Stakeholder: Essentially Contested or Just Confused?

Journal of Business Ethics

Volumn 108, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 285-298

  Miles, Samantha ^a  

^a OXFORD BROOKES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Essentially contested concepts; Stakeholder; Stakeholder definitions

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861348363     PISSN: 01674544     EISSN: 15730697     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-011-1090-8     Document Type: Article

References (122)

1. Abbey, R. (2005). Is liberalism now an essentially contested concept? New Political Science, 27(4), 461-480.
2. Agle, B. R., Donaldson, T., Freeman, R. E., Jensen, M. C., Mitchell, R. K., & Wood, D. J. (2008). Dialogue: Toward superior stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8(2), 153-190.
3. Alkhafaji, A. F. (1989). A stakeholder approach to corporate governance: Managing in a dynamic environment. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
4. Argandoña, A. (1998). The stakeholder theory and the common good. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 1093-1102.
5. Baldwin, D. A. (1997). The concept of security. Review of International Studies, 23, 5-26.
6. Bendheim, C. L., Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1998). Determining best practice in corporate-stakeholder relations using data envelopment analysis. Business & Society, 37, 306-339.
7. Blair, M. M. (1998). Whose interests should corporations serve? In M. B. E. Clarkson (Ed.), The corporation and its stakeholders: Classic and contemporary reading. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
8. Boatright, J. R. (1994). Fiduciary duties and the shareholder-management relation: Or what's so special about shareholders? Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 393-407.
9. Boatright, J. R. (2002). Contractors as stakeholders: Reconciling stakeholder theory with the nexus-of-contracts firm. Journal of Banking & Finance, 26, 1837-1852.
10. Bowie, N. E. (1998). A Kantian theory of capitalism. Business Ethics Quarterly, The Ruffin Series, Special Issue, 1, 37-60.
11. Brenner, S. N. (1993). The stakeholder theory of the firm and organizational decision making: Some propositions and a model. In J. Pasquero & D. Collins (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting oftheInternational Association for Business and Society, San Diego, pp. 205-210.
12. Burton, B. K., & Dunn, C. P. (1996). Feminist ethics as moral grounding for stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 6(2), 133-147.
13. Care, N. S. (1973). On fixing social concepts. Ethics, 84(1), 10-21.
14. Carroll, A. B. (1993). Business and society: Ethics and stakeholder management. Cincinnati: South-Western Publishing Company.
15. Cennamo, C., Berrone, P., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2009). Does stakeholder management have a dark side? Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 491-507.
16. Clarke, B. (1979). Eccentrically contested concepts. British Journal of Political Science, 9(1), 122-126.
17. Clarkson, M. E. (1994). Risk-based model of stakeholder theory. Toronto: The Centre for Corporate Social Performance & Ethics.
18. Clarkson, M. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 20(1), 92-118.
19. Collier, D., Hidalgo, F. D., & Maciuceanu, A. O. (2006). Essentially contested concepts: Debates and applications. Journal of Political Ideologies, 11(3), 211-246.
20. Connolly, W. E. (1983). Essentially contested concepts in politics. In Terms of Political Discourse (2nd edn). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21. Cornell, B., & Shapiro, A. C. (1987). Corporate stakeholders and corporate finance. Financial Management, 16(1), 5-14.
22. Crane, A., Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2004). Stakeholders as citizens? Rethinking rights, participation and democracy. Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 107-122.
23. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts evidence and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65-92.
24. Driscoll, C., & Crombie, A. (2001). Stakeholder legitimacy management and the qualified good neighbor: The case of Nova Nada and JDI. Business & Society, 40, 442-471.
25. Eesley, C., & Lenox, M. J. (2006). Firm responses to secondary stakeholder action. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 765-781.
26. Etzioni, A. (1998). A communitarian note on stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8, 679-691.
