Multimodal similarity and categorization of novel, three-dimensional objects

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 484-495

  Cooke, Theresa ^a   Jäkel, Frank ^a   Wallraven, Christian ^a   Bülthoff, Heinrich H ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

Author keywords

Categorization; Haptics; MDS; Multisensory; Similarity

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CATEGORIZATION; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALING; NORMAL HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PHYSICAL MODEL; PRINTING; SENSORY STIMULATION; SIMILARITY; TACTILE DISCRIMINATION; TACTILE STIMULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TECHNOLOGY; THREE DIMENSIONAL OBJECT; THREE DIMENSIONAL PRINTING TECHNOLOGY; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

CONCEPT FORMATION; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; GENERALIZATION, STIMULUS; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REACTION TIME; TOUCH;

EID: 33845439323     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.02.009     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Ahn W., and Medin D. A two-stage model of category construction. Cognitive Science 16 1 (1992) 81-121
2. Amedi A., Jacobson G., Hendler T., Malach R., and Zohary E. Convergence of visual and tactile shape processing in the human lateral occipital complex. Cerebral Cortex 12 (2002) 1202-1212
3. Amedi A., Malach R., Hendler T., Peled S., and Zohary E. Visuo-haptic object-related activation in the ventral visual pathway. Nature Neuroscience 4 3 (2001) 324-330
4. Borg I., and Groenen P. Modern multidimensional scaling (1997), Springer
5. Carroll J., and Chang J. Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an n-way generalization of "Eckart-Young" decomposition. Psychometrika 35 (1970) 283-319
6. Cooke T., Steinke F., Wallraven C., and Bülthoff H. A similarity-based approach to perceptual feature validation. APGV 2005-Symposium on applied perception in graphics and visualization. ACM SIGGRAPH (2005)
7. Cox T., and Cox M. Multidimensional scaling. 2nd ed. (2001), Chapman & Hall
8. Easton R., Greene A., and Srinivas K. Transfer between vision and haptics: Memory for 2-d patterns and 3-d objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 4 3 (1997) 403-410
9. Easton R., Srinivas K., and Greene A. Do vision and haptics share common representations? Implicit and explicit memory within and between modalities. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 23 1 (1997) 153-163
10. Edelman S. Representation and recognition in vision (1999), MIT Press
11. Ernst M., and Banks M. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415 (2002) 429-433
12. Ernst M., and Bülthoff H. Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends in Cognitive Science 8 4 (2004) 162-169
13. Forti S., and Humphreys G. Cross-modal visuo-tactile matching in a patient with a semantic disorder. Neuropsychologia 43 11 (2005) 1568-1579
14. Garbin C. Visual-haptic perceptual nonequivalence for shape information and its impact upon cross-modal performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 14 4 (1988) 547-553
15. Garner W. The processing of information and structure (1974), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Maryland
16. Goldstone R. The role of similarity in categorization: Providing a groundwork. Cognition 123 (1994) 125-157
17. Goldstone R., and Steyvers M. The sensitization and differentiation of dimensions during category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General 130 1 (2001) 116-139
18. Guest S., and Spence C. Tactile dominance in speeded discrimination of textures. Experimental Brain Research 150 2 (2003) 201-207
19. In: Hahn U., and Ramscar M. (Eds). Similarity and categorization (2001), Oxford University Press
20. Hollins M., Faldowski R., Rao S., and Young F. Perceptual dimensions of tactile surface texture: A multidimensional scaling analysis. Perception Psychophysics 54 6 (1993) 687-705
21. Imai S., and Garner W. Discriminability and preference for attributes in free and constrained classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology 69 (1965) 596-608
22. James T., Humphrey G., Gati J., Servos P., Menon R., and Goodale M. Haptic study of three-dimensional objects activates extrastriate visual areas. Neuropsychologia 40 (2002) 1706-1714
23. Klatzky R., Lederman S., and Reed C. There's more to touch than meets the eye: The salience of object attributes for haptics with and without vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General 116 4 (1987) 356-369
24. Lakatos S., and Marks L. Haptic form perception: Relative salience of local and global features. Perception & Psychophysics 61 5 (1999) 895-908
25. Landau B., and Leyton M. Perception, object kind, and object naming. Spatial Cognition and Computation 1 (1999) 1-29
26. Lederman S., and Klatzky R. Extracting object properties through haptic exploration. Acta Psychology 84 (1993) 29-40
27. Lederman S., Summers C., and Klatzky R. Cognitive salience of haptic object properties: Role of modality-encoding bias. Perception 25 (1996) 983-998
28. Medin D., and Schaffer M. Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review 85 3 (1978) 207-238
29. Medin D., Wattenmaker W., and Hampson S. Family resemblance, conceptual cohesiveness, and category construction. Cognitive Psychology 19 2 (1987) 242-279
30. Milton F., and Wills A. The influence of stimulus properties on category construction. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 30 2 (2004) 407-415
31. Morrongiello B., Humphrey G., Timney B., Choi J., and Rocca P. Tactual object exploration and recognition in blind and sighted children. Perception 23 7 (1994) 833-848
32. Murphy G., and Medin D. The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychological Review 92 3 (1985) 289-316
33. Newell F., Ernst M., Tjan B., and Biilthoff H. Viewpoint dependence in visual and haptic object recognition. Psychological Science 12 1 (2001) 37-42
34. Norman J., Norman H., Clayton A., Lianekhammy J., and Zielke G. The visual and haptic perception of natural object shape. Perception & Psychophysics 66 2 (2004) 342-351
35. Nosofsky R. Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General 115 1 (1986) 39-57
36. Nosofsky R. Similarity scaling and cognitive process models. Annual Review of Psychology 43 (1992) 25-53
37. Pietrini P., Furey M., Ricciardi E., Gobbini M., Wu W., Cohen L., et al. Beyond sensory images: Object-based representations in the human ventral pathway. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101 (2004) 5658-5663
38. Reales J., and Ballesteros S. Implicit and explicit memory for visual and haptic objects: Cross-modal priming depends on structural descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 25 3 (1999) 644-663
39. Regehr G., and Brooks L. Category organization in free classification: The organizing effect of an array of stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21 1 (1995) 347-363
40. Rock I., and Victor J. Vision and touch: An experimentally created conflict between the two senses. Science 143 (1964) 594-596
41. Rosch E., and Mervis C. Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structures of categories. Cognitive Psychology 7 (1975) 573-605
42. Rosch E., Mervis C., Gray W., Johnson D., and Boyes-Braem P. Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 8 (1976) 382-439
43. Shepard R., and Cermak G. Perceptual-cognitive explorations of a toroidal set of free-form stimuli. Cognitive Psychology 4 (1973) 351-377
44. Sigala N., and Logothetis N. Visual categorization shapes feature selectivity in the primate temporal cortex. Nature 415 (2002) 318-320
45. Smith L. Importance of the overall similarity of objects of adults' and children's classifications. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 7 4 (1981) 811-824
46. Tversky B., and Hemenway K. Objects, parts, and categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General 113 2 (1984) 169-197
47. Wattenmaker W. Relational properties and memory-based category construction. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 18 5 (1992) 1125-1138
48. Young, F., & Harris, D. (2003). ALSCAL. In SPSS 12.0 command syntax reference (pp. 100-116). Chicago, IL: SPSS.