Excitation patterns of simultaneous and sequential dual-electrode stimulation in cochlear implant recipients

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 559-567

  Saoji, Aniket A ^a,c   Litvak, Leonid M ^a   Hughes, Michelle L ^b  

^a ADVANCED BIONICS CORPORATION   (United States)

^b BOYS TOWN NATIONAL RESEARCH HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROSTIMULATION; HEARING; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; NERVE POTENTIAL; NERVE STIMULATION;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ADULT; AGED; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; COCHLEAR NERVE; DEAFNESS; ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOUDNESS PERCEPTION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PITCH PERCEPTION; PROSTHESIS DESIGN;

EID: 70349127372     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181ab2b6f     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Abbas, P. J., Brown, C. J., Hughes, M. L., et al. (2000). Electrically evoked compound action potentials recorded from subjects who use nucleus C124M device. Am Otol Rhinol Laryngol Supp, 185, 6-9.
2. Abbas, P. J., Brown, C. J., Shallop, J. K., et al. (1999). Summary of results using the nucleus CI24M implant to record the electrically evoked compound action potential. Ear Hear, 20, 45-59.
3. Abbas, P. J., Hughes, M. L., Brown, C. J., et al. (2004). Channel interaction in cochlear implant users evaluated using the electrically evoked compound action potential. Audiol Neurootol, 9, 203-213.
4. Bierer, J. A., & Middlebrooks, J. C. (2004). Cortical responses to cochlear implant stimulation: Channel interactions. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 5, 32-48.
5. Boex, C., Kos, M. I., Pelizzone, M. (2003). Forward masking in different cochlear implant systems. J Acoust Soc Am, 114, 2058-2065.
6. Brown, C. J., Abbas, P. J., Borland, J., et al. (1996). Electrically evoked whole nerve action potentials in ineraid cochlear implant users: Responses to different stimulating electrode configurations and comparison to psychophysical responses. J Speech Hear Res, 39, 453-467.
7. Brown, C. J., Abbas, P. J., Gantz, B. (1990). Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials: Data from human cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am, 88, 1385-1391.
8. Brown, C. J., Abbas, P. J., Gantz, B. J. (1998). Preliminary experience with neural response telemetry in the nucleus CI24M cochlear implant. Am J Otol, 19, 320-327.
9. Busby, P. A., Tong, Y. C., Clark, G. M. (1993). Electrode position, repetition rate, and speech perception by early- and late-deafened cochlear implant patients. J Acoust Soc Am, 93, 1058-1067.
10. Cartee, L. A., Miller, C. A., van den Honert, C. (2006). Spiral ganglion cell site of excitation: I-Comparison of scala tympani and intrameatal electrode responses. Hear Res, 215, 10-21.
11. Cartee, L. A., van den Honert, C., Finley, C. C., et al. (2000). Evaluation of a model of the cochlear neural membrane: I-Physiological measurement of membrane characteristics in response to intrameatal electrical stimulation. Hear Res, 146, 143-152.
12. Chatterjee, M., Galvin, J. J., III, Fu, Q. J., et al. (2006). Effects of stimulation mode, level and location on forward-masked excitation patterns in cochlear implant patients. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 7, 15-25.
13. Cohen, L. T., Busby, P. A., Clark, G. M. (1996). Cochlear implant place psychophysics: II-Comparison of forward masking and pitch estimation data. Audiol Neurootol, 1, 278-292.
14. Cohen, L. T., Richardson, L. M., Saunders, E., et al. (2003). Spatial spread of neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: Comparison of improved ECAP method and psychophysical forward masking. Hear Res, 179, 72-87.
15. de Balthasar, C., Boex, C., Cosendai, G., et al. (2003). Channel interactions with high-rate biphasic electrical stimulation in cochlear implant subjects. Hear Res, 182, 77-87.
16. Dillier, N., Lai, W. K., Almqvist, B., et al. (2002). Measurement of the electrically evoked compound action potential via a neural response telemetry system. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 111, 407-414.
17. Dingemanse, J. G., Frijns, J. H., Briaire, J. J. (2006). Psychophysical assessment of spatial spread of excitation in electrical hearing with single and dual electrode contact maskers. Ear Hear, 27, 645-657.
18. Donaldson, G. S., Kreft, H. A., Litvak, L. (2005). Place-pitch discrimination of single- versus dual-electrode stimuli by cochlear implant users (L). J Acoust Soc Am, 118, 623-626.
