Show me the features! Understanding recognition from the use of visual information

Psychological Science

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 402-409

  Schyns, Philippe G ^a   Bonnar, Lizann ^a   Gosselin, Frédéric ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECALL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS;

EID: 0036717205     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00472     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Ahumada, A.J., & Lovell, J. (1971). Stimulus features in signal detection. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49, 1751-1756.
2. Archambault, A., O'Donnell, C., & Schyns, P.G. (1999). Blind to object changes: When learning one object at different levels of categorization modifies its perception. Psychological Science, 10, 249-255.
3. Bayer, H.M., Schwartz, O., & Pelli, D. (1998). Recognizing facial expressions efficiently [Abstract]. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 39, S172.
4. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review; 94, 115-147.
5. Biederman, I., & Cooper, E.E. (1991). Priming contour-deleted images: Evidence for intermediate representations in visual object recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 393-419.
6. Brainard, D.H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436.
7. Brown, R. (1958). How shall a thing be called? Psychological Review, 65, 14-21.
8. Bülthoff, H.H., & Edelman, S. (1992). Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view theory of object recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 89, 60-64.
9. Burt, D.M., & Perrett, D.I. (1997). Perceptual asymmetries in judgements of facial attractiveness, age, gender, speech and expression. Neuropsychologia, 35, 685-693.
10. Cutzu, F., & Edelman, S. (1996). Faithful representations of similarities among three-dimensional shapes in human vision. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 93, 12046-12050.
11. De Valois, R.L., & De Valois, K.K. (1990). Spatial vision. New York: Oxford University Press.
12. Farah, M.H., Wilson, K.D., Drain, M., & Tanaka, J.W. (1998). What is "special" about face perception. Psychological Review, 105, 482-498.
13. Gosselin, F., & Schyns, P.G. (2001a). Bubbles: A new technique to reveal the use of visual information in recognition tasks. Vision Research, 41, 2261-2271.
14. Gosselin, F., &. Schyns, P.G. (2001b). Why do we SLIP to the basic-level? Computational constraints and their implementation. Psychological Review, 108, 735-758.
15. Henderson, J.M., Falk, R., Minut, S., Dyer, F.C., & Mahadevan, S. (2001). Gaze control for face learning and recognition in humans and machines. In T. Shipley & P. Kellman (Eds.), From fragments to objects: Segmentation processes in vision (pp. 463-48). New York: Elsevier.
16. Hill, H., Schyns, P.G., & Akamatsu, S. (1997). Information and viewpoint dependence in face recognition. Cognition, 62, 201-222.
17. Jenkins, J., Craven, B., Bruce, V., & Akamatsu, S. (1997). Methods for detecting social signals from the face (Technical Report No. HIP96-39). Kyoto, Japan: Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers.
18. Jolicoeur, P. (1990). Identification of disoriented objects: A dual-systems theory. Mind and Language, 5, 387-410.
19. Jolicoeur, P., Gluck, M., & Kosslyn, S.M. (1984). Pictures and names: Making the connexion. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 31-53.
20. Liu, Z., Knill, D.C., & Kersten, D. (1995). Object classification for human and ideal observers. Vision Research, 35, 549-568.
21. Morrison, D., & Schyns, P.G. (2001). Usage of spatial scales for the categorization of faces, objects and scenes. Psychological Bulletin and Review, 8, 454-469.
22. Oliva, A., & Schyns, P.G. (2000). Colored diagnostic blobs mediate scene recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 176-210.
23. Pelli, D.G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437-442.
24. Perrett, D.I., Oram, M.W., & Ashbridge, E. (1998). Evidence accumulation in cell populations responsive to faces: An account of generalisation of recognition without mental transformation. Cognition, 67, 111-145.
25. Poggio, T., & Edelman, S. (1990). A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects. Nature, 343, 263-266.
26. Rensink, R.A., O'Regan, J.K., & Clark, J.J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8, 368-373.
27. Rosch, E., Mervis, C.B., Gray, W., Johnson, D., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382-439.
28. Schyns, P.G. (1998). Diagnostic recognition: Task constraints, object information and their interactions. Cognition, 67, 147-179.
29. Schyns, P.G., Goldstone, R.L., & Thibaut, J.P. (1998). The development of features in object concepts. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 1-17.
30. Schyns, P.G., & Oliva, A. (1999). Dr. Angry and Mr. Smile: When categorization flexibly modifies the perception of faces in rapid visual presentations. Cognition, 69, 243-265.
31. Schyns, P.G., & Rodet, L. (1997). Categorization creates functional features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 681-696.
32. Simoncelli, E.P. (1997). Image and Multi-Scale Pyramid Tools [Computer software]. New York: Author.
33. Simons, D., & Wang, R.F. (1998). Perceiving real-world viewpoint changes. Psychological Science, 9, 315-320.
34. Tanaka, J., & Farah, M.J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A, 225-245.
35. Tanaka, J., & Gauthier, I. (1997). Expertise in object and face recognition. In R.L. Goldstone, D.L. Medin, & P.G. Schyns (Eds.), Perceptual learning (pp. 83-125). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
36. Tanaka, J., &. Sengco, J.A. (1997). Features and their configuration in face recognition. Memory & Cognition, 25, 583-592.
37. Tanaka, J., & Taylor, M.E. (1991). Object categories and expertise: Is the basic level in the eye of the beholder? Cognitive Psychology, 15, 121-149.
38. Tanaka, J.W., & Presnell, L.M. (1999). Color diagnosticity in object recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1140-1153.
39. Tarr, M.J., & Pinker, S. (1989). Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 233-282.
40. Tarr, M.J., & Pinker, S. (1991). Orientation-dependent mechanisms in shape recognition: Further issues. Psychological Science, 2, 207-209.
41. Troje, N., & Bülthoff, H.H. (1996). Face recognition under varying pose: The role of texture and shape. Vision Research, 36, 1761-1771.
42. Yarbus, A.L. (1965). Role of eye movements in the visual process. Moscow, USSR: Nauka.