27. Evan, W. M., & Freeman R. E. (1988/1993). A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capitalism. In T. L. Beauchamp & N. E. Bowie (Eds.), Ethical theory and business. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
28. Fassin, Y. (2009). The stakeholder model refined. Journal of Business Ethics, 84, 113-135.
29. Ferrell, O. C., & Ferrell, L. (2008). A macromarketing ethics framework: Stakeholder orientation and distributive justice. Journal of Macromarketing, 28(1), 24-32.
30. Foster, D., & Jonker, J. (2007). Towards a third generation of quality management: Searching for a theoretical re-conceptualisation of contemporary organisations based on the notions of stakeholders and transactivity. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 24(7), 683-703.
31. Freeden, M. (1998). Ideologies and political theory: A conceptual approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman Publishing.
33. Freeman, R. E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4, 409-421.
34. Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & De Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Friedman, M. (1970, Sept 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase profits. New York Times Magazine.
36. Friedman, A. L., & Miles, S. (2002). Developing stakeholder theory. Journal of Management Studies, 39(1), 1-22.
37. Friedman, A. L., & Miles, S. (2006). Stakeholders: Theory and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38. Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 191-205.
39. Galai, D., & Wiener, Z. (2008). Stakeholders and the composition of the voting rights of the board of directors. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14, 107-117.
40. Gallie, W. B. (1956). Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 56, 167-198.
41. Gamble, A., & Kelly, G. (2001). Shareholder value and the stakeholder debate in the UK. Corporate Governance, 9(2), 110-117.
42. Garver, E. (1990). Essentially contested concepts: The ethics and tactics of argument. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 23(4), 251-270.
43. Gellner, E. (1967). The concept of a story. Ratio, 9(1), 49-66.
44. Goodpaster, K. E. (1991). Business ethics and stakeholder analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 1(1), 53-73.
45. Grafstein, R. (1988). A realist foundation for essentially contested political concepts. The Western Political Quarterly, 41(1), 9-28.
46. Gray, J. N. (1977). On the contestability of social and political concepts. Political Theory, 5(3), 331-348.
47. Gray, J. N. (1978). On liberty, liberalism and essential contestability. British Journal of Political Science, 8(4), 385-402.
48. Gray, R., Dey, C., Owen, D., Evans, E., & Zadek, S. (1997). Struggling with the praxis of social accounting: Stakeholders, accountability, audits and procedures. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 10(3), 325-364.
49. Gray, R. H., Owen, D. L., & Adams, C. (1996). Accounting and accountability: Changes and challenges in corporate social and environmental reporting. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall.
50. Greenwood, M. (2007). Stakeholder engagement: Beyond the myth of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 315-327.
51. Hamilton, R. P. (2006). Love as an essentially contested concept. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 36(3), 239-254.
52. Hart, S. L., & Sharma, S. (2004). Engaging fringe stakeholders for competitive imagination. Academy of Management Executive, 18, 7-18.
53. Hendry, J. (2001). Economic contacts versus social relationships as a foundation for normative stakeholder theory. Business Ethics: A European Review, 10(3), 223-232.
54. Hill, C. W. L., & Jones, T. W. (1992). Stakeholder-agency theory. Journal of Management Studies, 29(2), 131-154.
55. Humber, J. M. (2002). Beyond stockholders and stakeholders: A plea for corporate moral autonomy. Journal of Business Ethics, 36, 207-221.
56. Jackson, J. (2001). Prioritising customers and other stakeholders using the AHP. European Journal of Marketing, 35(7/8), 858-871.
57. Jacobs, M. (2006). Sustainable development as a contested concept. In A. Dobson (Ed.), Fairness and futurity: Essays on environmental sustainability and social justice (pp. 21-45). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
58. Jensen, M. C. (1983). Organization theory and methodology. Accounting Review, April, pp. 319-339.
59. Jensen, M. C. (2001). Value maximisation, stakeholder theory and the corporate objective function. European Financial Management, 7, 297-317.
