Reinterpretation of a metaphor: from stakes to claims

Strategic Change

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 239-249

  Waxenberger, Bernhard ^a   Spence, Laura J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST GALLEN   (Switzerland)

^b BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 42949096693     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10991697     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jsc.638     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Ambler T, Wilson A. 1994. Problems of stakeholder theory. Business Ethics: A European Review 4(1): 30–35.
2. Boatright J. 1994. What's so special about stakeholders? Business Ethics Quarterly 4(4): 393–407.
3. Carroll A, Buchholtz A. 1999. Business and Society. Ethics and Stakeholder Management, 4th ed. South Western College Publishing: Cincinnati.
4. Child J, Marcoux A. 1999. Freeman and Evan: stakeholder theory in the original position. Business Ethics Quarterly 9(2): 207–223.
5. Cortina A. 1995. The general public as the locus of ethics in modern society. In Facing Public Interest. The Ethical Challenge to Business Policy and Corporate Communications, Ulrich P, Sarasin C (eds). Kluwer: Dordrecht; 43–58.
6. Donaldson T, Preston L. 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review 20(1): 65–91.
7. Evan W, Freeman RE. 1988. A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capitalism. In Ethical Theory and Business, 3rd ed. Beauchamp T, Bowie N (eds). Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs; 97–106.
8. Fama E, Jensen M. 1983. Agency problems and residual claims. Journal of Law and Economics 262: 327–350.
9. Freeman RE. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman: Boston.
10. Freeman RE. 1994. The politics of stakeholder theory: some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly 4: 409–421.
11. Gibson K. 2000. The moral basis of stakeholder theory. Journal of Business Ethics 26: 245–257.
12. Goodpaster KE. 1997. Business ethics and stakeholder analysis. In Ethical Theory and Business, 5th ed. Beauchamp T, Bowie N (eds). Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs; 76–85.
13. Gossain S. 2002. Cracking the collaboration code. Journal of Business Strategy 23(6): 20–25.
14. Habermas J. 1985. Die neue Unübersichtlichkeit. Suhrkamp: Frankfurt.
15. Habermas J. 1990. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Translated by Lenhardt C, Weber Nicholsen S. Polity Press: Cambridge.
16. Handy C. 1995. Beyond Certainty. Hutchinson: London.
17. Hillman A, Keim G. 2001. Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what's the new bottom line? Strategic Management Journal 22(2): 125–139.
18. Hummels H. 1998. Organizing ethics: a stakeholder debate. Journal of Business Ethics 17: 1403–1429.
19. ISEA. 1999. Towards Standards in Social and Ethical Accounting, Auditing and Reporting. Consultation draft. Institute of Social and Ethical Accountability: London.
20. Jonas H. 1984. Das Prinzip Verantwortung. Versuch einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilisation. Suhrkamp: Frankfurt.
21. Kant I. 1784/1982. Beantwortung der Frage: Was ist Aufklärung? Werksausgabe Vol. XI, 6th ed. Suhrkamp: Frankfurt; 51–61.
22. Kant I. 1785/ 1993. Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, 3rd ed., Hackett: Indianapolis.
23. Kettner M. 1993. Scientific knowledge, discourse ethics, and consensus formation in the public domain. In Applied Ethics: A Reader, Winkler E, Coombes J (eds). Blackwell: Oxford; 28–45.
24. Kleinewefers H. 1996. Der Shareholder Value im Allgemeininteresse. Wie der volkswirtschaftliche Nutzen maximiert wird. Neue Zürcher Zeitung 05.07.96.
25. Kuhn J, Shriver D. 1991. Beyond Success: Corporations and Their Critics in the 1990s. Oxford University Press: New York.
26. Lea D. 1999. Corporate and public responsibility, stakeholder theory and the developing world. Business Ethics: A European Review 8(3): 151–162.
27. Luijk H van. 2000. Competition and corporate responsibility. Paper presented at the Second World Congress of the International Society for Business, Economics and Ethics, São Paulo, July 19–23.
28. Maak T, Thielemann U. 1996. Shareholder value — nicht das Maß aller Dinge Neue Zürcher Zeitung 23.08.96; 27.
29. Marens R, Wicks A. 1999. Getting real: stakeholder theory, managerial practice, and the general irrelevance of fiduciary duties owed to shareholders. Business Ethics Quarterly 9(2): 273–293.
30. Mintzberg H, Lampel J, Quinn JB, Ghoshal S. 2003. The Strategy Process: Concepts, Contexts and Cases, 4th ed. Prentice Hall: New Jersey.
31. Pearce J, Raynard P, Zadek S. 1996. Social Auditing for Small Organisations. New Economics Foundation: London.
32. Phillips R. 1997. Stakeholder theory and a principle of fairness. Business Ethics Quarterly 7(1): 51–66.
33. Phillips R, Reichart J. 2000. The environment as a stakeholder? a fairness-based approach. Journal of Business Ethics 23(2): 185–197.
34. Reed D. 1999. Stakeholder management theory: a critical theory perspective. Business Ethics Quarterly 9(3): 453–484.
35. Rusche T. 1996. Das Diskursmodell der kommunikativen Unternehmensethik. Eine Weiterführung des Shareholder- und Stakeholder-Ansatzes. In Das neue strategische Management. Elemente und Perspektiven einer zukunftsorientierten Unternehmensführung, Hinterhuber HH, Al-Ani A, Handlbauer G (eds). Gabler: Wiesbaden; 301–320.
36. Schmidt J. 1999. Corporate excellence in the new millennium. Journal of Business Strategy 20(6): 39–43.
37. Spence LJ, Coles A-M, Harris L. 2001. The forgotten stakeholder? Ethics and social responsibility in relation to competitors. Business and Society Review 106(4): 331–352.
38. Ulrich P. 1993. Transformation der ökono-mischen Vernunft. Fortschrittsperspektiven der modernen Industriegesellschaft, 3rd ed. Haupt: Bern.
39. Ulrich P. 1995. Business in the nineties: facing public interest. In Facing Public Interest. The Ethical Challenge to Business Policy and Corporate Communications, Ulrich P, Sarasin C (eds). Kluwer: Dordrecht; 1–8.
40. Ulrich P. 1996. Brent Spar und der ‘moral point of view’. Die Unternehmung 50(1): 27–46.
41. Ulrich P. 1998. Integrative Wirtschaftsethik. Grundlagen einer lebensdienlichen Ökonomie, 2nd ed. Haupt: Bern.
42. Ulrich P. 1999. Was ist ‘gute’ Unternehmensführung? Reflexionen zu den normativen Grundlagen ethisch bewussten Managements. In Entwicklungsperspektiven einer inte-grierten Managementlehre Gomez P, Müller-Stewens G, Rüegg-Stürm J (eds). Haupt: Bern; 225–253.
43. Waxenberger B. 1999. Bewertung der Unternehmensintegrität. Grundlagen für die Zertifizierung eines ethisch orientierten Managements. Beiträge und Berichte des Instituts für Wirtschaftsethik No. 86, St. Gallen.
44. Waxenberger B. 2000. Bewertung der Unternehmensintegrität II. Schritte zu einem System prinzipiengeleiteten Managements. Berichte des Instituts für Wirtschaftsethik No. 87, St. Gallen.
45. Werhane P, Freeman RE. 1999. Business ethics: the state of the art. International Journal of Management Research March: 1–16.
46. Whysall P. 2000. Stakeholder mismanagement in retailing: a British perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 23(1): 19–28.
47. Zajitschek S. 1997. Corporate Ethics Relation — Orientierungsmuster für die legitime Gestaltung unternehmensexterner Beziehungen. Haupt: Bern.