Interpreting evolutionary diagrams: When topology and process conflict

Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Volumn 47, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 861-882

  Catley, Kefyn M ^a   Novick, Laura R ^b   Shade, Courtney K ^b  

^a WESTERN CAROLINA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Anagenesis; Cladogenesis; Diagrammatic reasoning; Evolution education; Evolutionary diagrams; Tree thinking

Indexed keywords

ANAGENESIS; CLADOGENESIS; DIAGRAMMATIC REASONING; EVOLUTION EDUCATION; EVOLUTIONARY DIAGRAMS; TREE THINKING;

BIOLOGY; GRAPHIC METHODS;

STUDENTS;

EID: 77956905624     PISSN: 00224308     EISSN: 10982736     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tea.20384     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. The Academy of Sciences for the Developing World. (2006). IAP statement on the teaching of evolution. Trieste, Italy: Interacademy Panel on International Issues. www.interacademies.net/iap.
2. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (2001). Atlas of science literacy. Washington, DC: AAAS.
3. American Museum of Natural History. (1994). Science and nature survey. Louis Harris and Associates.
4. Anderson, D. L., Fisher, K. M., & Norman, G. J. (2002). Development and evaluation of the Conceptual Inventory of Natural Selection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 952-978.
5. Audesirk, G., Audesirk, T, & Byers, B. E. (2004). Biology: Life on earth (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
6. Baum, DA., Smith, S. D., & Donovan, S. S. (2005). The tree thinking challenge. Science, 310, 979-980.
7. Baum, DA., Smith, S. D., & Donovan, S. S. (2006). Comment on Tree-thinking (Science Online, 22 March). AAAS Science Magazine: Published E-Letter responses 310 (5750) 979-980. Retrieved from: http://www.sciencemag. org/cgi/eletters/310/5750/979414, April 25, 2008.
8. Bishop, B. A., & Anderson, C. W. (1990). Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 415-427.
9. Bonnet, C. (1745). Traite d'Insectologie, premier parte. Paris. Durand.
10. Catley, K. M. (2006). Darwin's missing link: A new paradigm for evolution education. Science Education, 90, 767-783.
11. Catley, K. M., Lehrer, R., & Reiser, B., (2005). Tracing a prospective learning progression for developing understanding of evolution. Paper Commissioned by the National Academies Committee on Test Design for K-12 Science Achievement (a copy can be downloaded from: http://www7. nationalacademies.org/bota/Evolutionpdf).
12. Catley, K. M., & Novick, L. R. (2008). Seeing the wood for the trees: An analysis of evolutionary diagrams in biology textbooks. BioScience, 58, 976-987.
13. Catley, K. M., & Novick, L. R. (2009). Digging deep: Exploring college students' knowledge of macroevolutionary time. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 311-332.
14. Chiras, D. D. (2002). Human biology (4th ed.) Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
15. Clark, CA. (2001). Evolution for John Doe: Pictures, the public, and the Scopes trial debate. The Journal of American History, 87, 1275-1303.
16. Darwin, C. R. (1858). On the origin of species by means of natural selection: Or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London, reprinted with an introduction by Ernst Mayr. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1964.
17. Demastes, S. S., Good, R. G., & Peebles, P. (1995). Student's conceptual ecologies and the process of conceptual change in evolution. Science Education, 79, 637-666.
18. Demastes, S. S., Good, R. G, & Peebles, P. (1996). Patterns of conceptual change in evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 407-431.
19. Deniz, H., Donnelly, LA., & Yilmaz, I. (2008). Exploring the factors related to acceptance of evolutionary theory among Turkish preservice biology teachers: Toward a more informative conceptual ecology for biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 420-443.
20. Donnelly, LA., & Boone, W. J. (2007). Biology teachers' attitudes toward and use of Indiana's state evolution standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 236-257.
21. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, HA. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, 215-251.
22. Evander, R. L. (1989). Phylogeny of the family Equidae. In: D. R. Prothero & R. M. Schoch (Eds.), The evolution of perissodactyls (pp. 109-127). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
23. Foley, R. (1987). Hominid species and stone-tool assemblages: How are they related? Antiquity, 61, 380-392.
24. Goldsmith, D. W. (2003). The great clade race. Presenting cladistic thinking to biology majors & general science students. The American Biology Teacher, 65, 679-682.
25. Goldston, M. J., & Kyzer, P. (2009). Teaching evolution: Narratives with a view from three southern biology teachers in the USA. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 762-790.
26. Gould, S. J. (1995). Ladders and cones: Constraining evolution by canonical icons. In: R. B. Silver (Ed.), Hidden histories of science (pp. 37-67). New York, NY: NYREV.
27. Harris Poll. (2005). Nearly two thirds of U. S. adults believe human beings were created by God. The Harris Poll. 52, July 26, 2005.
28. Hennig, W. (1966). Phylogenetic systematics. Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois Press.
