Inversion and Processing of Component and Spatial-Relational Information in Faces

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 904-915

  Searcy, Jean H ^a   Bartlett, James C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FACE; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION DISORDER; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SHORT TERM MEMORY;

ADULT; ATTENTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FACE; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL DISTORTION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 0030210889     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.22.4.904     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bartlett, J. C., & Searcy, J. (1993). Inversion and configuration of faces. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 281-316.
2. Benson, P. J., & Perrett, D. I. (1994). Visual processing of facial distinctiveness. Perception, 23, 75-93.
3. Bruce, V., Doyle, T., Dench, N., & Burton, M. (1991). Remembering facial configurations. Cognition, 38, 109-144.
4. Carey, S., & Diamond, R. (1977, January). From piecemeal to configurational representation of faces. Science, 195, 312-314.
5. Diamond, R. & Carey, S. (1986). Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 107-117.
6. Ellis, H. D., & Young, A. W. (1989). Are faces special? In A. W. Young and H. D. Ellis, (Eds.), Handbook of research on face processing (pp. 1-26). New York: North-Holland.
7. Endo, M., Masame, M., & Maruyama, K. (1990). A limited use of configurai information in inverted faces. Tohoku Psychologica Folia, 49, 114-125.
8. Galton, F. (1879). Composite portraits made by combining those of many persons into a single resulting figure. Journal of the Anthropological Institute, 8, 132-144.
9. Garner, W. R. (1978). Aspects of a stimulus: Features, dimensions, and configurations. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd, (Eds.), Cognition and categorization, (99-133) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Gorea, A., & Julesz, B. (1990). Context superiority in a detection task with line-element stimuli: A low-level effect. Perception, 19, 5-16.
11. Hillger, L., & Koenig, O. (1991). Separable mechanisms in face processing: Evidence from hemispheric specialization. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 42-58.
12. Hole, J. (1994). Configurational factors in the perception of unfamiliar faces. Perception, 23, 65-74.
13. Kemp, R., McManus, C. & Piggot, T. (1990). Sensitivity to the displacement of facial features in negative and inverted images. Perception, 19, 531-543.
14. Morton, J., & Johnson, M. (1991). CONSPEC and CONLERN: A two-process theory of infant face recognition. Psychological Review, 98, 164-181.
15. Purcell, D. G., & Stewart, A. L. (1988). The face-detection effect: Configuration enhances detection. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 355-366.
16. Reinitz, M., Lammers, W., & Cochran, B. (1992). Memory conjunction errors: Miscombination of stored stimulus features can produce illusions of memory. Memory and Cognition, 20, 1-11.
17. Rock, I. (1973). Orientation and form. New York: Academic Press.
18. Rock, I. (1988). On Thompson's inverted-face phenomenon. Perception, 17, 815-817.
19. Rhodes, G., Brake, K., & Atkinson, A. (1993). What's lost in inverted faces? Cognition, 47, 25-57.
20. Rhodes, G., Brennan, S., & Carey, S. (1987). Identification and rating of caricatures: Implications for mental representations of faces. Cognitive Psychology, 19, (4), 473-497.
21. Sergent, J. (1984). An investigation into component and configurai processes underlying face perception. British Journal of Psychology, 75, 221-242.
22. Takane, Y., & Sergent, J. (1983). Multidimensional scaling models for reaction times and same-different judgments. Psychometrika, 48, 393-423.
23. Tanaka, J. W., & Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45, 34-79.
24. Thompson, P. (1980). Margaret Thatcher: A new illusion. Perception, 9, 483-484.
25. Valentine, T. (1988). Upside-down faces: A review of the effect of inversion on face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 79, 471-491.
26. Valentine, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and face in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43, 161-204.
27. Yin, R. K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7, 181-190.
28. Young, A. W., Hellawell, D., & Hay, D. C. (1987). Configural information in face perception. Perception, 16, 747-759.
29. Yuille, A. L. (1991). Deformable templates for face recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 59-70.