Interaction in asynchronous discussion forums: Peer facilitation techniques

Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 280-294

  Ng, C S L ^a   Cheung, W S ^b   Hew, K F ^b  

^a MINISTRY OF EDUCATION   (Singapore)

^b NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Asynchronous online discussion forums; Interaction; Knowledge construction; Participation; Peer facilitation techniques; Student facilitators

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861224875     PISSN: 02664909     EISSN: 13652729     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00454.x     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Anderson T., Rourke L., Garrison D.R. & Archer W. (2001) Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 5, 1-17.
2. Appleton J.V. (1995) Analysing qualitative interview data: addressing issues of validity and reliability. Journal of Advanced Nursing 22, 993-997.
3. Baran E. & Correia A.P. (2009) Student-led facilitation strategies in online discussions. Distance Education 30, 339-361.
4. Beaudin B.P. (1999) Keeping online asynchronous discussions on topic. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 3, 41-53.
5. Berge Z.L. (1995) Facilitating computer conferencing: recommendatiions from the field. Educational Technology 15, 22-30.
6. Biesenbach-Lucas S. (2003) Asynchronous discussion groups in teacher training classes: perceptions of native and non-native students. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 7, 24-46.
7. Bodgan R. & Biklen S.K. (1992) Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods, 2nd edition. Allyn & Bacon, Boston, MA.
8. Bonk C.J. & Kim K.A. (1998) Extending sociocultural theory to adult learning. In Adult Learning and Development: Perspectives from Educational Psychology (eds M.C. Smith & T. Pourchot ), pp. 67-88. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
9. Braham J. & Piela A. (2009) Acknowledgement of others' contributions as a peer facilitation skill in online discussions. Paper presented at The Cambridge International Conference on Open and Distance Learning 2009, Cambridge, UK.
10. Cheung W.S. & Hew K.F. (2004) Evaluating the extent of ill-structured problem solving process among pre-service teachers in an asynchronous online discussion and reflection log learning environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research 30, 195-225.
11. Cheung W.S. & Hew K.F. (2005) How can we facilitate students' in-depth thinking and interaction in an asynchronous online discussion environment? A case study. Paper presented at the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, USA.
12. Cheung W.S., Hew K.F. & Ng C.S.L. (2008) Toward an understanding of why students contribute in asynchronous online discussion. Journal of Educational Computing Research 38, 29-50.
13. Cifuentes L., Murphy K.L., Segur R. & Kodali S. (1997) Design considerations for computer conferences. Journal of Research on Computing in Education 30, 177-201.
14. Dennen V.P. (2005) From message posting to learning dialogues: factors affecting learner participation in asynchronous online discussion. Distance Education 26, 127-148.
15. Dennen V.P. (2008) Pedagogical lurking: student engagement in non-posting discussion behavior. Computers in Human Behavior 24, 1624-1633.
16. Dennen V.P. & Wieland K. (2007) From interaction to intersubsubjectivity: facilitating online group discourse processes. Distance Education 28, 281-297.
17. Driscoll M.P. (2000) Psychology of Learning for Instruction, 2nd edition. Allyn & Bacon, Boston, MA.
18. Erlandson D.A., Harris E.L., Skipper B.L. & Allen S.D. (1993) Doing Naturalistic Inquiry: A Guide to Methods. Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
19. Feenberg A. (1989) The written world: on the theory and practice of computer conferencing. In Mindweave: Communication, Computers and Distance Education (eds R. Mason & A. Kaye ), pp. 22-39. Pergamon Press, Oxford.
20. Fischer F., Bruhn J., Gräsel C. & Mandl H. (2002) Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualization tools. Learning and Instruction 12, 213-232.
21. Fraenkel J.R. & Wallen N.E. (2006) How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. The McGraw Hill, New York, NY.
22. Garrison D.R. & Cleveland-Innes M. (2005) Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: interaction is not enough. American Journal of Distance Education 19, 133-148.
