Consensus panel on a cochlear coordinate system applicable in histologic, physiologic, and radiologic studies of the human cochlea

Otology and Neurotology

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 722-730

  Verbist, Berit M ^a   Skinner, Margaret W ^b   Cohen, Lawrence T ^c   Leake, Patricia A ^d   James, Chris ^e   Boëx, Colette ^f   Holden, Timothy A ^b   Finley, Charles C ^g   Roland, Peter S ^h   Roland Jr , J Thomas ^c   Haller, Matt ⁱ   Patrick, Jim F ^j   Jolly, Claude N ^k   Faltys, Mike A ^l   Briaire, Jeroen J ^a   Frijns, Johan H M ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e CHU PURPAN   (France)

^f GENEVA UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS   (Switzerland)

^g UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

ⁱ NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^j Advanced Bionics   (United States)

^k Research and Technology Labs   (Australia)

^l MED EL GmbH   (Austria)

more..

Author keywords

Cochlea; Cochlear implant; Consensus; Coordinate system; Imaging

Indexed keywords

COCHLEA; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONSENSUS; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; PHYSIOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; REVIEW; STANDARD;

COCHLEA; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; CONSENSUS; HUMANS; REFERENCE STANDARDS;

EID: 77954350603     PISSN: 15317129     EISSN: 15374505     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181d279e0     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Greenwood DD. A cochlear frequency-position function for several speciesV29 years later. J Acoust Soc Am 1990;87:2592-605.
2. Greenwood DD. Critical bandwidth and consonance in relation to cochlear frequency-position coordinates. Hear Res 1991;54:164-208.
3. Greenwood D. Critical bandwidth and frequency coordinates of basilar membrane. J Acoust Soc Am 1961;33:1344-56.
4. Blamey PJ, Dooley GJ, Parisi ES, Clark GM. Pitch comparisons of acoustically and electrically evoked auditory sensations. Hear Res 1996;99:139-50.
5. Tong YC, Clark GM. Absolute identification of electric pulse rates and electrode positions by cochlear implant patients. J Acoust Soc Am 1985;77:1881-8.
6. Collins LM, Zwolan TA, Wakefield GH. Comparison of electrode discrimination, pitch ranking, and pitch scaling data in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 1997;101:440-55.
7. Boëx C, Baud L, Cosendai G, Sigrist A, Kós MI, Pelizzone M. Acoustic to electric pitch comparisons in cochlear implant subjects with residual hearing. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2006;7:110-24.
8. Dorman MF, Spahr T, Gifford R, et al. An electric frequency-toplace map for a cochlear implant patient with hearing in the nonimplanted ear. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2007;8:234-40.
9. Briaire JJ, Frijns JH. The consequences of neural degeneration regarding optimal cochlear implant position in scala tympani: a model approach. Hear Res 2006;214:17-27
10. Sridhar D, Stakhovskaya O, Leake PA. A frequency-position function for the human cochlear spiral ganglion. Audiol Neurootol 2006;11:16-20.
11. Ariyasu L, Galey FR, Hilsinger R, Byl FM. Computer-generated 3-dimensional reconstruction of the cochlea. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989;100:87-91.
12. Kawano A, Seldon HL, Clark GM. Computer-aided threedimensional reconstruction in human cochlear maps: measurement of the lengths of organ of corti, outer wall, inner wall, and Rosenthal's canal. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1996;105:701-9.
13. Stakhovskaya O, Sridhar D, Bonham BH, Leake PA. Frequency map for the human cochlear spiral ganglion: implications for cochlear implants. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2007;8:220-33
14. Bredberg G. Cellular pattern and nerve supply of the human organ of Corti. Acta Otolaryngol 1968;236:1-135.
15. Wright A, Davis A, Bredberg G, Ulehlova L, Spencer H. Hair cell distributions in the normal human cochlea. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1987;444:1-48.
16. Ketten DR, Vannier MW, Skinner MW, Gates GA, Wang G, Neely JG. In vivo measures of cochlear length and insertion depth of nucleus cochlear implant electrode arrays. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1998; 175:1-16.
