Dynamic changes in nucleosome occupancy are not predictive of gene expression dynamics but are linked to transcription and chromatin regulators

Molecular and Cellular Biology

Volumn 32, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 1645-1653

  Huebert, Dana J ^a,d   Kuan, Pei Fen ^b,c,e   Keles, Sündüz ^b,c   Gasch, Audrey P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^c University of Wisconsin Madison   (United States)

^d GUSTAVUS ADOLPHUS COLLEGE   (United States)

^e IL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA; HYDROGEN PEROXIDE; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR MSN2P; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; CHROMATIN STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA SEQUENCE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE LOCUS; GENOME; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOSOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DNA BINDING; REGULATORY SEQUENCE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION SITE; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION;

CHROMATIN; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; NUCLEOSOMES; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84861368045     PISSN: 02707306     EISSN: 10985549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.06170-11     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Adkins MW, Howar SR, Tyler JK. 2004. Chromatin disassembly mediated by the histone chaperone Asf1 is essential for transcriptional activation of the yeast PHO5 and PHO8 genes. Mol. Cell 14:657-666.
2. Albert I, et al. 2007. Translational and rotational settings of H2A.Z nucleosomes across the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 446:572-576.
3. Alejandro-Osorio AL, et al. 2009. The histone deacetylase Rpd3p is required for transient changes in genomic expression in response to stress. Genome Biol. 10:R57.
4. Almer A, Rudolph H, Hinnen A, Horz W. 1986. Removal of positioned nucleosomes from the yeast PHO5 promoter upon PHO5 induction releases additional upstream activating DNA elements. EMBO J. 5:2689-2696.
5. Archer TK, Cordingley MG, Wolford RG, Hager GL. 1991. Transcription factor access is mediated by accurately positioned nucleosomes on the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11:688-698.
6. Badis G, et al. 2008. A library of yeast transcription factor motifs reveals a widespread function for Rsc3 in targeting nucleosome exclusion at promoters. Mol. Cell 32:878-887.
7. Bailey TL, et al. 2009. MEME SUITE: tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 37:W202-W208.
8. Basehoar AD, Zanton SJ, Pugh BF. 2004. Identification and distinct regulation of yeast TATA box-containing genes. Cell 116:699-709.
9. Beck T, Hall MN. 1999. The TOR signalling pathway controls nuclear localization of nutrient-regulated transcription factors. Nature 402:689-692.
10. Berry DB, Gasch AP. 2008. Stress-activated genomic expression changes serve a preparative role for impending stress in yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 19:4580-4587.
11. Bose S, Dutko JA, Zitomer RS. 2005. Genetic factors that regulate the attenuation of the general stress response of yeast. Genetics 169:1215-1226.
12. Brickner DG, et al. 2007. H2A.Z-mediated localization of genes at the nuclear periphery confers epigenetic memory of previous transcriptional state. PLoS Biol. 5:e81.
13. Causton HC, et al. 2001. Remodeling of yeast genome expression in response to environmental changes. Mol. Biol. Cell 12:323-337.
14. Chi Y, et al. 2001. Negative regulation of Gcn4 and Msn2 transcription factors by Srb10 cyclin-dependent kinase. Genes Dev. 15:1078-1092.
15. Durrin LK, Mann RK, Grunstein M. 1992. Nucleosome loss activates CUP1 and HIS3 promoters to fully induced levels in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12:1621-1629.
16. Erkina TY, Tschetter PA, Erkine AM. 2008. Different requirements of the SWI/SNF complex for robust nucleosome displacement at promoters of heat shock factor and Msn2-and Msn4-regulated heat shock genes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28:1207-1217.
17. Ertel F, et al. 2010. In vitro reconstitution of PHO5 promoter chromatin remodeling points to a role for activator-nucleosome competition in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 30:4060-4076.
18. Field Y, et al. 2008. Distinct modes of regulation by chromatin encoded through nucleosome positioning signals. PLoS Comput. Biol. 4:e1000216.
19. Floer M, et al. 2010. A RSC/nucleosome complex determines chromatin architecture and facilitates activator binding. Cell 141:407-418.
20. Fraley C, Raftery AE. 2002. Model-based clustering, discriminant analysis, and density estimation. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 97:611-631.
