Seeing the wood for the trees: An analysis of evolutionary diagrams in biology textbooks

BioScience

Volumn 58, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 976-987

  Catley, Kefyn M ^a   Novick, Laura R ^b  

^a WESTERN CAROLINA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Alternative conceptions; Biology textbooks; Cladograms; Evolutionary diagrams; Macroevolution

Indexed keywords

EID: 55549090360     PISSN: 00063568     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1641/B581011     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. [AAAS] American Association for the Advancement of Science. 2001. Atlas of Science Literacy. Vol. Project 2061. Washington (DC): AAAS and the National Science Teachers Association.
2. [AMNH] American Museum of Natural History. 1994a. Science and Nature Survey. New York: Louis Harris and Associates.
3. _. 1994b. Systematics Agenda 2000: Charting the Biosphere. New York: AMNH.
4. _. 1999. The Global Taxonomic Initiative: Using Systematic Inventories to Meet Country and Regional Needs. New York: AMNH.
5. Bar M, Neta M. 2006. Humans prefer curved visual objects. Psychological Science 17: 645-648.
6. Baum DA, Smith SD, Donovan SS. 2005. The tree thinking challenge. Science 310: 979-980.
7. Bonnet C. 1745. Traité d'insectologie. Paris: Durand.
8. Catley KM. 2006. Darwin's missing link: A new paradigm for evolution education. Science Education 90: 767-783.
9. Catley KM, Novick LR. Digging deep: Exploring college students' knowledge of macroevolutionary time. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Forthcoming.
10. Catley KM, Lehrer R, Reiser B. 2005. Tracing a Prospective Learning Progression for Developing Understanding of Evolution. Paper Commissioned by the National Academies Committee on Test Design for K-12 Science Achievement. (3 September 2008; www7.nationalacademies.org/bota/Evolution.pdf)
11. Delson E, Eldredge N, Tattersall I. 1977. Reconstruction of hominid phylogeny: A testable framework based on cladistic analysis. Journal of Human Evolution 6: 263-278.
12. Demastes SS, Good RG, Peebles P. 1995. Student's conceptual ecologies and the process of conceptual change in evolution. Science Education 79: 637-666.
13. _. 1996. Patterns of conceptual change in evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 33: 407-431.
14. Eldredge N, Cracraft J. 1980. Phylogenetic Patterns and the Evolutionary Process.New York: Columbia University Press.
15. Evans EM. 2001. Cognitive and contextual factors in the emergence of diverse belief systems: Creation versus evolution. Cognitive Psychology 42: 217-266.
16. Gilbert SF. 2003. Opening Darwin's black box: Teaching evolution through developmental genetics. Nature Reviews Genetics 4: 735-741.
17. Goldsmith DW. 2003. Presenting cladistic thinking to biology majors and general science students. American Biology Teacher 65: 679-682.
18. Haeckel EH. 1874. Anthropogenie. Leipzig (Germany): W. Engelmann.
19. Hennig W. 1966. Phylogenetic Systematics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
20. Hickman CP Jr, Roberts LS, Keen SL, Larson A. 2006. Integrated Principles of Zoology. 13th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill Science/Engineering/Math.
21. Kelemen DW, DiYanni C. 2005. Intuitions about origins: Purpose and intelligent design in children's reasoning about nature. Journal of Cognition and Development 6: 3-31.
22. Lamarck JB. 1809. Philosophies zoologique, ou exposition des considérations relatives à l'histoire naturelle des animaux. Paris: Dentu.
23. Lovejoy AO. 1936. The Great Chain of Being: A Study of the History of an Idea. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
24. [NAS] National Academy of Sciences. 1998. Teaching about Evolution and the Nature of Science. Washington (DC): National Academy Press. (3 September 2008; www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=5787#toc)
25. [NRC] National Research Council. 1996. National Science Education Standards. Washington (DC): National Academy Press. (3 September 2008; www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=4962)
26. Nee S. 2005. The great chain of being. Nature 435: 429. doi:10.1038/435429a
27. Novick LR, Catley KM. 2007. Understanding phylogenies in biology: The influence of a Gestalt perceptual principle. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 13: 197-223.
28. _. 2008. Assessing students' understanding of cladograms. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching; 30 March 2008, Baltimore, MD.
29. O'Hara RJ. 1988. Homage to Clio, or, toward an historical philosophy for evolutionary biology. Systematic Zoology 37: 142-155.
30. Sandvik H. 2008. Tree thinking cannot taken for granted: Challenges for teaching phylogenetics. Theory in Biosciences 127: 45-51. (3 September 2008; www.springerlink.com/content/eu62420p381402xr/)
31. Spoor F, Leakey MG, Gathogo PN, Brown FH, Antón SC, McDougall I, Kiarie C, Manthi FK, Leakey LN. 2007. Implications of new early Homo fossils from Ileret, east of Lake Turkana, Kenya. Nature 448: 688-691.
32. Staub NL, Pauw PG, Pauw D. 2006. Seeing the forest through the trees: Helping students appreciate life's diversity by building the Tree of Life. American Biology Teacher 68: 149-151.