Simultaneous and non-simultaneous dual electrode stimulation in cochlear implants: Evidence for two neural response modalities

Acta Oto-Laryngologica

Volumn 129, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 433-439

  Frijns, Johan H M ^a   Kalkman, Randy K ^a   Vanpoucke, Filiep J ^b   Bongers, Jorien Snel ^a   Briaire, Jeroen J ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b Advanced Bionics   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Cochlear implant; Computational modelling; Current steering; Dual electrode stimulation; Loudness balancing; Neural excitation; Pitch; Psychophysics; Sequential stimulation; Simultaneous stimulation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COMPUTER MODEL; ELECTRIC CURRENT; ELECTRODE; HUMAN; LOUDNESS; NERVE POTENTIAL; NERVE STIMULATION; NOISE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ELECTROSTIMULATION; HEARING; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; AGED; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; HUMANS; LOUDNESS PERCEPTION; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, ANATOMIC; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PITCH PERCEPTION; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY;

EID: 66349097585     PISSN: 00016489     EISSN: 16512553     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00016480802610218     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Donaldson GS, Kreft HA, Litvak L. Place-pitch discrimination of single- versus dual-electrode stimuli by cochlear implant users (L). J Acoust Soc Am 2005;/118:/623-6.
2. Kwon BJ, van den Honert C. Dual-electrode pitch discrimination with sequential interleaved stimulation by cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am 2006;/120:/EL1-6.
3. Koch DB, Downing M, Osberger MJ, Litvak L. Using current steering to increase spectral resolution in CII and HiRes 90K users. Ear Hear 2007;/28(2 Suppl):/38S-41S.
4. Firszt JB, Koch DB, Downing M, Litvak L. Current steering creates additional pitch percepts in adult cochlear implant recipients. Otol Neurotol 2007;/28:/629-36.
5. Frijns JHM, Briaire JJ, Grote JJ. The importance of human cochlear anatomy for the results with modiolus hugging multi-channel cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol 2001;/22:/ 340-349
6. Briaire JJ, Frijns JHM. Unraveling the electrically evoked compound action potential. Hear Res 2005;/205:/143-56.
7. Stakhovskaya O, Sridhar D, Bonham BH, Leake PA. Frequency map for the human cochlear spiral ganglion: implications for cochlear implants. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2007;/8:/220-33.
8. Vanpoucke FJ, Zarowski AJ, Peeters SA. Identification of the impedance model of an implanted cochlear prosthesis from intracochlear potential measurements. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2004;/51:/2174-83.
9. Laneau J, Wouters J, Moonen M. Relative contributions of temporal and place pitch cues to fundamental frequency discrimination in cochlear implantees. J Acoust Soc Am 2004;/116:/3606-19.
10. Briaire JJ, Frijns JH. The consequences of neural degeneration regarding optimal cochlear implant position in scala tympani: a model approach. Hear Res 2006;/214:/17-27.
11. McDermott HJ, McKay CM. Pitch ranking with nonsimultaneous dual-electrode electrical stimulation of the cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 1994;/96:/155-62.
12. Bonham BH, Litvak LM. Current focusing and steering: modeling, physiology, and psychophysics. Hear Res 2008;/ 242:/141-53.
13. Greenwood DD. A cochlear frequency-position function for several species- 29 years later. J Acoust Soc Am 1990;/87:/ 2592-2605