19. Donaldson, G. S., & Nelson, D. A. (2000). Place-pitch sensitivity and its relation to consonant recognition by cochlear implant listeners using the MPEAK and SPEAK speech processing strategies. J Acoust Soc Am, 107, 1645-1658.
20. Dynes, S. B. (1996). Discharge Characteristics of Auditory Nerve Fibers for Pulsatile Electrical Stimuli (Doctoral Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge).
21. Eddington, D. K., Dobelle, W. H., Brackmann, D. E., et al. (1978). Auditory prosthesis research with multiple channel intracochlear stimulation in man. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 87(Suppl.), 1-39.
22. Firszt, J. B., Koch, D. B., Downing, M., et al. (2007). Current steering creates additional pitch percepts in adult cochlear implant recipients. Otol Neurotol, 28, 629-636.
23. Frijns, J. H., Briaire, J. J., de Laat, J. A., et al. (2002). Initial evaluation of the Clarion CII cochlear implant: Speech perception and neural response imaging. Ear Hear, 23, 184-197.
24. Girzon, G. (1987). Investigation of Current Flow in the Inner Ear During Electrical Stimulation of Intracochlear Electrodes. EE MS Thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
25. Henry, B. A., Turner, C. W., Behrens, A. (2005). Spectral peak resolution and speech recognition in quiet: Normal hearing, hearing impaired, and cochlear implant listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 118, 1111-1121.
26. Hughes, M. L., & Abbas, P. J. (2006a). Electrophysiologic channel interaction, electrode pitch ranking, and behavioral threshold in straight versus perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode arrays. J Acoust Soc Am, 119, 1538-1547.
27. Hughes, M. L., & Abbas, P. J. (2006b). The relation between electrophysi-ologic channel interaction and electrode pitch ranking in cochlear implant recipients. J Acoust Soc Am, 119, 1527-1537.
28. Koch, D. B., Downing, M., Osberger, M. J., et al. (2007). Using current steering to increase spectral resolution in CII and HiRes 90K users. Ear Hear, 28, 38S-41S.
29. Kwon, B. J., & van den Honert, C. (2006). Dual-electrode pitch discrimination with sequential interleaved stimulation by cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am, 120, EL1-EL6.
30. Lai, W. K., & Dillier, N. (2000). A simple two-component model of the electrically evoked compound action potential in the human cochlea. Audiol Neurootol, 5, 333-345.
31. Laneau, J., Wouters, J., Moonen, M. (2004). Relative contributions of temporal and place pitch cues to fundamental frequency discrimination in cochlear implantees. J Acoust Soc Am, 116, 3606-3619.
32. Litvak, L. M., Spahr, A. J., Saoji, A. A., et al. (2007). Relationship between perception of spectral ripple and speech recognition in cochlear implant and vocoder listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 122, 982-991.
33. McDermott, H. J., & McKay, C. M. (1994). Pitch ranking with nonsimul-taneous dual-electrode electrical stimulation of the cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am, 96, 155-162.
34. McKay, C. M., Henshall, K. R., Farrell, R. J., et al. (2003). A practical method of predicting the loudness of complex electrical stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am, 113, 2054-2063.
35. McKay, C. M., & McDermott, H. J. (1998). Loudness perception with pulsatile electrical stimulation: The effect of interpulse intervals. J Acoust Soc Am, 104, 1061-1074.
36. McKay, C. M., McDermott, H. J., Clark, G. M. (1995). Loudness summation for two channels of stimulation in cochlear implants: Effects of spatial and temporal separation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl, 166, 230-233.
37. Shannon, R. V. (1983). Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man: I-Basic psychophysics. Hear Res, 11, 157-189.
38. Townsend, B., Cotter, N., Van Compernolle, D., et al. (1987). Pitch perception by cochlear implant patients. J Acoust Soc Am, 82, 106-115.
39. Vanpoucke, F. J., Zarowski, A. J., Peeters, S. A. (2004). Identification of the impedance model of an implanted cochlear prosthesis from intraco-chlear potential measurements. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 51, 2174-2183.
40. White, M. W., Merzenich, M. M., Gardi, J. N. (1984). Multichannel cochlear implants: Channel interactions and processor design. Arch Otolaryngol, 110, 493-501.
41. Wilson, B. S., Finley, C. C., Lawson, D. T., et al. (1991). Better speech recognition with cochlear implants. Nature, 352, 236-238.
42. Won, J. H., Drennan, W. R., Rubinstein, J. T. (2007). Spectral-ripple resolution correlates with speech reception in noise in cochlear implant users. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 8, 384-392.