Are representations of unfamiliar faces independent of encoding modality?

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 506-513

  Casey, Sarah J ^a   Newell, Fiona N ^a  

^a TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Configural processing; Crossmodal; Face recognition; Haptics

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; FACE; FACE PROFILE; FACIES; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; RECOGNITION; SENSORIMOTOR INTEGRATION; TACTILE DISCRIMINATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TOUCH; VISION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL MEMORY;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); TOUCH; TRANSFER (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 33845382470     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.02.011     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Bartlett J.C., and Searcy J. Inversion and configuration of faces. Cognitive Psychology 25 (1993) 281-316
2. Bruce V., and Langton S. The use of pigmentation and shading information in recognising the sex and identities of faces. Perception 23 (1994) 803-822
3. Bruce V., and Young A.W. Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology 77 (1986) 305-327
4. Casey S.J., and Newell F.N. The role of long-term and short-term familiarity in visual and haptic face recognition. Experimental Brain Research 166 3-4 (2005) 583-591
5. Collishaw S.M., and Hole G.J. Featural and configurational processes in the recognition of faces of different familiarity. Perception 29 (2000) 893-909
6. Diamond R., and Carey S. Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 115 (1986) 107-117
7. Easton R.D., Greene A.J., and Srinivas K. Transfer between vision and haptics: Memory for 2D patterns and 3D objects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 4 (1997) 403-410
8. Ernst M.O., and Bülthoff H.H. Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 4 (2004) 162-169
9. Farah M.J., Drain H.M., and Tanaka J.W. What causes the face inversion effect?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21 3 (1995) 628-634
10. Freire A., Lee K., and Symons L.A. The face-inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: Direct evidence. Perception 29 (2000) 159-170
11. Gauthier I., and Tarr M.J. Becoming a "Greeble" expert: Exploring the face recognition mechanism. Vision Research 37 (1997) 1673-1682
12. Haxby J.V., Hoffman E.A., and Gobbini M.I. The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 6 (2000) 223-232
13. Haxby J.V., Horowitz B., Ungerleider L.G., Maisog J.M., Pietrini P., and Grady C.L. The functional organisation of human extrastriate cortex: A PET-fCBF study of selective attention to faces and locations. Journal of Neuroscience 14 (1994) 6336-6353
14. Hoffman E.A., and Haxby J.V. Distinct representations of eye gaze and identity in the distributed human neural system for face perception. Nature Neuroscience 3 1 (2000) 80-84
15. James T.W., James K.H., Humphrey G.K., and Goodale M.A. Do visual and tactile object representations share the same neural substrate?. In: Heller M.A., and Ballesteros S. (Eds). Touch and blindness: Psychology and neuroscience (2005), Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
16. Kanwisher N. Domain specificity in face recognition. Nature Neuroscience 3 (2000) 759-763
17. Kanwisher N., McDermott J., and Chun M.M. The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialised for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience 17 (1997) 4302-4311
18. Kemp R., Pike G., White P., and Musselman A. Perception and recognition of normal and negative faces: The role of shape-from-shading and pigmentation cues. Perception 25 (1996) 37-52
19. Kilgour, A.R. (2003). Haptic face recognition: Behavioural, neuropsychological, and neuroimaging perspectives. Doctoral dissertation, Queen's University at Kingston, Canada. Dissertation Abstracts International, AAT NQ81001.
20. Kilgour A.R., de Gelder B., and Lederman S.J. Haptic face recognition and prosopagnosia. Neuropsychologia 42 (2004) 707-712
21. Kilgour A.R., Kitada R., Servos P., James T.W., and Lederman S.J. Haptic face identification activates ventral occipital and temporal areas: An fMRI study. Brain and Cognition 59 3 (2005) 246-257
22. Kilgour A.R., and Lederman S.J. Face recognition by hand. Perception and Psychophysics 64 (2002) 339-352
23. Lederman S.J., and Klatzky R.L. Haptic classification of common objects: Knowledge-driven exploration. Cognitive Psychology 22 (1990) 421-459
24. Lehmann S., and Murray M.M. The role of multisensory memories in unisensory object discrimination. Cognitive Brain Research 24 (2005) 326-334
25. Lewis M.B., and Glenister T.E. A sideways look at configural encoding: Two different effects of face rotation. Perception 32 (2003) 7-14
26. Loomis J.M. Tactile recognition of raised characters: A parametric study. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 23 (1985) 18-20
27. Loomis J.M. A model of character recognition and legibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 16 (1990) 106-120
28. Loomis J.M., and Lederman S.J. Tactual perception. In: Boff K.R., Kaufman L., and Thomas J.P. (Eds). Handbook of perception and human performance: Vol. 2. Cognitive processes and performance (1986), Wiley, New York 31/1-31/41
29. Loomis J.M., Klatzky R.L., and Lederman S.J. Similarity of tactual and visual picture recognition with limited field of view. Perception 20 (1991) 167-177
30. McCarthy G., Puce A., Gore J.C., and Allison T. Face-specific processing in the human fusiform gyrus. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 9 5 (1997) 605-610
31. Murray M.M., Foxe J.J., and Wylie G.R. The brain uses single trial multisensory memories to discriminate without awareness. NeuroImage 27 (2005) 473-478
32. Newell F.N. Crossmodal object recognition. In: Calvert G., Spence C., and Stein B.E. (Eds). The handbook of multisensory processes (2004), MIT Press, London
33. Newell F.N., Ernst M.O., Tjan B.S., and Bülthoff H.H. Viewpoint dependence in visual and haptic object recognition. Psychological Science 12 (2001) 37-42
34. Pietrini P., Furey M.L., Ricciardi E., Gobbini M.I., Wu W.H., Cohen L., et al. Beyond sensory images: Object-based representation in the human ventral pathway. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America 101 15 (2004) 5658-5663
35. Price C.J., and Humphreys G.W. The effects of surface detail on object categorisation and naming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 41A (1989) 797-828
36. Reales J.M., and Ballesteros S. Implicit and explicit memory for visual and haptic objects: crossmodal priming depends on structural descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 25 (1999) 644-663
37. Schwaninger A., Lobmaier J.S., and Collishaw S.M. Role of featural and configurational information in familiar and unfamiliar face recognition. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2525 (2002) 643-650
38. Sergent J., Ohta S., and McDonald B. Functional neuroanatomy of face and object processing: A positron emission tomography study. Brain 115 (1992) 15-36
39. Tanaka J.W., and Farah M.J. Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 46A (1993) 225-245
40. Tanaka J.W., and Sengco J. Features and their configuration in face recognition. Memory and Cognition 25 (1997) 583-592
41. Tanaka J.W., Weiskopf D., and Williams P. The role of colour in high-level vision. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5 5 (2001) 211-215
42. Vuong Q.C., Peissig J.J., Harrison M.C., and Tarr M.J. The role of surface pigmentation for recognition revealed by contrast reversal in faces and Greebles. Vision Research 45 (2005) 1213-1223
43. Yin R.K. Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (1969) 141-145
44. Yip A.W., and Sinha P. Contribution of colour to face recognition. Perception 31 8 (2002) 995-1003
45. Young A.W., Hellawell D., and Hay D.C. Configural information in face perception. Perception 16 (1987) 747-759