60. Jensen, M. C. (2002). Value maximisation, stakeholder theory and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2), 235-256.
61. Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20, 404-438.
62. Kaler, J. (2002). Morality and strategy in stakeholder identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 39, 91-100.
63. Kaler, J. (2003). Differentiating stakeholder theories. Journal of Business Ethics, 46, 71-83.
64. Kaler, J. (2006). Evaluating stakeholder theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 69, 249-268.
65. Kassinis, G., & Vafeas, N. (2006). Stakeholder pressure and environmental performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 145-159.
66. Kekes, J. (1977). Essentially contested concepts: A reconsideration. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 10(2), 71-89.
67. King, B. (2008). A social movement perspective of stakeholder collective action and influence. Business & Society, 47(1), 21-49.
68. Kochan, T. A., & Rubinstein, S. A. (2000). Towards a stakeholder theory of the firm: the Saturn approach. Organization Science, 11, 367-386.
69. Kotler, P. (2003). Marketing management (11th ed.). Upper Saddler River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
70. Kuhn, (2008). A communicative theory of the firm: Developing an alternative perspective on intra-organizational power and stakeholder relationship. Organization Studies, 29, 1227-1254.
71. Lampe, M. (2001). Mediation as an ethical adjunct of stakeholder theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 31, 165-173.
72. Langtry, B. (1994). Stakeholders and the moral responsibilities of the firm. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4, 431-443.
73. Laplume, A. O., Sonpar, K., & Litz, R. A. (2008). Stakeholder theory: Reviewing a theory that moves us. Journal of Management, 34(6), 1152-1189.
74. Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A radical view. London: Macmillan.
75. MacIntyre, A. (1973). The essential contestability of some social concepts. Ethics, 84(1), 1-9.
76. MacMillan, I. C., & Jones, P. E. (1986). Strategy formulation: Power and politics (2nd ed.). St. Paul: West Publishing Co.
77. Madsen, H., & Ulhøi, J. P. (2001). Integrating environmental and stakeholder management. Business Strategy & the Environment, 10(2), 77-88.
78. Mahon, J. F. (2002). Corporate reputation: A research agenda using strategy and stakeholder literature. Business & Society, 41, 415-445.
79. Mahon, J. F., & Wartick, S. L. (2003). Dealing with stakeholders: How reputation, credibility and framing influence the game. Corporate Reputation Review, 6(1), 19-35.
80. Mason, K. J., & Gray, R. (1999). Stakeholders in a hybrid market: The example of air business passenger travel. European Journal of Marketing, 33(9/10), 844-858.
81. Mattingly, J. E. (2004). Stakeholder salience, structural development, and firm performance: Structural and performance correlates of sociopolitical stakeholder management strategies. Business & Society, 43, 97-114.
82. Miles, S. (2011, June 7-8). Stakeholder definitions: Profusion and confusion. Paper presented at the EIASM 1st Interdisciplinary conference on stakeholders, resources and value creation, IESE Business School, University of Navarra, Barcelona.
83. Miller, R. L., & Lewis, W. F. (1991). A stakeholder approach to marketing management using the value exchange models. European Journal of Marketing, 25(8), 55-68.
84. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Towards a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22, 853-886.
85. Mitroff, I. I., & Linstone, H. A. (1993). The unbounded mind: Breaking the chains of traditional business thinking. New York: Oxford University Press.
86. Murphy, B., Stevens, K., & McLeod, R. (1997). A stakeholderism framework for measuring relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 5(Spring), 43-57.
87. Näsi, J. (1995). What is stakeholder thinking? A snapshot of social theory of the firm. In J. Näsi (Ed.), Understanding stakeholder thinking (pp. 19-32). Helsinki: LSR-Julkaisut Oy.
88. Nuti, D. M. (1995). The economics of participation. Jeddah: Islamic Research and Training Institute, IDB.
89. O'Riordan, L., & Fairbrass, J. (2008). Corporate social responsibility (CSR): Models and theories in stakeholder dialogue. Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 745-758.
90. Ojala, J., & Luoma-aho, V. (2008). Stakeholder relations as social capital in early modern international trade. Business History, 50(6), 749-764.
91. Okoye, A. (2009). Theorising corporate social responsibility as an essentially contested concept: Is a definition necessary? Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 613-627.
