Computer-assisted placement technique in hip resurfacing arthroplasty: Improvement in accuracy?

International Orthopaedics

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 27-33

  Kruger S ^a   Zambelli, P Y ^a   Leyvraz, P F ^a   Jolles, B M ^a,b  

^a LAUSANNE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Switzerland)

^b Hopital Orthopedique de la Suisse Romande   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; LOW MOLECULAR WEIGHT HEPARIN; WARFARIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HUMAN; IMPLANT; LOW DRUG DOSE; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPHYLAXIS; RADIOGRAPHY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

ADULT; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BODY MASS INDEX; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; MALE; METALS; MIDDLE AGED; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 59449106704     PISSN: 03412695     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-007-0440-8     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. (1990) EuroQol-a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. The EuroQol Group. Health Policy 16:199-208
2. HC Amstutz 2006 Hip resurfacing arthroplasty J Am Acad Orthop Surg 14 452 453
3. HC Amstutz PE Beaule FJ Dorey MJ Le Duff PA Campbell TA Gruen 2004 Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: 2 to 6-year follow-up study J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A 28 39
4. PE Beaule HC Amstutz M Le Duff F Dorey 2004 Surface arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the hip: hemiresurfacing versus metal-on-metal hybrid resurfacing J Arthroplasty 19 54 58
5. N Bellamy WW Buchanan CH Goldsmith J Campbell LW Stitt 1988 Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee J Rheumatol 15 1833 1840
6. S Blendea K Eckman B Jaramaz TJ Levison AM Digioia III 2005 Measurements of acetabular cup position and pelvic spatial orientation after total hip arthroplasty using computed tomography/radiography matching Comput Aided Surg 10 37 43
7. AJ Cossey DL Back A Shimmin D Young AJ Spriggins 2005 The nonoperative management of periprosthetic fractures associated with the Birmingham hip resurfacing procedure J Arthroplasty 20 358 361
8. J Daniel PB Pynsent DJ McMinn 2004 Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis J Bone Joint Surg Br 86 177 184
9. KA De Smet C Pattyn R Verdonk 2002 Early results pf primary Birmingham hip resurfacing using a hybrid metal-on-metal couple Hip Int 12 158 162
10. DeLee JG, Charnley J (1976) Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 20-32
11. AM DiGioia III B Jaramaz AY Plackeseychuk 2002 Comparison of a mechanical acetabuar alignment guide with computer placement of the socket J Arthroplasty 17 359 364
12. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC (1979) "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 17-27
13. WH Harris 1969 Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation J Bone Joint Surg Am 51 737 755
14. DW Howie D Campbell M McGee BL Cornish 1990 Wagner resurfacing hip arthroplasty. The results of one hundred consecutive arthroplasties after 8 to 10 years J Bone Joint Surg Am 72 708 714
15. BM Jolles P Genoud P Hoffmeyer 2004 Computer-assisted cup placement techniques in total hip arthroplasty improve accuracy of placement Clin Orthop Relat Res 426 174 179
16. BM Jolles P Zangger PF Leyvraz 2002 Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: a multivariate analysis J Arthroplasty 17 282 288
17. JM Loughead D Chesney JP Holland AW McCaskie 2005 Comparison of offset in Birmingham hip resurfacing and hybrid total hip arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Br 87 163 166
18. G Marti C Baur PY Zambelli 2004 Optimal femoral head contour segmentation in CT images using dynamic programming Technol Health Care 12 315 322
19. McCollum DE, Gray WJ (1990) Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Causes and prevention. Clin Orthop Relat Res 159-170
20. McMinn D, Treacy R, Lin K, Pynsent P (1996) Metal on metal surface replacement of the hip. Experience of the McMinn prothesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res S89-S98
21. DJ McMinn P Roberts GR Forward 1991 A new approach to the hip for revision surgery J Bone Joint Surg Br 73 899 901
22. TC Pollard RP Baker SJ Eastaugh-Waring GC Bannister 2006 Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A 5- to 7-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing J Bone Joint Surg Br 88 592 600
23. TC Pollard C Basu R Ainsworth W Lai GC Bannister 2003 Is the Birmimgham hip resurfacing worthwhile? Hip Int 13 25 28
24. RB Treacy CW McBryde PB Pynsent 2005 Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A minimum follow-up of 5 years J Bone Joint Surg Br 87 167 170
25. Vail TP (2005) Surface replacement. Advanced reconstruction: hip. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons