The early results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: A prospective study at a minimum two-year follow-up

Bulletin of the NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases

Volumn 67, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 132-134

  Bergeron, Stephane G ^a   Desy, Nicholas M ^a   Nikolaou, Vassilios S ^b   Debiparshad, Kevin ^b,c   Antoniou, John ^b,c  

^a MONTREAL GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS; BONE NECROSIS; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONFERENCE PAPER; DEBRIDEMENT; FEMALE; FEMUR NECK FRACTURE; FOLLOW UP; HIP DISLOCATION; HIP DYSPLASIA; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; LONGEVITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; METAL ON METAL HIP RESURFACING ARTHROPLASTY; OSTEOARTHRITIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OVERALL SURVIVAL; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; SURGICAL APPROACH;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; METALS; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 67649506566     PISSN: 19369719     EISSN: 19369727     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Callaghan JJ, Forest EE, Sporer SM, et al. Total hip arthroplasty in the young adult. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1997;(344):257-262 (Pubitemid 27490654)
2. Chandler HP, Reineck FT, Wixson RL, McCarthy JC. Total hip replacement in patients younger than thirty years old. A five-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981;63:1426-1434 (Pubitemid 12246724)
3. Dorr LD, Kane TJ 3rd, Conaty JP. Long-term results of cemented total hip arthroplasty in patients 45 years old or younger. A 16-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty. 1994;9:453-456 [see comment, 1995 Apr;10(2):255-6] (Pubitemid 24321131)
4. Duffy GP, Berry DJ, Rowland C, Cabanela ME. Primary uncemented total hip arthroplasty in patients <40 years old: 10- to 14-year results using first-generation proximally porous-coated implants. J Arthroplasty. 2001 Dec;16(8 Suppl 1):140-144 (Pubitemid 33151061)
5. Joshi AB, Porter ML, Trail IA, et al. Long-term results of Charnley low-friction arthroplasty in young patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75:616-623 (Pubitemid 23222139)
6. Amstutz HC, Graff-Radford A, Gruen TA, Clarke IC. THARIES surface replacements: a review of the first 100 cases. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1978;(134):87-101.
7. Howie DW, Campbell D, McGee M, Cornish BL. Wagner resurfacing hip arthroplasty. The results of one hundred consecutive arthroplasties after eight to ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:708-714 (Pubitemid 20236491)
8. Ritter MA, Gioe TJ. Conventional versus resurfacing total hip arthroplasty. A long-term prospective study of concomitant bilateral implantation of prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68:216-225 (Pubitemid 16108699)
9. Amstutz HC, Beaulé PE, Dorey FJ, et al. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:28-39. (Pubitemid 38057333)
10. Daniel J, Pynsent PB, McMinn DJW Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:177-184 (Pubitemid 38386853)
11. Hing CB, Back DL, Bailey M, et al. The results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings at a mean of five years. An independent prospective review of the first 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:1431-1438
12. Steffen RT, Pandit HP, Palan J, et al. The five-year results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:436-441 (Pubitemid 351542858)
13. Treacy RBC, McBryde CW, Pynsent PB. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A minimum follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:167-170
14. Amstutz HC, Antoniades JT, Le Duff MJ. Results of metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing for Crowe type-I and II developmental dysplasia. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:339-346 (Pubitemid 46214353)
15. Beaulé PE, Amstutz HC, Le Duff M, Dorey F. Surface arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the hip: hemiresurfacing versus metal-on-metal hybrid resurfacing. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:54-58 (Pubitemid 39575829)
16. Boyd HS, Ulrich SD, Seyler TM, et al. Resurfacing for Perthes disease: an alternative to standard hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2007;(465):80-85
17. Klein M, Scherger B, Bernd H, Ostermann PA. [Complications after hip resurfacing using the ASR prosthesis in patients with osteoarthritis]. Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie & Unfallchirurgie. 2008;146:179-184 [German]
18. Siebel T, Maubach S, Morlock MM. Lessons learned from early clinical experience and results of 300 ASR hip resurfacing implantations. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H]. 2006 Feb;220(2):345-353
19. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51:737-755
20. Zahiri CA, Schmalzried TP, Szuszczewicz ES, Amstutz HC. Assessing activity in joint replacement patients. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13:890-895 (Pubitemid 29016797)
21. Ball ST, Le Duff MJ, Amstutz HC. Early results of conversion of a failed femoral component in hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:735-741 (Pubitemid 46564276)
22. Kim PR, Beaulé PE, Laflamme GY, Dunbar M. Causes of early failure in a multicenter clinical trial of hip resurfacing. J Arthroplasty. 2008 Sep;23(6 Suppl 1):44-49