Serial exploration of faces: Comparing vision and touch

Journal of Vision

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 1-14

  Dopjans, Lisa ^a   Bülthoff, Heinrich H ^a,b   Wallraven, Christian ^b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

^b Korea University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Face processing strategies; Face recognition; Haptic processing

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; RECOGNITION; TOUCH; YOUNG ADULT;

FACE; FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); TOUCH; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84862111198     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/12.1.6     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Alvarez, G. A., & Cavanagh, P. (2004). The capacity of visual short-term memory is set both by visual information load and by number of objects. Psychological Science, 15, 106-111.
2. Baron, M. (2008). Haptic classification of facial expressions of emotion on 3D facemasks and the absence of a haptic face-inversion effect. Unpublished BSc (honors) thesis, Queen's University.
3. Barton, J. J., Radcliffe, N., Cherkasova, M. V., Edelman, J., & Intriligator, J. M. (2006). Information processing during face recognition: The effects of familiarity, inversion, and morphing on scanning fixations. Perception 35, 1089-1105.
4. Bliss, I., & Hämäläinen, H. (2005). Different working memory capacity in normal young adults for visual and tactile letter recognition task. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 46, 247-251.
5. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436.
6. Bukach, C. M., Bub, D. N., Gauthier, I., & Tarr, M. J. (2006). Perceptual expertise effects are not all or none: Spatially limited perceptual expertise for faces in a case of prosopagnosia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 48-63.
7. Carey, S., & Diamond, R. (1977). From piecemeal to configurational representation of faces. Science, 195, 312-314.
8. Casey, S. J., & Newell, F. N. (2007). Are representations of unfamiliar faces independent of encoding modality? Neuropsychologia, 45, 506-513.
9. Cooke, T., Jäkel, F., Wallraven, C., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2007). Multimodal similarity and categorization of novel, three-dimensional objects. Neuropsychologia, 45, 484-495.
10. Dahl, C. D., Logothetis, N. K., & Hoffman, K. L. (2007). Individuation and holistic processing of faces in rhesus monkeys. Proceedings of the Royal Society: Biological Sciences, 274, 2069-2076.
11. Dahl, C. D., Wallraven, C., Bülthoff, H. H., & Logothetis, N. K. (2009). Humans and macaques employ similar face-processing strategies. Current Biology, 19, 509-513.
12. Desimone, R. (1996). Neural mechanisms for visual memory and their role in attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United Stated of America, 93, 13494-13499.
13. Diamond, R., & Carey, S. (1986). Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 107-117.
14. Dopjans, L., Wallraven, C., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2009). Cross-modal transfer in visual and haptic face recognition. IEEE Transaction on Haptics, 2, 236-240.
15. Emery, N. J. (2000). The eyes have it: The neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 24, 581-604.
16. Farroni, T., Csibra, G., Simion, F., & Johnson, M. H. (2002). Eye contact detection in humans from birth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99, 9602-9605.
17. Gaissert, N., Wallraven, C., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2010). Visual and haptic perceptual spaces show high similarity in humans. Journal of Vision, 10(11):2, 1-20, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/10/11/2, doi:10.1167/10.11.2.
18. Gauthier, I., & Tarr, M. J. (1997). Becoming a 'Greeble' expert: Exploring the face recognition mechanism. Vision Research, 37, 1673-1682.
19. Goldstein, A. G., & Mackenberg, E. J. (1966). Recognition of human faces from isolated facial features: A developmental study. Psychonomic Science, 6, 149-150.
20. Guo, K., Robertson, R. G., Mahmoodi, S., Tadmor, Y., & Young, M. P. (2003). How do monkeys view faces? A study of eye movements. Experimental Brain Research, 150, 363-374.
21. Haig, N. D. (1986). Exploring recognition with interchanged facial features. Perception, 15, 235-247.
22. Hay, D. C., & Cox, R. (2000). Developmental changes in the recognition of faces and facial features. Infant and Child Development, 9, 199-212.
23. Ikeda, M., & Uchikawa, K. (1978). Integrating time for visual pattern perception and a comparison with the tactile mode. Vision Research, 18, 1565-1571.
24. Joseph, R. M., & Tanaka, J. (2003). Holistic and partbased face recognition in children with autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 44, 529-542.
25. Kanwisher, N. (2000). Domain specificity in face recognition. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 759-763.
26. Kilgour, R., deGelder, B., & Lederman, S. J. (2004). Haptic face recognition and prosopagnosia. Neuropsychologia, 42, 707-712.
27. Kilgour, R., & Lederman, S. J. (2002). Face recognition by hand. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 339-352.
28. Kilgour, R., & Lederman, S. J. (2006). A haptic faceinversion effect. Perception, 35, 921-931.
29. Klin, A., Jones, W., Schultz, R., Volkmar, F., & Cohen, D. (2002). Visual fixation patterns during viewing of naturalistic social situations as predictors of socialcompetence in individuals with autism. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59, 809-816.
30. Knecht, S., Kunesch, E., & Schnitzler, A. (1996). Parallel and serial processing of haptic information in man: Effects of parietal lesions on sensorimotor hand function. Neuropsychologia, 34, 669-687.
31. Lakatos, S., & Marks, L. (1999). Haptic form perception: Relative salience of local and global features. Perception & Psychophysics, 6, 895-908.
32. Langdell, T. (1978). Recognition of faces: An approach to the study of autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 19, 255-268.
33. Leder, H., & Bruce, V. (2000). When inverted faces are recognized: The role of configural information in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 513-536.
34. Lederman, S. J., Klatzky, R. L., & Kitada, R. (2010). Haptic face processing and its relation to vision. In J. Kaiser & M. J. Naumer (Eds.), Multisensory object perception in the primate brain (pp. 273-300). New York: Springer.
35. Loomis, J. M., Klatzky, R. L., & Lederman, S. J. (1991). Similarity of tactual and visual picture recognition with limited field of view. Perception, 20, 167-177.
36. Loomis, J. M., & Lederman, S. J. (1986). Tactual perception. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performances: Cognitive processes and performance (vol. 2, pp. 31/1-31/41). New York: Wiley.
37. Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279-281.
38. Maurer, D., LeGrand, R., & Mondloch, C. J. (2002). The many faces of configural processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 255-260.
39. McGregor, T. A., Klatzky, R. L., Hamilton, C., & Lederman, S. J. (2010). Haptic classification of facial identity in 2D displays: Configural versus feature-based processing. IEEE Transaction on Haptics, 3, 48-55.
40. McKelvie, S. J. (1976). The role of eyes and mouth in the memory of a face. American Journal of Psychology, 89, 311-323.
41. Millar, S., & Al-Attar, Z. (2004). External and bodycentered frames of reference in spatial memory: Evidence from touch. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 51-59.
42. Mondloch, C. J., Geldart, S., Maurer, D., & LeGrand, R. (2003). Developmental changes in face processing skills. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 86, 67-84.
43. Norman, J. F., Norman, H. F., Clayton, A. M., Lianekhammy, J., & Zielke, G. (2004). The visual andhaptic perception of natural object shape. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 342-351.
44. Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437-442.
45. Pellicano, E., & Rhodes, G. (2003). Holistic processing of faces in preschool children and adults. Psychological Science, 14, 618-622.
46. Pietrini, P., Furey, M. L., Ricciardi, E., Gobbini, M. I., Wu, W.-H. C., Cohen, L., et al. (2004). Beyond sensory images: Object-based representation in the human ventral pathway. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 5658-5663.
47. Rodger, H., Kelly, D. J., Blais, C., & Caldara, R. (2010). Inverting faces does not abolish cultural diversity in eye movements. Perception, 39, 1491-1502.
48. Schwaninger, A., Wallraven, C., Cunningham, D. W., & Chiller-Glaus, S. (2006). Processing of identity and emotion in faces: A psychophysical, physiological and computational perspective. Progress in Brain Research, 156, 321-343.
49. Schwarzer, G. (2000). Development of face processing: The effect of face inversion. Child Development, 71, 391-401.
50. Schyns, P. G., Bonnar, L., & Gosselin, F. (2002). Show me the features! Understanding recognition from the use of visual information. Psychological Science, 13, 402-409.
51. Searcy, J. H., & Bartlett, J. C. (1996). Inversion and processing of component and spatial-relational information of faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 43-47.
52. Sekuler, A. B., Gaspar, C. M., Gold, J. M., & Bennett, P. J. (2004). Inversion leads to quantitative, not qualitative, changes in face processing. Current Biology, 14, 391-396.
53. Sergent, J. (1984). An investigation into component and configural processes underlying face perception. British Journal of Psychology, 75, 221-242.
54. Squire, L. R. (1992). Declarative and nondeclarative memory: Multiple brain systems supporting learning and memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 4, 232-243.
55. Tanaka, J. W., & Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 242-248.
56. Tanaka, J. W., & Sengco, J. (1997). Features and their configuration in face recognition. Memory and Cognition, 25, 583-592.
57. Troje, N. F., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1996). Face recognition under varying poses: The role of texture and shape. Vision Research, 36, 1761-1771.
58. Valentine, T. (1988). Upside-down faces: A review of the effects of inversion upon face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 79, 471-491.
59. Van Belle, G., De Graef, P., Verfaillie, K., Rossion, B., & Lefe'vre, P. (2010). Face inversion impairs holistic perception: Evidence from gaze-contingent stimulation. Journal of Vision, 10(5):10, 1-13, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/10/5/10, doi:10.1167/ 10.5.10.
60. Vogel, E. K., Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2001). Storage of features, conjunctions and objects in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 92-114.
61. Walk, R. D., & Pick, H. L., Jr. (1981). Intersensory perception and sensory integration. New York: Plenum.
62. Walker Smith, G. J. (1978). The effects of delay and exposure duration in a face recognition task. Perception & Psychophysics, 24, 63-70.
63. Williams, C. C., & Henderson, J. M. (2007). The face inversion effect is not a consequence of aberrant eye movements. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1977-1985.
64. Yarbus, A. L. (1967). Eye movements and vision. New York: Plenum Press.
65. Yin, R. K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 141-145.