92. Orts, E. W., & Strudler, A. (2002). The ethical and environmental limits of stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2), 215-234.
93. Phillips, R. A. (1997). Stakeholder theory and a principle of fairness. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7, 51-66.
94. Phillips, R. A. (2003). Stakeholder legitimacy. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13, 25-41.
95. Phillips, R. A., & Reichart, J. (2000). The environment as a stakeholder? A fairness-based approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 23, 185-197.
96. Polonsky, M. J. (1996). Stakeholder management and the stakeholder matrix: Potential strategic marketing tools. Journal of Market Focused Management, 1(3), 209-229.
97. Polonsky, M. J., & Ottman, J. (1998). Stakeholders' contribution to the green new product development process. Journal of Marketing Management, 14, 533-557.
98. Post, F. G. M. (1989). Beware your stakeholders. Journal of Management Development, 8(1), 28-35.
99. Post, J. E., Preston, L. E., & Sachs, S. (2002). Redefining the corporation: Stakeholder management and organizational wealth. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
100. Reed, D. (1999). Stakeholder management theory: A critical theory perspective. Business Ethics Quarterly, 9, 453-483.
101. Reed, D. (2002). Employing normative stakeholder theory in developing countries. Business & Society, 41, 166-207.
102. Rhenman, E. (1964). Foeretagsdemokrati och foeretagsorganisation. Stockholm: Thule.
103. Rowley, T. J. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22, 887-910.
104. Rowley, T. J., & Moldoveanu, M. (2003). When will stakeholder groups act? An interest and identity based model of stakeholder group mobilization. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 204-219.
105. Ruf, B. M., Muralidhar, K., Brown, R. M., Janney, J. J., & Paul, K. (2001). An empirical investigation of the relationship between change in corporate social performance and financial performance: A stakeholder theory perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 32, 143-156.
106. Savage, G. T., Nix, T. W., Whitehead, C. J., & Blair, J. D. (1991). Strategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders. Academy of Management Executive, 5(2), 61-75.
107. Schneper, W. D., & Guillén, M. (2004). Stakeholder rights and corporate governance: A cross-national study of hostile takeovers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 263-295.
108. Smith, K. (2002). Mutually contested concepts and their standard general use. Journal of Classical Sociology, 2(3), 329-343.
109. Stanford Research Institute. (1963). Internal memo (unpublished). Menlo Park, CA: Stanford Research Institute.
110. Starik, M. (1993). Is the environment an organizational stakeholder? Naturally! Paper presented at the 4th Annual Conference of the International Association for Business and Society, San Diego, CA.
111. Starik, M. (1994). The Toronto conference: Reflections on stakeholder theory. Business & Society, 33(1), 89-95.
112. Starik, M. (1995). Should trees have managerial standing?: Towards stakeholder status for nonhuman nature. Journal of Business Ethics, 14, 207-217.
113. Sternberg, E. (1996). Stakeholder theory exposed. The Corporate Governance Quarterly, 2(1), 4-18.
114. Sternberg, E. (1997). The defects of stakeholder theory. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 5, 3-10.
115. Stoney, C., & Winstanley, D. (2001). Stakeholding: Confusion or Utopia? Mapping the conceptual terrain. Journal of Management Studies, 38(5), 603-626.
116. Swanton, C. (1985). On the "essential contestedness" of political concepts. Ethics, 95(4), 811-827.
117. Waldron, J. (2002). Is the rule of law an essentially contested concept (in Florida)? Law and Philosophy, 21(2), 137-164.
118. Walsh, J. P. (2005). Book review essays: Taking stock of stakeholder management. Academy of Management Review, 30(2), 426-438.
119. Wartick, S. (1994). The Toronto conference: Reflections on stakeholder theory. Business & Society, 33(1), 110-117.
120. Waxenberger, B., & Spence, L. (2003). Reinterpretation of a metaphor: From stakes to claims. Strategic Change, 12, 239-249.
121. Wicks, A. C., Gilbert, D. R., & Freeman, R. E., Jr. (1994). A feminist reinterpretation of the stakeholder concept. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4, 475-497.
122. Wijnberg, N. M. (2000). Normative stakeholder theory and Aristotle: The link between ethics and politics. Journal of Business Ethics, 25, 329-342.