17. Skinner MW, Ketten DR, Holden LK, et al. CT-Derived estimation of cochlear morphology and electrode array position in relation to word recognition in Nucleus-22 recipients. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2002;3:332-50.
18. Ulehlova L, Voldrich L, Janisch R. Correlative study of sensory cell density and cochlear length in humans. Hear Res 1987;28:149-51.
19. Hardy M. The length of the organ of Corti in man. Am J Anat 1968;62:291-311.
20. Sato H, Sando I, Takahashi H. Sexual dimorphism and development of the human cochleaVcomputer 3-D measurement. Acta Oto Laryngol 1991;111:1037-40.
21. Escude B, James C, Deguine O, Cochard N, Eter E, Fraysse B. The size of the cochlea and predictions of insertion depth angles for cochlear implant electrodes. Audiol Neurootol 2006;11:27-33.
22. Cohen LT, Xu J, Xu SA, Clark GM. Improved and simplified methods for specifying positions of the electrode bands of a cochlear implant array. Am J Otol 1996;17:859-65.
23. Marsh MA, Xu J, Blamey PJ, et al. Radiologic evaluation of multichannel intracochlear implant insertion depth. Am J Otol 1993;14: 386-91.
24. Verbist BM, Frijns JHM, Geleijns J, van Buchem MA. Multisection CT as a valuable tool in the postoperative assessment of cochlear implant patients. Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:424-9.
25. Xu J, Xu SA, Cohen LT, Clark GM. Cochlear view: postoperative radiography for cochlear implantation. Am J Otol 2000;21:49-56.
26. Kós MI, Boëx C, Sigrist A, Guyot JP, Pelizzone M. Measurements of electrode position inside the cochlea for different cochlear implant systems. Acta Otolaryngol 2005;125:474-80.
27. Skinner MW, Holden TA, Whiting BR, et al. In vivo estimates of the position of advanced bionics electrode arrays in the human cochlea. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 2007;197:2-24.
28. Yoo SK, Wang G, Rubinstein JT, Vannier MW. Three-dimensional geometric modeling of the cochlea using helico-spiral approximation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2000;47:1392-402.
29. Skinner MW, Ketten DR, Vannier MW, Gates GA, Yoffie RL, Kalender WA. Determination of the position of nucleus cochlear implant electrodes in the inner ear. Am J Otol 1994;15:644-51.
30. Wang G, Vannier MW, Skinner MW, Kalender WA, Polacin A, Ketten DR. Unwrapping Cochlear implants by spiral CT. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1996;43:891-900. (Pubitemid 126768566)
31. Whiting BR, Holden TA, Brunsden BS, Finley CC, Skinner MW. Use of computed tomography scans for cochlear implants. J Digit Imaging 2008;21:323-8.
32. Cohen LT, Xu J, Tycocinski M, Saunders E, Raja D, Cowan R. Evaluation of an x-ray analysis method: comparison of electrode position estimates with information from phase contrast x-ray and histology. 5th European Symposium on Paediatric Cochlear Implantation, Antwerp, Belgium, 2000.
33. Verbist BM, Joemai RMS, Teeuwisse WM, Veldkamp WJH, Geleijns J, Frijns JHM. Evaluation of 4 multisection CT systems in postoperative imaging of a cochlear implant: a human cadaver and phantom study. Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1382-8.
34. Rebscher SJ, Hetherington A, Bonham B, Wardrop P, Whinney D, Leake PA. Considerations for design of future cochlear implant electrode arrays: electrode array stiffness, size, and depth of insertion. J Rehabil Res Dev 2008;45:731-47.
35. Connor SEJ, Bell DJ, O'Gorman R, Fitzgerald-O'Connor A. CT and MR imaging cochlear distance measurements may predict cochlear implant length required for a 360 degrees insertion. Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1425-30
36. Finley CC, Holden TA, Holden LK, et al. Role of electrode placement as a contributor to variability in cochlear implant outcomes. Otol Neurotol 2008;29:920-8.
37. Verbist BM, Ferrarini L, Briaire JJ, et al. Anatomic considerations of cochlear morphology and its implications for insertion trauma in cochlear implant surgery. Otol Neurotol 2009;30:471-7.
38. Aschendorff A, Kromeier J, Klenzner T, Laszig R. Quality control after insertion of the nucleus contour and contour advance electrode in adults. Ear Hear 2007;28:75S-9S.