23. Gilbert P.K. & Dabbagh N. (2005) How to structure online discussions for meaningful discourse: a case study. British Journal of Educational Technology 36, 5-18.
24. Gunawardena C.N. (1997) Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research 17, 397-431.
25. Guzdial M. (1997) Information ecology of collaborations in educational settings: influence of tool. In Proceedings of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (eds R. Hall, N. Miyake & N. Enyedy ), pp. 83-90. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Toronto, Canada.
26. Hew K.F. & Cheung W.S. (2008) Attracting student participation in asynchronous online discussions: a case study of peer facilitation. Computers and Education 51, 1111-1124.
27. Hewitt J. (2005) Toward an understanding of how threads die in asynchronous computer conferences. Journal of the Learning Sciences 14, 567-589.
28. Hewitt J. & Teplovs C. (1999) An analysis of growth patterns in computer conferencing threads. In Proceedings of the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (eds C. Hoadley & J. Roschelle ), pp. 232-241. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA.
29. Hofstede G.J. (2005) Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
30. Hycner R.H. (1985) Some guidelines for the phenomenological analysis of interview data. Human Studies 8, 279-303.
31. Ingram A.L. & Hathorn L.G. (2004) Methods for analyzing collaboration in online. In Online Collaborative Learning: Theory and Practice (ed. T.S. Roberts ), pp. 215-241. Information Science Publishing, Hershey, PA.
32. Johnson R.B. (1997) Examining the validity structure of qualitative research. Education 118, 282-292.
33. Knowlton D. (2001) Promoting durable knowledge construction through online discussion. Paper presented at the Mid-South Instructional Technology Conference, Murfreesboro, TN.
34. Liang A. & McQueen R.J. (1999) Computer assisted adult interactive learning in a multi-cultural environment. Adult Learning 11, 26-29.
35. Light P., Nesbitt E., Light V. & White S. (2000) Variety is the spice of life: student use of CMC in the context of campus-based study. Computers and Education 34, 257-267.
36. Lincoln Y.S. & Guba E.G. (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
37. MacLean R.L. (2004) Measuring and improving interactivity in an asynchronous learning network. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA.
38. Marra R.M., Moore J.L. & Klimczak A.K. (2004) Content analysis of online discussion forums: a comparative analysis of protocols. Educational Technology Research and Development 52, 23-40.
39. Marshall C. & Rossman G.B. (1999) Designing Qualitative Research, 3rd edition. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
40. Mazzolini M. & Maddison S. (2003) Sage, guide or ghost? The effect of instructor intervention on student participation in online discussion forums. Computers and Education 40, 237-253.
41. Merriam S.B. (1998) Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. Revised and Expanded from 'Case Study Research in Education'. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, CA.
42. Ng C.S.L., Cheung W.S. & Hew K.F. (2009) Sustaining asynchronous online discussions: contributing factors and peer facilitation techniques. Journal of Educational Computing Research 41, 477-511.
43. Ng C.S.L., Cheung W.S. & Hew K.F. (2010) Solving ill-structured problems in asynchronous online discussions: built-in scaffolds vs no scaffolds. Interactive Learning Environments 18, 115-134.
44. Nickel T.B. (2002) Student-to-student interaction in online discussions: the role of moderator status. Abstract in Dissertation Abstracts International 63, 152.
45. Ohbuchi K.I., Fukushima O. & Tedeschi J.T. (1999) Cultural values in conflict management: goal orientation, goal attainment, and tactical decision. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 30, 51-71.
46. Osman G. & Herring S.C. (2007) Interaction, facilitation, and deep learning in cross-cultural chat: a case study. Internet and Higher Education 10, 125-141.
47. Pena-Shaff J.B. & Nicholls C. (2004) Analyzing student interactions and meaning construction in computer bulletin board discussions. Computers and Education 42, 243-265.
48. Poole D.M. (2000) Student participation in a discussion-orientated online course: a case study. Journal of Research on Computing in Education 33, 162-177.
49. Prammanee N. (2003) Understanding participation in online courses: a case study of perceptions of online interaction. Acet Instructional Technology Forum, Available at: (last accessed 27 October 2008).
