Teaching Tree-Thinking to Undergraduate Biology Students

Evolution: Education and Outreach

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 621-628

  Meisel, Richard P ^a  

^a Cornell University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Great chain of being; Ladderized thinking; Learning cycle; Nature of science; Phylogenetics; Tree thinking

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861683131     PISSN: 19366426     EISSN: 19366434     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12052-010-0254-9     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Abd-El-Khalick F, Bell RL, Lederman NG. The nature of science and instructional practice: making the unnatural natural. Sci Educ. 1998;82:417-36.
2. Abd-El-Khalick F, Lederman NG. Improving science teachers' conceptions of nature of science: a critical review of the literature. Int J Sci Educ. 2000;22:665-701.
3. Baum DA, Smith SD, Donovan SS. Evolution: the tree-thinking challenge. Science. 2005;310:979-80.
4. Baum DA, Offner S. Phylogenies and tree-thinking. Am Biol Teach. 2008;70:222-9.
5. Catley K, Lehrer R, Reiser B. Tracing a prospective learning progression for developing understanding of evolution. http://www7.nationalacademies.org/bota/Evolution.pdf (2005).
6. Catley KM. Darwin's missing link - a novel paradigm for evolution education. Sci Educ. 2006;90:767-83.
7. Catley KM, Novick LR. Seeing the wood for the trees: an analysis of evolutionary diagrams in biology textbooks. Bioscience. 2008;58:976-87.
8. Catley KM, Novick LR, Shade CK. Interpreting evolutionary diagrams: when topology and process conflict. J Res Sci Teach. 2010; 10.1002/tea.20384.
9. Creevey CJ, Fitzpatrick DA, Philip GK, Kinsella RJ, O'Connell MJ, Pentony MM, et al. Does a tree-like phylogeny only exist at the tips in the prokaryotes? Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004;271:2551-8.
10. Crisp MD, Cook LG. Do early branching lineages signify ancestral traits? Trends Ecol Evol. 2005;20:122-8.
11. Dobzhansky T. Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. Am Biol Teach. 1973;35:125-9.
12. Doolittle WF. Phylogenetic classification and the universal tree. Science. 1999;284:2124-8.
13. Doolittle WF, Bapteste E. Pattern pluralism and the Tree of Life hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:2043-9.
14. Gee H. Progressive evolution: aspirational thinking. Nature. 2002;420:611.
15. Giese AR. Using inquiry and phylogeny to teach comparative morphology. Am Biol Teach. 2005;67:412-7.
16. Gilbert SF. Opening Darwin's black box: teaching evolution through developmental genetics. Nat Rev Genet. 2003;4:735-41.
17. Goldsmith DW. The great clade race: presenting cladistic thinking to biology majors & general science students. Am Biol Teach. 2003;65:679-82.
18. Gregory TR. Understanding evolutionary trees. Evo Edu Outreach. 2008;1:121-37.
19. Gregory TR. Understanding natural selection: essential concepts and common misconceptions. Evo Edu Outreach. 2009;2:156-75.
20. Gregory TR, Ellis CAJ. Conceptions of evolution among science graduate students. Bioscience. 2009;59:792-9.
21. Halverson KL. Using pipe cleaners to bring the tree of life to life. Am Biol Teach. 2010;72:223-4.
22. Haukoos GD, Penick JE. The influence of classroom climate on science process and content achievement of community college students. J Res Sci Teach. 1983;20:629-37.
23. Jensen MS, Finley FN. Changes in students' understanding of evolution resulting from different curricular and instructional strategies. J Res Sci Teach. 1996;33:879-900.
24. Julius ML, Schoenfuss HL. Phylogenetic reconstruction as a broadly applicable teaching tool in the biology classroom: the value of data in estimating likely answers. J Coll Sci Teach. 2006;35:40-5.
25. Koonin EV, Wolf YI. Genomics of bacteria and archaea: the emerging dynamic view of the prokaryotic world. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:6688-719.
26. Krell FT, Cranston PS. Which side of the tree is more basal? Syst Entomol. 2004;29:279-81.
27. Lawrence JG, Ochman H. Molecular archaeology of the Escherichia coli genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:9413-7.
28. Lawson AE. A better way to teach biology. Am Biol Teach. 1988;50:266-78.
29. Lederman NG. Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: a review of the research. J Res Sci Teach. 1992;29:331-59.
