The relation between electrophysiologic channel interaction and electrode pitch ranking in cochlear implant recipients

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Volumn 119, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 1527-1537

  Hughes, Michelle L ^a   Abbas, Paul J ^b  

^a BOYS TOWN NATIONAL RESEARCH HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COCHLEAR IMPLANT RECIPIENTS; ELECTRICALLY EVOKED COMPOUND ACTION POTENTIAL (ECAP); ELECTRODE PITCH RANKING; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGIC CHANNEL INTERACTION;

ACOUSTICS; BIOELECTRIC POTENTIALS; CORRELATION METHODS; ELECTRODES; SPEECH RECOGNITION;

ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ELECTRODE; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; PITCH; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ADULT; AGED; COCHLEA; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; DEAFNESS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PITCH DISCRIMINATION; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 33644646903     PISSN: 00014966     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1121/1.2163273     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Abbas, P. J., and Brown, C. J. (1988). " Electrically evoked brainstem potentials in cochlear implant patients with multi-electrode stimulation., " Hear. Res. 36, 153-162.
2. Abbas, P. J., Brown, C. J., Shallop, J. K., Firszt, J. B., Hughes, M. L., Hong, S. H., and Staller, S. J. (1999). " Summary of results using the Nucleus CI24M implant to record the electrically evoked compound action potential., " Ear Hear. 20, 45-59.
3. Abbas, P. J., Hughes, M. L., Brown, C. J., Miller, C. A., and South, H. (2004). " Channel interaction in cochlear implant users evaluated using the electrically evoked compound action potential., " Audiol. Neuro-Otol. 9, 203-213.
4. Boex, C., Kos, M. -I., and Pelizzone, M. (2003). " Forward masking in different cochlear implant systems., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114, 2058-2065.
5. Brown, C. J., Abbas, P. J., Borland, J., and Bertschy, M. R. (1996). " Electrically evoked whole nerve action potentials in Ineraid cochlear implant users: Responses to different stimulating electrode configurations and comparison to psychophysical responses., " J. Speech Hear. Res. 39, 453-467.
6. Brown, C. J., Abbas, P. J., and Gantz, B. J. (1990). " Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials: Data from human cochlear implant users., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88, 1385-1391.
7. Brown, C. J., Abbas, P. J., and Gantz, B. J. (1998). " Preliminary experience with Neural Response Telemetry in the Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant., " Am. J. Otol. 19, 320-327.
8. Brown, C. J., Hughes, M. L., Luk, B., Abbas, P. J., Wolaver, A. A., and Gervais, J. P. (2000). " The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the Nucleus CI24M speech processor: Data from adults., " Ear Hear. 21, 151-163.
9. Busby, P. A., and Clark, G. M. (2000). " Electrode discrimination by early-deafened subjects using the Cochlear Limited multiple-electrode cochlear implant., " Ear Hear. 21, 291-304.
10. Cartee, L. A., van den Honert, C., Finley, C. C., and Miller, R. L. (2000). " Evaluation of a model of the cochlear neural membrane. I. Physiological measurement of membrane characteristics in response to intrameatal electrical stimulation., " Hear. Res. 146, 143-152.
11. Chatterjee, M., and Shannon, R. V. (1998). " Forward masked excitation patterns in multielectrode electrical stimulation., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103, 2565-2572.
12. Cohen, L. T., Richardson, L. M., Saunders, E., and Cowan, R. S. C. (2003). " Spatial spread of neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of improved ECAP method and psychophysical forward masking., " Hear. Res. 179, 72-87.
13. Collins, L. M., Zwolan, T. A., and Wakefield, G. H. (1997). " Comparison of electrode discrimination, pitch ranking, and pitch scaling data in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjects., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101, 440-455.
14. Dawson, P. W., McKay, C. M., Busby, P. A., Grayden, D. B., and Clark, G. M. (2000). " Electrode discrimination and speech perception in young children using cochlear implants., " Ear Hear. 21, 597-607.
15. Dillier, N., Lai, W. K., Almqvist, B., Frohne, C., Muller-Deile, J., Stecker, M., and von Wallenberg, E. (2002). " Measurement of the electrically evoked compound action potential via a neural resonse telemetry system., " Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 111, 407-414.
16. Gantz, B. J., Tyler, R. S., Knutson, J. F., Woodworth, G., Abbas, P., McCabe, B. F., Hinrichs, J., Tye-Murray, N., Lansing, C., Kuk, F., and Brown, C. (1988). " Evaluation of five different cochlear implant designs: Audiologic assessment and predictors of performance., " Laryngoscope 98, 1100-1106.
17. Henry, B. A., McKay, C. M., McDermott, H. J., and Clark, G. M. (2000). " The relationship between speech perception and electrode discrimination in cochlear implantees., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108, 1269-1280.
18. Hughes, M. L., and Abbas, P. J. (2006). " Electrophysiologic channel interaction, electrode pitch ranking, and behavioral threshold in straight versus perimodiolar cochlear implant arrays.. " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119, 1538-1548.
19. Laneau, J., and Wouters, J. (2004). " Multichannel place pitch sensitivity in cochlear implant recipients., " J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 5, 285-294.
20. McKay, C. M., O'Brien, A., and James, C. J. (1999). " Effect of current level on electrode discrimination in electrical stimulation., " Hear. Res. 136, 159-164.
21. Nelson, D. A., Van Tasell, D. J., Schroder, A. C., Soli, S., and Levine, S. (1995). " Electrode ranking of "place pitch" and speech recognition in electrical hearing., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98, 1987-1999.
22. Peeters, S., Van Immerseel, L., Zarowski, A., Houben, V., Govaerts, P., and Offeciers, E. (1998). " New developments in cochlear implants., " Acta Otorhinolaryngol. Belg. 52, 115-127.
23. Pfingst, B. E., Zwolan, T. A., and Holloway, L. A. (1997). " Effects of stimulus configuration on psychophysical operating levels and on speech recognition with cochlear implants., " Hear. Res. 112, 247-260.
24. Shannon, R. V. (1983). " Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. II. Channel interaction., " Hear. Res. 12, 1-16.
25. Shannon, R. V. (1985). " Loudness summation as a measure of channel interaction in a cochlear prosthesis., " in Cochlear Implants, edited by, R. A. Schindler, and, M. M. Merzenich, (Raven Press, New York), pp. 323-334.
26. Throckmorton, C. S., and Collins, L. M. (1999). " Investigation of the effects of temporal and spatial interactions on speech-recognition skills in cochlear-implant subjects., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105, 861-873.
27. Townshend, B., Cotter, N., Van Compernolle, D., and White, R. L. (1987). " Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 82, 106-115.
28. White, M. W., Merzenich, M. M., and Gardi, J. N. (1984). " Multichannel cochlear implants: Channel interaction and processor design., " Acta Oto-Laryngol. 110, 493-501.
29. Zwolan, T. A., Collins, L. M., and Wakefield, G. H. (1997). " Electrode discrimination and speech recognition in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjects., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 3673-3685.