Canadian academic experience with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing

Bulletin of the NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases

Volumn 67, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 128-131

  O'Neill, Michelle ^a   Beaulé, Paul E ^a,b   Nasser, Ahmad Bin ^a   Garbuz, Donald ^c   Lavigne, Martin ^e   Duncan, Clive ^d   Kim, Paul R ^a   Schemitsch, Emil ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^d MAISONNEUVE ROSEMONT HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^e ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AWARENESS; CANADA; CEREBROVASCULAR MALFORMATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONFERENCE PAPER; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FEMUR INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURE; FEMUR NECK FRACTURE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HIP FRACTURE; HIP PROSTHESIS; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; INFECTION; LUNG EMBOLISM; MALE; METAL ON METAL HIP RESURFACING ARTHROPLASTY; PERONEAL NEUROPATHY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREVALENCE; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RADIODIAGNOSIS; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL APPROACH; TEACHING;

ADULT; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; CANADA; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; FEMALE; FEMORAL NECK FRACTURES; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; METALS; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; QUESTIONNAIRES; REOPERATION; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 67649512006     PISSN: 19369719     EISSN: 19369727     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Shimmin AJ, Beaule PE, Campbell PA. Current concepts: metal on metal hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(3):637-654 (Pubitemid 351342001)
2. Mont MA, Marker DR, Smith JM, et al. Resurfacing is comparable to total hip arthroplasty at short-term follow-up. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2009;467(1):66-71.
3. Heilpem GN, Shah N, Fordyce MJ. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a series of 110 consecutive hips with a minimum five-year clinical and radiological follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90(9)1137-1142
4. Steffen RT, Pandit HP, Palen J, et al. The five-year results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90(4):436-441 (Pubitemid 351542858)
5. Hing CB, Back DL, Bailey M, et al. The results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings at a mean of five years. An independent prospective review of the first 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89(11):1431-1438
6. De Smet KA. Belgium experience with metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 2005;36(2):203-213 (Pubitemid 40503998)
7. Amstutz HC, Beaule PE, Dorey FJ, et al. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(1):28-39. (Pubitemid 38057333)
8. Vail TP, Mina CA, Yergler D, Pietrobon R. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compares favorably with THA at 2 years followup. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2006;(453):123-131 (Pubitemid 44900970)
9. Amstutz HC, Ball ST, LeDuff MJ, Dorey FJ. Resurfacing THA for patients younger than 50 years: results of 2- to 9-year follow-up. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2007;460:159-164 (Pubitemid 47056492)
10. Beaule PE, Dorey FJ, LeDuff MJ, et al. Risk factors affecting outcome of metal on metal surface arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2004;(418):87-93. (Pubitemid 38140428)
11. Kim PR, Beaule PE, Laflamme GY, Dunbar MJ. Causes of early failure in a multicenter clinical trial of hip resurfacing. J Arthroplasty. 2008 Sep;23(6 Suppl 1):44-49
12. Della Valle CJ, Nunley RM, Raterman SJ, Barrack RL. Initial American experience with hip resurfacing following FDA approval. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2008; Epub Oct 24 ahead of print.
13. Shimmin A, Back D. Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing. A national review of 50 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87(3):463-464
14. Siebel T, Maubach S, Morlock MM. Lessons learned from early clinical experience and results of 300 ASR hip resurfacing implantations. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H]. 2006 Feb;220(2):345-353
15. Mont MA, Seyler TM, Ulrich SD, et al. Effect of changing indications and techniques on total hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2007;465:63-70. (Pubitemid 350306495)
16. Lachiewicz PF. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a skeptic's view. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2007;(465):86-91. (Pubitemid 350306497)
17. Stulberg B, Trier KK, Naughton M, Zadrilka JD. Results and lessons learned from a United States hip resurfacing investigational device exemption trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(Suppl 3):21-26
18. Marker DR, Seyler TM, Jinnah RH, et al. Femoral neck fractures after metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing: a prospective cohort study. J Arthroplasty 2007;22(7 Suppl 3):66-71. (Pubitemid 47494612)
19. Beaule PE, Campbell PA, Lu Z, et al. Vascularity of the arthritic femoral head and hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(Suppl 4):85-96. (Pubitemid 44901977)
20. Beaule PE, Lee J, LeDuff M, et al. Orientation of femoral component in surface arthroplasty of the hip: a biomechanical and clinical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(9):2015-21. (Pubitemid 39223470)