50. Rourke L. & Anderson T. (2002) Using peer teams to lead online discussions. Journal of Interactive Media in Education 1. Available at: (last accessed 15 July 2008).
51. Rourke L., Anderson T., Garrison D.R. & Archer W. (2001) Methodological issues in the content analysis of computer conference transcripts. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 12, 8-22.
52. Salmon G. (2004) E-Moderating: The Key to Teaching and Learning Online. Taylor & Francis, London.
53. Schrire S. (2006) Knowledge building in asynchronous discussion groups: going beyond quantitative analysis. Computers and Education 46, 49-70.
54. Seo K.K. (2007) Utilizing peer moderating in online discussions: addressing the controversy between teacher moderation and nonmoderation. American Journal of Distance Education 2, 21-36.
55. Sheingold K. (2005) Conversations in Learning: Facilitating Online Science Courses. TERC, Cambridge, MA.
56. Silverman D. (2006) Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analyzing Talk, Text, and Interaction. Sage Publications Ltd., London.
57. Smet M.D., Keer H.V. & Valcke M. (2008) Blending asynchronous discussion groups and peer tutoring in higher education: an exploratory study of online peer tutoring behaviour. Computers and Education 50, 207-223.
58. Smith J. (2001) Modeling the social construction of knowledge in ELT teacher education. ELT Journal 55, 221-227.
59. Staarman J.K., Krol K. & van der Meijden H. (2005) Peer interaction in three collaborative learning environments. Journal of Classroom Interaction 40, 29-39.
60. Suh E., Diener E., Oishi S. & Triandis H.C. (1998) The shifting basis of life satisfaction judgments across cultures: emotions versus norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74, 482-493.
61. Tagg A.C. (1994) Leadership from within: student moderation of computer conferences. American Journal of Distance Education 8, 40-50.
62. Tagg A.C. & Dickinson J.A. (1995) Tutor messaging and its effectiveness in encouraging student participation on computer conferences. Journal of Distance Education 10, 1111-1124.
63. Thompson L. & Ku H.-Y. (2005) Chinese graduate students' experiences and attitudes toward online learning. Educational Media International 42, 33-47.
64. Tu C.-H. (2001) How Chinese perceive social presence: an examination of interaction in online learning environment. Educational Media International 38, 45-60.
65. Valcke M., Zhu C. & Schellens T. (2008) A cross-cultural study of student learning in e-learning environments. In Proceedings EARLI 2008 Advanced Study Colloquium Research on Cultural Differences and the Influence on Education in Teaching and Teacher Education (eds Y. Waghid, F. Dochy & C. Carl ), pp. 208-222. University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch.
66. Veldhuis-Diermanse A.E. (2002) CSCLearning?: participation, learning, activities and knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning in higher education. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Wageningen University, The Netherlands.
67. Vrasidas C. & McIsaac M.S. (1999) Factors influencing interaction in an online course. American Journal of Distance Education 13, 22-36.
68. Walther J.B., Gay G. & Hancock J.T. (2005) How do communication and technology researchers study the internet? Journal of Communication 55, 632-657.
69. Wan D. & Johnson P.M. (1994) Computer supported collaborative learning using CLARE: the approach and experimental findings. In Proceedings of CSCW '94 (eds R. Furuta & C. Neuwirth ), pp. 187-198. ACM, Chapel Hill, NC.
70. Weinberger A. & Fischer F. (2006) A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers and Education 46, 71-95.
71. Westwood R., Chan A. & Linstead S. (2004) Theorizing Chinese employment relations comparatively: exchange, reciprocity and the moral economy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 21, 365-389.
72. Xie K., DeBacker T.K. & Ferguson C. (2006) Extending the traditional classroom through online discussion: the role of student motivation. Journal of Educational Computing Research 34, 67-89.
73. Yin R.K. (2003) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 3rd edition. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
74. Zhu E. (2006) Interaction and cognitive engagement: an analysis of four asynchronous online discussions. Instructional Science 34, 451-480.