Perceptions concerning hip resurfacing from attendees at the Second Annual U.S. Comprehensive Course on Total Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty

Bulletin of the NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases

Volumn 67, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 102-107

  Mont, Michael A ^a   Schmalzried, Thomas P ^b   Zywiel, Michael G ^a   McGrath, Mike S ^a   Seyler, Thorsten M ^c  

^a SINAI HOSPITAL OF BALTIMORE   (United States)

^b Joint Replacement Institute   (United States)

^c WAKE FOREST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL RESEARCH; CONFERENCE PAPER; COXITIS; EDUCATION PROGRAM; HIP PROSTHESIS; KNOWLEDGE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; PATIENT SELECTION; PERCEPTION; PRETEST POSTTEST DESIGN; QUESTIONNAIRE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TOTAL HIP RESURFACING ARTHROPLASTY; TRAINING; TREATMENT INDICATION;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; PATIENT SELECTION; PERCEPTION; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 67649496584     PISSN: 19369719     EISSN: 19369727     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. Zhan C, Kaczmarek R, Loyo-Berrios N, et al. Incidence and short-term outcomes of primary and revision hip replacement in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(3):526-533
2. Mont MA, Marker DR, Smith JM, et al. Resurfacing is comparable to total hip arthroplasty at short-term follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(1):66-71.
3. Pollard TC, Baker RP, Eastaugh-Waring SJ, Bannister GC. Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88(5):592-600.
4. Vail TP, Mina CA, Yergler JD, Pietrobon R. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compares favorably with THA at 2 years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;(453):123-131
5. Melkerson MN. Approval letter for Cormet Hip Resurfacing System. Available at http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/pdf5/p050016a. pdf. Accessed February 5, 2009.
6. Tillman DB. Approval letter for Birmingham hip resurfacing system. Available at http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/pdf4/p040033a. pdf. Accessed February 5, 2009.
7. Marker DR, Seyler TM, Jinnah RH, et al. Femoral neck fractures after metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing: a prospective cohort study. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22(7 Suppl 3):66-71.
8. Della Valle CJ, Nunley RM, Raterman SJ, Barrack RL. Initial American experience with hip resurfacing following FDA approval. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(1):72-78
9. Brezis M, Cohen R. Interactive learning in medicine: Socrates in electronic clothes. QJM. 2004;97(1):47-51.
10. Nayak L, Erinjeri JP. Audience response systems in medical student education benefit learners and presenters. Acad Radiol. 2008;15(3):383-389
11. Pradhan A, Sparano D, Ananth CV. The influence of an audience response system on knowledge retention: an application to resident education. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(5):1827-1830