21. Gasch AP. 2002. The environmental stress response: a common yeast response to environmental stresses. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany.
22. Gasch AP. 2002. Yeast genomic expression studies using DNA microarrays. Methods Enzymol. 350:393-414.
23. Gasch AP, et al. 2004. Conservation and evolution of cis-regulatory systems in ascomycete fungi. PLoS Biol. 2:e398.
24. Gasch AP, et al. 2000. Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Mol. Biol. Cell 11:4241-4257.
25. Geng F, Laurent BC. 2004. Roles of SWI/SNF and HATs throughout the dynamic transcription of a yeast glucose-repressible gene. EMBO J. 23:127-137.
26. Görner W, et al. 1998. Nuclear localization of the C2H2 zinc finger protein Msn2p is regulated by stress and protein kinase A activity. Genes Dev. 12:586-597.
27. Gross DS, Adams CC, Lee S, Stentz B. 1993. A critical role for heat shock transcription factor in establishing a nucleosome-free region over the TATA-initiation site of the yeast HSP82 heat shock gene. EMBO J. 12:3931-3945.
28. Guillemette B, et al. 2005. Variant histone H2A.Z is globally localized to the promoters of inactive yeast genes and regulates nucleosome positioning. PLoS Biol. 3:e384.
29. Hager GL, McNally JG, Misteli T. 2009. Transcription dynamics. Mol. Cell 35:741-753.
30. Han M, Kim UJ, Kayne P, Grunstein M. 1988. Depletion of histone H4 and nucleosomes activates the PHO5 gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 7:2221-2228.
31. Hogan GJ, Lee CK, Lieb JD. 2006. Cell cycle-specified fluctuation of nucleosome occupancy at gene promoters. PLoS Genet. 2:e158.
32. Jiang C, Pugh BF. 2009. A compiled and systematic reference map of nucleosome positions across the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Genome Biol. 10:R109.
33. John S, et al. 2008. Interaction of the glucocorticoid receptor with the chromatin landscape. Mol. Cell 29:611-624.
34. Kaplan N, et al. 2009. The DNA-encoded nucleosome organization of a eukaryotic genome. Nature 458:362-366.
35. Kuan PF, Huebert D, Gasch A, Keles S. 2009. A non-homogeneous hidden-state model on first order differences for automatic detection of nucleosome positions. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol. 8:Article29.
36. Kundu S, Horn PJ, Peterson CL. 2007. SWI/SNF is required for transcriptional memory at the yeast GAL gene cluster. Genes Dev. 21:997-1004.
37. Lallet S, et al. 2006. Role of Gal11, a component of the RNA polymerase II mediator in stress-induced hyperphosphorylation of Msn2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Microbiol. 62:438-452.
38. Lallet S, Garreau H, Poisier C, Boy-Marcotte E, Jacquet M. 2004. Heat shock-induced degradation of Msn2p, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae transcription factor, occurs in the nucleus. Mol. Genet. Genomics 272:353-362.
39. Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M, Salzberg SL. 2009. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 10:R25.
40. Lee CK, Shibata Y, Rao B, Strahl BD, Lieb JD. 2004. Evidence for nucleosome depletion at active regulatory regions genome-wide. Nat. Genet. 36:900-905.
41. Lee MV, et al. 2011. A dynamic model of proteome changes reveals new roles for transcript alteration in yeast. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7:514.
42. Lee W, et al. 2007. A high-resolution atlas of nucleosome occupancy in yeast. Nat. Genet. 39:1235-1244.
43. Li H, Ruan J, Durbin R. 2008. Mapping short DNA sequencing reads and calling variants using mapping quality scores. Genome Res. 18:1851-1858.
44. Lieb JD, Liu X, Botstein D, Brown PO. 2001. Promoter-specific binding of Rap1 revealed by genome-wide maps of protein-DNA association. Nat. Genet. 28:327-334.
45. Light WH, Brickner DG, Brand VR, Brickner JH. 2010. Interaction of a DNA zip code with the nuclear pore complex promotes H2A.Z incorporation and INO1 transcriptional memory. Mol. Cell 40:112-125.
46. Liko D, Conway MK, Grunwald DS, Heideman W. 2010. Stb3 plays a role in the glucose-induced transition from quiescence to growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 185:797-810.
47. Lindstrom KC, Vary JC, Parthun MR, Delrow J, Tsukiyama T. 2006. Isw1 functions in parallel with the NuA4 and Swr1 complexes in stressinduced gene repression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26:6117-6129.
48. Lippman SI, Broach JR. 2009. Protein kinase A and TORC1 activate genes for ribosomal biogenesis by inactivating repressors encoded by Dot6 and its homolog Tod6. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106:19928-19933.
49. Liu CL, et al. 2005. Single-nucleosome mapping of histone modifications in S. cerevisiae. PLoS Biol. 3:e328.
50. Lohr D, Lopez J. 1995. GAL4/GAL80-dependent nucleosome disruption/ deposition on the upstream regions of the yeast GAL1-10 and GAL80 genes. J. Biol. Chem. 270:27671-27678.