30. Lederman NG. The state of science education: subject matter without context. Elec J Sci Educ. 1998;3 (guest editorial).
31. Lovejoy AO. The great chain of being: a study of the history of an idea. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1936.
32. Maddison WP. Gene trees in species trees. Syst Biol. 1997;46:523-36.
33. Mazur E. Education: farewell, lecture? Science. 2009;323:50-1.
34. Meir E, Perry J, Herron JC, Kingsolver J. College students' misconceptions about evolutionary trees. Am Biol Teach. 2007;69:e71-6.
35. Musheno BV, Lawson AE. Effects of learning cycle and traditional text on comprehension of science concepts by students at differing reasoning levels. J Res Sci Teach. 1999;36:23-37.
36. Nee S. The great chain of being. Nature. 2005;435:429.
37. Nehm R, Poole T, Lyford M, Hoskins S, Carruth L, Ewers B, et al. Does the segregation of evolution in biology textbooks and introductory courses reinforce students' faulty mental models of biology and evolution? Evo Edu Outreach. 2009;2:527-32.
38. Nei M, Kumar S. Molecular evolution and phylogenetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000.
39. Nickels MK, Nelson CE. Beware of nuts & bolts: putting evolution into the teaching of biological classification. Am Biol Teach. 2005;67:283-9.
40. Novick L, Catley K, Funk D. Characters are key: the effect of synapomorphies on cladogram comprehension. Evo Edu Outreach. 2010; 10.1007/s12052-12010-10243-z.
41. Novick LR, Catley KM. Understanding phylogenies in biology: the influence of a Gestalt perceptual principle. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2007;13:197-223.
42. O'Hara RJ. Population thinking and tree thinking in systematics. Zool Scr. 1997;26:323-9.
43. Offner S. A universal phylogenetic tree. Am Biol Teach. 2001;63:164-70.
44. Omland KE, Cook LG, Crisp MD. Tree thinking for all biology: the problem with reading phylogenies as ladders of progress. BioEssays. 2008;30:854-67.
45. Page RDM, Holmes EC. Molecular evolution: a phylogenetic approach. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 1998.
46. Perry J, Meir E, Herron JC, Maruca S, Stal D. Evaluating two approaches to helping college students understand evolutionary trees through diagramming tasks. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2008;7:193-201.
47. Philippe H, Douady CJ. Horizontal gene transfer and phylogenetics. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2003;6:498-505.
48. Rivera MC, Lake JA. The ring of life provides evidence for a genome fusion origin of eukaryotes. Nature. 2004;431:152-5.
49. Rudolph JL, Stewart J. Evolution and the nature of science: on the historical discord and its implications for education. J Res Sci Teach. 1998;35:1069-89.
50. Sandvik H. Tree thinking cannot be taken for granted: challenges for teaching phylogenetics. Theory Biosci. 2008;127:45-51.
51. Sandvik H. Anthropocentricisms in cladograms. Biol Philos. 2009;24:425-40.
52. Schwartz RM, Dayhoff MO. Origins of prokaryotes, eukaryotes, mitochondria, and chloroplasts. Science. 1978;199:395-403.
53. Singer F, Hagen JB, Sheehy RR. The comparative method, hypothesis testing & phylogenetic analysis: an introductory laboratory. Am Biol Teach. 2001;63:518-23.
54. Smith JJ, Cheruvelil KS. Using inquiry and tree-thinking to "march through the animal phyla": teaching introductory comparative biology in an evolutionary context. Evo Edu Outreach. 2009;2:429-44.
55. Smith MK, Wood WB, Adams WK, Wieman C, Knight JK, Guild N, et al. Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions. Science. 2009;323:122-4.
56. Staub NL, Pauw PG, Pauw D. Seeing the forest through the trees: helping students appreciate life's diversity by building the tree of life. Am Biol Teach. 2009;68:149-51.
57. Tëmkin I, Eldredge N. Phylogenetics and material cultural evolution. Curr Anthropol. 2007;48:146-54.
58. Treagust D, Duit R. Conceptual change: a discussion of theoretical, methodological and practical challenges for science education. Cult Stud Sci Educ. 2008;3:297-328.
59. Woese CR, Kandler O, Wheelis ML. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990;87:4576-9.
60. Wolf YI, Rogozin IB, Grishin NV, Koonin EV. Genome trees and the tree of life. Trends Genet. 2002;18:472-9.