Spread of excitation and pitch perception for dual and single electrodes using the nucleus freedom cochlear implantnds

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 853-864

  Busby, Peter A ^a   Battmer, Rolf D ^b   Pesch, Joerg ^c  

^a Research and Technology Labs   (Australia)

^b HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

^c Cochlear GmbH ^*  (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; ELECTRODE; EVOKED RESPONSE; HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PITCH; SCORING SYSTEM; TELEMETRY; ACTION POTENTIAL; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; HEARING; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOPHYSICS;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ADULT; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; HUMANS; PITCH PERCEPTION; PSYCHOACOUSTICS;

EID: 60849110305     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318181a878     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Abbas, P. J., Brown, C. J., Shallop, J. K., et al. (1999). Summary of results using the Nucleus CI24M implant to record the electrically evoked compound action potential. Ear Hear, 20, 45-59.
2. Abbas, P. J., Hughes, M. L., Brown, C. J., et al. (2004). Channel interaction in cochlear implant users evaluated using the electrically evoked compound action potential. Audiol Neuro Otol, 9, 203-213.
3. Battmer, R. D., Buechner, A., Frohne, C., et al. (2001). Recording of compound action potentials through telemetry with cochlear implant systems. 2nd International Symposium and Workshop on Objective Measures in Cochlear Implantation, Lyon, France, 16-18 March 2001.
4. Battmer, R. D., Dillier, N., Lai, W. K., et al. (2004). Evaluation of the Neural Response Telemetry (NRT) capabilities of the Nucleus Research Platform 8: initial results from the NRT trial. Int J Audiol, 43 (Suppl. 1), S10-S15. (Pubitemid 40179557)
5. Brown, C. J., & Abbas, P. J. (1990). Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials. II. Parametric data from the cat. J Acoust Soc Am, 88, 2205-2210.
6. Busby, P. A., & Plant, K. L. (2005). Dual electrode stimulation using the Nucleus CI24RE cochlear implant: electrode impedance and pitch ranking studies. Ear Hear, 26, 504-511.
7. Carhart, R., & Jerger, J. (1959). Preferred method for clinical determination of pure tone thresholds. J Speech Hear Disord, 24, 330-345.
8. Charasse, B., Thai-Van, H., Berger-Vachon, C., et al. (2003). Assessing auditory nerve recovery function with a modified subtraction method. Clin Neurophysiol, 114, 1307-1315.
9. Cohen, L. T., Richardson, L. M., Saunders, E., et al. (2003). Spatial spread of neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: comparisons of improved ECAP method and psychophysical forward masking. Hear Res, 179, 72-87. (Pubitemid 36547892)
10. Cohen, L. T., Saunders, E., & Richardson, L. M. (2004). Spatial spread of neural excitation: comparison of compound action potential and forward-masking data in cochlear implant recipients. Int J Audiol, 43, 346-355. (Pubitemid 38821612)
11. Donaldson, G. S., Kreft, H. A., & Litvak, L. M. (2005). Place-pitch discrimination of single- versus dual-electrode stimuli by cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am, 118, 623-626.
12. Hughes, M. L., & Abbas, P. J. (2006). The relation between electrophysiologic channel interaction and electrode pitch ranking in cochlear implant recipients. J Acoust Soc Am, 119, 1527-1537.
13. Kwon, B., & Van Den Honert, C. (2006). Dual-electrode pitch discrimination with sequential interleaved stimulation by cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am Express Lett, 120, E1-E6.
14. McDermott, H., & McKay, C. M. (1994). Pitch ranking with nonsimultaneous dual-electrode electrical stimulation of the cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am, 96, 115-162.
15. McKay, C. M., O'Brien, A., & James, C. J. (1999). Effect of current level on electrode discrimination in electrical stimulation. Hear Res, 136, 159-164. (Pubitemid 29450508)
16. Miller, C. A., Abbas, P. J., & Brown, C. J. (2000). An improved method of reducing stimulus artifact in the electrically evoked whole-nerve potential. Ear Hear, 21, 280-290.
17. Patrick, J. F., Busby, P. A., & Gibson, P. J. (2006). The development of the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant system. Trends Amplif, 10, 175-200. (Pubitemid 44934659)
18. Thornton, A. R., & Raffin, M. J. M. (1978). Speech-discrimination scores modelled as a binomial variable. J Speech Hear Res, 21, 507-518.
19. Townshend, B., Cotter, N., van Compernolle, D., et al. (1987). Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects. J Acoust Soc Am, 82, 106-115. (Pubitemid 17114943)