29. Hulbert, R. C. Jr., (1989). Phylogenetic interrelationships and evolution of North American late Neocene Equinae. In: D. R. Prothero & R. M. Schoch (Eds.), The evolution of perissodactyls (pp. 176-196). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
30. Johanson, D. C., & White, T. D. (1993). A systematic assessment of early African Hominids. In: R. L. Ciochon & J. G Fleagle (Eds.), The human evolution source book (pp. 100-111). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
31. Johnson, GB. (1998). Biology: Visualizing life. Austin, TX: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
32. Johnson, G. B., & Raven, PH. (2001). Biology: Principles & explorations. Austin, TX: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
33. Kelemen, D. (1999). Why are rocks pointy? Children's preference for teleological explanations of the natural world. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1440-1452.
34. Kelemen, D. W., & DiYanni, C. (2005). Intuitions about origins: Purpose and intelligent design in children's reasoning about nature. Journal of Cognition and Development, 6, 3-31.
35. Lahr, M. M., & Foley, R. (2004). Human evolution writ small. Nature, 431, 1043-1044.
36. Lakoff, G, & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
37. Lamarck, J. B. (1809). Philosophies zoologique, ou Exposition des considérations relatives à l'histoire naturelle des animaux... Dentu. Paris.
38. Lovejoy, A. O. (1936). The Great Chain of Being: A study of the history of an idea. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
39. Morabito, N, Catley, K. M., & Novick, L. R. (2010). Reasoning about evolutionary history: The effects of biology background on post-secondary students' knowledge of most recent common ancestry and homoplasy. Journal of Biological Education. Accepted pending revision.
40. McFadden, B. J. (1992). Fossil horses: Systematic, paleobiology, and evolution of the family Equidae. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
41. Meir, E., Perry, J., Herron, J. C., & Kingsolver. J., (2007) College students' misconceptions about evolutionary trees. American Biology Teacher Online Publication September. Retrieved March 19, 2008 from http://www.bioone. org/perlserv/?request=getdocument&doi=10.1662%2F0002- 7685%282007%2969%5B71%3ACSMAET%5D2.0.CO%3B2.
42. Miller, J. D., Scott, E. C., & Okamota, S. (2006). Public acceptance of evolution. Science, 313, 765-766.
43. National Academy of Sciences. (1998). Teaching about evolution and the nature of science. Working group on teaching evolution. National Academy of Sciences.
44. National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
45. Nehm, R. H., & Schonfeld, I. S. (2008). Measuring knowledge of natural selection: A comparison of the CINS, an open-response instrument, and an oral interview. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 1131-1160.
46. Novick, L. R. (2004). Diagram literacy in pre-service math teachers, computer science majors, and typical undergraduates: The case of matrices, networks, and hierarchies. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6, 307-342.
47. Novick, L. R., & Catley, K. M. (2007). Understanding phylogenies in biology: The influence of a Gestalt perceptual principle. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 13, 197-223.
48. Novick, L. R., & Catley, K. M. (2010). Understanding the Tree of Life: Exploring Tree-Thinking Skills in College Students. Manuscript under revision for an invited resubmission.
49. Novick, L. R., & Hurley, S. M. (2001). To matrix, network, or hierarchy: That is the question. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 158-216.
50. O'Hara, R. J. (1988). Homage to Clio, or, toward an historical philosophy for evolutionary biology. Systematic Zoology, 37, 142-155.
51. Passmore, C., & Stewart, J. (2002). A modeling approach to teaching evolutionary biology in high schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 185-204.
52. Poling, DA., & Evans, E. M. (2004). Religious belief, scientific expertise, and folk ecology. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 4, 485-524.
53. Sandoval, W. A., & Reiser, B. J. (2003). Explanation-driven inquiry: Integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88, 345-372.
54. Sandvik, H. (2008). Tree thinking cannot taken for granted: Challenges for teaching phylogenetics. Theory in Biosciences, 127, 45-51. Retrieved from: http://www.springerlink.com/content/eu62420p381402xr/. March 19, 2008.
55. Settlage, J. (1994). Conceptions of natural selection: A snapshot of the sense-making process. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 449-457.
56. Shine, R. (1998). Australian snakes: A natural history. Reed New Holland. Australia.
57. Shtulman, A. (2006). Qualitative differences between näive and scientific theories of evolution. Cognitive Psychology, 52, 170-194.
58. Starr, C, & Taggart, R. (1992). Biology: The unity and diversity of life (6th ed.). Wadsworth Publishing Company. Belmont, California.
59. Treagust, D. F., & Duit, R. (2008). Conceptual change: A discussion of theoretical, methodological and practical challenges for science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3, 297-328.
60. Tversky, B., Zacks, J., Lee, P. U., & Heiser, J. (2000). Lines, blobs, crosses and arrows. In: M. Anderson, P. Cheng, & V. Haarslev (Eds.), Theory and application of diagrams (pp. 221-230). Edinburgh: Springer.
61. Wood, B. (1992). Origin and evolution of the genus Homo. Nature, 355, 783-790.