51. Molina-Navarro MM, et al. 2008. Comprehensive transcriptional analysis of the oxidative response in yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 283:17908-17918.
52. Nagaich AK, Walker DA, Wolford R, Hager GL. 2004. Rapid periodic binding and displacement of the glucocorticoid receptor during chromatin remodeling. Mol. Cell 14:163-174.
53. Ni L, et al. 2009. Dynamic and complex transcription factor binding during an inducible response in yeast. Genes Dev. 23:1351-1363.
54. Ohsawa R, Adkins M, Tyler JK. 2009. Epigenetic inheritance of an inducibly nucleosome-depleted promoter and its associated transcriptional state in the apparent absence of transcriptional activators. Epigenetics Chromatin 2:11.
55. Perlmann T, Wrange O. 1988. Specific glucocorticoid receptor binding to DNA reconstituted in a nucleosome. EMBO J. 7:3073-3079.
56. Polach KJ, Widom J. 1995. Mechanism of protein access to specific DNA sequences in chromatin: a dynamic equilibrium model for gene regulation. J. Mol. Biol. 254:130-149.
57. Polach KJ, Widom J. 1996. A model for the cooperative binding of eukaryotic regulatory proteins to nucleosomal target sites. J. Mol. Biol. 258:800-812.
58. Raisner RM, et al. 2005. Histone variant H2A.Z marks the 5' ends of both active and inactive genes in euchromatin. Cell 123:233-248.
59. Rando OJ, Ahmad K. 2007. Rules and regulation in the primary structure of chromatin. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 19:250-256.
60. Ransom M, et al. 2009. FACT and the proteasome promote promoter chromatin disassembly and transcriptional initiation. J. Biol. Chem. 284:23461-23471.
61. Segal E, et al. 2006. A genomic code for nucleosome positioning. Nature 442:772-778.
62. Shivaswamy S, et al. 2008. Dynamic remodeling of individual nucleosomes across a eukaryotic genome in response to transcriptional perturbation. PLoS Biol. 6:e65.
63. Smyth G. 2004. Linear models and empirical Bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol. 3:Article3.
64. Song JS, et al. 2007. Model-based analysis of two-color arrays (MA2C). Genome Biol. 8:R178.
65. Stavreva DA, Muller WG, Hager GL, Smith CL, McNally JG. 2004. Rapid glucocorticoid receptor exchange at a promoter is coupled to transcription and regulated by chaperones and proteasomes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:2682-2697.
66. Storey JD, Tibshirani R. 2003. Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100:9440-9445.
67. Venters BJ, et al. 2011. A comprehensive genomic binding map of gene and chromatin regulatory proteins in Saccharomyces. Mol. Cell 41:480-492.
68. Weiner A, Hughes A, Yassour M, Rando OJ, Friedman N. 2010. High-resolution nucleosome mapping reveals transcription-dependent promoter packaging. Genome Res. 20:90-100.
69. Wolffe AP. 1991. Activating chromatin. Curr. Biol. 1:366-368.
70. Workman JL. 2006. Nucleosome displacement in transcription. Genes Dev. 20:2009-2017.
71. Xu Z, et al. 2011. Antisense expression increases gene expression variability and locus interdependency. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7:468.
72. Xu Z, et al. 2009. Bidirectional promoters generate pervasive transcription in yeast. Nature 457:1033-1037.
73. Yassour M, et al. 2010. Strand-specific RNA sequencing reveals extensive regulated long antisense transcripts that are conserved across yeast species. Genome Biol. 11:R87.
74. Yoon OK, Brem RB. 2010. Noncanonical transcript forms in yeast and their regulation during environmental stress. RNA 16:1256-1267.
75. Yosef N, Regev A. 2011. Impulse control: temporal dynamics in gene transcription. Cell 144:886-896.
76. Yuan GC, et al. 2005. Genome-scale identification of nucleosome positions in S. cerevisiae. Science 309:626-630.
77. Zanton SJ, Pugh BF. 2004. Changes in genomewide occupancy of core transcriptional regulators during heat stress. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101:16843-16848.
78. Zanton SJ, Pugh BF. 2006. Full and partial genome-wide assembly and disassembly of the yeast transcription machinery in response to heat shock. Genes Dev. 20:2250-2265.
79. Zawadzki KA, Morozov AV, Broach JR. 2009. Chromatin-dependent transcription factor accessibility rather than nucleosome remodeling predominates during global transcriptional restructuring in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell 20:3503-3513.
80. Zhang H, Roberts DN, Cairns BR. 2005. Genome-wide dynamics of Htz1, a histone H2A variant that poises repressed/basal promoters for activation through histone loss. Cell 123:219-231.
81. Zhang L, Ma H, Pugh BF. 2011. Stable and dynamic nucleosome states during a meiotic developmental process. Genome Res. 21:875-884.
82. Zhu C, et al. 2009. High-resolution DNA-binding specificity analysis of yeast transcription factors. Genome Res. 19:556-566.