:358-362.
34. Lundin C., Erixon K., Arnaudeau C., Schultz N., Jenssen D., Meuth M., Helleday T. Different roles for nonhomologous end joining and homologous recombination following replication arrest in mammalian cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2002, 22:5869-5878.
35. Mangham D.C., Rowlands D.C., Newbold K.M., Reynolds G.M., Fielding J.W., Hallissey M.T. Expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) in gastric carcinoma: no evidence for prognostic value. J. Clin. Pathol. 1994, 47:473-474.
36. Matsumoto Y. Molecular mechanism of PCNA-dependent base excision repair. Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol. 2001, 68:129-138.
37. Moldovan G.L., Pfander B., Jentsch S. PCNA, the maestro of the replication fork. Cell 2007, 129:665-679.
38. Muller-Weeks S.J., Caradonna S. Specific association of cyclin-like uracil-DNA glycosylase with the proliferating cell nuclear antigen. Exp. Cell Res. 1996, 226:346-355.
39. Nakamura A.J., Redon C.E., Bonner W.M., Sedelnikova O.A. Telomere-dependent and telomere-independent origins of endogenous DNA damage in tumor cells. Aging (Albany NY) 2009, 1:212-218.
40. Petermann E., Orta M.L., Issaeva N., Schultz N., Helleday T. Hydroxyurea-stalled replication forks become progressively inactivated and require two different RAD51-mediated pathways for restart and repair. Mol. Cell 2010, 37:492-502.
41. Sage J.M., Gildemeister O.S., Knight K.L. Discovery of a novel function for human Rad51: maintenance of the mitochondrial genome. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285:18984-18990.
42. Saleh-Gohari N., Helleday T. Conservative homologous recombination preferentially repairs DNA double-strand breaks in the S phase of the cell cycle in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32:3683-3688.
43. Sampath P., Pritchard D.K., Pabon L., Reinecke H., Schwartz S.M., Morris D.R., Murry C.E. A hierarchical network controls protein translation during murine embryonic stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. Cell Stem Cell 2008, 2:448-460.
44. Saretzki G., Armstrong L., Leake A., Lako M., von Zglinicki T. Stress defense in murine embryonic stem cells is superior to that of various differentiated murine cells. Stem Cells 2004, 22:962-971.
45. Saretzki G., Walter T., Atkinson S., Passos J.F., Bareth B., Keith W.N., Stewart R., Hoare S., Stojkovic M., Armstrong L., von Zglinicki T., Lako M. Downregulation of multiple stress defense mechanisms during differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 2008, 26:455-464.
46. Schneider-Poetsch T., Ju J., Eyler D.E., Dang Y., Bhat S., Merrick W.C., Green R., Shen B., Liu J.O. Inhibition of eukaryotic translation elongation by cycloheximide and lactimidomycin. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2010, 6:209-217.
47. Schwanhausser B., Busse D., Li N., Dittmar G., Schuchhardt J., Wolf J., Chen W., Selbach M. Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control. Nature 2011, 473:337-342.
48. Serrano L., Liang L., Chang Y., Deng L., Maulion C., Nguyen S., Tischfield J.A. Homologous recombination conserves DNA sequence integrity throughout the cell cycle in embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2011, 20:363-374.
49. Shirodkar S., Ewen M., DeCaprio J.A., Morgan J., Livingston D.M., Chittenden T. The transcription factor E2F interacts with the retinoblastoma product and a p107-cyclin A complex in a cell cycle-regulated manner. Cell 1992, 68:157-166.
50. Sinha M., Peterson C.L. A Rad51 presynaptic filament is sufficient to capture nucleosomal homology during recombinational repair of a DNA double-strand break. Mol. Cell 2008, 30:803-810.
51. Sobell H.M. Actinomycin and DNA transcription. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1985, 82:5328-5331.
52. Sorensen C.S., Hansen L.T., Dziegielewski J., Syljuasen R.G., Lundin C., Bartek J., Helleday T. The cell-cycle checkpoint kinase Chk1 is required for mammalian homologous recombination repair. Nat. Cell Biol. 2005, 7:195-201.
53. Sung P., Krejci L., Van Komen S., Sehorn M.G. Rad51 recombinase and recombination mediators. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278:42729-42732.
54. Taniura H., Glass C., Gerace L. A chromatin binding site in the tail domain of nuclear lamins that interacts with core histones. J. Cell Biol. 1995, 131:33-44.
55. Tichy E.D., Pillai R., Deng L., Liang L., Tischfield J., Schwemberger S.J., Babcock G.F., Stambrook P.J. Mouse embryonic stem cells, but not somatic cells, predominantly use homologous recombination to repair double-strand DNA breaks. Stem Cells Dev. 2010, 19:1699-1711.
56. Trojanek J., Ho T., Del Valle L., Nowicki M., Wang J.Y., Lassak A., Peruzzi F., Khalili K., Skorski T., Reiss K. Role of the insulin-like growth factor I/insulin receptor substrate 1 axis in Rad51 trafficking and DNA repair by homologous recombination. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2003, 23:7510-7524.
57. Umar A., Buermeyer A.B., Simon J.A., Thomas D.C., Clark A.B., Liskay R.M., Kunkel T.A. Requirement for PCNA in DNA mismatch repair at a step preceding DNA resynthesis. Cell 1996, 87:65-73.
58. Verdun R.E., Karlseder J. The DNA damage machinery and homologous recombination pathway act consecutively to protect human telomeres. Cell 2006, 127:709-720.
59. White J., Dalton S. Cell cycle control of embryonic stem cells. Stem Cell Rev. 2005, 1:131-138.
60. Yamamoto A., Taki T., Yagi H., Habu T., Yoshida K., Yoshimura Y., Yamamoto K., Matsushiro A., Nishimune Y., Morita T. Cell cycle-dependent expression of the mouse Rad51 gene in proliferating cells. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1996, 251:1-12.
61. Yu Y., Cai J.P., Tu B., Wu L., Zhao Y., Liu X., Li L., McNutt M.A., Feng J., He Q., Yang Y., Wang H., Sekiguchi M., Zhu W.G. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen is protected from degradation by forming a complex with MutT Homolog2. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284:19310-19320.